Being a sports fan: when hot emotion and cold logic come into conflict | Bleader

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Being a sports fan: when hot emotion and cold logic come into conflict

Posted By on 10.25.12 at 07:39 AM

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

Being right about Nebraskas win over Northwestern sure feels wrong
  • Matt Miller / AP
  • Being right about Nebraska's win over Northwestern sure feels wrong
A number of years ago I had a moment of insight as I was sitting at a table with a group of supposedly bright people. As I pondered the issue before us, I looked closely at each and every one of them and realized, with great clarity, that they were a bunch of chumps.

The occasion was our annual fantasy baseball draft, it was my turn to pick a player, and somehow the collection of experts in the room had all overlooked Sammy Sosa. As I said, this was some years ago, when Sammy, aided by a steady diet of Flintstone vitamins, was swatting homers by the dozens—making him a huge point-generator in fantasy leagues.

Just as important to me personally was the inescapable fact that he played for the north-siders. As a fourth-generation Cubs fan—I certainly wouldn't choose such a fate—I was eager to scoop up the rare Cub who also could help me escape the shame of another last-place finish in my fantasy league.

As I recollect, my instincts were correct: with Sammy's help, I finished at least one or two spots from the bottom. Even better, throughout the season I was able to cheer for Sammy and the Cubs without any reservation, since there was no clash between my desires as a fan and my needs as a would-be general manager.

Most die-hard sports fans who dabble in fantasy leagues know what I'm talking about—those inevitable moments when hot emotion and cold logic come into conflict; when your team isn't really your team, the one you root for; when you contemplate adding another stat-producing Yankee or Packer but wonder if that makes you a brilliant operator or an immoral cheat.

Which brings me to the subject of the hour. When I put together my highly influential set of college football predictions each week, I inevitably agonize over what to do with the teams and games I really, really care about. That is, just because I can't stand the thought of Northwestern losing or Notre Dame winning, does that mean I should pick their games accordingly? Should I simply trust my analytical reasoning to cut through the haze of emotional attachments? Or, acknowledging my ability to curse even the most formidable teams, should I tag NU as losers and ND as winners so the reverse might come true?

After much consideration, I've determined that I have no freaking clue.

But I do know this: Last week I guessed that the Wildcats would lose to Nebraska, and then hoped like hell I would be wrong. I even boasted to my colleague Jerome Ludwig that the pick was part of my winning strategy. And for three and a half quarters of the game, I appeared to be the lousy prognosticator I aspired to be.

Then the Huskers came from behind and won by a point. I've never been so sorry to be right.

On to the games.

Thursday night special:

No. 14 Clemson over Wake Forest: You know why? Because Clemson's better.

Friday night lights:

Louisville over Cincinnati: This was going to be a matchup of undefeateds until Cincy was snagged by Toledo. Too bad—that happened to me once too, when I took a wrong turn on the way home from vacation.

Big Ten:

Indiana over Illinois: When two teams battle for their elusive third win, who doesn't come out losing?

Northwestern over Iowa: The stadium will be full of disappointed fans, and that's before kickoff.

Purdue over Minnesota: The winner is a near-lock for a bowl game no one will attend.

Wisconsin over Michigan State: This looks like a great game last year.

Penn State over No. 8 Ohio State: There ought to be a law. Actually, there is, and they both broke it, which is why this has become the Bowl-Banned Bowl.

Nebraska over Michigan: Which erratic quarterback will play like he has all season?

Other games:

No. 3 Florida over No. 12 Georgia: Georgia's been really good except when they lost to South Carolina by something like 412—the same South Carolina team that Florida thrashed, routed, dominated, and chomped.

No. 4 Kansas State over No. 15 Texas Tech: K State may very well be the nation's best team of Wildcats in purple—and I don't say that lightly.

No. 8 Oklahoma over No. 5 Notre Dame: The Irish are still undefeated, which leaves me thinking something previously untenable: It's up to Oklahoma to set things right.

No. 2 Oregon over Colorado / No. 7 Oregon State over Washington: What, there are only two undefeated top-ten teams in Oregon?

No. 1 Alabama over No. 13 Mississippi State: The Bulldogs could be the first team to come within 19 points of Alabama, but I doubt it.

NIU over Western Michigan: But don't start getting cocky, because my mother and grandmother went to Western and they'll kick your ass.

U. of C. over Case Western: Both have beaten up on the same weaklings and been treated as weaklings by others. Man up, Maroons!

Last week: I went 10-3 (thank you very little, Indiana, Iowa, and West Virginia). Season: 80-22.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

More by Mick Dumke

Agenda Teaser

Performing Arts
Guards at the Taj Steppenwolf Theatre
June 13
ASAP Ferg, Jay IDK House of Blues
July 17

Tabbed Event Search

The Bleader Archive

Popular Stories