Chicago Reader [ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Pitchfork Music Festival - Union Park - July 17 - 19 ] [ Food & Drink - Openings and closings, deals and special events, and more - Sign up now ]

 

Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[ Chicago Reader FREE STUFF: ALEFEST Soldier Field July 11 ]

[ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Kathy Griffin - The Chicago Theatre - October 8 & 9 ]


submit to the windy citizen | Digg! Digg this | del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this | facebook Facebook

Sharp Darts

Past Music Columns

Wayne Marshall

Clay Ward

Watch My Meme

How the Web is changing black youth culture, and vice versa.

October 16, 2008

A couple weeks ago a message popped up on my Twitter account from someone who’d heard my name dropped during a talk at Harvard on black youth culture and Web 2.0. The speaker was Wayne Marshall, a writer, DJ, ethnomusicologist, and probably the only person on staff at Brandeis University who’s been written up by the Fader. Turns out we share an addiction to YouTube footwork videos and DJ Nate, and a comment I made on Sasha Frere-Jones’s blog about the bedroom-production juke wunderkind landed me in Marshall’s presentation. I looked him up and we bonded via e-mail; then I asked him to get a little formal and tell me about what he shared with the scholars that day.

Can you give me the broad view on black youth culture and Web 2.0? What sites have had the biggest impact on black youth culture? Or given that 2.0 is driven by user-generated content, which sites have been the most impacted by black youth culture?

I should stress first of all that I’m something of an armchair observer. There have been times in my life—when I was a high school teacher (or, better, a high school student!) or when I was actively doing beat-making workshops at urban community centers—that I’ve been a lot more directly in touch with black youth culture. These days my exposure is what I’m seeing and hearing on the corner or more often on my laptop.

Recently in Sharp Darts:

They Like That Old-Time Rock 'n' Roll Catfish Haven moves past indie rock to 1978.

Metal Shop Seventh Rule releases punishing music in beautiful packages.

Chill the Funk Out The latest from Shape Shoppe: Chandeliers' The Thrush

When I think of black youth and Web 2.0, I think of creativity. The sites that come to mind are perhaps the obvious ones: YouTube, MySpace, imeem. These are places where the ability to upload, share, and comment on content has fostered a great deal of visible and audible (and shareable) activity—and that’s true across the board, not just for young people of color. But for me—and perhaps this says as much about my own interests as anything—the examples that often best illustrate the vibrancy of digital youth culture are being generated by black kids. The remarkable efflorescence of regional African-American dance scenes, which were of course rooted in nondigital culture, is perhaps most striking. You can go to any of these Web sites and browse your way through hours of DIY, P2P, distinctively local (yet recognizably familiar) music/culture: Chicago juke, Detroit jit, Memphis buckin, Harlem’s “Chicken Noodle Soup,” Philly’s Wu-tang, not to mention stuff like Soulja Boy’s viral video dance routines or the countless and/or nameless routines of dancehall reggae (in Jamaica and the diaspora).

For a number of socioeconomic reasons, young African-Americans came sort of late to the Internet game but then seemed to come online almost en masse. Can you tell me more about that?

I’m afraid that the data remains to be col­lected to really give a sense of what people used to call the “digital divide” and now tend to refer to as the “participation gap.” Basic access to computers and the Internet is no longer so rare in (urban) America, though the quality and time of that access and the levels of literacy one brings to that is another question. So far studies haven’t shown race to be as much of a factor in the participation gap as parental schooling, though obviously something like parental schooling also cor­relates to race. The Pew Internet & American Life Project last published a study of African-Americans and the Internet in 2000. A whole lot has changed since then and a whole generation has come online via the tools of Web 2.0. At any rate, it seems remarkable—as in other realms of U.S. culture—what a conspicuous presence and outsize influence black youth have in the digital realm.

Sites like YouTube have exposed an exponentially greater number of people to hyper­local black music scenes like juke and Baltimore club music. Do you see any effect, positive or negative, on these scenes or the music itself? When Samsung introduced their Juke phone, the ad campaign used a jukelike track composed by some guys in California, which struck me as deeply wrong.

The main effect, I think, is greater interest in the music and the place, both locally as well as nationally and internationally. This can lead to what some might see as exploitative or unfair appropriations on the part of corporations or (more) privileged kids but also to collaborative and financial opportunities for the original creators. I haven’t seen much in the way of a negative effect on the local scenes themselves. Kids in Bmore are still making club music, kids in Chicago still making juke. And it’s that ground-zero level of production that’s always going to have an advantage in terms of actual and perceived authenticity (to bring in a rather loaded term).

The Verizon Juke phone thing was such a joke—and a flash in the pan. The dancing in the commercial did resemble footwork, but the music was watered-down, preset Miami bass or something. Totally misguided, and obviously so, I think, except to clueless consumers. Meantime—and since—kids are still making juke tracks in their bedrooms in Chicago, still dancing on street corners and in gymnasiums, and still sharing all of that on the Internet. It still remains to be seen whether guys like Chicago’s 18-year-old juke prodigy DJ Nate will parlay all of this into a viable career, but it sure looks promising to me. And it’s made me think a lot differently about the meaning of “music industry.”

User-content-driven sites have also accel­erated the speed at which the mainstream absorbs elements of black youth culture, with things like “Chicken Noodle Soup” going from a Harlem neighborhood thing to a worldwide pop phenomenon more or less in a matter of days. What do you think the effects of this have been so far, and what do you see happening in the future?

In a sense it’s just an intensification of what has been a long-standing pattern of influence. African-American culture finds itself amplified in the mainstream for all sorts of reasons—some specious (primitivist fascination), some not (genuine celebration, empathy)—and, in turn, projected around the world by American imperial/corporate networks (with which African-American culture has an ambivalent relation). The radical difference is that some of the traditional middlemen (record/media companies, government, privileged appropriators/champions) have been cut out with the rise of P2P technologies. So now anyone can make a video of themselves dancing in their kitchen or driveway and put it up and it can catch on, across the street or across the globe.

Conversely, there also seems to be a rise in the number of black kids taking music/fashion/social cues from historically white subcultures like punk, a phenomenon I partially attribute to the Internet. How do you think this easy transmission of cultural ideas across class and racial lines has affected or is going to affect black youth culture?

I do think the Internet has been playing an interesting role not just in projecting but also informing black youth culture. There is a lot of playfulness, a lot of humor, a lot of experimentation at the heart of what kids are doing online (and off-line, of course—these worlds bleed into each other quite fluidly, maybe increasingly so). The diversity of options, of images and sounds and—dare I say?—subject positions to check out and try on is unprecedented in its way. I do think that racial politics and cultural politics are changing pretty rapidly in the United States, and that has implications for the wider world given the powerful circulation of American products and ideologies.   

For more on music, see our blogs Crickets and Post No Bills.

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

a.b. spellman at 10:54 AM on 10/16/2008

two white boy experts on black culture. keep dropping that knowledge, miles!!

Flag as inappropriate

seriously at 5:58 PM on 10/16/2008

no doubt. miles, is there anything that you are qualified to comment on? like... hey that jammie thomas case is back in the news! you could do one of your little anti-riaa rants. those are always fun. unproductive but fun.

Flag as inappropriate

Dude at 9:33 AM on 10/17/2008

Like a.b. I too get a kick out of being told who I am by two white guys. Thanks! And look for my forthcoming essay on what it's like to be a Hindi woman, written in conjunction with Neil Steinberg.

Flag as inappropriate

PHLP at 11:29 AM on 10/17/2008

Yeah, whatever happened to the good old days, when people from different cultures just feared and hated each other? Why can't white people go back to mocking and reviling black art and music, so that only other black people ever try to address it seriously and respectfully?

Oh, wait. Lots of white people never stopped reviling black music! But you're gonna bitch about this column--to judge by your comment, apparently for no other reason than because Miles is white? Way to pick your battles, soldier.

And @ seriously: What would you suggest that someone with a significant public platform but no real political power do about policy issues that concern him? Bite his tongue and cede the discussion entirely to his opponents? That's great citizenship.

"I do not agree with your opinion, and therefore you should shut up and let me have my way." Excellent. Who says democracy has to be messy and complicated?

Flag as inappropriate

a.b. spellman at 12:02 PM on 10/17/2008

PHLP, who told anyone to shut up?

there is a long history of white folks looking at and dissecting other people and cultures, and then deeming themselves experts on the matter. this story is no different. where are the voices of the "black youth culture"? they are "given" voice by a white guy who has "studied" them. ridiculous and very, very typical.

since you brought the term democracy into this, it would be nice if the author brought in a variety of voices into the matter, rather than two outsiders. that would be far more democratic to me.

Flag as inappropriate

PHLP at 12:39 PM on 10/17/2008

@ a.b.

That is true. You didn't say "shut up," and I thank you for it.

(That comment of mine was more for "seriously," who seemed to be saying that, because he couldn't personally see the point of it, Miles therefore shouldn't bother writing about IP issues.)

But you have to admit that the tone of your message didn't exactly say "I believe Miles has every right to talk about this topic, and I applaud him for his attempt."

I'm aware of the history you describe, and I agree that it's a good thing when "black youth culture" speaks to the world at large in its own voice. (As the column mentions, that's happening more and more.) I also agree that a piece quoting several sources probably would've been richer than a one-on-one interview.

What got to me about your initial reply was the implication that Miles and Wayne are out of line to comment on black youth culture--even in a thoughtful, positive way--simply because they're white. Maybe you didn't mean that, but it's what I took away. (Perhaps I am too easily riled to be getting into conversations on the Internet . . . )

I suppose I don't believe that all white people who talk about black youth culture are necessarily robbing those kids of their own voices or speaking for them--people like Miles and Wayne can speak in addition to rather than instead of, can't they?

I thought that in this interview they went out of their way *not* to claim more expertise than they had (Wayne is especially careful to avoid sweeping, unsupported generalizations) or to preempt or override any voices coming directly out of black youth culture itself.

Sure, it's not a world-changing column by any stretch. But I don't think it's pernicious or worthless either.

In my opinion it's a good thing just on principle for people to engage in dialogue about issues involving race. I think more talk is better, even if it's two white people talking to each other. But I'm aware that I come by that point of view because I believe that genuine dialogue is possible--that is, that race-based power imbalances in the larger society don't turn every attempted exchange into a one-way dictation.

Flag as inappropriate

Krista at 1:19 PM on 10/17/2008

this is a really cool website and i have to use it for my report so this is the only thing i can use!!!
it is really cool!

Flag as inappropriate

Dude at 11:22 AM on 10/18/2008

"In my opinion it's a good thing just on principle for people to engage in dialogue about issues involving race."

This article isn't engaging in dialogue. It's telling someone else what they're thinking without real input from them. Pretty arrogant if you ask me.

Flag as inappropriate

Dude at 11:25 AM on 10/18/2008

"Oh, wait. Lots of white people never stopped reviling black music! But you're gonna bitch about this column--to judge by your comment, apparently for no other reason than because Miles is white? Way to pick your battles, soldier."

I take it you don't think the fight to speak for yourself is an important battle, then? Great.

Flag as inappropriate

sikcatv at 1:16 PM on 10/18/2008

why do you struggle with source of the information? What exactly is missing from the content to make you question it? do you feel you have been misled? Nothing I have read here leads me to believe that wayne entered this discussion without reverence or respect for the subject matter, or the people it encompasses. I also noticed that although most of the negative comments had little to offer as far as meaningful input concerning the discussion provided, no one has questioned their ability/right to express themselves concerning it.

Flag as inappropriate

Dude at 1:11 PM on 10/21/2008

"why do you struggle with source of the information? What exactly is missing from the content to make you question it?"

I don't question anyone's "sincerity" or "reverence" or whatever you want to call it. But the answer to my skepticism is right in the story:

"These days my exposure is what I’m seeing and hearing on the corner or more often on my laptop."

To post theories on how African American youths are changing (never once using the word "some") when more and more are involved in gangs, being shot on the street, etc. in a culture that is trying it's best to distance itself from then and adding to the alienation they already feel, and the person making that statement admits they're basing it "more often (on what they glean) on their laptops"...you don't feel that viewpoint is worth questioning? Cultural identity pulled from a laptop??? C'mon...

The changes he describes are not unique to African American youth culture but ALL youth culture, the whole DIY thing. What is uniquely African american about posting your personal dance videos, music videos, etc. on YouTube? What in this article makes the situation uniquely African American? Present it as an examination on an aspect of general youth culture and it might make more sense. But if you're just going to tell me that black culture is being exposed more to the mainstream by a new medium, get in line behind Ledbelly and Chuch Berry. Big news...

This reminds me of a conversation I had years ago at a screening of a documentary on the Jesse White Tumblers. After the film, which had scenes of kids describing the horrors of their life in Cabrini-Green but laughing at some of the incidents, I was talking with a couple of guys, one white, one Asian about that scene when one of the men (the Asian guy) remarked, "Oh, yeah, dark humor is big in the Black community." I think the "huh?" look was stuck on my face for a couple of minutes. Funny thing is, the other guy didn't bother to ask me (an African American) if it was true. He just shook his head and soaked up the information.

this article is that conversation all over again.

"I also noticed that although most of the negative comments had little to offer as far as meaningful input "

Of course no one is going to question the right of anyone to post a theory about the subject. But as far as "meaningful input", I guess that depends on what you think is meaningful.

Flag as inappropriate

man at 3:06 PM on 10/21/2008

i see your concerns, dude, but i think your criticism is off-base. no one's telling you who YOU are or what you think, and no one's making the kind of blanket generalizations you're talking about. you can feel free to tell us who you are and what you think right here, though -- or lots of other places online for that matter, that's the beauty of web2.0.

structural inequalities and historical legacies aside (if we can even posit such a thing), to say that white dudes (no one's calling himself an 'expert' above) shouldn't offer perspectives on black culture is to call for an impoverished public conversation. yes, ideally, there would be more of a balance of perspectives. but i think the world is a much richer place when 'outside' perspectives -- especially reflective, self-conscious ones -- are brought to bear on various subjects. for instance, don't we get a better picture of US news/history if we listen to foreign/minority perspectives? to argue against that sort of thing, in principle, makes little sense.

finally, this is short piece, so it leaves a lot out, including the important social context you mention (questions of inequality and injustice, of disproportionate experience of social problems, etc.). but part of the point is precisely the paradox, if a longstanding one, between the bleak social prospects for black youth on the one hand, and their amazing creativity and outsize influence on the other. in that sense, it's not just a question of general youth culture b/c it's remarkable that among 'digital natives' black kids continue to distinguish themselves as producers, rather than just consumers, of (digital) culture.

Flag as inappropriate

some_other_dude at 3:54 PM on 10/21/2008

hey dude, i'm a little confused. maybe you can help me out. by your logic, miles and wayne should instead be discussing:

a) gangs

b) rock'n'roll

c) search engines

plz help us all learn the rulez!

Flag as inappropriate

kujawa at 4:00 PM on 10/21/2008

uhhh....miles ISN'T white.

Flag as inappropriate

the anti-spokesman at 8:46 AM on 10/22/2008

Dude wrote: "Funny thing is, the other guy didn't bother to ask me (an African American) if it was true."

Ah, yes, because unlike an Asian or a white person, you would be well-positioned to speak on behalf of the entire African-American community. Get over yourself, dude.

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.