Racked
When Allen Walker's bike fell off a city bus, he expected more than sympathy from the CTA.
By Edward McClelland October 25, 2007
Wherever bicyclists gather—bike shops, Critical Mass rallies, Chicagoland Bicycle Federation events—Allen Walker is there, handing out his homemade flyer. It shows a photograph of the mangled remains of his $1,800 Italian racing bike. All that’s left is the frame, which looks like a daddy longlegs squished by a piece of earth-moving equipment. Above the picture is a warning: “Don’t let this happen to you.”
The bike went on its last ride back in June, on the front of a 147 Outer Drive Express bus. Walker, a massage therapist who doesn’t own a car, was on his way home to Rogers Park from the Blues Fest in Grant Park. He was with a friend with no bike so they caught the bus downtown and headed north. As Walker loaded his bike onto the rack, he inspected the clamps that hold front wheels in place and thought they looked beat up. “I tried to use the back one, but the back one had electrical tape, so it was no good,” he says. “The front one seemed to be just a little different than usual. It clamped and went over the wheel the way it should. But the bike was leaning.”
At Wilson the bus bounced over a bump. The driver stopped, then drove on to Foster. Walker had a feeling something was wrong. When he got off at Foster and Sheridan, the driver asked him, “Are you the guy with the bike? It fell off.”
Walker depends on his bike to get to his appointments for work. He went glassy-eyed.
“The driver seemed like she was kind of remorseful about it,” he recalls. “She said, ‘You just talk to claims, and they’ll reimburse you for that.’”
While Walker waited for the police at Foster, his friend walked home to fetch her car, then drove back down Lake Shore Drive. She found the bike lying by the side of the road near Wilson, obviously battered by traffic. She brought it back to Walker before the cops arrived. When the officers saw the damage, Walker says, “they just shook their heads and said, ‘Oh, man, I’m sorry.’”
Walker took his police report down to the CTA’s claims department. A clerk gave him a form, but told him, “You use the bike racks at your own risk.” The CTA’s “Bike and Ride” brochure says as much: “The CTA is not responsible for bicycles lost, stolen or damaged on CTA buses.”
That risk has proven too much for Walker, now that he’s bought a replacement bike. “The bike racks were put on years ago, and some of the old equipment is breaking down,” he says. According to the CTA, the first racks were installed in 2001, and some of them are still on buses. “They’re a hazard to cars, and they’re a hazard to bicycles,” says Walker. “If someone was driving down Lake Shore Drive on a motorcycle, they’d be dead.”
John Dugan, who works at a north-side bike shop, says Walker isn’t the only customer whose bike has toppled off a bus rack. “I wouldn’t say it’s super common, but I personally have talked to two or three other people. I talked to another guy this happened to on the Outer Drive Express.” The racks, he says, are “not a great design. They rely on a coiled spring. They’re designed to be easy to open. At 25 miles an hour, it’s not a problem. But at 40 miles an hour, when it hits that bump . . . ”
A bump near Soldier Field threw Aaron Shkuda’s road bike into the road while he was riding the Jackson Park Express. “The bike just sort of wobbled, and it wasn’t there anymore,” Shkuda says. “I walked up to the driver and asked, ‘Did my bike just fall off?’ He said, ‘I can’t stop because we’re on the Inner Drive.’”
Shkuda finally got off the bus when it stopped for a red light at Roosevelt. He walked three-quarters of a mile south and found his bike in the grass. The front wheel and fork were crushed. He filed a claim but got a letter telling him the CTA was not responsible.
“The problem seems to be that they’re being held in by this little red arm,” Shkuda says, describing the part of the mechanism that clamps to the side of the front wheel. “It doesn’t seem like enough.”
The CTA uses two types of racks. The Sportsworks rack—the one Shkuda used—has a spring-tension hook that secures the front wheel. The Byk-Rak—the one Walker used—has a rotating U-shaped bracket. Derek K. Sanden, vice president of MMT Products, which manufactures Sportsworks, said in an e-mail that his company “has had only one known reported case of a bike ever coming out of a Sportsworks MMT rack in our 14 year history. The problem stemmed from a rack that was damaged in the field (i.e. this typically occurs when drivers park buses and bump up against the wall or bus in front of them) that subsequently did not ‘lock’ into the deployed position.” Ronald L. Coon, president of Byk-Rak, referred questions about damaged bikes to the CTA.
CTA spokesperson Wanda Taylor declined to comment on Walker’s case, but stated in an e-mail that “CTA customers are responsible for properly securing their bicycles on the bike racks.” Asked if that meant riders were liable for damaged bikes, Taylor replied, “That is a question that can’t be answered generally. Customers should contact the agency and each individual incident will be investigated.”
Walker says he’s contacted the agency “two or three times a month” since the accident. Every time he calls, “pretty much they say, ‘It’s under investigation.’ I think they don’t really know what to do. They probably will string me along until the statute of limitations runs out.”
While he awaits an answer, he continues to hand out flyers. “I want to warn people that the bike racks are a little aged, and I want to pressure the CTA,” he says. “If they’re going to provide this service, they need to keep it in working condition.”
Oh, and he wants one more thing from the transit authority. “My new bike cost $1,180,” he said. “That amount would be fine with me.” Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs Chicagoland Whet Moser: The FDIC closed down five Illinois banks today. Thursday at 5:31 pm
|
Flag as inappropriate
Mark L. at 12:47 AM on 10/25/2007
Yeah, but, they planted a bunch of flowers on Michigan Avenue!
Flag as inappropriate
Mac at 12:56 PM on 10/25/2007
Mr. Walker,
I feel really bad about the damage to your bike. Based on what you wrote it sounds like you knew that your bike was on an unstable bike rack, but still proceeded to place your very expensive bike on it. I agree that the city should maintain their racks if they are going to provide them as a service on the cta, but I don't think they should replace your very expensive bike. I am a fellow biker and I bike the city on a very simple and very cheaply self made single speed. If I were you I would consider a cheaper bike to commute on. If I had a bike worth more a few hundred dollars I would probably be more careful with it.
Flag as inappropriate
jtuckers at 3:22 PM on 10/25/2007
The cost of the bike is an irrelevant issue here.
This is a matter of the CTA's legal liability and the limits of that liability. I feel bad for the guy (and I'm a committed cyclist with several bikes -- some are expensive), but I think the disclaimer on the pamphlets is probably enough to, legally, limit his claim.
This doesn't seem, to me, much different than an airlines' limits on their liability for lost luggage.
I'd suggest, if he wants to pursue it, he should call a lawyer. (Does anyone think the CTA is really going to give him anything but a runaround without some legal pressure?) Still, I think a lawyer will say the same thing I just said: they have a disclaimer and that disclaimer is valid.
Flag as inappropriate
PC at 6:38 PM on 10/25/2007
At least two acquaintances of mine have also had their bikes damaged while the bikes were riding LSD express buses. Dugan seems right about this: the racks work fine at low speeds (which most buses in Chicago, and nationally, run at), but at higher speeds the spring just isn't strong enough.
Yes, the racks should be maintained, but the one time I ever put my nice road bike on one of these racks (due to a flat), I stood up in front and watched the bike with an eagle eye. You can't be too careful.
Flag as inappropriate
TC at 10:31 PM on 10/25/2007
Seems like the disclaimer should be displayed on the rack then, visible when one puts the bike on, not on some far away brochure someone may have never read. Just a thought.And the price of the bike is completely irrelevant. Also, it is insanely irresponsible for the CTA to allow what sounds like more than one bike to fall off buses travelling on Lake Shore Drive. The comment about the danger to other drivers/motorcyclists is very valid and the CTA should update and/or remove the racks for those routes that require high speed driving. I will never again use one of those racks.
Flag as inappropriate
sam at 10:33 PM on 10/25/2007
The CTA drivers seem annoyed anytime I've put my bike on the rack. Do they know something that I don't? If Mayor Daley truly wants a 'green' city, it would be nice to sort this issue out.
Flag as inappropriate
Daniel at 10:33 AM on 10/26/2007
Luckily, I've yet to be on an express bus not caught in rush hour traffic on LSD traveling faster than 20mph. I'm strapping bungee cords to the bike rack after this story.
Flag as inappropriate
j at 11:43 AM on 10/26/2007
For the $1180 this guy spent on his new bike he could have bought a nice folding bike. I just got a bikefriday tikit for about that much and it's great. No need to rely on the CTA to maintain the racks, just fold it up and brink it on the buss with you -- which is allowed under the CTA's new rules. But I still feel bad for this guy. The city and the CTA should be doing everything possible to encourage intermodal commuting, not giving bikers the run around. If he was a normal rider and he fell getting off of the bus I don't think he'd have any problem getting the CTA to cough up for the medical bills to avoid a tort suit. They should do the same for bikes.
Flag as inappropriate
PK at 12:28 PM on 10/26/2007
Am I missing something here? Does no one else think that Mr. Walker must have many more screws loose than his mangled bicycle? He put his Italian racing bike on the front of a CTA bus. He realized, upon inspection, that the equipment he was about to entrust with the safety of his beloved bike was in visibly poor condition. He is in possession of the CTA's brochure which spells out their policy exactly, yet he wants money from them. Mr. Walker: be honest with yourself and everyone you give your flyer, point out that your bike is mangled because you made a poor decision. And please, stop bugging the CTA for money, they have enough problems.
Flag as inappropriate
Carter at 1:16 PM on 10/26/2007
So you are suggesting it is too much to ask of the CTA to maintain the bike racks?
Would you say the same thing if the bike fell of the rack and then caused an accident involving a fatality?
Seems to me the poor decision is the CTA not regularly performing basic maintenance on what is a piece of publicly owned property.
Let me repeat that - this is PUBLIC transit. It seems quite reasonable for the public to expect that if they pay to board a bus that the bike rack attached to the front is in good working order.
Flag as inappropriate
Walker at 3:35 PM on 10/26/2007
In response to PK's comment:
Great way to attempt alleviate CTA of responsibilty by shifting the blame to me.
A.You don't even understand the circumstances that night that included waiting for the bus for 1 hour as well as the Red-line re-route that was at it's worst that month.
B.Perhaps you should remind me where
I put my brochure..probably because
I never had one! A silly brochure sitting in an office somewhere is not going to do anyone any good.
Why don't you bring some to us at critical mass tonight?Oh, wait, never mind, we already have them in our possession.
And C.You are extremely out of line
to suggest I am "just trying to get money" out of the CTA.Yes, I did not make the best decision I could have,
But I really didn't even fathom that would even happen, I trusted the CTA and was let down.
By the way PK, Isn't it time to punch in for your weekend CTA route?
So why did I put my bike on that rack? I was with a pedestrian friend, it was 12:00 at night and I was tired of waiting for the bus for the past hour otherwise I wouldn't have made this choice.I was tired!
It is CTA responsibility to keep equipment in good maintenance.If we have to inspect the buses ourselves, we might as well drive them too!
Flag as inappropriate
greg at 5:03 PM on 10/26/2007
yeah, as much as the cta should reimburse you, get over your expensive taste or get insurance for the damn thing. did it do special things? for $1800 it better at least have had tassels on the handgrips. seriously, duh buddy.
Flag as inappropriate
Mcgank at 5:10 PM on 10/26/2007
I've had enough of the sanctimonious "one less car" platitudes from the bicyclists in this town. These Critical Mass trolls snarl traffic for hours, causing vehicles to belch even more CO2 into the air while idling. Kudos to the CTA for refusing to pay for this guy's expensive status symbol.
Flag as inappropriate
Critical Ass at 6:47 PM on 10/26/2007
Ride your bike not the bus!!!!
One less bike!!!
Flag as inappropriate
Mac at 6:52 PM on 10/26/2007
Walker,
I think you should definitely seek legal council to help resolve this. I think the best outcome could be the city revamping their racks, as far as your bike is concerned, I guess it would be nice if they paid for it, but this would not fix the overall problem. I write as a commuter that not even like to lock up his bike outside, at all, so those racks would not ever be an option. Sorry bout the flat and the overall experience, but the city just doesn't care about bikers.
Flag as inappropriate
Rm at 7:00 PM on 10/26/2007
the cta is full of crap. walker, you messed up, get over it they are not going to reimburse you, ever. i'm sorry this happened to you (and many other bikers out there) but, you should have rode to Rogers Park, that's a nice ride. Being 'tired' is not in city cyclist's vocabulary. You either ride or you don't. Get someone to build you a cheapy and ride buses all you want. Screw the cta!
Flag as inappropriate
Walker at 8:49 PM on 10/26/2007
(pardon the formatting)
I really would like to thank the support I have received from the biker community.I am glad that there are those who are able to see beyond the whole money and expense issue and realize that this is not about my money,money, expensive bikes or someone tring to scam the CTA.
The more important issue at hand for me is that we have a crumbling transportation infrastructure that is becoming more unsafe for users and bystanders alike.Not only that, but they want to absolve themselves from any responsibility. Actually folks, I am lucky in this situation that my bike was ultimately ran over by several motor vehicles and did not cause the serious injury or death of a motorcyclist.Then what?
So lets examine the case through that angle, would I be a murderer for being so stupid as to not ride my bike to Rogers Park; to not see the bike leaning over a couple of degrees off, for using the stupid thing on Lake Shore DR.and resulting in the injury of the motorcyclist.Is that my fault?Yes..A bit of a dramatic example, but you get where I going.
In a perfect world, the end result would be both parties coming to an amicable decision since I am not only a customer on occasion, but a taxpayer like everyone else.
The reason I called the reader and wanted to get this story published is to bring awareness to yet another part of our nations infrastructure that may be dangerous to "be on or around".Kind of like driving over a bridge.I know they likely will not reimburse me, that's not the point.Does it take someone getting hurt these days for something to get done?
So folks, Accountability is step one to the power still remaining in the hands of everyday person; the average citizen and not "Big Brother"Unless you like the Blackwater/DEPT. Defense way of running this country.
Goodnight and enjoy this rainy evening while I get on my 1800$ bottle of champagne and continue engaging in my hedonist, expensive cycling habits.
Peace and happy Halloween weekend!
Flag as inappropriate
Critical sass at 9:03 PM on 10/26/2007
"Ride your bike not the bus!!!!
One less bike!!!"
How about one less beer for you Homer!!!!
Flag as inappropriate
inspector at 9:51 PM on 10/26/2007
what kind of idiots puts an 1800 dollar bike on a bus rack? there's lots of good reasons not to. this isn't about money or bus racks, it's about another whining bicycle fetishist seeking sympathy. keep handing out those fliers, maybe soon they'll be promo cards for a candle-light dirge/fundraiser for you behind Jewel or at the hideout.
Flag as inappropriate
Inspector General at 3:33 AM on 10/27/2007
Bit more beer for you? Perhaps you aren't aggressive enough.Another OldStyle might top off that judgemental bitterness.
Flag as inappropriate
Cyclist at 11:45 AM on 10/27/2007
In many cases, people don't know what they have or the worth until they either try to sell it or they need to file a claim.
In my case, I have been an avid cyclist for 20 years and there has been a couple of occasions where I had to take my 1000$ plus dollar bike on public transportation.It happens.I don't think we should criticize others for what kind of bike they have nor call them stupid for the decisions they make.
The point here is that "we" should be insured that equipment in our transportation system is in good working order.
And to that post made by "inspector".....Don't be a jerk!
That was a very childish post.Your negativity is not helpful for anyone.Stop being a bully and grow up.Like Inspector General said:
Lay off the cheap beer!
Flag as inappropriate
Joel at 12:07 PM on 10/27/2007
I think we are overlooking something really positive in all this--bike smashing!! That's right, put together a junker out of whatever parts you have lying around, wait for the bus, and gently place your sled on the bike rack. Strap it down? Hell no. Get a seat near the front and watch the show!
If you want to demonstrate to the CTA that this is a problem nothing beats an actual demonstration. Pick up a few Sledgehammers today and try it out.
Flag as inappropriate
inspector at 1:10 PM on 10/27/2007
ok, if this about defending idiotic practices, then i would like to propose the cta puts laptop racks on buses too, so everybody can put their 1800 dollar laptop on it for safe keeping, while the oversized vehicle serving an entire public, not a narrow niche of nerds, competes in traffic. then let's add wallet and purse repositories, and maybe even identity receptacles.
just out of curisosity, has anybody considered user error in the case of bikes falling off? i've used both types of rack without problem. then again, I would never have put my bike on a bus going up/down lakeshore, and mine's not worth $100.
speaking of cheap beer, did anybody ask why this dude had to use the rack in the first place?
Flag as inappropriate
Walker at 1:33 PM on 10/27/2007
Hey inspector, if you would have taken the time to read my above post, you would have noticed that I was with a friend.She is not familiar the transportation system so I had to accompany her.So excuse me for being concerned about her getting home.I was 100% sober that night so beer does not even come into play here.So far you are filled with preconceived assumptions about this situation.
Second of all, as you call my practices idiotic, I would also call it idiotic to get on a blog and bully people trough name calling and
negative and jabbing sarcasm.So I commend you for never having a problem with a bike rack and being so smart that you never make any bad decisions about anything.
So if you are really an "inspector"
it's best to look at your own negativity before you point the finger at someone else.You might be surprised what you find.
Flag as inappropriate
Inspector General at 1:59 PM on 10/27/2007
Drinking again inspector to deal with that killer hangover?No surprise.
Stop the Oldstyle!
The only idiotic behavior is yours.
Sober up.
Flag as inappropriate
Walker Texas Ranger at 6:09 PM on 10/27/2007
@Walker
"Second of all, as you call my practices idiotic, I would also call it idiotic to get on a blog and bully people trough name calling..."
Is this a blog? I thought is was the Comments section of a story.
I think you had your chance to speak your mind when you were interviewed for the story. Stop hanging out and rebutting people for disagreeing with you, you freak. This ISN'T a blog.
Flag as inappropriate
Digitech at 11:46 PM on 10/27/2007
Walker Texas Ranger, I think it is great that Walker is informing the public about the incident in its entirely. Newspapers are limited by word count which results in the whole story not being fully explored. Walker is providing us his view. I would love to read some bus drivers view on this whole situation. Let's all try not to put each other down in these comment sections and use this space to express opinions respectfully and explore the issue and to gain a better understanding of the topic at hand. Good luck to everyone!!
Flag as inappropriate
Usedbookman at 12:14 AM on 10/28/2007
As a 45 year former Chicago resident, I just rode my bike, and skipped the bus. It was faster, and more enjoyable. My ultimate solution to the shortcomings of the CTA, was to move to Seattle, where the buses and bike racks are well maintained.
Flag as inappropriate
Tallboy66 at 1:56 AM on 10/28/2007
It sucks that it got tossed off, but I would not have put an $1800 bike on a rack either.
I used to take an express bus and would use a bungi to attach the bike frame to the bus rack as well.
Flag as inappropriate
Johnny at 10:04 AM on 10/28/2007
The price of the bike is relevant. The fact that the CTA has aged equipment in poor mechanical shape is the center of this issue. The fact that the CTA isn't upkeeping the equipment is also at the center of this issue. At the cost of a bus ride today and with the cost of a bus ride about to increase the CTA is obligated to fix their equipment and not give a paying rider the runaround. Oh yeah the CTA wants to cut routes also. Hmmmm!!! So what is it that the CTA provides? Let's count Let's ponder about thes facts ... the CTA has ... poorly maintained equipment, Bad bus driver attitudes, increased fare hikes looming, bus route cuts looming, bad overall management, bad support from the City, bad customer satisfaction, bad disclaimers lurking somewhere on a brochure most people can't find, I'm getting tired. I didn't realize how incompetent the CTA was until I started writing down all their imperfections. And you know what? I can't think of oseveral 'very good' aspects of the CTA that exonerates all the bad.
Flag as inappropriate
j at 11:23 AM on 10/28/2007
To all the people giving this guy crap about the price of his bike and calling it a status symbol, tell us how much you paid for your cars? This guy doesn't own a car. His bike is his primary mode of transportation. If you've ever ridden an $1800 bike next to a $300 bike you would know there is a big difference. It rides better and its faster. If your bike is your only transport then it should be a nice bike. Give this guy a break.
Flag as inappropriate
Ted at 11:52 AM on 10/28/2007
Mr. "Walker" put his "bike" on the "bus"? Thats hilarious! This guy sounds conflicted.
Flag as inappropriate
Walker at 1:52 PM on 10/28/2007
In my final post, I just want to say thank you once again for all the support and positive feedback and attention that this issue has received.Thanks to the last few posters for the warm feedback and support.
I admit, I let my self get a bit down due to a few trolls, but there is always going to be that type of person/or people that will put your patience, but in the long run, it's a good thing.I suppose if every one agreed with you, that would be a bit scary.
I felt really did benefit from a few earlier comments that felt pretty honest.It's hard to hear when you loose something you really cared about,that it was due to the fact that I made a bad decision trusting CTAs equipment which I feel is true.
But it really saddens me that in this Liberal, "in" city with all of it's resources and culture, that there are those out there that don't care to engage in any real dialog, but just want to be hurtful.I guess thats the way it is.
But to focus back on the positive, I am so glad to hear that there is interest in this topic and that it did cause a bit of controversy.As we
become smarter as a culture and move from cars to bikes, Many new factors come into play like upgrading from that beater to a faster bike because of a tight schedule perhaps.
I think there are many people, including cyclists and drivers alike that believe having a nice bike is a luxury and a "fetish".But like "j" mentioned, the price f a cheap beater is the same price as a fine ass bike and I don't dare even own a car.I have been doing long distance riding since I was twelve and started with a trek 900 which was an entry level racing bike at the time.
So thats what I am used to riding and navigating in traffic with considering the average speed I go.
If the "beater" skeptics feel having a nice bike, it's just a status symbol and a fetish I wouldn't mind a friendly,safe bike race where the looser buys lunch.But ya' gotta use your beater,don't cheat.
But regardless,I fell if us cyclists
are going to be riding all over town
as a lifestyle and transpotation, we deserve to treat ourselves to a nice bike.You deserve it!!!You won't be disappointed!
Upgrade, but don't make the same decision I did, please.Keep em, safe
and get a New York Lock or two regs.!And remember, us bikers gotta stick together because it's not just about biking, it's about peace.
Thanks!
Flag as inappropriate
Ted at 7:22 PM on 10/28/2007
On bike prices: If you are going to ride your bike on a daily basis for commuting, quality counts. A good bike will last a long time, and you may end up spending as much over a few years on several bikes that are not as reliable as you do on one good one. Also, cycling is very physical, obviously, and cheapo bikes tend to beat the crap out of the rider.
$1800 for a bike sounds like a lot, until a plant your ass on one and ride it for a few days. Remember a lot of those vintage bikes you see out there are still road worthy because they were built well, and they were the $1800-$2500 bikes of their day.
In closing, this Walker guy is a chooch.
Flag as inappropriate
Hawkey at 11:18 AM on 10/29/2007
Here it is in a nutshell, folks... Mr. Walker uses his bike as his primary mode of transportation. The discussion of the bike's cost/worth is ridiculous; if the bike was my "only" form of personal transportation, I would spend as much as I could afford to get the best possible bike. After all, not like I'm spending money on gas, insurance, etc.
This story, to me, points out two things:
a) The CTA and city should be more vigilant and creative in how it provides for alternatives to driving. The bike rack idea is wonderful and they SHOULD take more care to keep the racks maintained. Not only does it encourage more bike riders, it addresses the safety issue concerning bikes falling off and potentially causing accidents.
b) Take personal responsibility. I find it hard to have "sympathy" for Mr. Walker. Forget for the moment the legalese and fine-print of the CTA's liability statement. In Mr. Walker's own words, he chose to put his expensive bike (and only mode of personal transportation) on a bike rack he KNEW and ADMITTED was shaky at best.
I understand the lateness of the hour and concern over a friend not familiar with the CTA's map/system. However, much as I wouldn't attempt to drive a car I knew to be defective and potentially dangerous, I would NEVER have put my bike in a rack that was in poor condition.
What if someone HAD been injured as a result of the bike falling off? I believe the blame would have to be placed w/Mr. Walker, since he willfully placed the bike on a rickety support structure, knowing full well the risk involved. That might come off as a bit harsh, but at some point personal responsibility has to come into play.
After all, aside from the CTA's apparent ineptness in maintaining the bike rack, Mr. Walker still went ahead and "trusted" it with his bike. Now really... whos fault is that?
I hope the CTA learns from this, as I suspect Mr. Walker has. Both parties should examine their actions and act accordingly in the future.
Flag as inappropriate
Bob Thomas at 1:05 PM on 10/29/2007
Why would anyone blame the city for this? The city does not operate buses on the CTA. That is the Chicago Transit Authority. While I agree that planters are a waste of money, that's straw man to the real argument, here.
Flag as inappropriate
Jane at 1:19 PM on 10/29/2007
Ted, inspector, why don't you guys grow up and quit the name calling.Youand I both know you wouldn't say it to the guys face. Ted, shame on you for calling the guy a cooch after he honestly expresses his feelings.What the hell is the matter with you? Yes, Walker was somewhat at fault, but he really doesn't deserve a whole bunch of jerks acting like assholes, calling him names and being insensitive to where he is coming from. Grow up guys.
Flag as inappropriate
Ben Dobb at 2:41 PM on 10/29/2007
Ted, Ive seen Allen around for 5yrs.Very nice and caring guy.
Dude,your an ass.
Why dont Take him up on that race offer it would be funny to see him make you the cooch.Im sure no matter what bike you have you'd get dusted.
But you are likely a guy that would take cheap shots behind a computer like a twisted misanthrope.
Flag as inappropriate
Vaguely Amused at 3:18 PM on 10/29/2007
If the CTA provides bike racks, it has an obligation to make certain that they actually support bikes.
That said, Mr. Walker, having apparently lived in the city for some time, should know that, merely because the CTA has an obligation to do something, there is no reason to assume that it will actually do the thing in question. C'mon, the NTSB just found that the CTA doesn't even maintain the tracks that its trains run on - what in God's name makes anyone think it's going to make certain that bike racks attached to buses work properly, especially when the only damage likely to result is to the property of mere CTA riders, who don't matter to the Mayor, and therefore don't matter to Carole Brown or Ron Huberman.
I'm inclined to have some sympathy for those posters who suggest that it is, at least, charmingly optimistic to trust an $1,800 bike to a rack on the front of a bus maintained by the CTA.
Flag as inappropriate
Jon A. Duncan at 3:42 PM on 10/29/2007
You ought to determine whether your homeowner's (or renter's) insurance policy covers this. If you have that kind of insurance, it's probably covered as damaged personal property. Most people whose bikes get damaged don't think of making a claim on their own insurance, and they should!
Flag as inappropriate
Howard at 5:03 PM on 10/29/2007
The CTA has been in a belt-tightening phase for 30+ years. They've eliminated all but key staff. There's noone left to oversee the bike racks and make sure they're maintained. I participated with another person in an independent effort to report missing and broken racks to the responsible person at CTA and we got a very good response-- it shouldn't have to be an independent volunteer effort, but the CTA is underfunded and all anyone can ever seem to do is suggest it should be boycotted, shut down, penalized. . . .
Anyways, I appreciate the effort Mr. Walker has gone to to warn others, and also appreciate the research which went into the reporting-- all of the facts are solid, right down to the reason the racks get damaged.
I would hope the brochures say three things:
1) do not use racks which are pitched forward
2) do not use racks with weak or broken springs
3) do not leave anytihng on the bike which raises it's center of gravity-- it is absolutely essential to remove all panniers, packs, and locks which may be hanging on the bike.
So, wha' bout a fundrasing massage-a-thon to raise replacement $$? I'll help with publicity (and contribute).
Flag as inappropriate
jenna at 9:48 PM on 10/29/2007
Wow. I figured this guy was just trying to RAISE AWARENESS about the conditions of the bike racks.
Hey, it worked. He seems like a pretty nice dude to me.
Flag as inappropriate
AD at 1:06 AM on 10/30/2007
I am glad to have read about this incident because I'm thinking of riding my bike more but I remember thinking it would suck to have been out and get caught in an unexpected rain storm. Or hey you decide to hang out with somebody and it's late at night and you might not feel safe biking al the way home. It's good to have an option. The fact that CTA is providing the racks mean they are agreeing to provide this service to biking customers. I don't believe it's some kind of scam that people are putting their bikes on the racks and hoping they fly off just so they can sue the cta. It is reasonable to expect that under normal conditions that include traffic and the bus actually moving, that the bikes should stay on. If the bus was hit by another motorist, or someone threw something at the bus that also hit the bike or if lightning struck it while it was on the rack, the cta shouldn't have to pay for it. Now if the mechanism for attaching the bike doesn't work properly, cta has the option of putting an out of order sticker on it like they do with fare boxes or they can take the thing off the front of the bus until it can be matenenced. If it happens while out in the field before the rack can be repaired, maybe you let that person bring the bus on board. After all if the bike flew off the bus and hit a pedestrian or someone's windshield would that be acceptible?
Now considering the state of the cta I think they should be allowed to say that they will reimburse for up to the cost of a reasonably priced bike. I also think insurance for an expensive bike should be obtained.
It is not acceptable to tell people hey have a service that they can use but oh yeah it's broken but you can still use it. That's a cop out. They don't allow people to use broken elevators and then antagonize someone who got hurt by saying they should have used the stairs. If the cta doesn't want to be reasponsible for the minimal amount of safety on the racks, take them all off. Cyclist will be disappointed but everyone in the city is begining to feel that with the cta on a daily basis anyway.
Anyway thank you Mr. Walker for letting us know.
Flag as inappropriate
Kyle at 12:25 PM on 10/30/2007
Ah, to be a wronged hipster in the city of Chicago...
Does Walker stop at all stop signs or yield to peds?
How did he get his own blog about crimes against expensive bikes on the reader website?
Flag as inappropriate
amelieanonymous at 4:40 PM on 10/30/2007
Thank you, Mr. Walker for ensuring that this article was printed in the Reader. I too use a bicycle as my primary mode of transport, and have also used the bus bike racks on more than one occasion.
The article was eye opening to me after several experiences that I had on CTA buses, which came close to yours. Once, I put my bike on the rack as well as I could and got on. About 45 seconds into the ride my bike did not look right; it was leaning. Luckily, the driver was nice enough to allow me to get off the bus and take off.The rack was not fit for a bike. The other time this happened, it was my fault, and I adjusted the rack and got back on. The kicker is, that in BOTH cases the drivers told me that if my bike were to fall off, CTA would pay for the bicycle. It is very disturbing that drivers are offering up this kind of misinformation.
Flag as inappropriate
Moon at 5:36 PM on 10/30/2007
Kyle, the bigger question is, how much of his riding is on the sidewalk?
Flag as inappropriate
Neil at 10:30 AM on 12/12/2007
This guy should have been riding his bike instead of carting it around on a bus! People that get on public transportation with bikes are so rude and annoying. I've been on crowded EL trains when bikers get on with thier filthy bikes and knock into people.
Add a comment