Savage Love | Savage Love | Chicago Reader

Savage Love 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

I'm about to marry a caring and intelligent man, an amazing lover, a total stud, beyond well-endowed, someone who "gets" me in a way.

Here's the problem: I have a ferocious sex drive, to the point where three to five times a day is good and more is better. The beauty of our relationship is that he has an appetite to match, but despite my sublime satisfaction, I love toys. This never seemed to be a big deal, but the other day he freaked out and said he doesn't want me to buy them anymore.

I feel like his request is totally off base. I'm 100 percent monogamous, and the idea of being with anyone else sickens me, but a toy is a toy is a toy! Where is this coming from? --Blushing Anonymous Bride

So you're getting married, BAB, to an amazing man with a massive cock. How nice for you. How nice for everyone. Just one little problem: he doesn't want you to slap away at yourself with sex toys. Actually, two little problems: I don't give a shit. I'm sorry, BAB, but I'm just not up for crafting a response that offers you some insight into your fiance's insecurities and goes on to emphasize that getting married shouldn't have to mean sacrificing your sexual autonomy (unless that turns you on) before winding things up with a stirring minisermon about the necessity of compromise in any long-term relationship.

You see, last month state supreme courts in New York and Washington State handed down blatantly bigoted rulings against gay marriage, and I'm kind of pissed that you get to marry your big-dicked boyfriend but I can't marry mine. It doesn't help that the grounds of the decisions were so fucking stupid.

After decades of being told that gay people were unfit for marriage because our relationships are unstable, the supremes in New York ruled that marriage can be reserved solely for straights because straight relationships are "all too often casual or temporary"! The supremes in Washington State ruled that since "limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation . . . and furthers the well-being of children by encouraging families where children are reared in homes headed by children's biological parents," then, by golly, only straights should be allowed to marry. Gay couples and gay couples with kids? Hey, fuck 'em!

Look, BAB, I hope the fiance calms down about your toys, something he might do if you give him some measure of control over them (let him pick them out for you, swear to use no toy that's bigger than his mighty dick, etc), but that's really the best I can do for you this week. Sorry.

I'm a gay Roman Catholic. Some of my Catholic friends are a bit awkward about it, but by and large it's my non-Catholic gay friends who have the biggest beef. As far as many of them are concerned, the money I put into the collection basket is going to some sort of Anti-Gay Civil Liberties Union. I take my religion seriously, but I'm not a fundamentalist: I don't take something as gospel just because a man in a dress in Rome says it is. Please remind people that many gay men are deeply religious and happy about it. We don't need our fellow fags diagnosing us as secretly self-loathing so much as we need their support and respect. --Gay Roman Catholic

You can't resent other gay men--saner gay men--for thinking that you might take as gospel every morsel of crap that falls from the thin lips of that "man in a dress in Rome," GRC. The Catholic Church has been busily "reimposing doctrinal discipline," as they say, ever since JPII plopped his clenched butt down on the Throne of Peter. And I'm sorry, but the money you put in the collection plate does fund, in part, what amounts to an Anti-Gay Civil Liberties Union. It's only natural that your non-Catholic gay friends would be curious about how you reconcile your Catholicism with your cocksuckism. If you want to get pissy at anyone, GRC, get pissy at the religious leaders who've worked so hard to make faith and sexual freedom seem like mutually exclusive phenomena.

Speaking of pissy Catholics: a couple of months ago I sent a big chunk of ITMFA dough off to Bob Casey, the Democrat running against Senator Rick "Frothy Mix" Santorum in Pennsylvania. (The maximum personal contribution possible--$2,100.) That didn't sit well with some Savage Love readers, because Casey is antichoice. "Yes, yes: Bob Casey is opposed to abortion," I wrote back in June. "[But] electing one or two antichoice Dems is the price we're going to have to pay to put reliably pro-choice Dems in positions of power."

Well, guess what? Jake Perry, Casey's campaign finance director, called me last week with some bad news: Bob Casey was sending my check back to me. Casey is worried that Santorum's flying monkeys will spot my name on his campaign finance reports and raise holy hell about it. Casey didn't want to debate the merits of the frothy mix, so he wasn't going to take my filthy money.

I'm miffed--wouldn't you be?--but seeing as I've asked my overwhelmingly pro-choice readers to be pragmatic, swallow hard, and support Bob Casey, I'm going to be pragmatic myself, swallow harder, and support Bob Casey whether he wants me to or not. So what if Bob Casey doesn't want to take my dirty money? I still want him to beat the lube-and-fecal-matter-splattered pants off Santorum this November. That's why I'm sending the $2,100 Casey spurned to Philadelphians Against Santorum. Got some dough to spare? Help defeat Rick Santorum this November by making a donation at

In last week's column you used the term Official Discussion, or OD, to describe the conversation where a couple sits down and discusses their couplehood. I'm writing to tell you that a good acronym for that conversation already exists: DTR, which stands for "define the relationship." Usage: "I thought we were just going to hang out, but then she turned it into a DTR." It can be a verb, too: "I need to DTR him and find out what's what."

This term is widespread at--are you ready for this?--Brigham Young University, but it's quite handy, and surely it doesn't only apply to young heterosexual Mormons. --Abbreviations Are Awesome

I agree, AAA: DTR is in every way superior to OD. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Agenda Teaser

June 12
Galleries & Museums
Monet and Chicago Art Institute of Chicago
February 11

Popular Stories