Chicago Reader [Chicago Reader: Best of Chicago -- VOTE NOW!] [THE WELL - Click here for drink specials]

 

Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[Chicago Reader: Best of Chicago -- VOTE NOW!]

[THE WELL - Click here for drink specials]




Digg! Digg this | Post to del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this to a friend

Spring Books Special 2007

A Little Secret About The Secret

The best-selling self-help book Oprah’s thrown her muscle behind appears to contain at least one fabrication.

By Julia Rickert
June 1, 2007

“I BELIEVE THAT the truth matters,” Oprah Winfrey assured her viewers last year following her on-air confrontation with author James Frey. By then the Smoking Gun had revealed that Frey’s best-selling “memoir,” A Million Little Pieces, which Oprah’s book club had promoted, was partially concocted, and Oprah was pissed. “I feel that you conned us all,” she admonished him during a stern and thorough grilling. Her indignation had been slow to develop, but once it had (following public outcry) it wasn’t reserved for Frey alone. Nan Talese, who had published A Million Little Pieces under her Doubleday imprint, also came in for a share. “As the consumer, the reader, I am trusting you,” Oprah lectured. Eventually, the publisher would settle a class action lawsuit by offering refunds to the book’s “defrauded” purchasers.

Oprah may trust Doubleday, but she’s also well aware that masses of consumers trust Oprah—implicitly. No doubt the talk-show Midas would like to keep it that way. For this reason one might assume that she has been especially careful, post-Frey, in anointing pet authors. But her recent and intense promotion of Rhonda Byrne’s mystical self-help book, The Secret, strongly suggests that Oprah didn’t learn much from her experience with Frey.

The Secret and Oprah’s role in its wild popularity—she’s devoted two entire shows to it and there’s a 15-page feature on it at oprah.com—have already attracted censure: many reviewers have poked holes in the book’s profoundly flawed central premise that our thoughts determine every circumstance of our lives, as well as its promotion of selfishness and self-delusion. But illogic and irresponsibility are not the extent of The Secret’s faults. While many of the quotations Byrne uses to prop up her philosophy are shockingly divorced from their context, one has entirely eluded an extensive search for its origin: “The secret is the answer to all that has been, all that is, and all that will ever be,” attributed to Ralph Waldo Emerson on page 183.

A Little Secret About The Secret The best-selling self-help book Oprah’s thrown her muscle behind appears to contain at least one fabrication.
By Julia Rickert

One Man's Niche Is Another Man's Treasure The improbable success of Chicago Review Press, Inc.
By Scott Eden

Fighting Second City Syndrome One Blog Entry at a Time Literago gets a hungry welcome from a scene primed for validation.
By Martha Bayne

The Stylist's Stylist Meet the anonymous editor who plays Miss Manners to the blue-pencil set.
By Anne Ford

Their Job Is Murder Kevin Davis takes a book-length look at the homicide specialists in the Cook County Public Defender's Office.
By Harold Henderson

Plus: brief reviews of 21 new books by Nathan Englander, Michael Chabon, Miranda July, J.R.R. Tolkien, and more

To be clear, what I’ve come to suspect—strongly—is that Rhonda Byrne may have made it up.

So what? you may be asking. The question came up a lot in discussions of Frey’s dishonesty, and back then the only answer with any weight was that we value truth for truth’s sake. Many readers were inspired by what they believed to be a true story, but it’s hard to show that Frey’s lies did any real damage. But The Secret has potential to cause tangible harm to both believers and bystanders.

For those who haven’t read The Secret (or seen the film version) here’s the eponymous “secret” at its core: envisioning what we desire (or don’t desire) will give us just that. “Whatever you choose to think will become your life experience,” Byrne writes. Don’t bother looking for a figurative meaning here—she means what she says literally. “As you focus on what you want, you are changing the vibrations of the atoms of that thing, and you are causing it to vibrate to You.” Byrne labels this the “law of attraction,” which she describes as a “law of nature” that works on the principle of like attracts like: you think about a car, you get a car; you think about a disease, you get a disease. That The Secret’s premise is a fantasy is undeniable: if it were true, there would be no hypochondriacs, no one suffering from delusions of grandeur—no mental illness at all.

Despite such absurdities, the sparkling promises Byrne makes—combined perhaps with a reader’s fear of life’s uncertainties—have made her book attractive to many. “Do you want to believe that you can be in the wrong place at the wrong time? . . . Or do you want to believe and know that your life experience is in your hands and that only good can come into your life because that is the way you think?” she asks.

She guarantees her readers wealth, love, health—even eternal youth—all with little to no effort. Her book abounds with anecdotal accounts of the successful application of her method: how she willed herself to no longer need glasses, for instance, or how a ten-year-old won Disney World VIP passes for his family simply by saying to himself before bed the previous night, “I’d love to go on all the big rides and never have to wait in line.” Then there’s the guy who visualizes and then gets great parking spaces 95 percent of the time (the other 5 percent he waits “just a minute or two”) and, memorably, the young man who, for practice, envisions a unique and unmistakable feather—two days later, it lands at his feet on a street in New York City.

Byrne also claims that years of arduous study can be replaced by simple desire. “I never studied science or physics at school, and yet when I read complex books on quantum physics I understood them perfectly because I wanted to understand them. The study of quantum physics helped me to have a deeper understanding of the Secret, on an energetic level,” she writes. So why even pick up a book, then? Why doesn’t she simply will herself to understand quantum physics without reading at all?

This stuff probably sounds more silly than dangerous, but consider her health claims: “You cannot ‘catch’ anything unless you think you can, and thinking you can is inviting it with your thought,” she writes. Of course in reality the reverse is often true, as the case of Magic Johnson, diagnosed with HIV in 1991, illustrates. “I thought I was invincible,” he explained in a 2004 interview with CNN.

If you have managed, one way or another, to become seriously ill, Byrne has more good news for you: medical intervention is unnecessary to become well again. She tells the story of a woman who claims to have cured her own breast cancer without chemo or radiation; instead she simply watched funny movies. Then there’s Byrne’s rather cruel prescription for weight loss: “If you see people who are overweight, do not observe them,” she recommends, because “food is not responsible for putting on weight”—it’s “thinking fat thoughts” that does it. Lucky for Oprah the Secret remained hidden until after she slimmed down, or she might not have gained such a wide audience.

Disregard for others, justified by this extreme interpretation of individual responsibility, is the attitude Byrne endorses. Don’t listen to sick people talk about their illnesses, she warns, lest you get sick yourself. Don’t harbor any misgivings about acquiring masses of wealth (and this may go a long way toward explaining Oprah’s interest), because, according to Byrne, Jesus was a millionaire. Poverty is something that happens to people who don’t spend their days repeating Byrne’s mantra: “I love money and money loves me.”

Her insistence that individuals are solely responsible for the bad things that happen to them is arguably the nastiest part of The Secret, but she doesn’t ignore the likelihood that readers may object to the idea that there are no victims. “Often when people first hear this part of the Secret they recall events in history where masses of lives were lost, and they find it incomprehensible that so many people could have attracted themselves to the event,” she writes. “It doesn’t necessarily mean they thought of that exact event, but the frequency of their thoughts matched the frequency of the event.” She doesn’t bother to explain the plight of those who are born into poverty, abuse, or with congenital defects. Extreme negativity in utero, perhaps?

There’s only one way for a reader of The Secret to avoid such questions and concerns, and Byrne provides it: “The moment a thought of doubt comes, release it immediately.” To assist in this mind-numbing process, Byrne defers to many well-known people by claiming they knew the Secret before her: Shakespeare, Newton, Socrates, Galileo, Beethoven, Churchill, Einstein, Mother Teresa, and Emerson are but a few. If Byrne’s intended audience is likely to have heard of you and to respect you—and if you are dead and thus unable to object—you could make the cut. (Forget that Churchill was notoriously depressed, and don’t bother asking why Mother Teresa didn’t share the Secret with all those children who were thinking starvation upon themselves.)

Byrne quotes many of them to bolster her claim that our thoughts control our experiences, and the author’s intended meaning does not concern her. “You create your own universe as you go along,” a line from Winston Churchill’s My Early Life, exemplifies this. True, it sounds very Oprah, but it is something Churchill wrote not as a description of his own beliefs but as one example of the “absurd propositions” of metaphysicians. He believed exactly the opposite of what Byrne would have you think. Says Churchill, three lines later, “These amusing mental acrobatics are all right to play with. They are perfectly harmless and perfectly useless. I warn my younger readers only to treat them as a game.”

When I began looking for the original source of the Emerson line about “the secret” being the answer to everything, I expected to discover it as easily as I had tracked down the Churchill. But Google merely turned up Web sites that had culled the quote from Byrne’s book, and as within The Secret itself, these sites gave no indication of the quote’s source beyond attributing it to Emerson. When I searched electronic versions of Emerson’s complete works for every appearance of secret, I discovered nothing even remotely suggestive of the line Byrne credits to him.

At this point I sought the expertise of a professional, a librarian from the Andover-Harvard Theological Library at the Harvard Divinity School, Emerson’s alma mater, who asked not to be named. Her extensive search through Emerson’s works for references to secret covered multiple collections of his complete works, stand-alone editions of his essays and poems, collections of his letters, journals, poetry notebooks, and miscellaneous other notebooks as well as several volumes of criticism.

She was unable to attribute the quote to Emerson.

Thinking that the book’s publisher would have authenticated the line before going to print and would therefore be able to direct me to its source, I contacted Simon & Schuster, whose subsidiary, Atria Books, published The Secret. The publicity department graciously thanked me for bringing the matter to their attention, then referred me to legal. The attorney to whom I was directed denied any responsibility in the matter for the publisher, but agreed to forward an e-mail inquiry to Rhonda Byrne. I haven’t heard back from Byrne, or from Oprah, to whom I sent a similar query.

It’s difficult and perhaps impossible to prove that a line was never written by a particular author, especially if the author in question was as prolific as Emerson. The possibility remains that I’ve overlooked something or that Rhonda Byrne is in possession of an unpublished Emerson manuscript or letter. What shouldn’t be difficult is for Byrne to demonstrate the quotation’s legitimacy. So, I think she should. In fact, she should provide a list of the sources of all the quotations she uses. Why wouldn’t she want her readers to learn more from those she claims have mastered the Secret? And if Oprah values the truth so much, she should be asking the same question.

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

Linda at 1:53 PM on 7/28/2007

I have also searched for the Emerson quote, with no luck. Since my father gifted me with an antique book of his writings and essas I was very much interested in that particular quote. It does seem to me that I heard a similar quote prior to 'The Secret' but do not know the source.

Flag as inappropriate

JoeBobWillyBilly at 1:53 PM on 10/24/2007

I Read "The Secret" and thought it was a great, truthful book. It has truly helped me with my life. I believe everything written in it. I climbed up to the top of a high bridge and said to myself " If I jump I won't die for I don't believe that I will die." Well, I jumped and now I'm dead...writing to you from the grave. I guess the book won't save you from physics, centuries of scientific research and gravity though.

Flag as inappropriate

JoDee at 10:39 PM on 1/27/2008

Holy Christmas. If you get this worked up over a freakin misquote, or egads, perhaps she actually MADE THE QUOTE UP, I can only imagine the energy you might expend over some serious infraction. I say we bring her before a tribunal, convict her and burn her at the stake. Do you honestly lay in bed at night thinking you're doing the world a service by writing about crap like this? You really must have dreamed big as a kid.

Flag as inappropriate

Diego Aranha at 2:25 AM on 1/28/2008

Congratulations. You are doing a service to humanity exposing these kind of mumbo-jumbo pseudoscientific jokes.

Humanity is in heavily need of qualified education. The rate in which this kind of books are becoming more frequent is scary.

Flag as inappropriate

John regan at 11:59 AM on 3/18/2008

If you are sick enough and with a hidden personal agenda any fool can find fault with anything. you would be far better off looking for a job which does not expect you to write anything clever, as you are definitely not capable.The application of the secret in peoples lives is a personal thing. who are you to tell them how to think?

Flag as inappropriate

Cynthia at 1:05 PM on 4/10/2008

I have been practicing metaphysics for over 10 years and I attribute the law of attraction as the reason why I got into NYU Grad film School (top film school in the nation), got a job writing and directing commercials for Congressional Democrats (7 out 8 who won their seats in 2000), how I landed a job as Quentin Tarantino's assistant on Kill Bill, how I manifested $80,000 in a single phone call, how I attracted the love of my life (and how he attracted me - we both made lists) how I continue to attract incredible miracles and adventures on a daily basis. The only fault with The Secret is it is just giving you the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure you'll find plenty of metaphysical information coming out now that will show you how to "work it". In practice, the reason why hypochondriacs don't attract everything they think about has to do with 2 things, 1.that everyone's predominant vibration is well-being #2 that attraction has to do with how much desire and believe that the event can occur (not just the thought). You have 25000-50000 thoughts a day and studies in psychology have shown that 80% of them are negative. The reason why people don't tear themselves apart is because of the predominance of well-being that people are already...

The Secret is super simplified. . .if you want more information check out the work of Abraham-Hicks.com

Flag as inappropriate

jonn22 at 9:44 AM on 4/15/2008

good work

Flag as inappropriate

Mike S at 4:30 AM on 4/18/2008

This article makes a very good argument against the simplified view of the world put forward by The Secret and by many other books.

Positive thinking will certainly make your life better, and the richest people on this planet still need to think positively to enjoy life, but your fate is not determined by the way you think. For instance, to get richer other people have to get poorer relative to you, and you have to be in a circumstance in which getting richer is possible. For those people struggling to survive day-to-day that isn't exactly possible.

Flag as inappropriate

J Neill at 9:46 PM on 4/25/2008

Thank you for writing a well researched article. There are good parts to the book, but one little lie begets another.
The people reading the Secret are obviously searching for the true God. My prayer is that they will find Him. Thanks for writing this article.

Flag as inappropriate

DW at 1:17 PM on 4/29/2008

Excellent Point! I do believe in the merits of positive and forward thinking. Just like the Bible with the 10 Commandments, Buddha with The Universal Mind, and Hinduism with Karma, The Secret is a great message which will indeed help people through life. However, ignorance is not always bliss! Philosophy is just that. People NEED to analyze and think - and I believe your point wasn't to rip apart a good idea but instead to show the hypocrisy of Oprah and to raise a red flag to HER ever-growing religion and masses of sheep! She, much like The Secret, occasionally needs to be knocked off her pedestal/soapbox in hopes the blind masses will open an eye. Sure, continue using what works for you but consider there may be flaws because we all want to strive for some sort of perfection and to do this we need to keep learning - not from one person or religion, but from many. Maybe ONE day we will find the answer this way. It's disconcerting when anything or anyone takes a lead and we have everyone fanatically buying into it - whether it be wonderful or not! Take time and consider all sides - chances are it won't be perfect! Just a sidenote, almost ironic that JoDee seems to be defending The Secret here but is obviously NOT a positive thinker. Strange how she shoots Julia down for making an in-depth argument... perhaps with the material she reads she's not used to anything researched or in-depth. OUCH! I may not be all that postive thinking either! Serenity NOW!

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)



From the Reader blogs

Chicagoland Whet Moser: God save the Mayor, God save your mad parade.
Thursday at 12:46 pm

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.