The speaker of the House will be near impossible to beat, but 32-year-old navy vet John Laesch is hitting the road to convert voters one handshake at a time.
By Harold Henderson | Photo by Flynn
THE 14TH CONGRESSIONAL District of Illinois stretches west from
the fast-spreading sprawl of Kane and Kendall counties past
Northern Illinois University in De Kalb and the Ronald
Reagan home in Dixon to the eastern suburbs of the Quad Cities on
the Mississippi. Like congressional districts everywhere, its boundaries
were drawn for one purpose only: to help the incumbent win.
Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert, who has represented
the 14th in its various permutations since 1986, may not need the
help. In 2004 he raised $5 million while his opponent, Ruben
Zamora, made do with $18,000. Since he first won the seat,
Hastert has never been seriously challenged, doubling or tripling
his opponents’ vote totals and running ahead of the ticket.
Nevertheless, 32-year-old Democrat Jonathan “John” Laesch is
playing David to Hastert’s Goliath this election year. He’s a Jeep-driving
navy veteran, the son of Lutheran missionaries and brother
of a GI currently on duty in Iraq, and an aggressive, confident campaigner
with a door-to-door strategy.
He may be a long shot, but a
Democratic victory here would
be an upset of biblical proportions.
After Laesch won the
Democratic nomination over
Zamora in the March primary,
Hastert’s campaign office wasn’t
concerned—even in Aurora, the
most Democratic part of the district,
Hastert drew more votes in
his uncontested primary than
were cast for Laesch and Zamora
combined in theirs.
Still, Hastert has spent the last
five years carrying water for a
president and a set of policies
that are now pretty unpopular.
And unlike John Kerry in 2004,
Laesch isn’t going to put anyone
to sleep. “My life philosophy is,
do unto others as you would have
done unto you,” he told Air
America radio host Sam Seder in
February. “This is drastically different
from the current
Republican Party, which I think
views things as ‘Let’s do it to
them before they do it to us.’”
Laesch favors national health
insurance over expensive and
complicated partial fixes like the
Republicans’ Medicare prescription-
drug plan (which Hastert
got through the House in
November 2003 by holding the
15-minute roll call vote open for
an unprecedented three hours
until enough arms were twisted).
A position paper says next year’s
Democratic Congress—that’s
Laesch’s prediction—should take
the lead in turning the nation’s
energy policy around by sponsoring
a “$5 million contest for scientists,
students, inventors and
engineers to design an alternative
fuel energy efficient engine.”
Locally, he opposes the proposed
Prairie Parkway, which would
run north-south through farmland
in western Kane and
Kendall counties for about 30 miles and link I-88 and I-80.
Usually local pork is a winner,
but Laesch believes this issue
will be Hastert’s Achilles’ heel.
A Brother in the Gulf
CANDIDATE JOHN LAESCH served in the
Persian Gulf from 1996 to 1999, and
his younger brother Pete is now in
Baghdad. In a letter forwarded by his
brother, Pete explained that in 2004 “the
economy stank, my fiancee was getting
testy, my LSAT scores were not exactly
brilliant, and neither was my GPA.
I decided to go back in the Army.”
Doing his job but no fan of this particular
war, he began snapping pictures wherever he
happened to be in Iraq. He sent John an
image of a disarmed bomb in an Iraqi junkyard that might once have been attached
to a MIG aircraft. On it someone had spray
painted, “WEAPON OF DESTRUCTION.”
John suggested that he take more
pictures of GI messages, and now Pete has
hundreds. Most are graffiti on tanks and walls.
Some are political: “MAKE POLITICIANS
DEPLOYABLE.” The vast majority, Pete says,
are personal: words to sweethearts or family
members, commemorations of missed
birthdays and anniversaries, and “at
least two wedding proposals.”
Home on leave, Pete showed a few dozen
slides at his brother’s May 11 fund-raiser at
the Fisherman’s Inn in Elburn. John posted
some at dailykos.com, where he regularly
blogs as a diarist and “trusted user.” He
thinks the photos could become a book or an
art show. Pete would prefer to follow up
someday by looking for the soldiers who
wrote them. “My fascination with this place,”
he says, “is the intersection of so many lives
in such an odd, alienlike place in the world.”
His brother adds, “Pete looks to take
care of the individual, and I am out to
stop the war.”
--Harold Henderson |
It wasn’t local issues that drew
Laesch into politics. A veteran of
U.S. naval intelligence, he was
puzzled when he heard that we
might invade Iraq. The claims
about its weapons of mass
destruction didn’t square with
what he’d learned about the
region during his tour of duty
there from 1996 to ’99, and it
appeared to him that the administration’s
case relied on dubious
informants. His first thought was
to reenlist and help straighten
out the intelligence. Then he
heard Secretary of State Colin
Powell’s UN speech in February
2003 and realized that the flawed
evidence came from the top. In
his mind the Bush administration
was spouting “UFO intelligence”:
“There’s a light in the sky,
therefore they must be little
green men, and therefore they
must be coming to get us.”
Laesch would have Congress
investigate the Bush case for war.
“If that investigation shows that
they misled the country or lied,
then ‘impeachment’ should be the
first word in everyone’s mouth.”
As for the current mess, he thinks we should recognize that
the only thing Iraqis agree on is
that they want our soldiers out,
and we should negotiate a flexible
timetable with their government
for leaving. The U.S. should be
promoting regional disarmament
instead of rattling nuclear
sabers at Iran, he says, with the
caveat that we do need to have a
force nearby in case real trouble
breaks out. In his experience, the
military was a brotherhood and a
chance to learn, “but the guy
driving the machine needs a new
job.” Laesch is backing
Wisconsin’s senator Russell
Feingold for president in 2008.
No surprises here—a me-too
Democrat in the Joe Lieberman
mold wouldn’t be spending time
and money on a long-shot race
like this. But Laesch aims to
blend his unabashedly liberal
positions with personal crossover
appeal. Having hoisted more
than a few bales of hay during
high school in Kendall County,
he enjoys campaigning in the
most rural and most Republican
parts of the district. “Out there
it’s who you are that matters.”
His strategy’s been pieced
together from a stint as a labor
organizer for the Service
Employees International Union,
from reading the blogs of political
activists across the country,
and from the Republicans’ technologically
sophisticated get-out-the-
vote efforts in 2004 battlegrounds
like Ohio. Earlier this
year he helped overthrow what
he calls a “stagnant” Democratic
Party leadership in Kendall
County. The new party machinery
now claims to have precinct
committeemen in 47 of the county’s
64 precincts, though bad feelings
linger from the changeover
and from Laesch’s primary battle
with Zamora. Markos Moulitsas
Zuniga, an NIU alum and the
uber-blogger of dailykos.com, has
described Laesch as a “living
example” of the recommendations
he and Jerome Armstrong
made in their book Crashing the
Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and
the Rise of People-Powered
Politics. Zuniga summarized
them on his blog: “Organize
locally, take over moribund
Democratic Party organizations,
and leave no district behind.
Challenge everyone, everywhere.”
According to Laesch’s version of
this strategy, a 21st-century
precinct committeeman’s job is
not to mass-mail canned propaganda
or inflict robo-calls on local
residents. It’s to organize a doorto-
door campaign, talking to voters
one at a time and noting the
results of every conversation. The
information feeds into the campaign
database, allowing workers
to contact sympathetic voters as
needed and remind them on election
day why it’s important that
they vote. Laesch’s laptop displays
a precinct-by-precinct breakdown
of the district. (“Here in Aurora is
a precinct that’s 65 percent
Democratic, but it had only a
45 percent turnout.”) Person-toperson
politics with high-tech
backup is the way to improve
turnout, he believes. John Kerry
got 125,000 votes in the district
(44 percent) in 2004. “We need
to find those people,” he said—
and the thousands of new
voters moving out to Kane
and Kendall counties.
What are his chances of
winning? “It depends on how
much money I can raise.” He
figures he needs half a million to
make the race; so far he’s raised
less than a tenth of that, and
most of it has been spent.
Laesch is one of several dozen
recent veterans running for
Congress as Democrats. For most
of these “fighting Dems” it’s their
first foray into politics, and most
face uphill battles. Laesch has
met them at gatherings in D.C.,
where he also met Max Cleland,
a Vietnam veteran, triple
amputee, and former Georgia
Democratic senator who in 2002
lost to a Republican challenger
who ran TV ads linking him with
Saddam and Osama—so he
knows what he could face if the
race gets close. He’s also aware
that he can help his fellow candidates
win or lose: a serious challenge
might limit Hastert’s ability
to help Republicans elsewhere.
For those outside the Beltway
who think the country needs a
180-degree turn, “challenge
everywhere” sounds like
common sense. (After all, Karl
Rove made a career of attacking
the opposition at its strongest
point.) But will Illinois and
national Democratic power
brokers back this long shot?
Does Mayor Daley even want
them to? Does Daley want to
cross a speaker of the House
who has supported his O’Hare
expansion plan?
Illinois has two popular
Democratic senators who aren’t
facing reelection campaigns in
2006. Dick Durbin and Barack
Obama have campaigned with
Laesch’s fellow “fighting Dem,” L.
Tammy Duckworth, who’s running
for an open seat in the adjacent
Sixth District. Their political
action committees each gave
her campaign $10,000 in
December, before she’d even won
the primary. That doesn’t mean
they’ll help Laesch.
He doesn’t seem daunted by the
possibility that he may be left to
his own devices: “All it means for
me is I have to think creatively
and differently.” Send a letter to the editor.
|
No comments yet
Add a comment