What should lesbians RSVP to a Trump wedding? | Savage Love | Chicago Reader

What should lesbians RSVP to a Trump wedding? 

There’s no time like the present to gift a broken toaster.

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

click to enlarge JOE NEWTON
  • Joe Newton

Q: I have a quick question about bisexuality. What if one has a preference for dating straight individuals? As a straight woman, I am only interested in dating straight men. Is that some kind of phobia? Or is it OK for that to be a preference? I've always wanted to ask someone this but I'm afraid of being thought of as having a phobia.
—Nervously Asking Dan Something

A: I think you're fine, NADS, so long as you've taken a moment to think about why you're burdened with this "preference." Our sexual attractions, orientations, and preferences are easily distorted and limited by prejudice. If you reflect on what might be at the root of your "preference" for men who are straight (or for men who'll tell you they are), NADS, you might be able to open yourself up to more partners. But a person can reflect day and night for decades and still feel the same way. At the very least, though, we can all be thoughtful about our erotic and/or sexual biases, take responsibility for them, be considerate about how we express them, and—perhaps most importantly—do our best not to transit them. I'm not into shame but not finding a particular group of people attractive for whatever reason is something we can keep to ourselves—not just to avoid doing harm to people we aren't attracted to, but to avoid passing our erotic biases and limitations on to the next generation.

Q: My wife and I (lesbian moms together) have been invited to her cousin's wedding. And she's marrying the son of a former Republican state official who, in the early 2000s, turned the power of his state against gays, especially gay parents. His son hasn't renounced his views—in fact, he's converted his fiancée, my cousin-in-law, to Trumpism. If it's relevant, they're more country-club homophobes than rednecks, they want to be seen as mainstream and pleasant, and they now live in a very liberal city and hide their views so they're not pariahs. Not sure how to handle—simply not responding? Citing his father's views in the RSVP? Never going to any family function where they will be, ever? I really don't want my kid around these people, but also, I feel like maybe I should go to set an example. But then, wearing my best suit and tie to a Trump wedding deep in a red state makes me worried for my physical safety. What would you do? —Lesbian Against Republican Parties

A: I would send my regrets along with a broken toaster and the wrong receipt.

Q: I have a cult fascination with the film Withnail and I. OK, I love this film. But I am troubled by the perspective this film offers on homosexuality. It's not what one would call a "modern perspective." I believe the film's portrayal of homosexuality can be seen as funny or alarming or a cultural reference point. I think it's all three. My son is gay, and with some introductory apologies, I want to tell him to watch the film. Apologies for "trial ballooning" something like this with you, Mr. Savage, and I know you are not the standard-issue gay, as if such a thing exists. But have you seen the film? And if so, your thoughts? —Friend Of Withnail

A: I've never seen the film but a quick Google search of "Withnail and I" and "homophobic" brings up nearly 100,000 results. Apparently one of the film's main characters (Uncle Monty) is a "predatory homosexual" who makes unwelcome a series of advances on one of the male leads. "Is the film homophobic? Yes, undoubtedly," Philip Caveney writes at Bouquets & Brickbats. Richard Griffiths, the actor who plays Monty, "somehow manages to evoke genuine sympathy for a tragic character who is, more than anything else, lonely—but all the talk about buggery by force does make you feel rather uncomfortable." The film was released in 1987—which in no way excuses the homophobia, of course, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a popular film released in 1987 that wasn't deeply homophobic either by commission (the hateful portrayal of gay characters) or by omission (the complete absence of gay characters). Still, the film doesn't portray homosexuality, FOW, it portrays an individual homosexual. It was doubtless a damaging portrayal at the time, as there were so few other representations of gay characters on TV or in film back then. But viewed now—viewed at a time when there are more representations of gay people in film and television than ever before—it doesn't have the power to do the same damage. So go ahead and recommend the film to your son, FOW, with the appropriate qualifiers and apologies.

Q: I just got dumped in a pretty brutal and inconsiderate way by a guy I really liked. He didn't want to tell me it was over, he just pulled away and left me to figure it out on my own. We were dating for a year and he even started dating someone else and didn't bother to inform me but didn't hide it from me either. I feel depressed and really sad because I still like him and I miss him and I don't know what to do.
—Sad And Depressed Over New Ending

A: If he did that . . . if he broke up with you like that . . . you didn't like him. Not really. You liked the idea of him you formed in your head. He gave you the outline of a decent guy and you filled that outline in with everything you hoped he was, i.e. a kind, loving, decent guy who was as into you as you were into him. Or at the very least, SADONE, a guy who cared enough about your feelings to end things in a kind and considerate manner if it came to that. You can and should feel sad about losing the guy you hoped he was, but don't feel sad about losing the guy he turned out to be. Because that guy was an asshole.

Q: I was just listening to the Savage Lovecast (Episode 750) and you were responding to a fella who was ejaculating sooner than he would like. I wanted to say that I, a female, had a male partner who always came twice. Once was quick and he played it cool, and just owned that that was how he operated. We switched to a new condom and could go for much longer the second time! Own it, guys! No need for shame about your body's functionality. —Come And Come Again

A: It's good advice for men who suffer from premature ejaculation (PE)—don't try to stop that first orgasm and you're likely to last longer as you build to a second—but that advice works better for younger men with shorter refractory periods. The older a man gets, the longer his refractory period becomes; if your partner's second orgasm took 12-24 hours to arrive, well, that's a long time to wait, no condom or no new condom. Older guys with premature ejaculation might want to try low-dose SSRIs, i.e. antidepressants; one of the side effects of SSRIs is delayed ejaculation and studies have shown that they are a pretty effective treatment for PE.   v

Download the Savage Lovecast at savagelovecast.com.

Tags:

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Popular Stories