2020's Blurry Vision | Letters | Chicago Reader

2020's Blurry Vision 

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Kudos to Harold Henderson for illustrating the many follies and shortcomings of Chicago Metropolis 2020 [January 25]. Metropolis 2020, and the entire "Smart Growth" movement for that matter, don't stand up to even the slightest intellectual scrutiny. I am a degreed urban planner and a career land developer. As I've seen this movement practically applied, it has succeeded in doing nothing more than drive up the cost of housing in the Chicago area, not to mention creating the urban sprawl which it sought to prevent. Chicago Metropolis 2020 is intellectually, economically, socially, and politically bankrupt as far as public policy goes, not to mention that it is written with a sickeningly condescending, paternalistic tone. Additionally, the Smart Growth movement is nothing more than "I'm here, shut the door" philosophy. Both theories can be summed up thusly: urban sprawl is defined as the house built after yours, and it's always the next guy in that causes the problems. I've asked to publicly debate any of these organizations, Metropolis 2020, Sierra Club, Metropolitan Plan Commission, and I've yet to have any takers. Is it time now?

Jake Daab

W. 17th St.

Support Independent Chicago Journalism: Join the Reader Revolution

We speak Chicago to Chicagoans, but we couldn’t do it without your help. Every dollar you give helps us continue to explore and report on the diverse happenings of our city. Our reporters scour Chicago in search of what’s new, what’s now, and what’s next. Stay connected to our city’s pulse by joining the Reader Revolution.

Are you in?

  Reader Revolutionary $35/month →  
  Rabble Rouser $25/month →  
  Reader Radical $15/month →  
  Reader Rebel  $5/month  → 

Not ready to commit? Send us what you can!

 One-time donation  → 

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Jake Daab

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
April 10
Music
November 25

Popular Stories