Neocon, Schmeocon | Letters | Chicago Reader

Neocon, Schmeocon 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Dear editor:

Mr. Rosenbaum refers to Norman Podhoretz and Christopher Hitchens as "neoconservatives" in the review of the movie about Chomsky [February 7]. Quitting the Nation and not joining the anti-Iraqi-war movement does not automatically convert Hitchens to a conservative, neo or otherwise. This is a crude, simplistic judgment. Probably politics is not Mr. Rosenbaum's forte.

Olaf Mend

W. Patterson

Jonathan Rosenbaum replies:

When Christopher Hitchens wrote in the December 2001 issue of the Atlantic Monthly that "there's a distinct similarity between [Chomsky's] worldview and that of the religious dogmatists who regard September 11 in the light of a divine judgment on a sinful society," I thought he somehow belonged with Norman Podhoretz. Maybe that doesn't make him a neoconservative, but he sure isn't what I'd call an intellectual or a leftist.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
April 10
Performing Arts
March 21

Popular Stories