Chicago Reader [CHICAGO DRINKS: Your drink specials guide] [Reader Free Tix: JOAN BAEZ November 11 Symphony Center]

 

Sign up for our E-Newsletters:
 


Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[CHICAGO DRINKS]

[Chicago Reader - Best of Chicago - The results are in!]




Digg! Digg this | Post to del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this to a friend

Sharp Darts

Past Music Columns

Umphrey's McGee

Jake Cinninger and Ryan Stasik of Umphrey’s McGee at the Aragon December 30

Adam George

The New Model Is an Old Model

Jam bands like Umphrey’s McGee are a step ahead of the music business.

January 10, 2008

Two days before New Year’s Eve the Aragon was swarming with security guards, merch-table workers, and various flavors of roadie and support personnel—all part of the infrastructure for a three-day year-end concert blowout from Umphrey’s McGee. They’ve come a long way from their beginnings on the inglorious South Bend music scene of 1997. “We started just for fun and free beer,” says founding guitarist Brendan Bayliss. “We were getting paid in beer and we thought it was awesome.”

The band that works its way up from dive bars to ballrooms was a well-worn rock ’n’ roll narrative when the Beatles were still at the Cavern Club, but Umphrey’s McGee—like many of their fellow travelers in the jam-band scene—have made the trip largely without the assistance of the usual star-making machinery. No big labels, no commercial radio play, no MTV support—no singles, even. As the standard music-industry formula for success becomes increasingly irrelevant, this approach is starting to look prescient: since the heyday of the Grateful Dead jam bands have been building audiences through grassroots organizing, plenty of live shows, open taping policies, and music sharing among their fans, and the rise of the Internet has made that model even easier to follow.

Of course, jam bands don’t necessarily choose to operate outside the industry. Major labels won’t touch them unless they’re as huge as Phish—it’s hard to make money selling records by a group that’s all about live shows and tape trading. The music doesn’t get a lot of respect either. Jam bands often seem to confuse some of rock’s great aesthetic atrocities for virtues—the standard approach is apparently to combine the worst parts of acid rock and prog with a dash of white jazz—and I’ll come out and say that, aside from some live recordings of the Dead and a bootleg of the show Phish did with Jay-Z in Brooklyn, I don’t keep that kind of stuff in my house.

That doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate jam bands’ insane dedication to live performance, though. Umphrey’s McGee are shit-tight, and on their ninth and latest formal release, the double-CD set Live at the Murat (SCI Fidelity), it’s hard to tell where the written material ends and the improvised parts begin. They’ve got amazingly open ears and seem willing to try out pretty much any sound they like—this love for all sorts of music not only elevates a brief digression into Pharrell’s hook from Mystikal’s “Shake Ya Ass” above cheap-joke status but also makes the long instrumental stretches sound less like aimless meandering and more like taking an interesting side-street route with a city-wise driver. The members of the band have devised dozens of nonverbal signals to guide their improvisations—they use hand gestures to announce key changes, for instance, or lean backward to say “return to the original progression”—and their songs never come out the same way twice. Even the stuff they write out seems geared toward expanding their musical vocabulary, giving them more blocks to play with during the jams. “The thing that you can’t replace,” says keyboardist Joel Cummins, “is the real live experience, having real music happen and knowing that it’s happening in the moment, that it’s not some prefabricated idea of what’s going to happen on the stage.”

This focus on live shows works to the advantage of bands like Umphrey’s McGee—though many people understand the “music industry” as the business of selling records, only the very biggest acts can sell enough to support themselves. Most make their money, assuming they make any at all, by playing concerts. Umphrey’s McGee’s last few studio albums have sold in the modest range of 30,000 copies. “I’ve never seen a penny from any royalties,” Bayliss says. “In my world that doesn’t exist.” Because they don’t depend on moving units, they don’t consider the people trading their music to be pirates. If anything, those fans are unpaid promoters. “If anybody’s getting hurt by file sharing, they can afford to get hurt. Britney Spears, if her album leaks she’s still driving around in a fat-ass car. For us, we don’t make money selling albums. We make money selling tickets. So getting the music out—if people listen to it, maybe they’ll buy a ticket.”

Not surprisingly, the band’s dealings with labels have mostly been about keeping the labels out of their way. Bayliss calls their arrangement with SCI Fidelity “the most independent deal we could find. We get to say yes or no to anything.” The label was started by members of the String Cheese Incident, but Bayliss says, “I don’t think of it as a jam-band thing. I think of it as a machine in place to get our stuff out—and we actually know them on a first-name basis and I can call up the president of the company and tell him ‘Fuck Michigan,’ because they beat Notre Dame and shit like that.”

Like most jam merchants since the Dead, Umphrey’s McGee have been early adopters of audio technology—a necessity when you don’t have the established industry pulling for you. Tape trading in the jam-band scene was one of the earliest examples of free music distribution working for artists, and Umphrey’s has moved it onto the Internet and turned it into a source of income. Their Web site umlive.net offers a large variety of formats and more music, period, than many indie labels with download stores. You can buy MP3s, lossless FLAC files, and CDs of live Umphrey’s McGee recordings, sometimes the same day as the show. And they’ve been burning discs at their concerts since 2001; they now typically sell 120 to 180 CD-Rs a night at $15-$20 a pop. “We started doing it just to get gas money,” Bayliss says. “Like if you go all the way to Colorado and have a $500 guarantee, you spend more than half that money getting out there. Starting to sell them was just out of necessity, but now it’s turned to actually . . . it’s pretty cool. I didn’t have that option when I was a kid.”

That “pretty cool” is key to the Umphrey’s McGee philosophy. They’ve made a lot of savvy career moves to get to where they can make a living playing music, but they’ve always been decisions that would make the experience cooler for the audience. Jam bands are way ahead of most mainstream pop acts when it comes to respecting their fans and giving them what they want—in part because they aren’t shackled to major labels, which are still pretty uptight about digital distribution and seem to know how to deal with people only as consumers. Umphrey’s McGee may not be big enough to play the suburban mega venues, but they can fill the Aragon for three straight nights—and many of those fans have tickets to every show, not just one, so those numbers represent a lot of loyalty. The band knows it, too. “Say there’s a song we don’t want to play but we know a lot of people will like,” says Bayliss. “We gotta do it. In the end we get paid back because they’re happy. The thing is, we started off in bars with five people, and those five people are still here.”   

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

joe underdown at 10:46 AM on 1/10/2008

and thats the way it is!

Flag as inappropriate

Kirk Wilson at 4:23 PM on 1/10/2008

A BIG thank you to Umphrey's for doing what they do. Without bands like them defying what mainstream calls "music", fans like myself would be left with nothing.

Flag as inappropriate

Navdeep Jhaj at 9:50 PM on 1/10/2008

I generally despise this sort of music, but to be fair, can you be any more lazy at writing about them and their genre: " to combine the worst parts of acid rock and prog with a dash of white jazz" What the hell is "white jazz"?

I suspect you know hardly anything about "Jazz", let alone "white jazz", and it lends credence to my belief that the usual suspects who write about music are almost always (in the context of rock music, anyway) journalism or English majors and NOT musicians. Seriously, I learned nothing about this band's music--is it yet another incarnation of the tired and true "endless modal vamp on one or two chords" that's been going on forever because the musicians lack any deep harmonic knowledge to play over chord changes?

We'll never know, because you told us next to nothing about their music.

Flag as inappropriate

Taylor Danye at 12:10 AM on 1/11/2008

(Navdeep: the band's better heard than read, anyway. Sample this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZuVvBDnsWg

Flag as inappropriate

Hammer24 at 6:48 AM on 1/11/2008

Hey Navdeep: I'm a trained musician in both instument & vocal disciplines and I'm here to tell you that these guys are SUPER-talented. Check out a CD, but better yet, see them live. It it AMAZING!

Flag as inappropriate

jimbo at 7:35 AM on 1/11/2008

these guys are so white jazz, it's true. and what is so non-descriptive about white jazz? when people describe k-fed to you as white rap do you think of vanilla ice or does your head explode?

Flag as inappropriate

Lou at 10:29 AM on 1/11/2008

White Jazz - ie. Kenny G

Flag as inappropriate

delaney at 10:54 AM on 1/11/2008

Navdeep Jhaj, look buddy. I know where your coming from in regards to the lack of talent today. But these guys do not represent that disconnect. To prove themselves the have covered, Frank zappa, chick corea(senior mouse), king crimson, zeppelin, metallica, even miles davis. And they play the hard parts unlike others who leave the tuff stuff out. They talk about frank and his musical intention. This is what i think this article was trying to tell you. You cant really describe the sound of someones music without getting all technical. Not many people are ready to read an artical that describes harmonics, counterpoint, ect... But you can try to describe the intentions. Clearly the intentions of umphreys is to translate thier thoughts and emotions into sound. Miles davis, zappa, santana and many others have talked about this. That idea of translating thought and emotion into sound to create a vibe through harmony and rythmic devices is the enlightened goal of musical art. The evidence that this is thier goal is when they talk about how they arent out there tryin to sell records, they give away tons of music for free, they want people to experience the group mind in person. That is the most important thing to them, although they would use different language to describe it. They are not as pretentious as I am. music is not rock, jamband, jazz. Music is emotion and thought manifested by vibrating air molecules in a pattern. Think about that. Why do certain vibrations(sound) make us feel a certain way? Its an interesting question. Remember, "MUSIC IS THE BEST" - FRANK ZAPPA

Flag as inappropriate

Marty at 11:38 AM on 1/11/2008

UMPHREY'S!!! all 3 shows were bomb! if you missed them, you missed out. period!

Flag as inappropriate

Church at 12:34 PM on 1/11/2008

Actually, Navdeep, he told you EXACTLY what their music sounds like.

Musicians who bitch about writers not being musicians always seem to be the kind of wankers who don't actually listen to a whole lot of music.

I can't imagine the kind of dreck I'd have to read if every music critic was some sort of 6 string bass playing asshole who writes about asymmetric time signatures.

Flag as inappropriate

Carter at 1:03 PM on 1/11/2008

I thought this was a good article, it was more about the group's "business model" than anything else, and in that regard, it was educational.

It is of course not just jam bands who live on live performance & selling CDs at shows, many working jazz bands are in the same boat.

Flag as inappropriate

Dan C at 5:10 PM on 1/11/2008

Who throws down harder these days?

Jake can go toe to toe with any guitar player around and if you know music, you know this to be true.

Quit nit-picking and go rage a show and we can talk afterwards.

Flag as inappropriate

Navdeep Jhaj at 1:07 PM on 1/12/2008

Church, I have thousands of CDs and listen to all kinds of music--my basic point about rock criticism is that there should a modicum of knowledge about music as music--inevitably, the writers almost always write about the lyrics, the haircuts, the drug use, etc. and generally describe the "music" as such in the most basic, cliched ways. Perhaps this is due to the fact that large facets of rock and roll has historically had more in common with "marketing strategy" than anything else. There's too much in rock music about writers glorifying acts who have themselves discovered the wonders of drop D power chords..and not much else!

My impression (and again, it's only that: I'm certainly no expert) is that if one can take something positive about jam bands, is that rock bands seem to be taking musicianship and learning one's instruments a bit more seriously. I suppose that's not a bad thing.

Conversely, have you read much much criticism about Stravinsky or Bird?? What do they talk about in great detail that makes them great? The music, of course.

I watched the "You Tube" video from above--I would say that judging strictly from this alone, there's a certain element of '72-74 Crimson in this. A dark, lurking sound, although not as complex as Fripp, Bruford, et al. As far as rock bands that improvise, you couldn't get much better than Crimson 72-74..

I'm not a big fan of the Dead, but I do respect one thing about them: their drummers are almost never heavy-handed, ham-fisted, even if their rhythms are generally four to the floor rock conventions. My impression of this genre, such as it is, is that their successors tend to be a bit more ham-fisted.

Again, what the hell is "White Jazz"? No self-respecting jazz lover would associate "Kenny G" with the word "jazz". Perhaps the writer really means people such as Bix, Barney Kessel, Stan Getz, Pat Martino, Joe Pass, Gerry Mulligan, Chet Baker, et al.??

I guess that's "white jazz". But hey, guess what--it swings its ass off! Why shouldn't it, given that the practitioners are nothing else but some of the most outstanding musicians from the last century.

Apologies for the length of this comment...

Flag as inappropriate

Marty at 3:17 PM on 1/12/2008

Good article on the changing music business model, although it fails to point out that no musician will ever get truly rock-star rich from merch & tix sales only. Rising fuel fees, venue insurance, promoters, advertising, equipment, labor, etc. really take a bite from every show. A band/writer needs those fat royalties from a hit record to get those truly sweet paychecks.

As for most jam music (i.e., good luck finding a beginning, middle or end), it's best described by a great joke:

Q. What did the Deadhead say when he stopped doing drugs?

A. This music sucks!

Flag as inappropriate

Duufy at 4:52 AM on 1/13/2008

Delaney,
You are the only commenter who seems to understand the underlying reasons of music's power. We are all trying to share a little bit of our understanding of the universe to each other through various artistic means. Music offers an outstanding medium for us to share our deepest emotional feelings to each other. Painters are often compared to other painters, musicians to musicians, writers to writers. None of these comparisons ever facilitate a true understanding of the original artist’s true intensions. Too many people (especially other musicians) get caught up in the technical aspects of music and forget that in the end it is art. Music is about being creative and having fun, and if other people begin having fun while experiencing your art what could be better? Jam Bands live to please their captive fans and to express themselves while having a great time. Every picky artist and critic needs to get off their High-Horse and realize that music frees those who create it and those who listen to it, regardless of genre and talent. Art is not about the technical masters or trained gurus; it is about freedom of expression for anybody who can be enlightened by the creative process. Jam bands do their best to emphasize this aspect of art, so do symphonies, Zappa, Miles Davis and countless others. Mozart said that the universe already wrote his music for him. We all have the ability to feel the great power of music even if we cannot write it; that is because the creative energy of the cosmos is within us all. STOP COMPARING and START LISTENING. Closing your mind to any artist is the same as telling the universe that you are not interested in what it has in store for you.

As for the "music business" side of the article, Thanks to the writer and Umphrey’s for being an inspiration!

Flag as inappropriate

jimmy stewart at 11:22 AM on 1/13/2008

Hey, I didnt think this article was bad. I mean, for those of us who have been blessed with seeing these guys live, it is somewhat difficult to explain just how good they are. There really is no comparrison to anything. The only way I can begin to explain it is if you put the 2 best guitar players ever plus one of the best bass players ever plus the best drummer ever and a very creative percussionist together with just an unbelievable keyboard player who can play the smoothest classical music to the most entrancing sounds ever. This is what you get. Then when this group of ppl play together so much they get better and better. I think to label them a jamband is really limiting what they are, The most creative band ever. I have seen them 19 times since 04. I have been to over 100 concerts since 1990 and have seen some of the best. But Umphrey's Mcgee is the best I have ever seen everytime I see them and if they do a cover song they nail it perfectly and usually make it better. Plus I have had the chance to talk with Brendan a couple times and the whole band once and these guys are some of the most down to earth, respectful and appreciative ppl I have ever met. If you have not heard them live. Please dont deprive yourself any longer, atleast go buy the live at the Murat cd. It gives you an idea of what they are about. Just go see them in concert when they come to a town near you ,as long as you like any music, you will be pleasantly surprised. Thank you so much Umphrey's for doing what you do. Keep blowing minds and melting faces across the world.

Flag as inappropriate

jill at 8:01 AM on 1/14/2008

Navdeep Jhaj. This guy needs to disappear. Seriously, he doesn't get it. GO AWAY

Flag as inappropriate

bayyyyyliss at 10:13 AM on 1/14/2008

UM fuckin rages, all else can go to hel

Flag as inappropriate

Carter at 10:20 AM on 1/14/2008

"As for most jam music (i.e., good luck finding a beginning, middle or end)"

Jam music is for the dancers/people in the room, most dancers are just having fun, not analyzing the musical arrangement (although that said, good arrangements separate the best from the rest).

This is why most critics (ones who go the shows and just take notes instead of mixing in with the crowd, and those who only hear recordings) don't get it, and likely never will.

it's a LIVE phenomenon.

it's why I find the critiques on the musicianship so hilarious, as at least the musicians are out there on a stage giving it all they've got, not resorting to slick production and "studio magic."

Flag as inappropriate

Jerrylover at 11:59 AM on 1/14/2008

I'm what people call a serious DeadHead. Yet after Jerry's death, I have not continued seeing live shows or listening to music from other 'jam bands'. The players are for the most part extremely talented. They bring a lot of joy to people in the hall. But the music and the lyrics simply don't speak to me the way 'the boys' did. That being said, I think the problem with this article and written criticism of 'jam bands' and GD is not that the journalists don't understand music. It's just that most of them grew up on the Stooges/Ramones side of the fence. That asthetic says that any song more than 3 minutes is wankery, and the individual-more than the collective whole-is more important. Blowing your head of with 3 power chords was cool, and dancing for hours to someone noodling around wasn't. That's fine. Just admit that's where you're coming from. If you grew up Jewish, Christmas isn't a big deal and sometimes you just shake your head in wonder. If you grew up punk, 'jam bands' should provoke the same sentiments. But somehow, many of these folks decided to become music critics and instead of shaking their head in wonder, have carried their deep-rooted hatred/lack of understanding to the page.

I learned a long time ago that although I'm a music snob, if someone out there is making sounds that move another human being to smile, think, cry, etc...who the hell am I to say it sucks?

Flag as inappropriate

Tommy at 12:38 PM on 1/14/2008

Navdeep: "White jazz" is a sarcastic, disparaging comment meant to describe jazz-leaning music played without soul. It does not mean "all jazz played by white musicians." Black people can play "white jazz"; all it takes is a lack of soul. This term is not going to be in any of your music theory textbooks. It's just a figure of speech meant to describe bad music with jazz leanings short on soul and long on, well, mechanics.

Flag as inappropriate

Moon the Loon at 4:44 PM on 1/14/2008

The point of this article isn't necessarily to talk up the merits or lack thereof in UM's music. If you like them and the genre - they're the greatest thing in the world. For everyone else - they suck.

That wasn't the point.

The point was to show how a band is able to make their way outside the conventional star-driven machinery that has been the pompous trademark of a bloated, idiotic music industry.

This isn't even NEW; similar articles could have been written(and perhaps were?) about 70s/80s punk bands, such as Black Flag, who had to literally create their own audience, touring circuit, etc almost exclusively out side the realm of the Capitals, EMIs etc of the world.

I admit to not being a huge jam-band person myself, but always admire tenacity, creativity, etc. My hats are off to UM, because as a fellow musician, I know just how hard it can be.

Flag as inappropriate

Jay Jay Rollins at 5:09 PM on 1/15/2008

So I've read all of your postings- and it sounds like UM has some dedicated fans- and that's a good thing. Too bad their music sounds like one long wank job. THey are good at what they do- sadly thay do very little.

Flag as inappropriate

abid mansoor at 7:10 PM on 1/15/2008

navdeep your wasting our time youve rarely heard them and if you havent seen them live then please stop the bashing. your wasting your time and ours. Umphreys is unbelievable one of the most advanced and unique ways of improv.

Flag as inappropriate

Cat at 12:13 AM on 1/16/2008

Musicians are never in it for the money - usually chicks, beer, or expressive outlet...Old Model is also taking out a whole page ad in the Reader for the NY Eve gig BUT, Umphrey's found one profitable route, so kudos to them for their success in the industry. The secret sauce is indeed in creating/playing for your fans' EXPERIENCE (also why nostalgia bands are so popular now): people love to connect or take away their stories and experiences and share that with someone else, and Web 2.0 easily affords that, in addition to making a great distribution channel because it not only connects people with minimal effort but everything's digital. Stir in guitar picks as earrings and guitar strings as bracelets and voila! complementary goods. But R&D-ing/jamming for creativity gets to sounds a tad like one giant rehearsal that never ends. Talk to your fans, get their stories, weave those experiences into your songs and you'll never have to worry about a dedicated fan base because you've created a connection. Maybe in the near future we'll see an article on another Chicago band that does just this, puts on an equally-impressive performance, has a huge fan base, and has had to deal with the changing industry/distribution channel as well: Lovehammers? These are the things just-starting garage bands might want to be privvy to...

Flag as inappropriate

Peas at 12:41 AM on 1/16/2008

I really enjoyed this article. I think it is a very honest portrayal of a back-to-basics business model, where the focus is on the things that WORK. Many times in the experience and industry of music we tend to deconstruct the things that DON'T work, and never pay homage to those that do: diligent performance, gratitude to loyality, creative revenue streams. This article touched upon some of those positive aspects, which is very refreshing in a sea of cynics.

Flag as inappropriate

Cmerder at 10:29 AM on 1/16/2008

Man all these responses make me tired. Nothing like beating a dead horse. The hell with all of it, we can argue any thing to death if we choose to, no two people hardly ever have the same opinion on any thing, so go to the show read an article or whatever enjoy it or hate it and move on, the bottom line is its music its supposed to be fun and enjoyable and if it isn't for you than find something different just like this article. Despite all of it Umphreys rages, Umphreaks love it and the hell with the rest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Flag as inappropriate

Sweet D at 10:45 AM on 1/16/2008

Why would someone waste the time to bitch about an article instead of finding the artist online and listening? Ah, the angst of a music snob. Navdeep, I too loathe the jam-band. However, I worked a festival in Davenport last year and these guys rock. If you really are a fan of music then you will understand that not all music has to appeal to all people. That is the kind of ideology that gives us the crap that is force-fed to us daily. Remember this quote, "It takes different strokes to move the world!"

Flag as inappropriate

KrisRocks at 5:41 PM on 1/17/2008

All I can say is that I am a drummer and I would have to say that the drums and percussion in Umphrey's has got to get the respect it deserves. I think Kris is one of the best drummers out there and sometimes people forget about him because he is surrounded by so much talent.

The great thing about these new wave jam/rock bands is that they are well versed in the whole gamut of American music, something that I think Phish pioneered (what band covers Talking Heads AND traditional bluegrass classics?) but Umphrey's has perfected. And I think when a group of talented guys like Umphrey's can freely jump between jazz, blues, funk, reggae, rock, metal, and classical, you get a whole new mongrel sound that is so melodically interesting that it keeps people like me coming back time after time.

Plus, as many have already said, these guys just plain ROCK.

Another great Umphreys cover: Rush's YYZ note for note but played a little faster. That's why KRIS ROCKS!

Flag as inappropriate

Bumps at 10:29 AM on 1/19/2008

02-07-04 Fox Theater Boulder CO
'nuff said
the band is great

Flag as inappropriate

Rob B. at 2:12 PM on 1/28/2008

GOD BLESS UM!

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2008 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.