Dirty Drawing | Letters | Chicago Reader

Dirty Drawing 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

To the editors:

I found your column of 9/1/89, for the most part, in good taste, and written in a way as to try to actually give "the straight dope" on a rather strange topic. However, the graphic was extremely offensive . . . and confusing.

The picture of a fat woman supposedly seductively dressed, seducing a ram with a carrot is offensive to fat people, and to women (and to rams if they could read). You answer in your column a question about men having sex with sheep, not women with rams, so why is a woman depicted? (Although a graphic of a man seducing a sheep would also be offensive.)

I realize you may not be responsible for the graphic, but I believe you should express dissatisfaction with this graphic that is so disrespectful of women, overall sexist, and ultimately confusing.

I hope this kind of "joke" graphic will not be used to illustrate your column again. Please pass these comments on to the Editor. I would appreciate a response, if possible.

Marie Cartier
Santa Monica, California

Cecil Adams replies:

Sometimes Slug is just so . . . so primitive. He promises to be more discriminating in his choice of vegetables in the future.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
March 21
Performing Arts
November 12

Popular Stories