Rutherford & Son | Performing Arts Review | Chicago Reader

Rutherford & Son 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Rutherford & Son, Annex Theater Company, at the Boxer Rebellion Theater. From a purely historical standpoint, Githa Sowerby's 1912 melodrama is of some interest as an example of the populist fare beloved by working-class audiences in turn-of-the-century Britain. And the play's cynicism about domestic life--a common attitude among the more progressive playwrights of the time--has been echoed by such modern writers as Pinter and Albee.

As a play, though, Rutherford & Son is horribly uneven. Sowerby's long-winded script--about a mean-spirited industrialist's criminal neglect of his family--is anticlimactic, and her characters are as drab as the country setting. Inching along at a snail's pace, this two-and-a-half-hour work is not even an engaging bore.

Annex director Mark Gillespie has also made some ill-advised choices. The costumes don't all seem to have come from the same period, and none of the cast manages to maintain a convincing accent. Like the acting, the scenic design might have come from a high school production: the walls threaten to topple every time a door is opened, and no attempt has been made to mask such egregiously modern elements as a fire extinguisher and an exit sign. Annex would have been better off leaving Rutherford & Son where it belongs: collecting cobwebs in the dustbin of history. --Nick Green

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Nick Green

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
Not for Sale UrbanTheater Company
September 27
Performing Arts
Blue Man Group Briar Street Theatre
August 14

Tabbed Event Search

Popular Stories