Shocked and Saddened | Letters | Chicago Reader

Shocked and Saddened 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

To the editors:

We of the Depression & Bipolar Support Group hope your readers will recognize that "Is Psychiatry Going Insane?" [May 1] was an example of irresponsible journalism at its finest. In hopes of providing a candid discussion of ethical issues surrounding modern psychiatry, you have instead provided a forum for the personal agenda of a man quoted more often by Scientologists than by any of his colleagues. It is this association which accounts for the vitriolic quality of Mr. Friedberg's remarks. What accounts for your failure to accurately portray this man's fanaticism? Without reservation, you owe your readers an apology.

We are not claiming that there are not important issues to be addressed with regard to the ethics of biopsychiatry. As an organization formed by families and patients to help families and patients, many of us are daily faced with these matters in a truly personal way. It is us who must endure the pain of depression, the stigma of mental illness, and the outright hostility of people like Mr. Friedberg. For this reason, we think your readers should have been given a balanced presentation of differing viewpoints. There are several ways by which this might have been accomplished. We are appalled that you instead chose to cloak an extremist with an aura of legitimacy.

It is not possible, in such a short letter, to answer the four pages of falsehoods and distortions which you presented to your readers. We hope only that your readers will recognize this propaganda for the shallow nonsense that it is. If they do, they will certainly be showing more sense than your staff.

Howard Weisman

President

Depression & Bipolar Support Group

Chicago

Timothy Beneke replies:

For the record, Dr. Friedberg is not and has never been a Scientologist, nor does he have any intellectual sympathy with Scientology's dubious tenets. He, along with many others of various stripes, shares Scientology's opposition to electroshock and biopsychiatry's exaggerated claims. What's needed, and has been largely missing in the past, is public discussion and criticism of biopsychiatry's methods. Dr. Friedberg provocatively meets this need.

I support the attempts of those suffering from severe emotional distress to join together and offer each other community and hope, but I am saddened by Mr. Weisman's pious letter, which offers no argument and no insight, but simply engages in name-calling.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
February 08
Performing Arts
February 22

Popular Stories