What Does the GOP Know About You?
The Republicans’ secret
weapon is your credit card bill.
Laura Park
By Dan Weissmann
October 27, 2006
WHEN ANDY MCKENNA JR. took
the reins of the Illinois
Republican Party almost two
years ago, he was determined to turn
our blue state red—or at least closer to
purple. The party was in ruins, due in
part to the indictment of former governor
George Ryan and the decision to
import Alan Keyes from Maryland to
run for the Senate against Barack
Obama. McKenna, who’d made his
political debut in the 2004 Senate primary—spending $4.4 million, more
than half of it his own money, and
coming in dead last—says everyone kept
giving him the same advice. “The biggest
thing I heard was grass roots, you’ve
gotta focus on the grass roots. My experience
is in business, so I didn’t have any
experience with grass roots.”
Then at a postelection Republican
National Committee meeting in Ohio,
McKenna heard about Voter Vault, a
database that some analysts believe may
well have swung the state for George W.
Bush in his reelection campaign.
Heading into this year’s midterm elections,
GOP leaders are hoping the
system will help save the party’s bacon in
some of its toughest congressional contests,
and McKenna’s one of those laying
the groundwork. According to the RNC,
Illinois has more Republicans using
Voter Vault than any other state.
Campaigns have always used state
voter files to identify loyal partisans and
those who need an extra nudge to get to
the polls. With Voter Vault a Web-based
interface allows party workers and volunteers
to add the information they
glean when knocking on doors and
making phone calls, determining if
you’re pro-life or support the war in Iraq.
Next comes a third layer: data purchased
from commercial marketing companies.
The magazines you subscribe to, the kind
of car you drive, the number of TVs you
own, whether you use a Mac or a PC—
that’s all in the system. Finally your profile
gets topped off with public information
like census data: the race and
income mix of your neighborhood, how
many people own their homes and how
big the homes are, how far you and your
neighbors commute to work. If you’ve
got a hunting license you’re probably
against gun control, and since that
license is public record, it’s collected as
well. Even if you’ve never been to the
polls, Voter Vault can help determine
how you might cast a ballot.
Republicans use this data to “microtarget,”
a strategy McKenna first heard
about from an Ohio county chairman at
the 2004 meeting. Three months
before the election, the chairman told
McKenna, RNC officials had handed
him a list of 1,000 people he was supposed
to register. “He looks at the list
and he sees this guy Sam Smith’s
name,” says McKenna. “And he’s like,
‘These guys are idiots. Sam Smith, he’s
my number one volunteer. He does our
pig roast, he drops our literature—you
know, he’s registered.’ So before he
complains, the chairman calls Sam and
says, ‘Sam, you’re on my list.’ And Sam
says, kind of sheepishly, ‘Well, I moved
in three years ago, I just never took
time to register.’ Now, the question is,
how did they know Sam should have
been registered? Because they did their
microtargeting and figured out that
people who subscribe to these kinds of
magazines and live in this zip code and
have this income level, there’s a good
chance that’s one of our voters. So it
can be very refined.”
The Republican National Committee
started developing Voter Vault in 2000,
spurred by the success of the union-propelled
voting drives the Democrats had
mounted in Florida and other states. It
was first used in targeted congressional
races in 2002, when the party picked up some new seats in both houses. And in
2004, when the GOP hammered swing
states with money and people, Voter
Vault guided the effort. The Democratic
National Committee tried playing
catch-up during the 2004 election,
morphing its e-mail list into something
it called, variously, Datamart and
Demzilla, but the system never really
got off the ground, and by late 2005 it
had been abandoned.
Since then, Democratic efforts to
create a microtargeting database have
been fractured, partly as a result of
internal battles over how much money
the national party is willing to spend on
key congressional races. DNC chair
Howard Dean, who says he’s focused on
rebuilding party organizations in red
states, has agreed to pump as much as
$12 million into local races, but that’s
only a fraction of the $60 million the
RNC has allocated. In a story published
in the Hill on October 11, Rahm
Emanuel, serving as chairman of the
Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee, sniped that the DNC had
done nothing to target “drop-off ”
voters—people who typically don’t participate
in midterm elections.
The biggest national microtargeting
effort for Democrats is taking place outside
the party. Catalist, a private company
backed by billionaire financier
George Soros and led by former Clinton
aide Harold Ickes, is providing voteridentification
data to a consortium of
unions and activist groups, including the
AFL-CIO and EMILY’s List. But
because of national campaign-finance
laws, which prohibit federal candidates
from accepting donations or in-kind
contributions from labor unions, corporations,
or any group that raises money
in increments larger than $2,000, those
groups can’t coordinate their activities
with campaigns.
Governor Rod Blagojevich’s reelection
campaign has developed its own voter-identification
system, although it skips
some of the commercial data sources
used by Voter Vault. According to the
campaign’s director of field operations,
Scott Kennedy, the Blagojevich system
uses census data to identify small areas
where stray Democratic voters might be
hiding. Kennedy says the campaign also
plans to take advantage of the state’s
new early voting law, which requires the
board of elections to report each early
vote to the candidates within 48 hours.
That means if the Blagojevich campaign
believes it’s locked in an early vote, it can
check to see if that individual has followed
through—and make follow-up
calls if the voter hasn’t. “We can ask you,
‘Is it a timing issue?’” says Kennedy.
But just like the AFL-CIO, the
Blagojevich campaign won’t be able to
share any of its information with congressional
hopefuls across the state. The
governor raised his campaign money
under Illinois’ more permissive laws,
making his database the product of soft
money and thus off-limits to federal
candidates.
Campaign finance restrictions have
forced many Democratic candidates to
hire microtargeting consultants
like Ken Strasma,
president of the
Washington, D.C.,
firm Strategic
Telemetry. “We’re
able to take several
hundred different
indicators
from the census and
commercial marketing
data, look at
people who do have primary history, and
see what they look like demographically,”
says Strasma. “Even if you’re not able to
say people who drive four-door foreign
cars are Republicans, period, end of
paragraph, you can come up with scores
that say, these people with this combination
of 350 census indicators are 60 percent
likely to be Democrats.”
Strasma is aware that Democrats have
fallen behind in centralizing their scientific
campaign strategies. “I can’t argue
that the Republicans don’t have an
advantage in that they have a more command-
control-oriented structure,” says
Strasma. “Karl Rove says, ‘Call these
voters,’ and people from Senate to city
council make the call. On the
Democratic side we’re more focused on
calling meetings and getting consensus.
We’re not able to call an edict nationwide,
but we have a lot of ideas bubbling
up.” Tom Hamburger, a reporter for the
Los Angeles Times and coauthor of One
Party Country: The Republican Plan for
Dominance in the 21st Century, argues
that the GOP’s advantage is a big one.
With Voter Vault, he says, candidates up
and down the ticket are “able to work
hand in glove with the Republican Party.
And it’s a working database—you don’t
have to go to Harold Ickes and say, ‘Give
me your beta version.’”
Yet while Republican organizers in
Illinois have gotten with the program,
many of them don’t seem to have tapped
into Voter Vault’s full potential. The
Cook County Republican Party, for
example, isn’t doing much microtargeting.
“Right now we actually do more
with the names that we know instead of
trying to prospect off it,” says executive
director Tom Swiss. Lake County
chairman Dan Venturi says he uses
Voter Vault to look for “hard Rs” rather
than swing voters, and four of the five
committee members I talked to in Du
Page County said that they were using it
the same way. But they definitely think
it’s useful. “I walk my own precinct,” says
state senator Kirk Dillard, who also
chairs the Du Page GOP. “I just did an
early-voting letter to hard Republicans
in my precinct, and the info came from
Voter Vault. It’s a great tool—rather than
waiting for our campaign headquarters
in Wheaton to get us information, if a
precinct committeeperson has insomnia
at 2 AM, they can input or dig out or
print out what they need.”
On the other hand there’s the fifth
committeeperson, Debra Olson, whose
home precinct in Wheaton is in the
Sixth Congressional District, where
Democrat Tammy Duckworth is neck
and neck with Republican Peter Roskam
in the race to succeed Henry Hyde. “In a
race that’s this highly contested, you
realize that it could be how a candidate
votes on one particular issue that will
make the difference for a voter,” she says,
mentioning abortion and gun issues as
examples. “Especially when there’s so
much negative campaigning going on,
and people get frustrated or cynical, you
can appeal to them by saying, hey, I
know you care about this issue, and this
is a candidate that sees eye to eye with
you.” She gets that information from the
voter’s profile, but she usually doesn’t
come right out and say so. “You try to
work it into the conversation; you don’t
just try to blow someone away with it,”
she says. “You’re asking questions about
issues people care about rather than
saying, ‘I’ve been checking you out.’”
Meanwhile, McKenna is looking
beyond the immediate election. In 2008
there’ll be another presidential race, Dick
Durbin will be up for reelection, and
Voter Vault will be an even bigger part of
the mix. “We’re just beginning to build it
out in a baseline way,” he says. “It does
take two cycles for you to build the depth
of data and the number of volunteers to
actually make this stuff work.” 
Send a letter to the editor.
|
No comments yet
Add a comment