|

Meet John DohSwing Vote has the potential for vicious political satire, but Kevin Costner goes for Capra-style schmaltz.
SWING VOTE | Directed by Joshua Michael Stern | Written by Stern and Jason RichmanWith Kevin Costner, Madeline Carroll, Paula Patton, Kelsey Grammer, Dennis Hopper, Nathan Lane, and Stanley Tucci
By J.R. Jones August 7, 2008
If you’re as hooked on coverage of the presidential campaign as I am, you’re probably aware of a pernicious new euphemism that’s crept into the political lexicon: low-information voters. As an abuse of the English language, this may not rank with advanced interrogation techniques, but it still raises my blood pressure every time I hear it. I believe the more precise terminology is ignorant clowns. That may sound cruel, but if the media showed less sensitivity to such people, perhaps there wouldn’t be quite so many of them. Unlike blindness or retardation, ignorance is easily cured. Ignorant clowns are but one segment of the larger, more defensible group known as swing voters. According to the Gallup Poll, about 23 percent of likely voters haven’t yet decided between John McCain and Barack Obama; a recent CBS/New York Times poll puts the figure at 36 percent. Some of these voters are badly needed moderates in a political landscape so polarized the federal government barely functions. Some are intelligent, reasonably well informed people who realize that both parties serve special interests and that Election Day is the only time independents have any power at all. But some of them are just ignorant clowns, more susceptible than most people to slick commercials, emotional appeals, and brazen distortions of fact. Such is the great paradox of electoral democracy: by the time the polls open, the voters with the most influence are those who deserve it the least.
Swing Vote, the new Kevin Costner vehicle, focuses on this unfortunate phenomenon and magnifies it to the point of absurdity. Costner plays Earnest “Bud” Johnson, an ignorant clown in tiny Texico, New Mexico, whose wife has long since disappeared and whose hyper-responsible young daughter, Molly (Madeline Carroll), has to hound him out of bed just so he’ll show up for his dead-end job at an egg-packing plant. On the evening of Election Day, Bud is too absorbed in beer and foosball at the local tavern to meet Molly at the polling place as promised. Angry and ashamed, she takes advantage of a snoozing election official to steal her father’s ballot and cast it for him, but an electronic voting machine fails to register the vote. In a farcical take on the Florida recount in 2000, the presidency comes down to New Mexico’s five electoral votes, and New Mexico comes down to Bud Johnson, who has ten days to choose the next president of the United States.
Screenwriters Jason Richman and Joshua Michael Stern might have been inspired by Garson Kanin’s comedy The Great Man Votes (1939), with John Barrymore as an alcoholic ex-professor called upon to cast a critical vote in a big-city mayoral election. But by inflating the premise to the scale of a modern presidential race, and making their great man a clown so ignorant he’s never heard of Roe v. Wade, they shine a harsh light on what it takes to win the White House these days. The Republican incumbent, Andrew Boone (Kelsey Grammer), and his Democratic challenger, Donald Greenleaf (Dennis Hopper), each launch a full-court press for Bud’s vote. Boone dispatches NASCAR driver Richard Petty to make a personal appeal, invites Bud onto Air Force One for a beer, and lets him hold the “nuclear football.” Greenleaf counters with Willie Nelson, throws Bud a swanky party (with martini glasses full of Cheetos), and tries to pass himself off as a skeet shooter.
The situation gets even more ridiculous once an ambitious reporter (Paula Patton) begins coaxing Bud into giving his half-assed opinions and the candidates twist themselves into pretzels to oblige him. After Bud decides he has no problem with same-sex marriage, a TV commercial shows Boone locking arms with gay and lesbian couples. After Bud decides he’s pro-life, another TV commercial shows Greenleaf condemning abortion on a playground as little children disappear—poof!—into clouds of smoke. Naturally the candidates’ core constituencies are furious, but much the same thing happens in real life every four years once the nominations are locked up. When the president confesses his disgust at such blatant pandering, his icy campaign guru (Stanley Tucci) shrugs him off, and his rejoinder lays bare the movie’s comic formula: “We’re just doing what we’ve always done. Dancing the dance. Courting the voters. That’s all. Only this time, it’s just one guy.”
Following this trend, Swing Vote might have snowballed into an enjoyably vicious political satire, but then the bags of mail start arriving. Since the days of Frank Capra, bags of mail have been Hollywood shorthand for the simple yearnings of the common folk, and true to form, the letters piling up in Bud’s trailer are from people who’ve lost their jobs or their health care or their homes and want him to put in a good word with the candidates so they’ll address the country’s real problems and stop making dumb commercials about abortion and gay marriage. Bud ignores the letters at first, leaving Molly to sort and answer them while he enjoys his ten days of instant celebrity. But it’s only a matter of time before Stern and Costner, who produced the movie, try to morph their ignorant clown into a noble tribune of the people, and the movie becomes a gag-inducing exercise in righteousness.
As a star presence Costner has been compared most often to Gary Cooper, and by the last reel Swing Vote has been wrestled into a weak facsimile of Capra’s Meet John Doe, in which Cooper played a suicidal bum turned into a national folk hero by cynical newspaper columnist Barbara Stanwyck. There’s the same loathing of the press (which Costner shares personally and declared vociferously in a recent NPR interview). There’s the same traumatic shaming of the hero, a key ritual in Capra’s social-comment pictures (Bud happens into the local diner, finds his neighbors have turned against him, and hears comedian Bill Maher, on the TV, denouncing him as a “dumbass”). And as Bud prepares to moderate an 11th-hour presidential debate, there’s the same moment of truth before a live microphone, with millions waiting in silence for his halting words of expiation.
To Stern and Richman’s credit, those words actually hit home, reconnecting the movie, if only for a moment, to the uncomfortable truth that provided its earlier bite. “I’ve had my chances, more than most,” Bud confesses to the candidates. “I’ve grown up in a country where, if I’d decided to do more with my life than just drift and dream, I could be standing where, maybe, you stand tonight. Instead I’ve taken freely and I’ve given nothing. I’m ashamed in front of my daughter and my country. I’ve never served or sacrificed, and the only heavy lifting I have ever been asked is simple stuff like: Pay attention. Vote. If America has a true enemy tonight, I guess it’s me.” After that, men start hauling up bags of mail to lay on the platform, and Bud launches into a tired homily about the country needing better leaders. I can’t argue with that, but Swing Vote is most distinctive in asking for better followers.
For more on movies, visit our blog On Film. Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs On Film Ed M. Koziarski: "Mustachioed perverts in a spaceship fire upon a deformed, nude woman daily" in Lale Westvind's "Flesh Gun," screening in Chi(a)nimation All-Stars Sunday at Nightingale. Friday at 11:37 am
|
Flag as inappropriate
Hugo at 11:10 PM on 8/6/2008
What's with J.R. Jones and spoiling? Stop reciting the climax of the film being reviewed.
Flag as inappropriate
J.R. Jones at 7:30 AM on 8/7/2008
Given the movie's central conflict, a reader would expect it to be resolved when Bud makes his choice between the two candidates. So by identifying the scene above as the actual climax, you're the one who's spoiled it, not me. Please try to show a little more consideration for people who haven't seen the movie.
Flag as inappropriate
Jennifer at 9:22 AM on 8/7/2008
Sorry, but Frank Capra is not "schmaltz." Capra is one of the greatest directors of all time, and his movies will outlast the trash of today. Especially "Meet John Doe," which is so un-PC that the lamer trendy lemmings of now would be shocked by its meaning if they actually sat down to watch. (Oh I'm sure a lot of them would just laugh, but that's probably because they don't understand.)
Flag as inappropriate
J.R. Jones at 4:06 PM on 8/7/2008
That's an excellent point. MEET JOHN DOE is a pretty dark film, and one with a more conflicted response to populism than Kevin Costner could possibly wrap his head around. I didn't write that subhead, but I did OK it, and I should have thought it through more carefully.
Flag as inappropriate
Honor at 12:10 AM on 8/8/2008
Wha?? Thoughtful comment by reader; thoughtful (and kinda funny) reply by author? Insightful comment by reader; thoughtful, appreciative, and point well taken by author?! Is this comment board from an alternate universe? I like it.
Flag as inappropriate
Rudra at 11:03 AM on 8/9/2008
My parents are really interested in seeing this movie. I'm glad you referenced Meet John Doe. I think I'll have an easier time getting them to watch that.
Flag as inappropriate
epicurick at 6:05 PM on 8/9/2008
I feel that voting is over-rated. The movie is trying to make me feel that my 1 vote has the same affect as bud's 1 vote. But because it doesn't, it's not really noble. Neither is sacrificing for your country, since its only important if lots of other people do it too (otherwise your effort is ineffectual). Therefore, vote all you want, but new boss == old boss. Also, voting isn't noble, because *every* politician is mostly a celebrity, so voting is the same as gossip-mongering. I prefer voting with my dollars at 7-11, purchasing doritos and Adrenaline soda. What can I say, I live for pleasure.
Flag as inappropriate
cq at 3:31 AM on 8/10/2008
Electronic voting machines = choice = emotive cinema - we got a lot to learn.
Flag as inappropriate
MW at 12:35 PM on 8/12/2008
Oh please, Capra was a fine director, but he made loads of schmaltz. At his best, he could be rousing and believable in his idealism, but he can also be as syrupy and shallow as a campaign ad.
Flag as inappropriate
farmer at 11:17 PM on 10/25/2008
Despite this movie's premise, it is a fact that one person's vote does indeed not count.
Why is someone a clown if they avoid all the noise of politics?
Some people choose to use their time, thought and energies to focus on their own lives, or with their families, or whatever is of interest and importance to them. They don't have to play by your rules and be "engaged" in the high school drama known as politics.
Ignorant, yes. But not clowns. I think the insult "clowns" would be better used on the many Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken wannabees of the world - you know who you are.
And I believe their ignorance comes with some bliss, at least more blissful than the most of the political freaks that I meet who believe they are oh, so knowledgeable. And I might add, the great majority of who . . . haven't got a clue.
Flag as inappropriate
adriana at 4:13 PM on 2/10/2009
Given the movie's central conflict, a reader would expect it to be resolved when Bud makes his choice between the two candidates. So by identifying the scene above as the actual climax, you're the one who's spoiled it, not me. Please try to show a little more consideration for people who haven't seen the movie.
Add a comment