|

Mission DiminishedWith its old home about to become an exclusive hotel, the Three Arts Club moves on to things neither bigger nor better.
By Deanna Isaacs March 20, 2008
The timing was coincidental but totally appropriate: at two separate meetings on a single day last week, announcements were made revealing the very different fates of the Three Arts Club building, at 1300 N. Dearborn, and the organization that owned it for nearly a century.
Since the controversial $13 million sale of the structure to a developer last year, the two had gone their separate ways. Pockets stuffed with $11 million in net proceeds from the sale, the venerable Three Arts Club went off in search of a new mission to replace the one Jane Addams and 31 colleagues had articulated for it in 1912: creating a safe haven in the city for women artists. Meanwhile, the haven itself—a Byzantine-style landmark by City Hall designers Holabird and Roche, with quarters for 100 residents, a tea room, a library, a dining hall, and a spacious courtyard—headed down Zoning Change Lane toward a commercial makeover at the hands of M Development, which has also recently acquired the Cedar Hotel on north State Street as well as a big chunk of upscale Oak Street, including the Esquire Theatre.
The place, it turns out, will remain a club. After a fashion, anyway.
At an open meeting hosted by 42nd Ward alderman Brendan Reilly on March 11 at City Hall, a couple dozen people, mostly from the building’s Gold Coast neighborhood, learned that M Development will be signing a long-term lease with a British firm that will turn the four-story structure into Soho House Chicago, a boutique hotel promoted as a private club.
The firm, which has several similar club hotels in England, opened Soho House New York five years ago and has properties under way in Los Angeles and Miami. M Development’s Jeffrey Shapack said Soho is a good neighbor, blind to celebrity, and thriving; according to a video he showed, there are currently 15,000 members chainwide, with half that many more waiting to get in. But the Manhattan club (where fees are about $1,400 a year), after being featured on Sex in the City, has a reputation as a place to gawk, and as of last week, according to the New York membership office, there were open slots. Besides, you don’t have to join to play: if you can drop, say, $500 for a room, they’ll make you a “member for a day,” with full privileges.
In Chicago your dues will buy you access to a restaurant, bars, private dining rooms, a spa, and a rooftop pool, among other amenities. Architects from the BauerLatoza Studio discussed plans that promise to preserve the building’s exterior and most of its main floor while carving 48 hotel rooms out of the three stories above and adding—here’s where tension in the room really escalated—a 20-foot-tall rooftop structure for mechanicals and a sizable solarium. Just about everyone, but especially the Soho’s future next-door neighbor, objected to that.
There were also questions about parking (“valet” was the answer) and about what might happen if the club changes its membership rules. Former Three Arts Club resident Colby Luckenbill called it a shame that the board refused to keep the club going while a commercial firm is embracing a similar idea. An attractive piece of property like the Three Arts Club is easy to sell, Luckenbill lamented, but “imagine turning the Art Institute into condos.”
M Development’s attorney said he still needs a zoning change, and Reilly promised more meetings. But in the end, representatives of Gold Coast Neighbors and the North Dearborn Association said they were pleased that the building would be saved.
Less than an hour after the meeting disbanded, a much larger and more festive crowd climbed the Mies van der Rohe staircase in the Arts Club, at 201 E. Ontario, to sip wine and snack on caviar at a coming-out party for the organization that now styles itself 3Arts. Board president Cynthia West, who works in the nonprofit end of the Podmajersky family’s Pilsen-area arts and real estate empire, took the stage with treasurer William Girardi, MD, to announce that 3Arts is “setting out on a new path.” After extensive research, she said, they’d discovered that artists “struggle, lack funding,” and “are undervalued.” Then she introduced executive director Esther Grimm, who welcomed the guests to the “rebirth of 3Arts” as an organization that “supports the creative development of Chicago’s underrepresented artists working in music, theater, and visual arts” through grant making. The focus, she said, will be on “women, people of color, and people with disabilities.”
Grimm then rolled out the roster of annual grants. The signature program, she said, will bestow unrestricted $15,000 cash awards—mini genius grants—on 6 artists selected from a field of 54 compiled by 18 anonymous nominators. Another six artists will get $750 stipends along with two-week residencies at the Ragdale artists’ retreat in Lake Forest. And starting next year an additional award of $32,000 will go to an organization that serves women artists.
Grimm wrapped up by presenting a Special Project Award of $35,000 to the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs in support of Chicago Artists Month. Deputy cultural affairs commissioner Janet Carl Smith—a onetime Three Arts Club board president and member of the “vision committee” that steered the club through part of its transition—accepted.
So an organization that housed as manyas 100 artists at a time for nearly 100 years is patting itself on the back for sending six to Ragdale for two weeks. In a city that’s home to the MacArthur and Joyce foundations, where the state doles out hundreds grants to artists yearly, the Three Arts Club has given up its unique mission to become a small fish in the big pond of arts funders. (The grants it announced for this year total less than 1.5 percent of its $11 million in resources.) All that’s left of the founders’ idea is an administrative apparatus that will have to raise money like everybody else to finance a mission that’s pretty much like everybody else’s.
The Three Arts Club had a corner on artists’ residencies—so hot now—before the term was even coined. That makes it easy to imagine a different outcome, in which its board guides it back to health as the talent greenhouse and international magnet it was originally intended to be. That would have been a rebirth to celebrate. But not to worry. The developers say Soho House draws an artistic crowd. There will definitely be film and advertising folk among the doctors, lawyers, and investment bankers hanging out in the courtyard at Goethe and Dearborn.  Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs Chicagoland Whet Moser: The FDIC closed down five Illinois banks today. Thursday at 5:31 pm
|
Flag as inappropriate
GHarri at 11:48 AM on 3/20/2008
Chicago is one of the great arts communities in the nation, and has always been so. There are some interesting comments about arts funding on this thread:
http://digits.hrblock.com/ssDigits/digits.php?rType=1&sPath=1453&sNode=1453&uId=234
Flag as inappropriate
Sue Basko at 11:35 PM on 3/20/2008
The Friends of the Three Arts Club Association has worked hard to try to get the Three Arts Board and Executive Director to resign so that we can SAVE the Three Arts Club as a home for women in the arts!
We can be emailed at: THREEARTSFRIENDS@GMAIL.COM
We still have HOPE that the sale can be rescinded and the WOMEN IN THE ARTS can go back and be a great place for women from the world to come to pursue their dreams.
PLEASE HELP US! Email: THREEARTSFRIENDS@GMAIL.COM
Flag as inappropriate
Jacob Marchese at 10:26 PM on 3/22/2008
How ridiculous! What's up with this board and the directors? Somebody is surely making a big amount of money here...and it isn't the artists. Instead of selling the building, why doesn't the association use the power and the majesticness of the building to set itself apart from all the other common non-profits and really contribute, not only to the artists but our city!! There are so many ways this building can be used to benefit others rather than giving it to a hotel developer. Someone's in charge of giving away the house. Who's responsible here?
Flag as inappropriate
Sue Basko at 12:23 AM on 3/23/2008
Jacob, you asked who is responsible here. About 5 years ago, the Three Arts got a disloyal Board. They were not elected, but had been chosen by each other. Many of them were women from City of Chicago departments who wanted to use the building for their own purposes.
The two co-chairs at the time, Christy MacLear and Michelle Boone, as well as some of the others, did not value the mission of running a residence for women in the arts. They were more interested in aggrandizing themselves – which is what is STILL going on with the current Board.
This Board and the management became very disrespectful of the women living at the Club. These were women who had come from all over the world – China, Japan, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, South America, and all over the U.S. to live there for time periods ranging from a few days to a few years while the worked or studied in the arts. The full range of the arts was represented. When I stayed at the Club, there was a filmmaker from China, a museum intern from Africa, and many others. The mealtimes were like a United Nations summit, with all sorts of languages and cultures being shared. It was truly wonderful.
The right thing to do would have been for those on the Board and in the management who did not believe in the mission to resign, rather than destroy the organization. The Board has changed members several times since, but each set is equally as destructive and disloyal as the last. There are now several men on the Board – and I do wonder how any decent man (or woman) can be involved in this thievery of housing resources from women.
MacLear’s Board came up with a grandiose construction scheme that they said would cost $32 million or $24 million, depending on which day they said it. The things they proposed to build were a modern sky bridge over the building, a theatre dug out under the courtyard to be used by an outside theatre group (this represented the hugest chunk of the building scheme costs), a basement kiln (in a landmark building!), and apartments.
IN REALITY, all the building needed was some repairs. It could have been put into tip-top shape – even luxurious shape -- for about $1.5 million. At the time, there were actually NO building code violations. The building was very lovely and very livable.
The women living at the Club LOVED their shared housing and did not WANT apartments. They also did not want any of the other facilities. The Board leaders LIED, stating that the Club had low occupancy (it was FULL) and that this type of shared housing was not needed or wanted (IT WAS BELOVED.)
The REAL problem was that the Board was comprised of women who had never lived at the Club and did not value its mission. Many of them were rich wives who lived with their husbands in luxury homes in that area. They looked down upon these hard-working genuine women from all over the world, who were actually working in music, writing, theatre, film, dance, painting, etc.
The Board kicked out all the women in the arts, never to return!!!
The Three Arts Board thought it was somehow going to get all this excessive money from the City of Chicago Department of Housing and from donations. The Department of Housing funds low-income housing, not grandiose schemes. And donations? Who would donate to a group that was reneging on its mission?
The Board eventually sold the building and ran off with the money, to form a foundation that has nothing to do with the actual mission of the Three Arts Club.
The whole thing is shocking and shameful. Our group, the FRIENDS OF THE THREE ARTS CLUB ASSOCIATION, is calling for the building sale to be RESCINDED and for the Board and Executive Director to RESIGN, so that the building can continue on as a great place for women in the arts to live while in Chicago.
You can contact us at: THREEARTSFRIENDS@GMAIL.COM
Flag as inappropriate
charles steinberg at 11:10 AM on 3/23/2008
Time and again I have seen not-for-profit cultural, educational, charitable institutions etc. ruined because the board of directors gets to choose the board of directors in perpetuity and cliques emerge and take control with their own personal agenda. Now to make matters worse for the neighborhood, instead of selling to a residential developer, they sell for commercial use, zoning change and foist all kinds of problems and risks on the gold coast residential neighborhood. Fortunately, Natarus with his financial ties to developers and the NDA is no longer around. Don't underestimate the determination of Alderman Brendan to Reilly to protect the surrounding affected residents
Flag as inappropriate
L Cook at 2:27 PM on 3/23/2008
The sad truth is, there are a lot of prestige, power and money, involved in handing out grants, no matter how few nor how paltry. You get to be sought out, courted, idolized. You also get to pay yourself very handsomely out of the interest earned on the corpus, or principal, of the grant's funds for your work as fund adminstrator. You also get to pay your friends, whom you hire to keep the books, give you legal advice, etc. I guess that's more important to some people than nurturing generations of women artists and ... oh, yeah, fulfilling the original mission of the foundation. Can anyone else here see a conflict of interest?
Flag as inappropriate
JIM DEALL at 9:37 PM on 3/23/2008
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? THESE PEOPLE:
Board of Directors
Sharon Burge
Tricia Foley, Vice President
William Gerardi, MD, Treasurer
Beth Kies
Eric Marshall, Secretary
Robert Shannon, Vice President
Irene Siragusa Phelps
Phoebe C. Turner
Cynthia West, President
Staff
Mark Becker, Associate Director
Esther Grimm, Executive Director
Flag as inappropriate
Mary Ellen at 9:29 AM on 3/24/2008
This lack of responsibility and support towards female artists makes me very sad. Destruction of the building, and the mission of the 3 Arts Club, is nothing more than a victory for the wealthy and developers at the expense of the arts. This short-sighted, mindless disregard of the arts is really an assault on the general public, and the need for arts to be encouraged in our society. It just goes to show, you can't always trust "trustees" to do the right thing...
Flag as inappropriate
Carol Block at 2:08 PM on 3/24/2008
I miss the wonderful community of multi age, multi discipline women in the arts from all over the world. It is gone forever. Carol Block
Flag as inappropriate
Mandy Corrado-Gutwaks at 10:30 AM on 3/25/2008
My name is Mandy Corrado-Gutwaks and I was not only living at the Three Arts Club at the time of the closing, I was also a Resident Assistant. Thus, in the summer of 2003, I lost my job and home simultaneously - within 3 months of my graduation from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. On a personal level, I really cannot describe in words what kind of shock it was to become basically homeless and jobless immediately and unexpectedly upon my graduation from college. My career as an artist was struck a severe blow by this unforeseen event, and I dare to say that now, 5 years later, I am just finally recovering. To have this safe haven for women artists ripped away was a very cruel act to have to have endured.
The Three Arts Club was so amazing that it bordered on magical. Women artists throughout generations called this nurturing and supportive environment home. Walking through the halls, you could feel the presence of a creative force. One could often sit at their window listening to a classical pianist practicing on the grand piano downstairs. On any given night, you could go down to the dining hall and be in the company of fellow visual artists, filmmakers, musicians, dancers, writers, etc. etc. etc. As an artist, having this type of constant interaction with fellow artists is absolutely invaluable. The type of comradely and inspiration that was found within the walls of the Three Arts Club was, in my experience, unique to any place in the world, let alone Chicago. To say that our city suffered a loss at the closing of the Three Arts Club doors is definitely an understatement.
To have lived at the Three Arts Club is to have loved the Three Arts Club. Many former residents went on to have extremely successful careers and, as a way to pay back, several of these successful women tried for years to become a director, but the "runaway" board would not have it. They turned all former residents away, electing instead to have a board of directors full of people, most of whom rarely ever even stepped foot in the club, let alone having anyone on the board with any intimate knowledge of the amazing power of the place. Residents, who paid to live there, essentially the boards constituents, were given no voice whatsoever in any decisions regarding the club. Not only that, we were categorically lied to at the time of the closing. We were told that the doors would be shut for a short period of time (up to two years, if I recall correctly) for some renovation work that would cost a few million dollars. After we were evicted the story changed and the board suddenly had a plan to raise something like $12 million, for very extravagant plans. When that fell threw, they opted to keep the doors closed forever and sell the magical place that I called home.
The fact that the new board, and Esther Grimm, are touting their new plans as progress is sickening. They destroyed a uniquely rich cultural institution in favor of taking a pay out. The fact that the building that was designed and built, brick by brick, to serve as a home for women in the arts was sold and has been sitting as an empty shell for five years fills me with sorrow. Hearing yet another plan that involves completely stripping the building of it’s soul is heart wrenching.
How the Three Arts Club board, who’s job it is to uphold the mission can get away with such atrocities is beyond me. I wish there were some sort of checks and balances that would have prevented this in the first place, or some agency that could bring justice to this situation. I hope that this is not a lost cause and that the Three Arts Club can be restored to its purpose to be a home for women in the arts. If anyone out there that had any ideas of how to help, please contact the Friends of the Three Arts Club. I guess we’re looking for a miracle, so if you know of any miracle-makers, please let us know.
Thanks,
Mandy
Flag as inappropriate
M. Cooper at 4:49 PM on 3/25/2008
I cannot speak to all of the members of the board, but I know that one member in particular has very close ties to a local family whose dubious relationship between art and real estate is legendary in Chicago. It seems no wonder to me that this organization, and its board, suffered under her stewardship.
Flag as inappropriate
delphyne woods at 2:30 AM on 3/26/2008
It takes faith. Loss of the genuine Three Arts Club, devoted to supporting women in the arts, is appropriate to these dark times of exponentially expanding corporate greed. Although this singular battle may ultimately be lost, remember that it is upon creativity, in particular feminine creative powers, that corporate powers feed, our genius that they need. Yes, it seems cold comfort now, but the Three Arts Club will return.
Flag as inappropriate
Paloma Picasso at 10:12 AM on 3/26/2008
How obviously tragic. all i can write is that the developers should be profoundly concerned about Karmic return. 93 years of the feminist/female creative spirit circulates through the halls of 3AC to be used as the spirit sees fit. watch out!
Flag as inappropriate
neighbor at 3:50 PM on 3/26/2008
I used to live on the same block and would often chat with the young women who would hang out in front of the building. Many were art students, etc., who could not have afforded to study in the City if not receiving the benefit of affordable, safe and convenient housing. The Three Arts Club shamefully abandoned its mission.
Flag as inappropriate
Rich Chwedyk at 8:07 PM on 3/28/2008
One of the saddest aspects of this very sad story is that with the exception of "present company" and a few others (the Trib is playing catch-up now), the board must have figured they could get away with their scam because the local media would respond with a shrug, which is pretty much what they've done. It appears that at the other papers, until recently, no one thought to question the board's intentions, as if to say, "Hey, well, these folks all seem to be highly respectable muckety-mucks. What reason would THEY have to misrepresent themselves to us?" In this town, back in the day, that degree of naivite in a reporter would guarantee him or her permanent reassignment to loading paper into the teletype. No wonder no one wants to buy their tacky rags any more. Broadcast media, of course, wouldn't know the difference between a Three Arts Club and a golf club. No worries there for a pack of speculating jackals on the Three Arts Board.
I do appreciate that the Reader has stayed on this story for quite some time, as it escalated from fiasco to tragedy to catastrophe, and that the Friends of the Three Arts have not given up on this fight. A lot of folks in a lot of places have dropped the ball on this one and still they won't give up. Which proves, I guess, how successful the Three Arts Club was when it followed its mission.
Flag as inappropriate
SueBaskoIsCrazy at 3:09 PM on 3/31/2008
Wow. Seriously, Sue, please do some factual research before you go spouting things like "the building could have been put into luxurious condition for $1.5 million." There are so many ways the Three Arts Club building does not meet code, it's silly. And if you knew what you were talking about, you would realize that once you start a renovation project, it must incorporate all the changes necessary to meet code across the board. I've worked on multiple historical renovations in Chicago, for the City, for Chicago Public Schools, and on several renovations designed by Holabird & Root, the designer of the renovation the Three Arts Club initially had planned. Holabird over-designs everything to such an extent, it is not difficult to believe it went over budget. This notwithstanding, a typical major capital renovation of an historic building in this city, encompassing all aspects of the building ought to be expected to run around $300 per square foot, and even into the $350 per square foot zone. That building has got to be something like 60 or 70,000 square feet, so no, a full renovation in the $21 to $25 million range is not out of the question.
Honestly, if I were to bet on it, $1.5 million wouldn't cover the plumbing upgrade in that place, given the building's age and how many times the system is likely to have been bastardized over the years.
It doesn't seem likely that the board was dealing with anyone in the first place that could have told them that they were greatly overreaching on their design based on how much money they had, or that bothered to help them make their budget, and perhaps they did not attempt to redesign as many of you think they ought to have. The bottom line is the design was too expensive for the budget, and the decision became one of economics, which unfortunately for the misguidedly emotional such as yourself, appears to be beyond grasp, though it is unbearably simple. 1+1 cannot equal anything but 2.
And to rescind the sale of a building? Get serious. We're not dealing with broken ballpoint pens here. Good god you are nuts.
Flag as inappropriate
FriendsofThreeArtsIndeed at 5:28 PM on 3/31/2008
To all of the so-called "Friends of 3Arts": You want to look at who's to blame for this fiasco? Look in the mirror. The board was unable to raise the money required to renovate the building due in large part to your efforts and the slipshod "journalism" of this paper. It was you who created a phony controversy and scared away donors. As SueBascoIsCrazy put it, $1.5 million, or the $3 million you initially pulled out of thin air, to bring the building up to code can't even pass the laugh test. You couldn't do the plumbing for that amount. Apparently you were all happy to turn John Holibird's legacy into your personal fleabag flophouse for eternity. This would have been a valuable asset to the arts community in Chicago, providing arts education to people of all ages and economic backgrounds. Now it will become a playground for the over-rich. And you have no one but yourselves to blame.
Flag as inappropriate
Sue Basko (I must be crazy if maniacs say I am!) at 1:59 PM on 4/1/2008
The last two Comments show the kind of illogic we have been dealing with in this struggle – and I can name PRECISELY who wrote each one. Shall I? One is a vitriolic former Board member who should know better.
FIRST-- WHEN I HAVE said the building could have the needed repairs done for $1.5 million, I am referring to actual NEEDED repairs to keeping the place as a home for women in the arts, NOT the grandiose schemes to build an underground theater, apartments, etc. The $1.5 million number is based on ACTUAL ESTIMATES MADE by Holabird and updated for inflation. It is also based on an inspection done for our group by an architect experienced in historic renovation.
The $1.5 million repairs estimated is also based on a conversation I had with a principle at Cushman and Wakefield, the real estate firm that was marketing the Three Arts building. The Friends group was putting in a purchase offer on the property and I needed to make sure I was accurate in what repairs were needed. I was accurate and the estimate I have given was very reasonable at that time. I have no idea what further damages may have occurred since that time. I am also cognizant of the fact that the Three Arts Board sold off all the furniture and furnishings, and these would now need to be replaced. These are not included in the repairs estimate, but are a separate number.
The Three Arts Club building had NO recorded code violations and was quite livable. It could have been run as a home and club for women in the arts with $1.5 million in repairs and updates that would have made it very "luxurious" to the women in the arts living there. In fact, the Europeans living there thought it needed nothing at all.
What was actually NEEDED to keep the building running was this: Updated electricity in some areas of the building. Removal of a small amount of asbestos near the heater in the basement. Repair of some window sashes. Repair of one group bathroom. The "plumbing," in general, was just fine and of the excellent old quality and did not need to be replaced. The toilets flushed, the faucets and showers had excellent water pressure, the drains worked fine.
The Chicago Reader has done a FINE job in covering this story, and Deanna Isaacs is one of the finest journalistic writers ever. The Chicago Tribune has also done a great job written by various reporters. Felicia Dechter over at Skyline has covered it well, too. And so has Crain’s Chicago Business.
Flag as inappropriate
Jane Addams at 3:37 PM on 4/1/2008
"personal fleabag flophouse" ? ! ? !
Two Comment up calls the Three Arts Club a "personal fleabag flophouse" and considers herself a spokesperson for the place!
This was a residence for international women in theater, dance, painting, sculpture, film, writing, journalism, music, and other arts.
With Board members such as you, NO WONDER the place was killed off.
Flag as inappropriate
Donna Donaldson at 8:12 AM on 4/4/2008
Having had the priviledge of living at the Three Arts Club while attending the Art Institute of Chicago, I find the loss of this facility very sad. the Club provided intereaction between the various art diciplines. We met students from all over the place who came to study. The directors often gave us tickets to cultural events, which we would never have been able to afford. The students put on shows and the club sponsored dances that made attending school in the middle of a large city more like college. The rooms were spacious. I wish the dorm rooms my children had were as nice. Being able to live at the club greatly enriched my experience as I worked toward my BFA In Chicago.
Flag as inappropriate
Carrie at 4:03 PM on 4/4/2008
As a former resident of Three Arts this really makes me sad...
Flag as inappropriate
Shirley at 8:30 PM on 4/7/2008
As a former resident of "The Three Arts Club" while I was getting my Bachelor of Music Education degree I find this article very disturbing. This place was a "safe haven" for us girls who came from all parts of the United States as well as Europe and Canada. As a vocal music student I met wonderful people there and learned so much about living in a cultural world. Just living there was a wonderful experience/education in itself. Young women could benefit so much from this place. I sincerely hope it can be saved for future musicians, artists, drama students. It must be saved for future generations.
Flag as inappropriate
concernedchicagoan at 10:43 AM on 4/11/2008
This is indeed a sad story. It would make for a great movie. I hope the board and the organization will be held to some kind of responsibility.
Sadly, this is another case of women (artist) in particular being walked on.
Flag as inappropriate
A GREAT MOVIE at 12:58 AM on 4/13/2008
CONCERNED CHICAGOAN is right. This would make a great movie. The BEST ending will be if the current Board offers to rescind the sale, resigns, and allows the buildng to go into the hands of a Board LOYAL to the mission of running a home and club for women in the arts. THEN, there can be a rousing ending, a great music sequence, and applause in the audience!!!
Flag as inappropriate
Stacy at 2:27 PM on 6/19/2008
Here is another important aspect of the puzzle that has not yet been raised:
The President, Cynthia West, is part of the Podmajersky Inc. management duo alongside John Podmajersky. She "manages" the marketing dept., also known as "Chicago Arts District." They have many vacantcies within Pod buildings. Shutting down competitors assists the artist dependancy upon the Pod arts community.
Flag as inappropriate
laurel at 5:33 PM on 8/28/2008
have you ever heard of Pitt Rivers? have you ever requested a specimen from the drawer at the field museum, sat down studied and sketched, have you exhibited your art work to people in chicago and listened to comments and grown tremendously from the experience? have you ever listened to live jazz floating up the staircase to the fourth floor of the three arts club, and dreamed of exploring chicago? well,have you ever been a resident of the three arts club? Where Are YOU?? WHY are there not more comments here??
Add a comment