Baseball's bargain basement | Movie Review | Chicago Reader

Baseball's bargain basement 

Class warfare on the baseball diamond in Moneyball

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe



Moneyball, Michael Lewis's best seller about the Oakland Athletics' remarkable 2002 season, ends with one of those baseball moments that etch themselves into the memory. Jeremy Brown, an obese catcher for the University of Alabama, had been ridiculed endlessly in the press after the A's named him as a first-round draft choice. In a minor-league game that year, Brown hit a line drive into center field and began hauling himself around the bases. "Between first and second base his feet go out from under him and he backflops into the dirt, like Charlie Brown," writes Lewis. "He picks himself up, to scramble back to the safety of first base, when he sees his teammates in the dugout. The guys are falling all over each other, laughing." As Brown looks around, he realizes the humiliation is all in his head: the ball has landed in the stands, and he's hit a home run. In the new movie adapted from the book, A's general manager Billy Beane watches this play on a video screen and asks in voice-over, "How can you not be romantic about baseball?"

The question is ironic to say the least, because Beane has been accused of draining all the romance from the game. Faced with a daunting gap between what his team and the richest teams could spend on ballplayers—the A's payroll for 2002 was about $40 million, whereas the New York Yankees' was $126 million—Beane set out to reinvent his club by unloading overvalued players and shopping for bargains. Guided by the radical ideas of baseball statistician Bill James and assisted by Paul DePodesta, a young Harvard graduate with a degree in economics, Beane served notice to his grizzled scouting staff that they would no longer be judging prospects based on their looks, their builds, their personalities, or any of the other intangibles that scouts mystically invoked when trying to predict a player's future performance. From now on, players would be reduced to a set of complex statistics that would reveal their ability to do what counted most—score runs.

All this makes Moneyball a fascinating business book but an unlikely candidate for a baseball movie. From Pride of the Yankees (1942) to Bang the Drum Slowly (1973) to Bull Durham (1988) to Sugar (2008), dramas about baseball have always been steeped in romance, whether they follow a winner on his way up or a loser on his way out. The central tenet of this romance is that a person can defy other people's estimations of him and accomplish bigger things than he ever imagined. More than any other team sport, baseball focuses our attention on individuals trying to realize their true potential, which is what makes the grand slams so sweet and the strikeouts so bitter. Moneyball asks us to root for a team whose management saw every player not as a person capable of greatness but as a set of stats to be fed into an algorithm. If you've just lost your job as a result of some digital innovation, this is probably not the movie to cheer you up.

Screenwriters Steven Zaillian (Schindler's List, A Civil Action) and Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network, Charlie Wilson's War) certainly had their work cut out for them when they hired on to dramatize Lewis's book. Interspersed with the narrative about Oakland's 2002 season are long, unfilmable stretches in which Lewis debunks the misleading statistics that have governed baseball since the 19th century and explains the "sabermetrics" that Beane and Podesta used in their scheme to neutralize the money factor. For instance, players have long been evaluated by RBI—runs batted in—yet that figure involves so many uncontrolled factors (like the number of men who happen to be on base when the player comes to bat) that it's almost useless for measuring someone's contribution to the game score. Much more accurate, according to the sabermetricians, is OBP—on-base percentage, or the probability that the batter won't cause an out. It's engrossing stuff, but the screenplay barely touches on it.

Instead, Zaillian and Sorkin have mined the text for human stories and hung them, like Christmas ornaments, on the larger arc of the 2002 season. One of the more affecting subplots centers on Scott Hatteberg (Chris Pratt), a catcher for the Boston Red Sox whose career appeared to be over when he ruptured a nerve in his elbow during the 2001 season. The movie introduces Hatteberg with a partly invented scene where he sits glumly in the family room of his home as the clock strikes midnight, marking the contractual end of his career. A moment later the phone rings: it's Billy Beane, who's literally standing outside the house with his infield coach, Ron Washington. Invited in, they greet Hatteberg's wife and little daughter and then get down to business: Beane is mightily impressed by Hatteberg's OBP and wants to sign him to the A's, as long as he'll take on the challenge of playing first base. After the two men leave, Hatteberg and his wife share a lovely moment together, rejoicing in their good fortune as his sense of self-worth is unexpectedly renewed.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
March 22
Performing Arts
April 24

Popular Stories