Chicago Reader [ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Pitchfork Music Festival - Union Park - July 17 - 19 ] [ Food & Drink - Openings and closings, deals and special events, and more - Sign up now ]

 

Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[ Chicago Reader FREE STUFF: ALEFEST Soldier Field July 11 ]

[ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Kathy Griffin - The Chicago Theatre - October 8 & 9 ]


submit to the windy citizen | Digg! Digg this | del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this | facebook Facebook

The Works
Hollywood/Sheridan TIF map

Godfrey Carmona

A Sucker's System

Only in Chicago could an $8 million affordable-housing subsidy in Edgewater cost taxpayers $75 million.

August 17, 2007

You might say that the residents and activists of Edgewater have their backs against the wall.

In recent months the city’s given them an ultimatum: if you want $8 million to save affordable housing for senior citizens, you’d better endorse the proposed Hollywood/Sheridan tax increment financing district, which will wind up costing taxpayers about $75 million in property tax dollars. In effect, the city is proposing to divert roughly $67 million in property taxes from the chronically broke schools, parks, and county on the shoulders of an $8 million project. Only in Chicago would this kind of deal stand a chance.

For more than 40 years the not-for-profit Hellenic Foundation has run Hollywood House, a 198-unit senior citizens’ apartment building on the southwest corner of Hollywood and Sheridan. But last year, with the building in disrepair and vacancies on the rise, the foundation decided to sell it. According to a spokesman for 48th Ward alderman Mary Ann Smith, the foundation was offered $15 million by a private developer. But rather than sell to a conventional buyer, who would most likely convert the units into upscale condos, the foundation looked for one who would keep the property affordable and not displace the seniors living there.

Enter the well-regarded not-for-profit Heartland Housing, which entered a bid for $11 million. Heartland, however, couldn’t finance the project on its own. It would need at least $29 million to buy and rehab the building, and it only had about $21 million to spend.

So Heartland went to officials from the city’s Department of Housing, who directed them to officials with the city’s planning department, who told them what they pretty much tell anybody looking for city assistance these days: if you want city money, you have to get it from a TIF district. And since Hollywood House wasn’t in a TIF district, Heartland would have to help the city create a new one.

TIFs, as everyone should know by now, put a cap on property tax revenues going to the schools, parks, county, and other taxing bodies and divert additional revenues into a virtual slush fund controlled by the mayor. Under state law, TIFs are intended to revitalize blighted communities by attracting development. Accordingly, the city is required to prepare an eligibility report for each proposed TIF, establishing that the area in question truly is blighted and that, if not for the incentives provided by TIF funds, it would be unable to attract outside investment. Trouble is, the guidelines overseeing the process are so rife with loopholes that virtually any community qualifies—which is why TIFs exist in flourishing communities like the Loop, the near south side, and the near west side. Parts of Edgewater are likewise booming, and of course in the case of Hollywood House there were investors willing to buy without TIF assistance.

The TIF program has spurred a small cottage industry in Chicago: private consultants specializing in TIFs. In this case, city officials told Heartland that it should hire someone to document the area’s eligibility. “The department of planning told us we had to fund the TIF report,” says Andy Geer, executive director of Heartland Housing. “We expect to eventually get costs reimbursed from the TIF fund.”

Heartland hired consultant Stephen Friedman at a cost of $150,000. His subsequent report concluded—big surprise—that the area was blighted enough to qualify.

In theory, Friedman could have elected to draw a compact district including little more than the intersection of Hollywood and Sheridan to raise the $8 million need to rebuild Hollywood House. Instead he devised a 14-block-long skeleton-key-shaped district that runs down Broadway from Rosemont to Hollywood, juts east to Sheridan, then extends down to Ainslie. If approved, it’s expected to accumulate about $75 million in property taxes before expiring in 23 years.

Why draw the larger TIF district? Alderman Smith says that to win residents’ support for the TIF she had to make sure that it offered a little something for everyone in the 48th Ward. “We had over 20 community meetings on this TIF,” says Smith. “We listened to people throughout the ward.”

And so to secure funding for Hollywood House, Smith signed on to streetscaping for portions of Argyle and Granville, a new library for the ward, and repairs at McCutcheon Elementary School, among other projects. I’m not saying these aren’t worthy causes—McCutcheon, located at 4865 N. Sheridan, desperately needs repairs. But even those involved concede there are less costly, more efficient ways to go about improving the ward. “The system’s flawed,” says an aldermanic aide. “But it’s the only system we got, and we’re trying to make the best of it.”

The more you look at the Hollywood/Sheridan TIF, the more flawed the system seems. As it turns out, McCutcheon’s not even within its boundaries. It’s in the adjoining Broadway/Lawrence TIF district, where money has already been committed to projects like the restoration of the Uptown Theatre. To get TIF money to McCutcheon the city will have to move—or “port,” as city officials put it—money from one TIF district to another. “I know it’s crazy,” says the aldermanic aide. “What are you going to do?”

In June, Smith’s zoning advisory committee, which includes community organizations, merchants, and block clubs throughout the ward, overwhelmingly recommended the TIF. With the alderman’s support, it will almost certainly be approved by the City Council this fall.

I suppose you could argue that this is TIF planning at its best—a triumph of local democracy in which everybody gets a crack at the piggybank. Except of course, there are no guarantees that TIF money will be there when McCutcheon’s parents or Granville Street residents come for their share. Edgewater residents should realize that they’re not the only folks eyeing the Hollywood/Sheridan TIF. As aldermanic aides have been telling me for years, developers are like flies buzzing around TIF funds, pestering aldermen with proposals to spend the cash.

Smith says she will create a TIF oversight group to make sure the money is spent the way the community wants. Good luck. For all she knows, Daley and the planning department have already decided how to spend it— as aldermen like Gene Schulter (47th) and Anthony Beale (9th) found when they tried to use TIF money in their wards.

Then there’s the larger problem of rising property taxes. TIFs drive them up by forcing the schools and parks and all the other taxing bodies to compensate for revenue diverted into the funds. The more TIFs the city creates—and there are now 153 of them—the more residents and merchants have to pay, making housing less affordable. So in the name of saving 198 units of affordable housing, the folks up in Edgewater are contributing to the citywide affordable-housing problem.

I have to give Mayor Daley credit. By making TIFs the only game in town, he’s forced everyone from activists to aldermen to play according to his rules. It’s no surprise people look the other way when he plunders TIF funds for outrageous expenditures, like his recent offer to give $40 million to help the Chicago Mercantile Exchange with its acquisition of the Chicago Board of Trade. They’re relying on them too.

Lenin said that a capitalist will sell you the rope you plan to hang him with. When it comes to TIFs, Chicago’s activists buy the rope, make the noose, and take time to thank the mayor before wrapping it around their own necks. R

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

orangutan at 7:48 PM on 8/18/2007

Your article seems disingenuous. I have read a number of your pieces and they consistently fail to state the fundamental basic facts about TIF money. Money from TIF improvements only comes from increased property tax revenue generated by the improvements themselves. Schools, parks, etc. do not have to "compensate" for any lost revenue, the property tax base stays the same and they get the same amount of money as they did pre-TIF.

Your chicken-little, doomsday columns have an unabashed subjective agenda that only tells part of the story. This type of activist journalism only inflames your readership to act on misinformation that could be adverse to their interests.

Sure, no body wants to see connected developers get a free lunch from the City, but nobody wants neighborhoods to languish in decay either. If it's a choice between a handout to someone with juice or a perpetually run-down ward, I'll take the improvements every time. I bet so would most of your readers.

Flag as inappropriate

Harold at 8:04 AM on 8/19/2007

So would I, orangutan, but since when was that supposed to be the only choice in this country? Most of these places aren't rundown, so the tax revenues would've increased anyway. What exactly was wrong with appropriating those increased revenues by public votes, y'know, democracy?

Flag as inappropriate

orangutan at 9:50 AM on 8/19/2007

Good point Harold. Certainly if the investment is in place without the TIF, the TIF is just a gratuitous pay-off. The trouble is, just because the place is not run-down, does not automatically mean outside investments will be made.

It seems to me there is a choice between an existing TIF plan or a nonexistent hope that future investments will be injected into the community. How long do you wait?

Flag as inappropriate

jeff at 11:49 AM on 8/19/2007

Orangutan,

I only wish you were right that the money only comes from the improvements themselves. If you look at the Wilson Yard TIF you will see a huge area of private homes funding the improvements. The Broadway Bryn Mawr TIF has over $8,000,000 in the till that they do not have a plan in place to spend. How can the City collect $400 Million for improvements and say they need more money for CPS, the CTA pensions etc? Only because we let them.

Flag as inappropriate

Chris Lawrence at 12:19 PM on 8/19/2007

Orangutan, tax incremental financing generates revenue into each district due to the equalized assessed value (EAV) increasing over a 23 year period, not solely from improvements themselves. The only reason that this district qualifies is that relative to other areas in Chicago, its EAV has not increased as much as other areas. That does not mean that it is necessarily blighted. I fundamentally disagree with your assessment that Mr. Joravsky is disingenuous or misleading in regards to the TIF program. He is one of the few reporters in town who has recognized the growing concern of limiting the natural growth of our property tax base and that growths contribution to the future funding of vital services provided by both the city and other governing bodies with the misuse of such a well intentioned program.

My only criticism of this article is that it is more than a few days late and is a misleading portrait of this being community planning at its best or a triumph of local democracy. It is in fact neither and much like the addition of the Rickover Navel Academy, the approval of 5440 N. Sheridan zoning, and many other planning decisions over the overwhelming objections of residence of the 48th Ward. The concerns expressed during these several meetings were not listened too or addressed, and in fact Alderman Smith did not attend any of these meetings, including that of her own planning and zoning committee, but instead sent out her chief of staff who basically gave the community an ultimatum of take it or leave it (there was little doubt they were going to take it, most members of the Alderman’s Z&P committee are naturally allies of her administration, and those who might oppose it had the fear of retribution instilled in them.) The TIF advisory committee that she has proposed likewise lacks accountability to 48th Ward residence, and any input that they make can be overridden by the CDC, each of whose members are appointed solely by the mayor.

It might be mentioned that Commissioner Quigley gave tacit approval of Alderman Smith’s proposed TIF district, despite the many objections of the size and porting of money out of Edgewater and into Uptown. In addition to Hollywood House and McCutcheon, also proposed was traffic improvements to Sheridan road north of Hollywood, despite the fact that this area does not lie within this or any other TIF district. The good thing is that we residence now have in writing the many wonderful things that Alderman Smith promised to use TIF funding toward, and we can measure her success at actually governing such a program and hold her accountable.

It might also be mentioned that this was a politically savvy method of implementing yet another TIF district by making anyone opposed to perpetuating what her office admits is a flawed system look as though they are heartless obstructionist who would leave hundreds of senior citizens homeless. It is interesting to me that Chicago had 34,818 foreclosures, or one filing for every 88 households, for the first half of 2007, according to RealtyTrac, which publishes foreclosure information. This leads me to wonder if our city officials are missing the forest for the trees. We save a few hundred elderly citizens, while watching thousands lose their hold on the American dream.

What this does speak too is the very real need to reform the state laws and close the loop holes that allow virtually any community to qualify as a TIF district. As other communities begin to realize how Chicago has manipulated the rules and laws governing the TIF program, they will begin to designate more and more TIF districts throughout the state. This will only add one more complication into an already convoluted and unfair property tax system. The last thing this state needs is yet one more issue to add to the growing list of divisive and practically polarizing issues for our state legislature to tackle.

Flag as inappropriate

f.kennedy at 4:51 PM on 8/19/2007

Chris Lawrence makes some good points but does not go into enough detail. He says that the reason this area qualified for a TIF was because the EAV had not gone up as fast as other parts of the city. That is true. But let's look at why. The people in Edgewater are savvy and fairly well organized. The Edgewater Community Council has been VERY active in property tax appeals. They have had meetings, workshops and protests. The big condos have lawyers who appeal. Their success kept the EAV down so the area qualified. In addition the map was gerrymandered to eliminate pieces of improvement. Even buildings whose property is landmarked and therefore their property tax is frozen was included.

The process used by the 48th Ward was totally disgusting and Ben didn't bother to cover it because Daley is on his radar screen not Smith. When the Daley's ran the 11th Ward they were criticized for getting more for their wards than other wards. You can't accuse Smith of this, she gets less for her ward. That is why she had to knock her opponents off the ballot. She wouldn't have won.

Flag as inappropriate

Neil at 7:08 PM on 8/19/2007

Besides the remarkable gerrymandering, what is striking about this map is the lump at the east end of Foster Ave. - the only part more than a block wide.
If that little country club is truly blighted and in need of tax-financed relief, things are even worse than I thought.

Flag as inappropriate

Chris Lawrence at 9:31 PM on 8/19/2007

As a former staff and board member, I applaud the efforts of Clair Tobin, the executive director of the Edgewater Community Council (ECC), and all the board members of ECC for initiating an effort for fair and equal assessments of the property of homeowners throughout Edgewater. Though Mr. Kennedy is correct that I did not go into detail on the EAV and property tax reform efforts within our community, it was undertaken so that residents received a fair assessment of their properties. This effort was not undertaken in order to qualify any area of Edgewater as TIF district eligible. I would only add that despite all of these efforts, the value of properties within Edgewater continues to rise, and as Mr. Joravsky has stated several times including in this article, TIF eligibility was suppose to be for areas that are truly blighted and were BUT FOR the use of tax dollars, no investment would occur.

Again, the only way we are going to get true reform of a well intentioned but misused program is to close the loop holes within our state law governing TIF districts.

I would mention that Senator Ronen, the newly selected committeeman of the 48th Ward and Alderman Smith’s campaign manager, voted against the 7% cap in the state senate.

As for the appearance of this TIF district on the map, it becomes more concerning when you look at how the Bryn Mawr, Byrwn (although that TIF district is set to expire), and Lawrence/Broadway TIF districts form one large area covered by this out of control program.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 11:48 AM on 8/20/2007

"Money from TIF improvements only comes from increased property tax revenue generated by the improvements themselves. Schools, parks, etc. do not have to "compensate" for any lost revenue, the property tax base stays the same and they get the same amount of money as they did pre-TIF."

Where did you get this? The ITIA website or a DPD hand-out?

You are disingenuous. Are you a Star Trek fan? Because if you believe what you wrote you probably also believe in cold fusion, that a mayonnaise-jar sized device can serve as a power source, and that money grows on trees.

OK let's talk "fundamental basic facts about TIF money." First and foremost, there is no such thing as "TIF money." TIF money is property tax money. TIF is an acronym devised by the burgeoning TIF industry to obscure the source of TIF funds.

Property taxes are how we fund local government such as our cities, counties, parks, and schools. Property taxes are a finite resource. TIF is an ear-mark of the property taxes of the future. Any ear-mark or withdrawal from the property tax pot has to be made up elsewhere.

"... they get the same amount of money as they did pre-TIF."

This would be fine I guess as long as their expenses were also staying the same or going down. Unfortunately this is not the case, expenses rise, and our schools and parks have not had a real capital program for many years.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 11:54 AM on 8/20/2007

"TIFs, as everyone should know by now, put a cap on property tax revenues going to the schools, parks, county, and other taxing bodies and divert additional revenues into a virtual slush fund controlled by the mayor."

The map was not drawn to "give something to everyone." It was drawn to capture & divert the property taxes of the future. it was drawn to touch as many other TIFs as possible to facilitate porting. Touching makes the slush slushier.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 2:09 PM on 8/20/2007

" ... no body wants to see connected developers get a free lunch from the City, but nobody wants neighborhoods to languish in decay either. ...

It seems to me there is a choice between an existing TIF plan or a nonexistent hope that future investments will be injected into the community."

After floating the "TIF is free money" propaganda, you riff on the "Only game in town" meme: the false choice: it's either TIF or Detroit, whadda ya want, Chicago?

A wide variety of federal, state, and local programs exist to subsidize affordable housing and senior housing in particular.

NCBG compiled an excellent catalog of

TIF Alternatives

http://ncbg.org/tifs/alternatives.htm

TIF is NOT the only game in town.

Flag as inappropriate

Kiki at 2:11 PM on 8/20/2007

Ben has explained numerous times how schools, parks, etc. attempt to compensate for money lost to TIFs: see our archives of his TIF coverage and property tax coverage on our homepage.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 10:28 AM on 8/21/2007

"Schools, parks, etc. do not have to "compensate" for any lost revenue..."

Chicago Reader TIF Archive

http://www.chicagoreader.com/tifarchive/

The Schools Scam
June 23, 2006

Under the TIF system millions of dollars in property taxes are being diverted from education to development.

http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/theworks/060623/

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 11:05 AM on 8/21/2007

"Schools, parks, etc. do not have to "compensate" for any lost revenue..."

TIF and School Districts presentation
June 1, 2001
Rachel Weber and Therese McGuire, UIC

" ... school districts within municipalities that are big TIFers are experiencing larger increases in state aid than those within municipalities that are not relying heavily on this mechanism. ... The fact that the school aid formula will compensate TIF-ing municipalities is a case of what economists call "moral hazard." ... [the] state may be creating an incentive for municipalities to over-TIF and to take on more risk.... At present, there is an ad hoc policy of providing more aid to those who TIF than those who don’t ... Municipalities are under no obligation to recognize when TIF would seriously harm a school district’s financial condition. And school districts don’t have legal authority to demand that their interests be taken into account ... "

http://www.igpa.uillinois.edu/events/confhighlights/tif/presentation.pdf

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 10:57 AM on 8/22/2007

" ... could have elected to draw a compact district including little more than the intersection of Hollywood and Sheridan to raise the $8 million need to rebuild Hollywood House."

In support of the idea that a compact TIF district COULD have been drawn, take a gander at the "S&C" TIF, formally known as the "Pratt/Ridge" TIF.

http://ncbg.org/tifs/tifprofile.aspx?id=181

http://ncbg.org/tifs/maps/prattridge.gif

In 2004 this TIF was drawn almost EXACTLY to the property line of S&C Electric, a private corporation: Pratt on the north, Ridge on the west, Devon on the south, and the Metra tracks on the east, in Rogers Park. S&C is closely-held, it is almost entirely owned by the Conrad family and a a few top officers. When you draw a TIF like this, it is basically a property tax freeze, it is corporate welfare, it is a tax break for a few individuals, who also happen to be major campaign supporters of Aldermen Moore and Stone, and Mayor Daley via the Chamber of Commerce.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 10:23 AM on 8/23/2007

"This type of activist journalism only inflames your readership to act on misinformation that could be adverse to their interests."

so orangutan

where's the misinformation?

can you please be more specific?

half of every "TIF" dollar is a former school operating dollar

please educate us as to how diverting $75M / 2 = $37.5M from our schools to deliver an $8M subsidy to a senior housing rehab is in the public interest

bring it

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 10:15 AM on 8/24/2007

Equity and Entrepreneurialism: The Impact of Tax Increment Financing on School Finance

Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 38, No. 5, 619-644 (2003)

Rachel Weber, Associate Professor, Urban Planning and Policy Program, University of Illinois at Chicago

Statistical analysis of TIF's impact on the finances of school districts in Cook County, Illinois, reveals that municipal use of TIF depletes the property tax revenues of schools during the lifespan of the TIF district but that a portion of the budget shortfalls are relieved by increases in state school aid.

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 10:34 AM on 8/31/2007

so orangutan

Weber at UIC, an activist professor?

she spreading misinformation?

how about the editors of Urban Review

they have an unabashed subjective agenda?

Flag as inappropriate

Hugh at 11:28 AM on 9/4/2007

orangutan wrote:

"Schools, parks, etc. do not have to "compensate" for any lost revenue..."

but

"Over the last 20 years, schools, park districts, and other governments in Cook County have lost nearly
$700 million in revenue from TIF districts due to inflation, over $100 million in 2005 alone," said Cook County Commissioner Quigley.

"This adds to the incredible financial pressures facing almost every department of our local government. Health clinics have closed, schools are using textbooks held together by duct tape, and open space is not being preserved for the future," Quigley said.

http://www.commissionerquigley.com/tif.shtm

so orangutan

Quigley, he an activist county commissioner?

he read too much Joravsky?

Flag as inappropriate

albanypark at 10:09 PM on 9/11/2007

what really bothers me with these so called tif districts is that the property taxes are lower than in non tif districts . west town is in a tif district. does it seem blighted or in need of a boost? their needs to be tax relief across the board in this city. not just for the few.

Flag as inappropriate

Randall Maull at 7:47 AM on 9/20/2007

134th & Avenue K TIF (already well in the works) will displace about 250 mobile homes here. These mobiles are already affordable homes that people take pride in their homes(basically), and we have no crime here to speak of. So why are they trying to "improve" this area, why here, where homes go unsold and rent signs beg from windows and lamposts? They say this TIF will help the community, how so when Hegewisch is NOT a distination community for anyone. We had our second "sham" public forum last night on the topic, Alderman Pope presided, and our pleas for a hold-off on this TIF fell on deaf and un-caring ears...actually we were given smirks in that we are lowly mobile home dwellers, this from our great folks in City government! Very nice indeed very...

Flag as inappropriate

C.A. at 3:14 PM on 9/24/2007

This TIF's make me extremely angry...I worked for a company that basically made its money on these projects, continously overbilling without any regulation from the TIF itself. Orungutan, I understand that lopsided jounalism would make you mad however, you don't have the all of the facts. You have what our fine city wants that taxpayers to know and the actual living truth of the TIF's.

Flag as inappropriate

Hollywood/Sheridan Resident at 12:54 AM on 4/13/2008

Is the TIF issue dead? Appears so! Nothing new has been written for quite awhile. Well let me see if I can revive it?
So far none of the people at Hollywood House have seen one improvement. Nor can they get any answers. The Heartland people are demanding more money and Smith is saying no! She is saving the money for multimillionaire developer and pilot Beitler who wants TIF money to build parking for a church as a part of a 45 story luxury tower. Smith has been busy saving elephants from zoos and circuses. Maybe she can build an island in the lake for them.

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)



From the Reader blogs

Clout City Mick Dumke: Aldermen hold another hearing on the parking meter lease deal. Their conclusion: it still stinks.
Thursday at 7:49 pm

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.