|
 When the Music Makes the MovieScorsese masterfully captures the Stones onstage, but a clunky new Curtis Mayfield doc is still the better bet.
Shine a Light Directed by Martin Scorsese
Movin' On Up: The Music and Message of the Impressions, 1965-1973 Directed by David Peck, Phillip Galloway, and Tom Gulotta
By J.R. Jones April 3, 2008
This weekend brings the local premieres of two music documentaries, each running a full two hours. Both celebrate musicians who did their most significant work in the late 60s and early 70s, and both are packed with performance footage. But the similarities end there: Shine a Light, which screens at the Navy Pier IMAX theater on an 80-foot screen, is Martin Scorsese’s masterfully orchestrated concert movie of the Rolling Stones performing in 2006 at the Beacon Theatre in Manhattan, shot by a team of acclaimed cinematographers. Movin’ On Up, projected from DVD on Friday and Saturday at the Chicago Cultural Center, is an awkward talking-head documentary surrounding 19 complete performances by Chicago soul great Curtis Mayfield and his group the Impressions. The Scorsese movie easily trumps Movin’ On Up as a cinematic experience, but hearing the elderly Stones pick through their back catalog isn’t nearly as gratifying as all the rare footage of Mayfield at the full flower of his passion and social protest.
For a certain white-male demographic, Shine a Light is a match made in heaven—who better to toughen up the Stones than Scorsese, who’s used their songs in Mean Streets, Goodfellas, Casino, and The Departed? For this project he wisely talked the band into staging an intimate, New York-themed show instead of the gigantic open-air concert in Rio de Janeiro that Mick Jagger wanted him to film. Scorsese knows how to shoot and edit live music—he worked on Woodstock (1970) and Elvis on Tour (1972) and turned the Band’s farewell show into the elegiac The Last Waltz (1978), still a marker in the concert-doc genre. Shine a Light bills him as a costar, and in the production sequence before the concert he does his usual hyperactive shtick, comically fretting as he waits for Jagger to issue a last-minute set list. But he’s even more of a presence once he disappears behind the cameras, skillfully coordinating an all-star crew that includes Albert Maysles (Gimme Shelter), Robert Richardson (The Aviator), and Robert Elswit (There Will Be Blood).
Their attention to details of personality and musicianship allow Scorsese and editor David Tedeschi to create a strong sense of onstage space. The Stones are tight as usual, playing with vigor and an easy rapport developed over decades. But anyone looking for a human drama on the level of The Last Waltz will be disappointed: for the Stones this is just one more concert and, for that matter, one more film in a collection of dozens, including work by Robert Frank (Cocksucker Blues), Jean-Luc Godard (One Plus One), and Hal Ashby (Let’s Spend the Night Together). The best, Gimme Shelter (1970), centers on the Hell’s Angels’ stabbing of a black audience member at the Altamont Speedway concert in 1969; in Shine a Light the band gathers onstage after the sound check for a meet-and-greet with Bill Clinton and members of his foundation, which benefited from the two shows filmed. Who’d have thought Ronnie Wood would get on so well with Hillary’s mom?
A good editor might have done wonders with Movin’ On Up: The Music and Message of Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions, 1965-1973, a DVD release from the San Diego music-footage library Reelin’ in the Years. Directors David Peck, Phillip Galloway, and Tom Gulotta collect some fascinating personal details about the singer from his widow, Altheida Mayfield; his fellow Impressions Fred Cash and Sam Gooden; and producer Johnny Pate, who arranged and recorded some of Mayfield’s greatest singles. (Cash, Gooden, Altheida Mayfield, and Jerry Butler, who left the Impressions in 1958, will attend this Friday’s screening.) Carlos Santana holds forth on the spiritual power of Mayfield’s 60s anthems, former Martin Luther King aide Andrew Young remembers how they inspired the civil rights movement, and Chuck D testifies to the continuing resonance of Mayfield’s urban protest songs from the early 70s. Unfortunately the talking-head sequences move like molasses and grow more dutiful as the video progresses, serving only to set up the performances.
Despite these flaws, Movin’ On Up blows away the Stones movie as a musical experience. Curtis Mayfield was a gigantic talent: a singular vocalist, an inspired songwriter, and a lyricist of power and conscience. His songs with the Impressions sometimes dwelled on harsh truths, yet their infectious, gospel-flavored choruses were blasts of hope and connection. Peck and company have compiled a treasure trove of performances, lovingly included in their entirety. Viewing them chronologically, you can sense how each hit single captured the times, as the exuberant “People Get Ready” (1965) and “We’re a Winner” (1968) give way to more sober assessments like “This Is My Country” (1968), “Choice of Colors” (1969), and Mayfield’s solo debut, the funky “(Don’t Worry) If There’s a Hell Below We’re All Going to Go” (1970). Perhaps more than any other soul artist, Mayfield consciously set out to articulate the full range of the black experience, which may be why his music seems so much more meaningful now than the Stones’ white-millionaire blues.
Mayfield’s songs may sound benign now, but in their day their social commentary caused as much static as the Rolling Stones’ naughty come-ons. In Movin’ On Up, Cash and Gooden recall a session for “We’re a Winner” at which Pate prevailed upon a laughing Mayfield to cut the lyric “There will be no more Uncle Tom / Alas his blessed day has come / And we’re a winner.” Nonetheless, WLS radio refused to play the record, citing as “militant” the line “Keep on pushing / Like your leaders tell you to.” A spectacular clip shows the Impressions performing the song live for a black audience on the Boston TV program Say Brother and capping it off with a sing-along of their 1965 hit “Amen.” A year later a producer at The Joey Bishop Show forbade them to sing their hit “Choice of Colors” until Bishop himself stepped in on their behalf. That live performance is another classic, the Impressions trading lead vocals as they sing, “How long have you hated your white teacher? / Who told you you love your black preacher? / Can you respect your brother’s woman friend / And share with black folks not of kin?” Forty years later, none of those questions seems to have lost its edge.
The Stones have been around so long now that we might forget how odd it would have been in the mid-60s to hear Mick Jagger, a nice English boy and student at the London School of Economics, trying to sing like an old black man. The band has always been defined by its passion for American blues and soul, but Jagger and Richards’s lyrics are about alienation, not community. By the time the Impressions were trying to put across the morally challenging “We’re a Winner” and “Choice of Colors,” the Stones had ended a brief, halfhearted experiment with flower power and crossed over to the dark side with “Sympathy for the Devil,” which gets a long, respectful workout near the end of Shine a Light. Nowadays the most censurable element of the Stones’ songs may be their lascivious attitude toward black women: performing the 1978 “Some Girls” in the movie, Jagger drops the notorious lines “Black girls just want to get fucked all night / I just don’t have that much jam.”
Naturally, age and infirmity are a major subtext of Shine a Light (and, really, any movie featuring Keith Richards). No matter how cadaverous the Stones appear, they keep climbing onstage, and I’ll miss them when they’re finally gone. But even in that respect Curtis Mayfield set a more impressive example. In August 1990 a lighting rig fell on him as he was performing an outdoor concert in Brooklyn and left him paralyzed from the neck down. Six years later he came back with a final album, New World Order, which he sang lying on his back, one line at a time. “Welfare takes the tab and Daddy can’t sign,” he laments in the title song. “And can’t be seen, the family becomes a crime / The hunt is on and brother you’re the prey / Serving time in jail, it just ain’t the way.” Most 60s pop stars seem to enjoy some sort of last gasp, but few have used it so well. Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs On Film Ed M. Koziarski: "Mustachioed perverts in a spaceship fire upon a deformed, nude woman daily" in Lale Westvind's "Flesh Gun," screening in Chi(a)nimation All-Stars Sunday at Nightingale. Friday at 11:37 am
|
Flag as inappropriate
Steve Lewis at 11:27 AM on 4/6/2008
This review is spot on as far as the pacing of the Mayfield documentary goes. While it's hard to gripe at a free viewing of a film, I couldn't help but think this documentary was a good 45 minutes too long.
For me, the talking heads weren't the problem so much as the length of the musical numbers. I, like the members of the Saturday audience, cheered when a consultant to the film announced that entire musical numbers would be performed, as opposed to the traditional 30 second samples found in typical music documentaries. However, after watching half a dozen variety show performances, I hungered for more commentary.
That said, it was a delight to be able to watch Mayfield -- young, able-bodied and full of life -- perform. I got a chuckle out of Cash and Gooden with their opening and closing stories. It's rare to get to see the personalities of the musicians whose light isn't afforded the opportunity to shine as brightly for the star in front of them.
Kudos to the Chicago Cultural Center for providing the forum for a few hundred admirers to watch a musical master at work.
Flag as inappropriate
J.R. Jones at 9:06 AM on 4/9/2008
That seemed to be the problem--including the performances complete. It worked well enough for the short and concise Impressions singles, but once they got into the extended numbers from Mayfield's solo LPs, the proportion of talk to music didn't work. And despite the length, as Dave Hokestra pointed out in his Sun-Times review, the movie skipped over key parts of Mayfield's life, like his music publishing and producing with his Curtom Records label. You'd think that, because the thing was designed as a DVD release, the songs could have been excerpted in the documentary but also accessed complete on a separate disk. A recent DVD on the 60s songwriter Tim Buckley used this approach.
Flag as inappropriate
DAL at 6:50 PM on 4/11/2008
I haven't had the opportunity to see the Mayfield doc yet, but D.A. Pennebaker's '65 Revisited,' a reworking of Dylan footage from the same 1965 tour that produced 'Don't Look Back' (it was included as a DVD extra from last year's release of that film), demonstrates that it is possible to successfully integrate complete performances of songs into a full-length documentary and not turn off your audience.
Flag as inappropriate
David Peck at 11:52 PM on 4/20/2008
Hello,
As one of the Directors of this film I would like to address some of the comments on here.
The films we make are very different than what most are used to. Our number one goal is to include complete performances as close to the time period they were hits. The interviews are used to tell a story and to try whenever possible to either set up the song or performance.
Some have criticized us for not including Jerry Butler and to those I would say check your history of the group. The Impressions with Jerry Butler had ONE hit (Not even written by Curtis)and then Jerry was gone. Fred Cash joined after Jerry left and they broke up soon afterwards for lack of hits. They re-formed and had a hit with "Gypsy Woman" and then not long after that the Brooks Brothers left over creative differences. It really wasn't until they recorded "It's All Right" in 1963 with Johnny Pate's arrangements that the Impressions (Curtis, Fred & Sam) as we've come to know and love them were born. And it's becuase of that and the fact there were no vintage performances of "For Your Precious Love" and "Gypsy Woman" that we chose not to deal with the pre 1963 era other than at the start of the film.
The thing that made The Impressions and Curtis Mayfield so important was the message in their music (something unheard of for an R&B group of the time)and that's why we chose to focus on that aspect so strongly and thus named the film "Movin' On Up The Music And Message Of Curtis Mayfield & The Impressions"
Curtis as a producer and publisher was important (and he he and Altheida are both seen talking about his publishing in the film)But if we started to talk about the artists he produced it would have taken the film out of focus. If you were doing a documentary on the history of the Rolling Stones how much time would you spend on Jagger's solo career or the fact that they singed Peter Tosh to their label 1978? My point is that we chosed to focus on the social mesaage of Curtis Mayfield through the Superfly era because it was what felt to a very powerful and unique story.
I realize that some only like The Impressions and don't care for the funk grooves of Curtis' solo career, there's no doubt that it's a very different sound but we wanted to include both since it was important to us to show both eras of his career.
We've been very successful with our previous programs that have been produced in the same manner (The Temptations, Otis Redding, Smokey Robinson & The Miracles) We realize that you can't please everybody but I wanted to take the time to share my thoughts.
Sincerely,
David A. Peck
Reelin' In The Years Productions
Flag as inappropriate
Aaron Cohen at 10:53 AM on 4/23/2008
Hi,
As the consultant who Steve mentioned in his post, I feel I should add something here.
To echo director David Peck's comments, the main reason for this project is to present complete Curtis Mayfield/Impresssions performances on one DVD---which is a far different intention than, say, what Julian Temple did with his Joe Strummer documentary, "The Future Is Unwritten"; where Temple felt getting quotes from such dubious characters as Courtney Love was more important than providing viewers with full-length clips of Clash performances (something that, as a Clash fan, I cannot forgive him for).
Let me add that no chapter of Mayfield's life was "skipped over." The intention was never to tell the complete, comprehensive story of this complex artist. As I said above, the idea was to make his peak performances available to a wider public, and provide a political/social context for those songs. Anyway, a comprehensive biographical endeavor for an artist like Mayfield can only be done in a few-hundred page book, like Peter Guralnick's Sam Cooke biography. That being said, Rob Bowman's booklet that is part of the DVD does provide more information on Mayfield's publishing.
Anyway, there's no reason to have a separate disc to present just the songs---anyone can program their DVD players to play just the music (without the interviews) at the push of a button.
Add a comment