Empire of doubt | Bleader

Wednesday, September 6, 2006

Empire of doubt

Posted By on 09.06.06 at 08:15 AM

Sign up for our newsletters Subscribe

click to enlarge 120.gif

Niall Ferguson is contrary:

"It is, I discovered, acceptable among American liberals to say that the United States is an empire--provided that you deplore the fact. It is also permitted to say, when among conservatives, that American power is potentially beneficent--provided that you do not describe it as imperial. What is not allowed is to say that the United States is an empire and that this might not be wholly bad."

That's from the Harvard historian's introduction to the paperback version of Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire. He says some similar stuff in a recent article in Foreign Policy (free registration required).

Ferguson contends that the world is usually better off when there's a dominant empire than when there isn't.  (Empires are older and more durable than nation-states.) His subsidiary point is that the U.S. acquired its own continental empire without having to work very hard, and for that reason and others now lacks the required grit to do its imperial duty.  

But when it comes down to specifics, his analyses of Korea and Vietnam are severely flawed, in ways that make his thesis more plausible.

  • As a good historian, Ferguson explains that Gen. Douglas MacArthur in 1951 wanted total war against North Korea and China, without considering that it might cause the Soviet Union to invade or nuke western Europe. It was this ignorance, exposed by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that caused his popularity to evaporate and saved President Truman's civilian rule.

  • As an advocate, Ferguson blandly ignores this consideration when he comes back to his thesis, which is that a real empire would've done what MacArthur had in mind. The guy's too honest to be a hack, and too wedded to his conclusions not to be.

 

It seems like one could agree with Ferguson, but still not follow him to the conclusion that it would be best if we stayed in Iraq--as we would, say, under Emperor McCain, with whom Ferguson has been talking.  (More at Hit and Run.)  Would Ferguson really have told the Roman general whose legions were walking into a trap in the German forests in 9 AD to stay the course?

Tags: , , , ,

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

More by Harold Henderson

  • The Recyclable House

    The Recyclable House

    If Ken Ortiz has his way, no one in Chicago will ever simply "demolish" a building again.
    • Jul 24, 2008
  • Sympathy for the Devil?

    Sympathy for the Devil?

    Progressive scribe Rick Perlstein made his reputation finding the good in conservatives. Then they really started screwing up the country.
    • Jan 24, 2008
  • Dynamic Flash for Democrats

    Dynamic Flash for Democrats

    Wanna raise funds to run for office? Nag Schwarzenegger about health care? Or just make fun of Bush? Call Articulated Man.
    • Jan 10, 2008
  • More »

Tabbed Event Search

The Bleader Archive

Popular Stories