Chicago Reader [ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Pitchfork Music Festival - Union Park - July 17 - 19 ] [ Food & Drink - Openings and closings, deals and special events, and more - Sign up now ]

 

Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[ Chicago Reader FREE STUFF: ALEFEST Soldier Field July 11 ]

[ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Kathy Griffin - The Chicago Theatre - October 8 & 9 ]


submit to the windy citizen | Digg! Digg this | del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this | facebook Facebook

The Business

Brian Gubicza

A Great Place to Be From

New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl says Chicago is a “receptor city.”

November 29, 2007

New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl, in town last week to lecture at the Museum of Contemporary Art, didn’t waste any time putting us rubes in our place. “Chicago’s a great place to be from,” he said. “It’s a place that has always sent talented artists and creative types out—a net exporter of talent.” Schjeldahl, who considers himself a New Yorker but admits to being a refugee from small-town Minnesota (rube central, for what it’s worth), describes our little burg as a kind of bin by the lake. “It’s a great place to be, if you have a particular reason,” he said, “and a great place to visit. But I would call it one of the great receptor cities of the world.”

In the Schjeldahlian universe, Chicago is “a place where you can get a perspective on the rest of the world”—sort of like a beach in the Bahamas, and about as influential. New York, on the other hand, is one of very few “transmitter” cities. The transmitters, he said, are New York and LA, London and Berlin. Paris, where he headed as a college dropout in the 60s? “Not,” he said. “You go to Paris to be happy, which, as any creative person knows, is beside the point.” Chicago, as an art scene, is “receptor driven, collector driven,” Schjeldahl said. As if to prove both points, he added that he’d recently attended an 80th birthday party for Chicago collector Lew Manilow—at the Pegasus Room at Rockefeller Center.

Schjeldahl was supposed to be talking about the history of art over the last 40 years but confessed that he couldn’t get far from the starting gate, the momentous years of 1967-’68. The MCA’s founding in ’67 was part of a huge shift in how contemporary art figured in American culture, he said. It marked the end of modernism and the avant-garde as they’d been understood to that point, and of private galleries as the nerve centers of contemporary art. The founding of places like the MCA brought institutionalism, professionalism, and academicism to something that had been “wild and woolly,” while the prestige of specific art objects, like paintings, took a dive. Since then, the institutions have been more “consequential” than any of the art shown in them, and have, in fact, generated that art, giving artists an alternative to the commercial scene (which, in the late 60s, was “in such bad odor”) and spawning the likes of conceptualism and installation art. Art was created for the spaces available to show it; the public existed to be educated.

In recent years that institutional structure has been countered by “great heaps of money” in the commercial sector, which has gone off on its own track, giving rise to international art fairs that rival the institutional biennials. “Money’s desire is always simple: give me things to buy,” Schjeldahl observed. Ergo the decline of installation art and the return of paintings and sculptures. But there’s insanity in the market now, he added. The price of art, in the end, is only a reflection of the general psyche. “When [people] feel bad the market collapses. When they feel good the market soars.” There’s been “a wobble in the auctions” lately, he continued—the incredible prices of recent years “can’t go on.”

Schjeldahl, who calls himself an “accidental” critic, is also a published poet. He advised art students not to whine, but shared his problem at the New Yorker: “They have more critics than they have pages.” He also noted that the major product coming out of art schools now is artists’ statements, that art history is slide study, and that there are just two options for American artists—a career of selling or a career of setting up video installations in museums. He opined that Jeff Koons at his best is as good as there’s been in the last 20 years, that Damien Hirst is cynical and smart, and that dealer Leo Castelli was a good and honest man. A week earlier, at Archeworks, designer Bruce Mau called for an end to the tyranny of visual fashion, but Schjeldahl said fashion is a necessity: “Without it,” he observed, “everybody would need to know everything about everything all the time.” Here, in a receptor city, that could be especially tough.

Meanwhile in New York

And what of our little receptor-city theater companies, struggling for recognition in the Big Bad Apple? Writers’ Theatre, which opened its five-week off-Broadway run of Crime and Punishment to enthusiastic reviews just days before Broadway’s stagehands went on strike, is breaking box office records for the 99-seat house it’s playing, part of the theater complex 59E59. Executive director Kate Lipuma says the demand created by the strike can’t have hurt, but it’s hard to judge the impact—their shows were already near capacity before the strike was called.

The Hypocrites’ production of The 4th Graders Present an Unnamed Love-Suicide also opened at 59E59 (in a 45-seat house) just before the strike. Executive director Heather Clark says they can’t be sure about the strike’s impact either, but they saw a “definite spike in sales” after a positive review in the New York Times November 16. Their show closes December 2.

On the downside, on the night of its scheduled press opening last week, Steppenwolf’s August: Osage County, at the 1,400-seat Imperial Theatre, was still on ice. Cast members, who had to sign in at the theater each night to collect their Equity strike pay, were hanging in over the Thanksgiving holiday. Steppenwolf completed 13 preview performances before the walkout, and executive director David Hawkanson says 10,000 people had gone through the house, generating “great buzz.” Now the challenge is to keep the interest up. “There’s no question this will happen,” Hawkanson says. “It’s just a matter of when and what the cost will be when it’s finished.” Steppenwolf has announced a three-week extension that will keep the play in New York through March 9.

Steppenwolf lead Deanna Dunagan, whose previous New York experience was a single performance as an understudy in 1979, says there were rumors of a strike “from the day we walked into the theater.” Dunagan says she doesn’t think anyone in the show really wanted to come to Broadway, “but we wanted the play to be seen in New York, and we didn’t want other people to do it.” Now there’s talk of taking it to London.

Miscellany

Matt O’Brien, founder and former head of the Irish Repertory Theatre of Chicago, is taking over as executive director and producer at Arlington Heights’ Metropolis Performing Arts Centre. Now a city-subsidized nonprofit, Metropolis includes a professional theater season, music and dance programming, and a school. Last year it logged 400 performances and attendance of 75,000 on a budget of $2.5 million. . . . Former Chicagoan and Late Nite Catechism cocreator and star Maripat Donovan—still in court with cocreator Vicki Quade over the use of the Sister character—is in town for a two-performance one-night stand this Saturday, December 1, at the Center for Performing Arts at Governors State University. The show is her latest creation, Sister’s Christmas Catechism: The Mystery of the Magi’s Gold. . . . The state legislature was still wrangling over CTA money at press time, and the Illinois Arts Alliance was still asking for a supplemental appropriation that would restore the arts and arts education funding cut by Governor Blago for fiscal 2008. “It’s a long shot,” IAA executive director Ra Joy admitted earlier this week, not least because fiscal ’08 is already well under way. Joy and his group have been monitoring a roller coaster that began with flat arts funding in the governor’s budget last February, then took a giddy climb up with a boost from the General Assembly last summer. In August funding took a sharp drop in the governor’s veto budget, landing well below its starting point. In the end, Illinois Arts Council funding was cut from $20.6 million last year to $16.2 million for 2008, and funding for the state education board’s arts and foreign-language grant program, which had been $4 million in 2007, was eliminated. Up next for IAA: trying to get back what was lost, plus those midsummer increases or more, for fiscal ’09.

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

Paint by Numbers at 8:24 AM on 11/30/2007

I've never stepped foot in the MCA and haven't heard of any of these clowns.
I'm also from a very small town.
You have made me realize that I want nothing to do with the scene at all and that I will likely never go there. They are all too rich and too elite and too snobby for my tastes.

We call that "phony" where I'm from.

Flag as inappropriate

Wenalway at 9:36 AM on 11/30/2007

Yeesh. This is the second time this week I've come across someone panting about how great New York is. The Broadway strike must be weighing heavily on the minds of the Big Applers; they're out spreading propaganda.

Flag as inappropriate

sonds at 9:45 AM on 11/30/2007

Being a New England native, I understand the perception of Chicago as a receptor city, but it's also one of the most artist/people friendly cities I've encountered. Art can be created and displayed for art's sake, as well as for people's sake in Chicago, and it can be done on a working man's budget.

That's impressive.

Flag as inappropriate

Ferdy at 10:59 AM on 11/30/2007

As a Chicagoan, I suppose I'm supposed to take kneejerk offense to this characterization of Chicago as a "receptor city." I don't. I happen to agree with it. This city is the place to be if you're an architect, but Chicago has never treated its artists or writers particularly well. The great Nelson Algren received his first award, the National Book Award, in New York. He finally left Chicago and and died in Hoboken.

Flag as inappropriate

Minnesotan at 11:02 AM on 11/30/2007

We Minnesotans prefer the term "hicks," but "rube central" will have to suffice for the land of the Walker Art Center, Alec Soth, the Coen Brothers, and Prince.

Flag as inappropriate

tony fitzpatrick at 11:34 AM on 11/30/2007

Schjeldahl is not wrong.

Flag as inappropriate

tony fitzpatrick at 11:48 AM on 11/30/2007

Ferdy-- Algren died in Sag Harbor ,NY.

Flag as inappropriate

Chicago, We Really, Really Like You at 12:02 PM on 11/30/2007

I think the author of the article is seeing condescension where it quite possibly doesn't exist, and is quite possibly adding some of her own towards New York. Doesn't Schjeldahl just mean that great talent has come from Chicago and other places in the Midwest? It's inarguable: Fred Astaire, Johnny Carson, Willa Cather, T.S. Eliot, the list covers every field of endeavor, and is endless. I think he meant that many notable people from the Midwest have given a lot to our culture, and often the people who do are people who have left their home place. This is true everywhere; people generally leave a place to make a name for themselves. It is so common that when someone doesn't do it, it becomes part of their fame: look how everyone oohs and aahs about the fact that Warren Buffett still lives in Omaha. It's so rare that he's famous for it! In any case, please keep your Midwesterners coming; I'll take them over some of our natives any day: after all, our home-grown talent includes the likes of Donald Trump and Paris Hilton.
But here's the other thing: historically, New York has been the most powerful magnetic ever for people from all over this country and all over the world. It's just the way it is, and there are good reasons for it. Why do people here in our own country, in the great city of Chicago, hate us for that?

Flag as inappropriate

MarkMcD at 12:27 PM on 11/30/2007

Chicago produces nothing that the rest of the country "receives"?
Oprah
Springer

I'm less embarrassed by Springer now that Hollywood has foisted TMZ TV on us. And "Celebrity Justice."

Flag as inappropriate

so-called "Austin Mayor" at 1:03 PM on 11/30/2007

At the risk of exposing myself as a backwards-assed hick-billy, New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl's comments inspired the following thoughts:

1. Don't let the door hit ya where the dog shouldda bit ya.
2. "Mr. Schjeldah, how's your kid doin'?"
"Just named as a New Yorker art critic!"
"Really? I thought you had a boy..."
3. A-hole.

-- SCAM

Flag as inappropriate

Wesley Kimler at 4:45 PM on 11/30/2007

Deanna......what have I been telling you? Schjeldahl is dead on correct, as is Tony Fitz in concurring with him. Oh there is good art here -but you wouldnt know it. Its a perfect illustration -of how the scene here is regarded that Manilow celebrated his 80th birthday in NYC.....Lou and crowd have ghettoized the scene here.....basically supporting what art educators like Judith Kirchner told him to support. Which explains everything, why it is, that all you have to do is take one look at this crew of well scrubbed, harmless, lame ass suburbanite conceptual 101, NYC wannabees -Tasset, Ledgerwood, Gerber...to understand why Chicago has plummeted into mediocrity.....read sharkforum.org Mr. Schjeldhal -where we are attempting to have change.

Flag as inappropriate

Wesley Kimler at 12:55 AM on 12/1/2007

Let me further explain: the top collectors here by what is 'hot' in NYC...and most of the curators here -lacking originality, the huevos to create Chicago's own canon -defer instead to LA and NYC -the international consensus crowd -observe Dominic Molon's rock show as case in point-

as for here, people like Lou go to art educators like Kirchner for advice -and buy institutional product -often times through Rhona Hoffman Gallery Judith, Lou, Rhona, Howard and Donna Stone, Mr Curator Rondodo....shall I name more names? These
people run the scene here with great contempt for what is produced here, supporting only that which mimics what they perceive as like, what is happening elsewhere....which is why we get mediocre Larry Poons ripoffs being touted at the MCA as what is important here.....

Flag as inappropriate

Wesley Kimler at 2:23 AM on 12/1/2007

finally, what Schjeldahl is saying -dont take umbrage with it -HES RIGHT! Lets ACT UPON IT! QUESTION THE AUTHORITY of this small group of collectors/dealers/curators that have so FAILED the art world here. OFF WITH THEIR CONSENSORIAT conformist, HEADS!......metaphorically speaking -of course, said the grinning Shark-CHOMP!

Flag as inappropriate

william sachis at 2:40 PM on 12/2/2007


It's a fact -- Chicago is a great place to get a start, but it can't really support you if you want to progress in a creative career.

Flag as inappropriate

Dave Tainer at 12:18 AM on 12/3/2007

Hi, Wesley--you might remember me as one of the original doormen at Rainbo Club back in the Gavin days. Just wanted to say that you hit the nail on the head when you said "...small group". I am now a New Yorker, though not an artist, but I can see that the benefit of New York for artists is almost purely a demographic one: more art critics means that there is less likelihood that they all follow the same trends (and in fact actively look for new trends to be first!). New York, simply by having more people, but also because there are even more art critics, collectors, cognoscenti, and artists is what makes it such a vibrant scene and "place to be" for artists.

Not that I'm a "Collector", but it is nearly entirely Chicago art that graces our Manhattan apartment's walls. A fact the Wife and I always point out to our guests.

Although after they leave perhaps they talk about our "rube" art ;)

Flag as inappropriate

Kyle at 5:07 PM on 12/3/2007

What he's saying may be true of visual art, but not of the performing arts, as the recent spate of Chicago theatre tranferring to New York demonstrates. Conversely, apart from Broadway, New York shows can tour to just about anywhere in the country except Chicago--there's just too much being created locally for there to be a need to import.

Flag as inappropriate

jess at 8:00 PM on 12/3/2007

No one from NYC is ever as defensive about their "art-scene" as Chicagoians.

Flag as inappropriate

martine syms at 10:58 AM on 12/4/2007

I agree with Wesley. I'm from Los Angeles, and my biggest frustration with the Chicago scene is the desire to imitate what's "happening" in NY or LA. Most irritating is the fact that this behavior is largely informed by romantic ideas of these places. Let's not limit ourselves. There is no reason Chicago can't be a transmitter.

Flag as inappropriate

WILLPOWER at 7:21 AM on 12/5/2007

Chicago is a meat-packing town.
It was built on traintracks and steak.
We put up replicated form cows in our street (painted like trinkets with designs) and think it is high art. And worse, we stole the idea from Germany.
Worse yet, we pay the artists poorly and the whole idea came from politicians.

Bunch of hayseeds.

Lets stick to art and food fairs, Navy Pier rides and Blues festivals.

-born in Chicago

Flag as inappropriate

ARTLOVER at 8:21 AM on 12/5/2007

Oh come on now!
We have some really expensive art from other places. The Bean. the Picasso, The video Plenza (that looks like a NY Times Square sign).
OK, you're right.

I still like all those Lorado Taft sculptures, Georgia O'Keefes (exported artist), Gwendolyn Brooks poems, Saul Bellow novels, etc.

There is a little hope for us.

Flag as inappropriate

Carter at 10:42 AM on 12/5/2007

After watching the gentrification of Wicker Park, I suspect many Chicago artists are deliberately staying as far below the radar as possible - there is nothing more likely to make a "scene" extinct than to have it recognized as such in the first place.

Flag as inappropriate

ARTLOVER at 12:28 PM on 12/5/2007

How would recognition make your scene disappear? That sounds like you are simply a hider, not a better or more profound member of a more profound scene.

If the scene is profound and real, then recognition or negativity or news crits won't kill it.

Perhaps your're more into fashion?
That certainly is come and go.

Flag as inappropriate

Carter at 2:30 PM on 12/5/2007

You get priced out of the neighborhoods with buildings that allow you to create and to have colleagues in close vicinity.

Your use of the word "profound" three times in a single post suggests perhaps you confuse being recognized with being creative.

Flag as inappropriate

ARTLOVER at 2:58 PM on 12/5/2007

Hey wait a minute Mrs. Deep. Didn't you bring up the "recognition" thing?
Sorry if I'm killin your "scene".

Let me get this straight:
1) buildings are what allow you to create
2) cheap rent is what brings the most creative people together.

Both those things seem a bit questionable.

Balthus was a rich man
Cezanne was a banker
Van Gogh couldn't be around anyone
Giacometti lived in a mountain hideaway.
Bougereau hated visitors.
Gericault locked himself away when painting.

Sounds like you just like a good party.

Flag as inappropriate

Wesley Kimler at 3:36 PM on 12/5/2007

Kyle -excellent point! In fact I am thinking about writing a piece on this for sharkforum.org-and I assume you are referring to Steppenwolf's August Osage County -now taking Broadway by storm.......there is no reason this cannot be true with visual arts as well -we just need to fire all of the conformist mediocrities who run the art scene here with their noses up the ass of NYC-

Flag as inappropriate

DIFFERENT DRUM at 3:38 PM on 12/5/2007

Carter is confusing a social scene with an artistic one.
Art can be made anywhere and will be by true creative artists.
No "scene" necessary.

But there are some good parties when you have one. Personally I think the art quality can actually descend lower when there is a "scene".

Jackson Pollock painted best alone in a Vermont barn.

Flag as inappropriate

Wesley Kimler at 3:45 PM on 12/5/2007

Pollock did not paint in Vermont barn or no barn. He lived and worked for a time at Springs, Long Island, painting in a barn -in an area where all of the artists of his crowd congregated. Most great art comes out of 'scenes' -cities where culture gathers -where there is an exchange of ideas and, competition.

Flag as inappropriate

DIFFERENT DRUM at 10:48 PM on 12/5/2007

My heavens you are right.
It was Jim Dine, the internationally known painter, sculptor and printmaker I was thinking of (he lived there in Vermont on a farm)...or was it Leonard Baskin....

Artists are everywhere.
The "scene" is for the comfortable.
Most great art does not come out of a "scene". It comes out of an artist.

Mostly mediocre and annoying culture clubbers come out of the "scene".

Flag as inappropriate

Jess at 1:02 AM on 12/6/2007

Being an artist implies perception on some level (depending on your medium). So does being a critic. Would it be safe to say there is a higher concentration of these individuals living in NYC - a city where art is more prevalent and ingrained in the culture (for better or worse)? Of course.

Flag as inappropriate

Ian Edwards at 1:46 AM on 12/7/2007

Hmmmmm, it's somewhat disheartening to read a lot of these comments.

As a very young (I'm 22 y/o) Chicago-native who will be getting out of the military in less than a few months to return to Chicago to attend The Art Institue to pursue a career in fashion design, I have very high (perhaps even idealistic) expectations of a thriving and supportive art/design community. It seems as if some people here, aside from agreeing with what Mr. Schjeldahl is saying (which is perfectly alright, of course), would rather PREFER it if Chicago were nothing more than a "rube" (a word I shudder to apply to one of the cities around the world that I love - perhaps I'm biased) city. If one (or several, as the case may be) were to help further the city's artistic/creative endeavors and help to spawn and nurture new talent and encourage young hopefuls (myself included), maybe we can lift the Great City of Chicago to the heights of the lofty, artistic pedastal that New York has enjoyed for so long. I love New York to death, to be sure, but everyone is already there trying to do the same thing. Why not strive to add another fab city to the list of fashion/art capitals of the world?

Flag as inappropriate

Erik at 6:14 PM on 12/7/2007

Ian:
I'm a Chicago artist twice your age.
I've created over 60 public art sculpture projects in 14 states in the past 17 years. I've never lived anywhere but here but I'm moving away soon to join another City due to an offer. When I was in school 2o years ago I lived overseas for a time and out east learning under another artist.
My assistant just returned from his second duty in Iraq and is in a similar position as you...wanting to be an "artist". My only suggestion would be to be yourself. Don't let things you read or things you hear deter you. Chicago is a great place and there indeed is a thriving artistic and design community. Supportive? Not too sure about that. Competitive? yes.
Nobody is going to rock back and forth with you singing KOOMBAYAH!
You will have to do it all yourself.

The important thing is to have a few artistic friends who are close to you and who's opinion you trust. Everyone else can go to hell including self important journalists who have never lifted a pencil or paintbrush in their lives.

When I was your age I worked three jobs and taught art two nights a week on top of it all. My studio was tiny and rats joined me from time to time. Through slow incremental changes and "breaks" in my career I climbed into better digs and neighborhoods and I have little patience for those who don't understand what it takes to get somewhere.

You can show me any "scene" in the world and the stellar performer will be the one working their ass off and working hard to support themselves.
That's the magic to it all.
Not New York.

You can go there later.

Flag as inappropriate

Ian Edwardss at 2:02 AM on 12/8/2007

Erik,

Thank you so very much for the words. I really appreciate them.

To be sure, I don't want anyone to hand me anything, or to (to use your words - I got a chuckle out of it) "sing KOOMBAYAH!" with me. That's why I joined the military. It wasn't an easy thing to have to break myself away from my friends and family at the age of 17 when I came in, but I did it. Nor was it especially easy to have gone thru very rigorous, intensive training (I'm an airborne linguist - I didn't know what the job was when I initially agreed to it) for four years that I didn't want to have to deal with. But I did it to reach a goal. And I'm less than a few months away from starting the process. Although I know that that won't be a piece of cake, either. But my point in all of that, is that I truly understand the hard work and dedication that goes behind any artistic endeavor. I'm more than willing to put in the work, the long hours, the grind, the sometimes sleepless nights, the deadlines, networking, etc...

Anyway, again, I really appreciate your words. And I will definitely continue to reach my goal.

Good luck in all of your future endeavors. I surely look forward to seeing your work, and I have no doubt that I'll probaby be studying it while I'm in school. :)

New York is definitely in my plans, but I want to plant my roots in Chicago first. I'll be that stellar performer you speak of.

New York? I can go there later. ;)

Flag as inappropriate

Mark Staff Brandl at 2:17 PM on 12/9/2007

Peter Schjeldahl is right --- but not because of the ARTISTS. Chi-Artists are doing great. Whether at home or elsewhere. This "receptor state" is because of the rest of the Malinchismo-obsessed scene. It was created in the 1980s. I saw it happen. You make yourself provincial by always squinting to see and copy elswhere rather than looking at yourself and those around you. That is why London is doing great and Paris is terrible right now for artists.

I moved out of Chicago and moved to Europe because of that clique of ignorance which Wesley describes.

I paint in an ex-barn, by the way, near Zurich and Germany and Austria. So barns aren't all bad, and not all are far from "scenes" or Big Cities.

And you stole your stupid cows fom Switzerland, I am ashamed to admit, not Germany. We had them first, as well as stupid bears, etc. etc., etc.

Taking Peter Schjeldahl's remarks as real description and a challenge, come on over to Sharkforum and help us change the perception of the great creative oasis that Chicago really is.

Flag as inappropriate

Moo at 8:46 PM on 12/9/2007

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)



From the Reader blogs

Chicagoland Whet Moser: The FDIC closed down five Illinois banks today.
Thursday at 5:31 pm

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.