New Perspectives
Clint Eastwood looks at WW II from the losing side and Karen
Moncrieff slices and dices the usual slasher narrative.

Letters From Iwo Jima, The Dead Girl
LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA |
Directed by Clint Eastwood | Written by Iris Yamashita and Paul Haggis | With Ken Watanabe, Kazunari Ninomiya, Tsuyoshi Ihara, Ryo Kase, Hiroshi Watanabe, and Takumi Bando
THE DEAD GIRL |
Directed and written by Karen Moncrieff | With Toni Colette, Rose Byrne, Mary Beth Hurt, Marcia Gay Harden,
Brittany Murphy, Kerry Washington, Giovanni Ribisi, Piper Laurie, James Franco, Mary Steenburgen, Bruce Davison, Nick Searcy, and Josh Brolin
By Jonathan Rosenbaum
January 12, 2007
Letters From Iwo Jima
WHEN Multiple screenings daily
WHERE Landmark's Century Centre, 2828 N. Clark
INFO 773-509-4949
GIVEN MY USUAL aversion to war and slasher movies, I wasn't instantly
won over by either Letters From Iwo Jima or The Dead Girl.
Both films display a fundamental decency and seriousness from the outset,
but both are unrelievedly grim and full of booby traps. (At press time I
was told that The Dead Girl may not open for another week or
so.)
Letters From Iwo Jima, directed by Clint Eastwood, one of the
finest directors alive, looks at the World War II battle of his recent
Flags of Our Fathers from a Japanese perspective. Letters From
Iwo Jima opened in Japan around the same time its counterpart opened
here, evidence of the nobility of his intention to address the people of
both countries, not just us. It has few stars familiar to Americans, and it
shares with Pan's Labyrinth the rare distinction of being a
mainstream commercial movie with subtitles. The Dead Girl, directed
by Karen Moncrieff, who's made only one previous feature (Blue Car,
2002), confounds expectations as well -- about slasher stories and about
film narrative in general, in part by being closer to a collection of
interconnected short stories than to a novel. The film -- whose five
segments are "The Stranger," "The Sister," "The Wife," "The Mother," and
"The Dead Girl" -- begins with the discovery of the corpse of a young woman
(Brittany Murphy) by a troubled single woman (Toni Collette) living
with her viperish, bedridden mother (Piper Laurie), and ends with the
earliest chapter in the chronology, the dead girl's initial encounter with
the killer. In between Moncrieff explores the significance of the death to
a "stranger" (either the single woman or a guy who takes her out, played by
Giovanni Ribisi), to a grad student who might be the dead girl's sister
(Rose Byrne), to the killer's wife (MaryBeth Hurt), and to the dead girl's
mother (Marcia Gay Harden).
Both films lack heroes in any ordinary sense, though Letters From Iwo
Jima was inspired partly by a book of letters written by General
Tadamichi Kuribayashi to his family. Both are structured around their
collective casts of characters: in Letters they're all male soldiers
engaged in a losing struggle, and in The Dead Girl they're people
bound together in misery, in an illness that's related to sex, though they
don't see the commonality.
Part of Moncrieff's challenge to the audience is to recognize that
sickness, to see past the denials of the killer's wife and, at least
initially, of the dead girl's mother. And both Eastwood films implicitly
challenge viewers' perceptions of the war in Iraq. One could argue that the
struggle in World War II was meaningful and the occupation of Iraq
senseless. But as Raul Ruiz once observed, the effort required to make a
bad film is no less strenuous than the effort to make a good one, and from
the standpoint of soldiers fighting in any war, the distinctions between
meaningful and senseless are a civilian luxury. I think this is one reason
both of Eastwood's movies show soldiers trapped in impossible moral
dilemmas. Is it right to lie about one's own heroism and that of one's
buddies if it helps the war effort, as some American soldiers do in
Flags of Our Fathers? Is it right to disobey one's officer when
ordered to shoot a family's barking dog, as a Japanese soldier does in
Letters From Iwo Jima? In essence, Eastwood is saying that the
similarities between American and Japanese soldiers in 1944 are more
important than the differences. This is a surprisingly liberal position for
him to take, and in Letters it has the effect of turning the mainly
unseen Americans into villains.
ONE REASON I wasn't sure what to think of Letters the first time
I saw it was that I didn't know how it would be received in Japan. I
wondered if it would seem accurate to most viewers there. I've since
learned that the response has been very favorable and that it's been near
the top of the box-office charts since it opened.
A Japanese film critic and friend, Shigehiko Hasumi, who was around
eight years old when the Americans landed on Iwo Jima, admitted to me that
even though he likes Letters From Iwo Jima, he prefers Flags of
Our Fathers. I suspect he prefers it for the same reason I prefer
Letters From Iwo Jima -- because it tells a less familiar story.
(I'll concede that Flags of Our Fathers is stylistically more
ambitious -- in its exploration of how images are made and turned into
emblems -- but that doesn't necessarily make it more successful.) I told
Hasumi I worried that Letters From Iwo Jima might define the
humanity of the Japanese characters only in terms of American traits (a
bias I see in spades in Lost in Translation), but he assured me the
film is true to a "certain Japanese reality." He added that he found the
portraits of the pro-American Japanese officers in the film a bit
"romantic," comparing them to John Ford's depictions of Confederate
officers in such films as The Horse Soldiers.
I think General Kuribayashi (Ken Watanabe) also sometimes recalls John
Wayne's cavalry officer in Ford's She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, though
he's more ambiguous and more of a misfit. Kuribayashi reportedly was sent
to Iwo Jima as punishment for being pro-American, not for incompetence
(though his competence is questioned throughout the film by others). Hasumi
also told me that in the war's final stages many "internationalized"
students and intellectuals were called up, including his father and one of
his uncles. Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto -- who developed the strategy to bomb
Pearl Harbor, and whose death in 1943 in the South Pacific is briefly
alluded to in Letters -- was also pro-American and initially opposed
to the war.
Having seen The Dead Girl only once, I'm not sure how well the
strength of its performances and its unorthodox narrative structure would
hold up after a second viewing, because the film's morbidity constantly
hovers on the edge of overkill. At times Letters From Iwo Jima is
similarly hampered by its didacticism. Still, both movies indirectly but
cogently comment on our experiences of other movies. Having Japanese
soldiers as heroes allows us to reconsider the didacticism we've been
handed in the past, and seeing multiple responses to a sexually motivated
murder allows us to reconsider our understanding of sex crimes. 
Visit the long reviews archive for more reviews of recent films.
Send a letter to the editor.
|
No comments yet
Add a comment