Judging Through Rose-Colored Glasses | Letters | Chicago Reader

Judging Through Rose-Colored Glasses 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Thanks for the piece on jury duty ["A Jury of Whose Peers?" May 13]. I was especially interested in the lofty comments by Chief Judge Timothy Evans that jury duty is a civic duty and that people should serve "irrespective of what the salary is" and therefore not overburden the taxpayers.

Well, being a judge is also a civic duty, but I don't see Judge Evans offering to work for $17.20 a day. He's probably never been a juror and never will be one. In fact, jury duty is an onerous pain in the ass, and jurors do not get the nice perks that Judge Evans gets: a private office, a secretary, the option to start late and leave early, etc. In a democracy people are free to make their own decisions about what civic duty they want to contribute to, free of coercion by the state. (Sorry about that, Judge Evans.) Moreover, only people of leisure have the luxury of giving up their time for $17.20 a day. Not many working stiffs are going to risk their jobs for that. Has Evans ever heard the term minimum wage? Maybe he doesn't know that most people have real jobs to go to, have no options about it, and must make a living for their families. The judge needs a tour of the real world. We're not dilettantes out here.

Neil Elliott

Evanston

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Neil Elliott

Agenda Teaser

Music
Gerry Hemingway Experimental Sound Studio
October 22
Performing Arts
Manic Mondays Frances Cocktail Lounge
November 20

Tabbed Event Search

Popular Stories