Meat Is Bad for the Earth | Letters | Chicago Reader

Meat Is Bad for the Earth 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Pursuant to reading Nicholas Day's reviews of The River Cottage Meat Book and The Bloodless Revolution ["The Carnivore's Dilemma," July 13], it was evident that he preferred "conscientious meat-eating be[ing] better for people and animals than vegetarianism." He must have forgotten about global warming. The inhumane beef, pork, lamb, poultry, and fishing industries create massive air, water, and land pollution that perniciously exacerbate global warming. They also ravage marine and terrestrial ecosystems and fragile biodiversity. Vegetarianism is ecologically imperative for the planet's sustainability, and it's better for all the earth's inhabitants, especially, so-called "food animals."

Brien Comerford


Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Brien Comerford

Popular Stories