Paint It Black
Lowell Thompson fought racism in the ad industry. Now he’s targeting the wine-and-cheese scene.
By Deanna Isaacs
November 10, 2006
Lowell Thompson Lectures
When Fridays through 11/24, 3 PM
Where Open Studio, 179 N. State
Info 312-744-6630, cityofchicago.org/ culturalaffairs
THE LAST TIME the Reader heard
from adman turned artist Lowell
Thompson, he was getting ready
to take on segregation in the city’s
museums and galleries. He planned to
stand in front of the Art Institute in a
sandwich board and offer to unveil his
own work to passersby. At 8 AM on a
bitterly cold February day he gave it a
try, donning his signature black eye
patch and a sign that read TO SEE SOME
ART, JUST ASK. The response was icy:
tourists, willing to pay $12 to cruise the
Art Institute’s collection, gave him the
cold shoulder, and locals bent on getting
to work were unstoppable. It was a
learning experience, he says.
This week Thompson was prepping
to show his paintings of life on the
streets of Chicago in a more conducive
setting—the city’s Open Studio space in
the Page Brothers Building at the corner
of State and Lake.
This new gig also required some
hustle. Thompson had noticed city art
honcho Nathan Mason frequenting a
Starbucks in Uptown and began speaking
to him there. “I told him, ‘I’m an
artist: I’d like a crack at that Loop studio,’” Thompson says. “I didn’t think he
took it seriously.” But when Thompson
scored an exhibit at the Bezazian
Library in September, Mason showed
up to hear him talk about it, and soon
after that offered him one of the Loop
space’s monthly
residencies. Mason says he’s
been filling the
slots on an ad hoc
basis because the
city’s selling the
1872 landmark
building. (A planning
department
spokesperson says
final negotiations
are under way
with Marc Realty;
the city will soon
offer less-visible
artist residencies
in the pedway beneath the Chicago
Cultural Center.) He remembered
Thompson speaking up at a meeting
about the city-run Chicago Artists
Resource Web site and says he thought
he would do a good job of engaging the
public in the Open Studio.
Mason got that right: speaking out
is a Thompson specialty, a habit he says
cost him a very nice career in advertising.
After growing up in the Robert
Taylor Homes, scraping by in high
school, and throwing away an SAIC
scholarship after a few months, he landed
a starter job at advertising giant
Foote, Cone & Belding. Thompson says
he owes that break to the civil rights
movement: Martin Luther King Jr. had
been killed three months earlier and
corporate America was scrambling for
some diversity in its ranks. Between
1968 and 1980 Thompson moved rapidly
up the ladder, with jobs at six major
white-run firms before he wound up as
a vice president at Burrell, then the
country’s largest black-owned communications
company. He left that position
a year later, chafing at assignments
exclusively aimed at black audiences
and tired of working for others, and
became a freelance art director. During
the 80s he says he averaged $75,000 a
year working half-time and shared a Clio (the industry’s highest honor) for a Bulls television ad campaign.
But by the 90s it seemed to
Thompson that the ad industry was
regressing. Even as a freelancer he was
pigeonholed, and the mainstream work
went to agencies that looked whiter
than ever. He researched the creative
departments of the 25 largest ad agencies
and determined that out of a workforce
of more than 6,500, less than 1
percent—about 60 people—were black.
He says he shared this information
with an editor at Advertising Age,
which published a cover story based on
it, scooping Thompson himself, whose
12-page story, “The Invisible Man in
the Gray Flannel Suit,” was published
in the graphics-industry journal Print
in ’93. According to Thompson, those
two pieces, along with the flurry of coverage
that followed, finished off most of
what was left of his advertising career.
Thompson then turned his energies
to Partnership Against Racism, a nonprofit
he founded in ’93 and ran with
Derek Simons, a white Catholic priest
who also joined Thompson as cohost of
the award-winning Sunday morning
radio program The Race Question on
WLIT FM. The organization, which
aimed to conquer racism (through
advertising and other media) by the
year 2000, lasted about five years;
Thompson, who admits paperwork is
not his strength, says it got to the point
where “to blow it out and make it much
bigger, I would have to become more of
a bureaucrat.” He chose to let it fold.
Around this time Thompson
became active in the white studies
movement. In ’95 he self-published
Whitefolks: Seeing America Through
Black Eyes, which included a study of
the racist writings of Thomas
Jefferson and pronounced hypocrisy the central American trait. He sold
hardcover copies at $50 each to
finance a paperback run of several
thousand, and says he plans to reissue
but needs a bunch of money up front
to make it happen. (He also published
a cartoon follow-up, The Whitefolks
Funny? Book.)
The quest for cash inspired
Thompson’s rebirth as a fine artist six
years ago. He attended a show of “not
bad” work by another artist and
watched it get snapped up; when the
artist confided, “I gotta go back to the
hotel tonight and do some more pictures,”
Thompson says he told himself,
“I gotta look into this.” He hit on capturing
Chicago (“the way Hopper captured
urban America”) using photographs
or video to preserve a moment,
then painting the image freehand in
acrylic on sand resin. (The work he’s
showing at the Open Studio is priced
at $75 to $5,000.) Thompson says
there’s a developing black middle-class
market that didn’t exist when he was a
youngster, with new galleries and a
social life built around private home
shows and collecting. But he claims
the Chicago art scene is as segregated
as the ad industry and wants to do
something about it. “Compared to
what other people have gone through,
I’ve led a charmed life,” he says, “but
deep down inside I feel like I haven’t
done anything important. I know I
can’t change the world, but I can help
make stuff happen. I plan to integrate
the fine-art world the way Dr. King
and his people did the society at large
in the 1950s and ’60s.
“The fine-art world is like Selma in
a snowstorm right now: it’s that white,
and it’s oblivious,” he says. “If I did a
survey of downtown and north-side
galleries and museums, I bet I would
find a lower percentage of African-Americans—in terms of numbers,
money, influence—than what I found
in the ad agencies. And the fact that
nobody’s saying anything is embarrassing.
Kerry James Marshall? It’s like in
the 50s saying, ‘Hey, there’s Nat King
Cole.’ It would be a great thing for
Chicago to be the leader in this, to be
the most all-American art city, but
nobody’s interested. Every time I talk
about it people start looking the other
way. The black people are scared to talk
about it; the whites don’t want to hear
it. I may be wrong, but at least there
should be a discussion.”  Send a letter to the editor.
|
Flag as inappropriate
Stan OBA3 Smith at 2:02 PM on 3/24/2009
I think that a certain type of master over slave mentality is alive and well in Chicago. I have seen where credit has not been given to oppressed people for being anything other than subordinate. The highlights of our artistic achievements are only recognized by the mainstream when they have become commercial or will benefit some other group interest. We are not celebrated in mainstream media not because we are not excellent, but because we are expecting someone else to recognize our achievements. We do not have to be validated or defined by the so called mainstream. If we accept our own and support our own we will be fine.
Add a comment