
Something to Talk AboutLocal premieres of a dozen masterpieces almost none released in the past 12 monthsmade 2007 a good movie year.
By Jonathan Rosenbaum January 3, 2008
If I were playing by the usual rules, the contenders for my best of 2007 list would be drawn from the titles only millionaires could afford to promote. In that case, I would say 2007 was the worst year for new movies I could remember. But I’d be fudging, because I didn’t come close to seeing all the contenders.
Who did? Film Comment recently put together a list of eligible titles for its own annual poll. It’s 105 pages long, with roughly 23 films per page—more than 2,400 titles. “Major studios” released 119 films, or about one-twentieth of the total (I saw 33 of them), and 49 more came from “specialty divisions” (I saw 22 of those). “Independent distributors” were behind nearly 500 (90 of which I saw). The remaining 1,600-plus titles came out of festivals (where I saw about 50 not included in the other lists).
At least 30 of the movies I saw were so forgettable that I had to look them up in the Reader’s movie database to remind myself what they were about. This is one of my profession’s occupational hazards: each film is supposed to be important when it comes out and is then forgotten soon afterward—if only to make room for more titles that are supposed to be momentarily important.
Even if you assume the only movies worth talking about are those that are accompanied by a barrage of publicity (the equivalent of saying the 1930s’ best-selling novel The Good Earth is more important than Light in August), then I’d have to say the quality of those films has been plummeting over the past two decades. Maybe this is because much of the relatively unhampered creativity left in the industry is going into the marketing.
Yet when it comes to the list of movies making their Chicago premieres, 2007 may be the best year I can remember. This is my 21st “best of” list for the Reader and it may be my last: I’ve decided to retire as a staffer when I turn 65 in late February and won’t be reviewing many more of those dumb movies that have been weekly staples since 1987. So it’s nice to be able to sign off on an up note.
For me, the two dozen movies most worth celebrating include a dozen masterpieces that finally showed in Chicago in 2007 even though they were made earlier, one as long ago as 1959. These movies are disparate on many levels, but at least half share one significant trait: they abolish most of the distinctions commonly made between fiction and nonfiction. This is a characteristic central to my idea of cutting-edge cinema, and there’s not much new studio fare that has it.
In fact, in a movie culture predicated in many ways on planned obsolescence, where most “new” stuff is already conceived as some sort of spin-off, it’s tempting to argue that newness has less to do with when a film is made as with its power to reach and change us. It’s also worth considering what we mean by “old”: as Jean-Luc Godard pointed out in the 1960s, we’re more apt to say, “I just saw an old Chaplin movie” than “I just read an old Dickens novel.” And at a time when reading books is on the wane and seeing films on DVD is on the rise, we need to rethink some of our adjectives and some of our priorities.
1. Casa de Lava (1994), Where Lies Your Hidden Smile? (2001), Colossal Youth (2006) I’d only seen one of Pedro Costa’s six features before they came to the Gene Siskel Film Center this year. When I finally saw all of them, the impact of his work astounded me. I prefer Costa’s second film, Casa de Lava (dumbly called Down to Earth in English), maybe because it’s his only landscape film and contains so many other big-screen pleasures and mysteries. But choosing between these three is like trying to compare Carl Dreyer’s Day of Wrath, Ordet, and Gertrud: your preference will probably depend on which one you’ve seen last. All three of Costa’s films are about outsiders and improvised families, and I can’t think of another contemporary filmmaker who deals with these subjects more passionately. I’m still coming to terms with aspects of Colossal Youth (another dubious English title—the Portuguese original means “Youth on the March”), but these are plainly the kinds of works one comes to know like close friends over the span of years.
2. India Matri Bhumi (1959) The newly formed Chicago Cinema Forum’s most exciting event was its screening of the best version of Roberto Rossellini’s masterpiece—perhaps the least shown of his major works. So many people had to be turned away from the second screening at the Chopin Theatre that a third show was added the same weekend.
3. Out 1 (1971)/Out 1: Spectre (1972) Jacques Rivette’s 750-minute serial, the grandest of his experiments, is a comedy that ends tragically. His subsequent 255-minute reworking of the same improvised material is a tragedy that ends comically. Together they constitute the best films made anywhere about the 60s.
4. Bamako (2006) Globalization is placed on trial in a shared backyard in a Mali slum in Abderrahmane Sissako’s bold, sometimes hilarious experiment. It’s so up-to-date it took six months to arrive at the Music Box—unlike, say, The Astronaut Farmer, which is so irrelevant that it reached us immediately.
5. The Silence Before Bach Almost a year after the first U.S. retrospective of his work, the Catalan master Pere Portabella finally came to Chicago, presenting his feature to a packed house at the Siskel Film Center about a month after its world premiere in Venice. As a former senator of Spain who helped draft its new constitution, Portabella has a visionary grasp of Europe’s past, present, and future, and his flair for filming musical performance is often breathtaking.
6. A tie among the dozen best commercial releases: The boldest of the lot, Paul Verhoeven’s Black Book, in subtitled Dutch, is an ethically complex reply to Schindler’s List. The Disney cartoon Ratatouille is the funniest of the bunch and John Sayles’s Honeydripper, shown at the Chicago International Film Festival, is the funkiest; Blade Runner: The Final Cut is the sexiest. I’m Not There is the most academically challenging—though I wish it took more political risks, as does the narratively flawed but politically nervy In the Valley of Elah (which offers better Roger Deakins cinematography and a better Tommy Lee Jones performance than the relatively gutless, Oscar-ready No Country for Old Men). The other six are The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, The Dead Girl, Inland Empire, Letters From Iwo Jima, Margot at the Wedding, and Starting Out in the Evening. (While acknowledging the mastery of both Eastern Promises and Sweeney Todd, I can’t say I found either one more interesting than these.)
7. Away From Her (2006) Easily the year’s best first feature as well as its sweetest love story, Sarah Polley’s beautiful, devastating adaptation of an Alice Munro short story may also have the year’s best performances, by Julie Christie and Gordon Pinsent. It was shown by the Landmark chain.
8. My Brother’s Wedding A new and (for me) lesser cut of Charles Burnett’s morally nuanced 1983 feature quickly came and went at the Music Box. But you can see both cuts on a new, two-disc DVD package from Milestone that also includes Burnett’s Killer of Sheep and four of his shorts. One of them, When It Rains, is my favorite of all his films.
9. Private Fears in Public Places (2006) Even when he’s using third-rate material (a standard-issue Alan Ayckbourn play) to bare his shriveled heart, 85-year-old Alain Resnais paradoxically remains, along with Paul Verhoeven, one of the last great Hollywood studio directors—and perhaps the most exquisite filmer of snow (real or artificial) since Orson Welles.
10. Offside (2006) Like Verhoeven, Jafar Panahi offers an object lesson to today’s suits by showing how you can become more accessible, more populist, and more politically outspoken all at the same time. But if your characters speak Farsi, forget getting any kind of mainstream distribution (one reason, I assume, why the wonderful Iranian coming-of-age story Persepolis is coming out here in French). The suits decided that brain-dead, life-denying stuff like The Heartbreak Kid was more our speed than a life-enhancing comedy about girls in Tehran sneaking into a soccer match, and this turned up at the Music Box instead of the malls.
Big Shoulders In a year when shirking responsibility was the rule, movies about accepting it stood out.
By J.R. Jones
Send a letter to the editor.
From the Reader blogs On Film J.R. Jones: Rosenbaum redux. 4/30 at 12:41 pm
|
Flag as inappropriate
Joel Wicklund at 12:32 PM on 1/3/2008
Jonathan:
Sorry to hear you are retiring. We had a few short conversations on the elevator at the screening room when I was a freelancing critic. Even when I've disagreed with your opinions, I've always respected your knowledge and especially your swimming against the tide of criticism as a mainstream marketing tool. Good luck on your future endeavors and enjoy your retirement.
Flag as inappropriate
John at 4:16 PM on 1/3/2008
Mr. Rosenbaum, you will be missed. Your writing guided me, 15 years ago as a new Chicagoan in my early 20s, to films I would not otherwise have seen, and I owe much of my fascination with cinema to your words. You turned me on to, or fine-tuned my taste for, Hou and Kiarostami, for which I'm eternally grateful. Even when I disagreed with you I loved reading you. Best wishes and I hope we'll see frequent contributions from you in these and other pages during your retirement.
Flag as inappropriate
Mike Grost at 5:16 PM on 1/3/2008
Dear Mr. Rosenbaum,
Congratulations on your retirement.
I hope you will be showered with awards for your contributions to film culture.
And that you will write many more books.
Flag as inappropriate
Reader at 2:08 AM on 1/4/2008
Jonathan, congrats on your retirement. Earlier this year I was at MoMI in Queens for the Rivette retrospective and it was great to see you again (I'm a transplanted Chicagoan living in Philly). Will you still write for dvdbeaver and Cinema Scope?
Flag as inappropriate
Matthias Becker at 5:13 AM on 1/4/2008
You and your great writing on film will be missed. The list shows a really unexpected and interesting selection. I love the work of Resnais but unfortunately missed to see Private Fears in Public Places on the big screen.
Flag as inappropriate
Gareth at 10:05 AM on 1/4/2008
I'm not sure what you mean about "Persepolis" coming out in French rather than in Farsi/Persian; the original version of the film is in French (with smatterings of other languages), and Marjane Satrapi wrote the original graphic novels in French. I don't believe a Farsi/Persian version has been distributed anywhere - or exists.
Best wishes for your retirement from staffing duties - one which will no doubt provide much reading pleasure for the rest of us!
Flag as inappropriate
Pablo Podhorzer at 12:11 PM on 1/4/2008
So what should I do now after I finish watching all of your 1000 Essential Films? Create a digital version of yourself which will guide me in the future? (including Orwell quotes whenever possible).
Flag as inappropriate
PaulP at 2:28 PM on 1/4/2008
Mr. Rosenbaum:
Congratulations on your retirement. Your unique critical perspective will certainly be missed by everyone with a serious interest in film. I may not have always agreed with your perspective but your long essays in the Reader were always insightful and frequently encouraged me to watch films I had already seen with new eyes. Your year end lists (this year included) have introduced me to several works that I missed on their short (or often non-existent in my city) theatrical runs. I hope that you will find the time to write about the films that inspire you long after you retire from the Reader.
Flag as inappropriate
Eric at 2:54 PM on 1/4/2008
I am selfishly sorry to hear about your retirement. Will you still be writing for Cinema-Scope? Not to make it sound like you're dying or anything so dramatic, but who do you see replacing you, not at the CR, but in the world of Film Criticism?
Flag as inappropriate
j hanlon at 5:50 PM on 1/4/2008
I will miss your writing, but hope you enjoy your retirement.
Flag as inappropriate
Michael Merriweather at 7:08 PM on 1/4/2008
Mr. Rosenbaum,
For the past two years I've looked forward to reading your reviews every week. Thank you for your work and the best of wishes for your retirement.
Flag as inappropriate
Hoss at 7:36 PM on 1/4/2008
Rosenbaum isn't retiring from film writing; he's retiring from the drudgery of reviewing weekly releases which are mostly a waste of time. Poor JR and Andrea who must pick up the slack... which pays peanuts.
Flag as inappropriate
Hoss at 7:40 PM on 1/4/2008
"It’s also worth considering what we mean by "old": as Jean-Luc Godard pointed out in the 1960s, we’re more apt to say, "I just saw an old Chaplin movie" than "I just read an old Dickens novel." And at a time when reading books is on the wane and seeing films on DVD is on the rise, we need to rethink some of our adjectives and some of our priorities."
True. I say New is relative. For a young kid today who's starting out on the great adventure of cinematic discovery, Bergman, Antonioni, Godard, Peckinpah, etc, etc are all New. They were certainly New to me in the 80s.
Flag as inappropriate
Hoss at 9:29 PM on 1/4/2008
On Bamako.
I haven't seen this movie but it sounds morally dubious. Sure, globalization causes many problems but would Africa be in any better shape if globalization hadn't reach its shores? Idi Amin's Uganda was not part of the global order but it was crazy. Same is true of Mugabe's Zimbabwe. And, Congo recently has been invaded by diamond hungry black imperialists from Kenya, Uganda, and other neighboring countries. Was globalization behind the Rwandan massacre? The African nation with the best hope is South Africa, the most globalized of them all.
It's about time African put their own culture, their own values, and their own attitudes on trial. Just look at the mess in Kenya following the election. You gonna blame that on Wolfowitz?
Why is it that Vietnam is prospering by embracing globalism while Africa sinks deeper and deeper into debt, poverty, etc with or without globalization? Maybe, must maybe, Africans are partly to blame... just a little wittle bit?
Flag as inappropriate
Amy Cargill at 2:42 PM on 1/5/2008
I have to admit, I am saddened by the news of your retirement, selfishly as well! Your writings on film thoughout the years have directly affected me- I read 'Movies As Politics' in college and it changed my life, as well as course of study. Please please please do not stop writing!
Flag as inappropriate
Art at 7:40 PM on 1/5/2008
I wish you the best in your retirement. You will be missed. Your honesty and perceptiion have been a breath of fresh air in the world of 'thumbs up/down' film criticism. I hope to see you continue your DVD updates and occasional reviews. Best wishes.
Flag as inappropriate
ligeti42 at 1:47 AM on 1/6/2008
I must add my voice to the chorus here: Thank you, Jonathan, for your years of film writing for the Reader. As a college student in Chicago in the early 90s, I read your columns religiously, and they certainly shaped my taste for world cinema. Since I left Chicago, I've kept up with your work both in print and online, and will continue to do so wherever you choose to contribute. And please do!
And may I say it's too appropriate that you lambast the American studio system in your departing volley? Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more...
Flag as inappropriate
Hank Kingsley at 12:34 PM on 1/6/2008
So, for the past 20 years we've been reading a guy who hates his job. I for one couldn't tell! And sir, kudos for stealing money for all these years. Good luck with your 'retirement'. There is a quote about Howard Cosell stating, "When he entered the room, he sucked all the life out of it'. That sir, fits you to a T. Vaya con Dios.
Flag as inappropriate
Josh K. at 4:20 PM on 1/6/2008
I'm not sure how dubious "Colossal Youth" is as an English title. It's also the name of a post-punk album by Young Marble Giants that Costa admires. I haven't seen the film, so I don't know what connections, if any, exist between the album and the film.
Flag as inappropriate
steven Elworth at 8:27 PM on 1/6/2008
I can't believe the nay sayers. the smartest and best writing film critic in the US and the true heir of Manny Farber is retiring from a regular gig and instead of being saluted for his major contribution to film culture, he is being harangued. in NY, his closest contemperary, J. Hoberman is being celebrated for his 30 years at the Voice. The work of a critic is not to act as a mouth piece for the industry but to understand the development of an artform through both its formal and historical criteria, not if it has a good beat and one can dance to it.
Flag as inappropriate
Paul M. at 10:53 PM on 1/6/2008
Actually I am glad that you will be retiring as long as it means you will be more free to write what ever you want rather than dumbing it down (only a bit really), sticking to chicago only releases, and having to waste time reviewing nonsense and then getting attacked as an elitist for it.
You have been monumental in my life as a cinephile and I know I am echoing what I have heard all across the internet and (occasionally) real life conversations. Thanks for your contribution to the past, present, and future of film and film studies.
Flag as inappropriate
jose calvo at 10:09 AM on 1/7/2008
I am saddenned by the news of your retirement. For the past 7 years I´ve looked forward to your weekly column; and just so you know, even down here in Mexico you have lit a new perspective on the movies we look for and dream about. I hope you will continue writting someweher on the WWW.
Best wishes for this new year.
Jose
Flag as inappropriate
Stan Czarnecki at 8:55 AM on 1/9/2008
Dear Mr. Rosenbaum,
I want to congratulate you to your retirement, but am also saddened to hear about it. You have been my favorite film critic for years now and have influenced my own writing and thinking about movies in very profound ways. I'm thankful for your independence as a critic, as you were so often championing lesser-known filmmakers instead of the US status quo. Thanks for making me discover Abbas Kiarostami, Hou Hsiao-Hsien, Tsai Ming-Liang, Pedro Costa, Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet and many others. And thank you for the wonderful books you have written and compiled, which are essential companions of mine that guide me through hard times. Reading your pieces on films like "Gertrud" or "Playtime" is enough to make my day.
All the best to you in the future,
Stan Czarnecki
Flag as inappropriate
Benjamin at 2:35 PM on 1/9/2008
Can't say that I'm sad to see Mr. Rosenbaum retire, since his persistent rejection of studio filmmakers, genre films, and generally sour style never seemed to accomplish much, aside from convincing college hipsters that Hollywood wasn't cool.
Flag as inappropriate
Aaron B at 3:06 PM on 1/11/2008
So who the hell am I supposed to read once you retire?
Flag as inappropriate
Adam L. at 11:22 PM on 1/13/2008
Ditto to Aaron's question. Do you have any recommendations, Jonathan?
Flag as inappropriate
dan21 at 12:10 PM on 1/15/2008
While I have enjoyed your columns in the past, I'm not entirely sad to see you retire. You've turned me and many readers onto some great films, and thanks for that. The assumptions and biases that show up in your work though, have always turned me off. (The assumption you made in this column about Persepolis is just one example. A simple google search would tell you that it was a French-made book and film.)
I do appreciate the movies you've turned me onto in the past, but you've also taught me to be a discriminating reader. In a back-handed way, I guess I should thank you for that. Your takedown of Bergman in the NY Times right after his death, without even having seen "Fanny and Alexander", is another example of the mean, ill-informed assertions you're known to make.
I honestly do wish you luck with your post-column career. But, I really hope that you stop to simply check your facts or watch the "required" films of a given writer/director/actor before you send your next book/column/essay to the publisher.
Flag as inappropriate
Preston at 4:18 PM on 1/15/2008
Mr. Rosenbaum, I've been reading your writings since I was sixteen and first became enamoured with cinema. Your writings were like an older wiser counterpoint to my youthful enthusiasms, and I owe much of the maturing of my taste in films to you. They expanded my horizons, furthered my understanding, and provoked a great deal of thought. Now, in my early twenties, I read that you are retiring. Congratulations on a job well done.
However, the best is yet to come. You are now a free man who will never again have to waste time reviewing a flaming cowpie of hollywood garbage. What will you do with this newfound freedom? The answer is clear, Mr. Rosenbaum. I encourage you to do what Orson Welles, Samuel Fuller, Jean-Luc Godard, or any of your heroes would encourage you to do now: MAKE A MOVIE. And why not? I will revoke everything I have said above if you do not have the desire to make a movie. There is nothing to stop you now that you have retired from your column. You are certainly not too old; de Oliveira is pushing 100 and he's cranking movies out like no tomorrow. Would you protest that financing is a problem? This would be absolutely untrue; too many people in the film world know and admire you Mr. Rosenbaum. Last year alone, 2400 films were made! There is absolutely no doubt that, given time and effort, you can round up the financing to make your picture. We don't care how you make it, Mr. Rosenbaum, but you must. Go out into the streets and shoot in HD, free-form funky style like the Caheirs critics of old. Or, make it lavish and debut it like Welles, and pour everything you've got into one single masterpiece. Paint a paeon to your youth in Alabama, or ignite a righteous portrayal of the way things are now. Whatever it is, we don't mind, because we have faith it will be a film worth making. Now is the time for action, Mr. Rosenbaum. Gather your energies and make the most ambitious picture you can make, because nothing is stopping you.
Best regards,
Preston
Flag as inappropriate
Jonathan R. at 11:35 PM on 1/15/2008
To Prestonz;
I appreciate your confidence, but I've always been a writer and I'd
like to continue doing that. Writing can be done alone and cheaply; most filmmaking requires other people, money, and skills and connections I don't have.
Flag as inappropriate
Jonathan R. at 12:54 AM on 1/16/2008
To dan21:
I'll concede that my point about Persepolis could have been made more clearly; I should have said that the film was in French, not that it was "coming out" in French. But you don't seem to realize that the fact that it was a French-made book and film supports my point--that an Iranian story can only get into the mainstream (as it did in France) if the characters don't speak Farsi.
I estimate having seen almost 30 of Bergman's films before I wrote in the Times that I thought he was overrated by some people. I've seen the three-hour Fanny and Alexander since then, and could easily rank ten other Bergman films above it, including the two masterpieces that are among my favorites, Sawdust and Tinsel and Persona. I suspect I'll rank the original TV version of Fanny and Alexander much higher when I finally see it, as many supposed diehard Bergman fans have never bothered to do. Bergman himself repudiated the theatrical version that, according to dan21, I'm supposed to be ashamed of not having seen before writing my Times piece. Does he also consider it "ill-informed" and "mean" that I take seriously Bergman's own claim, supported by the shape and emphasis of his career, that his theater work was far more important than his films? If so, I guess that must have made Bergman ill-informed as well.
Flag as inappropriate
Preston at 5:16 AM on 1/16/2008
Hi Jonathan R:
You've been a fine writer for decades, and we're looking forward to what you do next. Right now, the writing is calling, yet I do want to put the idea out there that you could absolutely make a picture if you pursued that goal. Not to stop writing by any means, but perhaps to turn a new leaf and kick off your retirement. And not so much for the final product, as for the hell of it.
Flag as inappropriate
Ghostdog at 11:04 AM on 1/18/2008
Congratulations on your retirement although I feel this will be a devestating loss to to the film community. Whether I agreed with you or not you challenged me to look at your thoughts in a light that more often than not opened up further discussions within myself. Its unfortunate that more critcs do not follow your course as a teacher instead of that of peddler for supidity.
Thanx again for your many years of service
Flag as inappropriate
Sad at 12:32 PM on 1/18/2008
I LOVE YOU! Don't go :(
Flag as inappropriate
Suhitha Edirisinghe at 8:01 PM on 1/18/2008
Hello Mr. Rosenbaum,
I first encountered your writing here on this site, maybe 8-9 years ago. Since that time, my understanding of and appreciation for film has increased immeasurably, and your work still forces me to think about movies in a deeper way. Its hard to describe the impact your writing has had on my life. You were involved with two of my favourite film books of all time , those being Placing Movies, and This is Orson Welles. You're writing on Dreyer, Welles, Murnau and Kubrick, among many others, is invaluable. And finally, contrary to what some readers have felt, I thank you for never allowing a movie to exist in a vacuum, and always placing them within context. This applies equally well to the movies you praise as those you trash, and in fact it has been your arguments against certain movies that I have found most compelling and challenging. You are the first writer I go to when approaching a difficult movie for the first time. Thank you again for helping me unlock their secrets. I hope to continue hearing your thoughts and reading your work for a long time.
Best of luck in the future.
Flag as inappropriate
Muse at 5:05 PM on 1/19/2008
You have been one of the few writers out there that have continually brought insight and passion to their work in a most refreshing and eloquent way. I can only hope your "retirement" will ensure you time to pour yourself into new, exciting projects for your loyal readers to share. Thank you for your years of excellent work. Whether I agreed with you or not I always respected your perspective and thoughtfulness. You have widened and deepened my appreciation for film more than any other writer. You've been a unique, important voice that sails above the din of our sad, cultural sea of mediocrity. Keep writing, please. You make a difference.
Flag as inappropriate
Jeremy at 10:13 PM on 1/20/2008
Ever since reading Essential Cinema at the young age of 21, I have been a highly devoted fan of yours, Mr. Rosenbaum. (Your book hit me in ways that Sarris's The American Cinema has hit those in older generations). Your writings have motivated me to examine not merely the style and technique of cinema but also its conscience (particularly how these aspects sometimes intersect). I will genuinely miss your film reviews at the Reader and wish you the best in whatever you do in the future.
Flag as inappropriate
mattastic at 12:29 AM on 1/21/2008
RETIREMENT? Damn it, America never had that many good critics to begin with, now we're losing one of our finest. Who will tell me what's wrong with David Ansen and Time Magazine? Who will take on the Coen Brothers?
Flag as inappropriate
Jonathan R. at 10:17 AM on 1/21/2008
Many thanks for all the kind comments. I should stress for those who might be unclear about this that I'm retiring only from the Chicago Reader as a regular staff member, not at all from criticism or from writing more generally. So, by choice, the emphasis will shift somewhat from new films to older ones, but not always. Some recent or future freelance assignments I've been or will be working on include articles on Carl Dreyer's Day of Wrath and Ordet (two longtime favorites) for Australian DVDs, Casa de Lava for an international collection on Pedro Costa, a short piece on Jia Zhangke for a Block Films brochure, an expansion of my Reader piece on Rosellini's India for another collection (about non-Indian films made in India), an article about Adam Curtis for Film Quarterly, and my usual column on DVDs for Cinema Scope. If the various permissions allow this, many of these pieces will wind up on my web site, which is currently supposed to be launched around March, or at the very least there will be links or information about where to find them when they appear elsewhere.
Flag as inappropriate
Stan Czarnecki at 12:26 PM on 1/21/2008
Sounds wonderful, I must say! I greatly look forward to your website and to all the announced articles, particularly the pieces on Dreyer.
All the best,
Stan Czarnecki
Flag as inappropriate
Jeremy at 6:26 PM on 1/23/2008
Mr. Rosenbaum,
Will your new site feature a personal blog or just links to writings elsewhere? I've always enjoyed your contributions to the "On Film" blog here at the Reader.
Flag as inappropriate
Robert Chatain at 7:22 PM on 1/23/2008
Although I disagreed with your career evalaluation of Ingmar Bergman in the Times, I respected your clarity and temperate tone -- both qualities that many of today's passionate and well-informed critics would do well to cultivate. (I would have been interested in a similar revisionist take from someone else on Antonioni, who seemed to get a free pass.) Thanks for your intelligent and provocative criticism over the years. Retirement? Well, when writers quit our day jobs, that just gives us more time to write -- and I'll be looking forward to reading you anywhere, anytime.
Flag as inappropriate
Jonathan R. at 5:05 PM on 1/24/2008
To Jeremy: I'm still working out the details of what I'll be doing on and with the web site. Please check back in March.
Flag as inappropriate
Ernesto Blaquier at 12:56 AM on 1/29/2008
Hi, Jonathan. Just to tell you, in case you don't know, that Quintín has written a very nice piece about you and your work over these years, which you can find here:
http://www.otroscines.com/columnistas_detalle.php?idnota=1059&idsubseccion=11
Glad to hear that you're coming over for this year's BAFICI. Will you bring any rare film with you?
Flag as inappropriate
MonicaS at 6:06 PM on 2/15/2008
JR,
I cannot believe that you are retiring. I fell in love with your reviews in 1997-1998 as an undergrad at Northwestern. I can still quote from your funny review of "Pearl Harbor." I moved away from Chicago 7 years ago, but still read your column online to help me pick and engage in the best movies.
all the best.
Monica
Add a comment