|

Plunder on a Pedestal At the Art Institutes summer show, Benin royals get a good look at the stuff they want back.
By Deanna Isaacs July 17, 2008
There was plenty of polite pomp surrounding the opening of “Benin—Kings and Rituals: Court Arts from Nigeria” at the Art Institute of Chicago last week. A royal entourage from the Kingdom of Benin—now part of Nigeria, and not to be confused with the independent Republic of Benin—came to town for the show, which originated in Vienna and consists of 220 works, primarily brass sculpture and intricately carved ivory culled from major European and American museums. There was a gala party for more than 600 in the revamped Gunsaulus Hall, making its debut as an event venue. But at a press preview two days before the opening, Princess Theresa Erediauwa read a short speech on behalf of her father, Erediauwa I, the Oba of Benin. “I have made it a personal goal to build a museum in my country to display this art,” the Oba’s statement declared, and went on to say that he hopes to see at least some of it returned. That’s a touchy subject, since nearly everything in the exhibit was stolen by the British 111 years ago, when they invaded the city of Benin, burned much of it to the ground, killed its top officials, and sent the reigning Oba into an exile from which he never returned.
What’s more, the event was taking place on the home turf of Art Institute director James Cuno, whose new book, Who Owns Antiquity?, champions the claims of museums over nations in the tussle for the world’s cultural treasures.
The Oba’s cousin, Prince Ademola Iyi-Eweka, also in town for the festivities, says he has “mixed feelings” about the exhibit, which he thinks of partly as a testament to the ordeal of his great-grandfather, the exiled Oba Ovonramwen. The joyous part for Iyi-Eweka, who’s lived in Madison for the last 20 years and works for the city school district, is the chance to see so many objects he’d only heard about before. You have to understand, he says, that because Benin had an oral rather than a written tradition, “these artifacts contain the history of my people.”
An Edo-speaking city-state with origins going back to the 12th century, Benin was a vibrant force in Africa for hundreds of years. When the Portuguese arrived, in the 15th century, Benin forged a trading alliance with them and prospered by exporting goods including spices, ivory, and fabric—and, in later years, slaves—to Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas. Metal casting had been practiced in Benin since the 1200s, but after the Portuguese brought in supplies of copper, Benin’s artisans refined their methods and began producing one of the world’s most remarkable bodies of work in brass. The Obas, considered divine rulers, actively supported the artists’ guilds and commissioned work from them; ritual art and artifacts were used to honor the royals and to communicate with sacred ancestors. Most spectacularly, during the kingdom’s golden years in the 16th and 17th centuries the palace walls were said to be covered floor to ceiling with hundreds of finely detailed brass bas-reliefs depicting Benin’s history and customs.
In the late 19th century, when the European powers took it upon themselves to divvy up Africa, Britain claimed the Niger area. Benin had the audacity to resist, and in 1897, after an unwelcome delegation of Brits was ambushed on its way there, the British launched what they called the Punitive Expedition. After destroying the city and banishing the Oba, they stripped the palace of its artifacts, shipping thousands of them back to England, where they were sold to cover the expense of the invasion.
“We were writing in art and craft, recording history in bronzes and carving,” Iyi-Eweka says. “Because these artifacts were taken, we are now struggling to reconstruct that history.” The treasures were widely dispersed. Many wound up in museums, others disappeared into private collections. A great thing about this exhibition, Iyi-Eweka says, is that it’s collected the work and put it in the spotlight. “Unless they bring them out, we don’t even know what is out there. Now, we’ll know some of them. The cat is out of the bag.”
Iyi-Eweka says he “worked hard to convince my people in Chicago” to support the exhibition. “Many of their ancestors died in [the British] war.” But, he reasons, “If your rooster is stolen, you go to the police and say your neighbor stole your rooster. The police will say ‘Can you describe it?’ And you say, ‘It’s a rooster.’ Is it black or white? And you say, again, ‘It’s a rooster.’ Are the police going to listen to you?” Now there’s a better description of the rooster.
Princess Theresa was followed at the podium by Ochi C. Achinivu, head of Nigeria’s National Commission for Museums and Monuments, who said the exhibition stirs “our remembrance that these masterpieces were once our collection, under a single ownership, in one place.” Achinivu appealed to “the conscience of institutions and collectors around the world to give thought to what they collect and how they collect it.” He also announced that Nigeria is developing a comprehensive database of Benin’s missing treasures that will identify and locate each piece.
After a word from Art Institute curator Kathleen Bickford Berzock, who’s been working on the exhibit since before Cuno’s arrival in 2004 (the catalog is about 500 pages), everyone adjourned to the galleries where artifacts of the court of Benin waited: fabulous dwarfs, stunning black leopards, coral-beaded royal garb, and bas-relief obas. Iyi-Eweka made his way slowly past one display after another to the most incredible artifact of all: a huge photograph placed near the exit. Taken aboard a British yacht, it shows three soldiers, armed with rifles and swords and standing at attention behind a seated, robed, and clearly outraged man who looks very much like Iyi-Eweka. “That’s my great-grandfather,” Iyi-Eweka said. “In shackles.”
Osaro Uhunmwangho of Evanston’s Edo Arts and Cultural Heritage Institute worked with the Art Institute on the exhibit and argues that it will put Benin Kingdom “back on the map” and educate people about the difference between the kingdom and the republic. “This exhibition is not about ownership,” Uhunmwangho says. “This exhibition is about seeing the art.”
That’ll be possible at the Art Institute through September 21. After that, Chicagoans have another option: they can trek over to the Field Museum, which owns 400 pieces of Benin treasure—one of the world’s largest collections. About 20 percent of that collection, including huge carved tusks, numerous altar heads, and a bas-relief in which the Oba clasps the hands of his supporters, is on permanent display in the Field’s Africa exhibit; the rest is in storage. With the exception of a few new pieces, it’s all plunder from the Punitive Expedition. Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs Chicagoland Alison True: Grampa, what was it like before cell phones and Google Maps? Thursday at 2:14 pm
|
Flag as inappropriate
DR. KWAME OPOKU at 1:39 AM on 7/17/2008
Deanna Isaacs should be congratulated for the excellent report and the explanations therein. It would be interesting to know whether the Art Institute of Chicago will publish the full texts of the statements made at the opening of the exhibition and above all the statement of James Cuno,the Director stating that he will consider seriously any demand for restitution. Readers who are interested in this matter may wish to consult AFRIKANET. http://www.afrikanet.info/
Readers may also find the attached statement useful.
Statement on the Benin bronzes and their continued detention BY European and American Museums and Individuals
There are some points about the Benin bronzes that the reader must know and always bear in mind:
1. That most of these beautiful and fine art objects were stolen by the British in 1897 when they invaded Benin City, executed some nobles, exiled the Oba (King) and burnt the city.
2. Some thousands of the Benin objects were sold by the British to other European and American museums and individuals. British Museum, London, is alleged to have some 1000 pieces; the Ethnology Museum, Berlin has admittedly some 800 pieces, the Ethnology Museum, Vienna, some 200. Some of the finest pieces are in the United States, for example, The Metropolitan Museum of Art,.New York, has one of the hip masks of Queen=Mother Idia. The British Museum has the other.
3. The people of Benin and Nigeria have fewer that the European and American museums who refuse to lend or return any of these pieces.
4. The Nigerians and the Benin Royal family have been asking for years for the return of some of these pieces to Nigeria. The response of the Europeans and the Americans has either been dead silence or exasperated "no.
5. The United Nations and UNESCO have been urging for years countries holding such illegally and illegitimate exported objects to return them to their countries of origin. The Europeans and American remain impervious to all such appeals.
6. The hijacking of the religious and cultural icons of the African peoples by Europeans and Americans which was made possible by the colonialist and imperialist regimes should no longer be acceptable.
7. The human rights of the African peoples, individually and collectively, are being violated by this persistent and defiant refusal to return cultural objects which were not produced by the Europeans and American and were not meant for their use. Such a position also violates the freedom of religion in so far as many of the stolen African objects, for instance the many Ethiopian crosses in the British Museum, the Benin altars and the Fang reliquaries are necessary for the traditional practice of religious beliefs.
8. Most of these objects should have been returned when the African countries gained Independence in the 1960s.The refusal to return those objects relating to power and cultural generally, is a denial of the right to self-determination. If a people cannot determine where their cultural objects can be, where then is the right of self-determination which includes not only the right to determine your constitution but also to determine your cultural policy and practice.
9. True democrats and lovers of freedom should insist on all government respecting the right to cultural development of all, including the right to determine the destination of one’s cultural objects. This minimum requirement should be possible even in a world dominated by the use or threat of the use of force. DR. KWAME OPOKU
Flag as inappropriate
Alan Matthews at 12:21 PM on 7/22/2008
Funny how this article glosses over the export of slaves by Benin, not to mention the constant intra-African warfare which existed prior to the arrival of whites. We are talking about inanimate objects here, things. I dont see the Benin delegation making any amends for the thousands of families destroyed by their shipping actual humans in shackles all over the world, while they decry the Oba being shackled. Bald faced hypocricy.
Flag as inappropriate
Andrew J.C. at 6:56 PM on 7/23/2008
Alan,
I'm not an apologist for slavetraders and warring people, but isn't your argument pretty thin?
Say I decide to make myself owner of your house; you object so I have you forcefully removed. Then I pillage your material possessions.
Now, your grandchildren or great grandchildren, some time later, ask my grandchildren for some of their possessions back. Moreover, hypothetically, if your own ancestors were once slaveowners, that would make your grandchildren hypocrits by your logic, correct? Meanwhile, I'm off the hook because no matter what I did... someone else did something bad once upon a time too.
Does that actually make sense to you?
Flag as inappropriate
Willpower at 8:20 PM on 7/30/2008
It could be argued that the British actually saved these treasures from plunder and destruction. The British have the best Greek statues in their museums too. And some of the best Italian ones...and some of the best Indian ones....
Once again Deanna gives us a partial and PC version.
Flag as inappropriate
Artlover at 10:57 AM on 7/31/2008
Seems to me that Ms Isaacs has glossed over the interface of Europe and Africa.
The political leaders of Africa sold out to European powers in many cases and turned against their own people, even selling them. The poverty and cultural vaccuum that exists all over Africa today is the result of anarchic corrupt governments as much as colonial destruction and pillage.
Sad all around.
Are these African places ready to receive the treasures? Ethiopia just got back its obelisk from Italy, that was plundered by Mussolini during Italian occupation.
They held a near international celebration when it came back to northern Ethiopia. It was great to see that.
We saw in Iraq what happens when a collection is opened to a war situation unprotected.
Would any of these treasures even exist today had they been left in Africa? Hard to say I should think.
Also, did the African leaders trade any of these objects or were they all simply stolen by English thieves?
I think the story is more complex than Ms Isaacs made it out to be.
Sounded good though. Nice writing style. Especially her last line.
Add a comment