Credibility Gap | Letters | Chicago Reader

Credibility Gap 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

To the editors:

I found the March 31 music review [Critic's Choice]--the one letting us know that critics have been "creaming their jeans" about the Go-Betweens--in poor taste. Are you running out of fresh similes and metaphors for our reviews or has the Reader made a new editorial policy to use the stock phrases and cliches of pornographic magazines?

I don't know. But then again, the Reader--open-minded and socially concerned as it is--doesn't seem too concerned about using its ad space for a little pimping and sexual exploitation, considering the many ads for strippers and phone sex (not to mention the personal ads for "clean and discreet" sex partners). I can't see how a newspaper with so many articles crusading against political and social exploitation and reviews pontificating on artistic integrity can continue to run those cheap sex ads. I guess the money feels good in your pocket, though, huh?

Then again, maybe you like the image of bohemian pluralism and laissez-faire that these phone sex and stripper ads lend. Either way, I think you have a major credibility gap. Do you approve of making people into sex objects? I don't think it's a question of my prudishness, I think it's a question of your greed and poor judgment.

I don't see why the women on your staff--or the men with any integrity--put up with these ads. A little healthy feminism would do them good to stiffen their backbones, I think.

You've got a great paper. It's my favorite periodical. But I can't help but think there's someone pretty foolish and unprincipled making advertising policy.

Richard Wilkinson

Evanston

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Richard Wilkinson

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
His Shadow 16th Street Theater, Berwyn Cultural Center
September 05
Music
Rova Saxophone Quartet Constellation
October 18

Tabbed Event Search

Popular Stories