More Is More | Letters | Chicago Reader

More Is More 

To the editors:

I sincerely hope you disregard the comments made by Lynn Engelhardt about the "tedium" of most Reader cover stories (Letters, May 7). In my opinion, the cover stories are almost always worth reading in full. It seems to me that the stories are lengthy not because the Reader staff is lax about editing them, as Ms. Engelhardt assumes, but because the stories deal with complex issues and because the writers are committed to thoroughly researching those issues and to presenting every opinion that they find. I think there should be more, not less, of this type of journalism.

Although I haven't followed Ms. Engelhardt's suggestion by commissioning market research to determine how many Reader readers finish the cover stories, I am willing to bet that a fair number do. The ones who don't are probably picking up the paper for the reviews, event listings, classified ads, and other interesting things contained in its pages.

Ms. Engelhardt seems to be a victim of the "short attention span" affliction that we hear so much about these days. My advice for her is to try one of the many papers offering skimpily researched (but short and easily digested) features--the Tribune, for example. Better yet, just watch TV.

Steve Kreisler

S. Woodlawn

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Popular Stories