Made at Medill
Entertainment Weekly TV critic Gillian Flynn writes about
the crime reporter she never was.
By Jerome Ludwig
November 3, 2006
CAMILLE PREAKER, THE heroine of
Gillian Flynn’s debut novel,
Sharp Objects, is a reporter
for a second-rate newspaper called
the Chicago Daily Post. In an effort
to boost lagging sales with a sensational
story, her crusty but compassionate
editor sends her on
assignment back home to the small
town of Wind Gap, Missouri, to
cover the grisly, unsolved murders
of two preteen girls. Camille has to
not only deal with the suspicions
and gossip of Wind Gap’s leery residents
but must also grapple with
her obsessive, control-freak mother
and her 13-year-old half sister, a
borderline psycho who wields
unnerving control over her schoolmates.
To complicate matters,
Camille herself, sharp as a tack and
beautiful but emotionally distant
(and a bit of a boozer), has been
recently released from a psych
ward: a “cutter,” for years she’s
sliced words over nearly every inch
of her body. As she comes ever
closer to unraveling the mystery of
the murders, she’s drawn deeper
into the dark secrets of both the
town and her family.
It’s an unsettling and creepy
tale—and a far cry from the work
that Flynn, 35, does in her day job
as lead TV critic for Entertainment
Weekly. “Yeah,” she says, “I pad out
in my pajamas in the morning and
watch TV for four or five hours . . . .
It’s a good gig.”
At one time Flynn imagined that
she might be a crime reporter herself.
The daughter of teachers in
Kansas City, Missouri, she majored
in English and journalism at the
University of Kansas before going on
to grad school at Northwestern’s
Medill School of Journalism. As a
reporter for the Medill News Service
she covered all sorts of local news,
from the dedication of a corner park
to court cases and labor conflicts. But
in 1998, fresh out of school, she
landed an entry-level job at
Entertainment Weekly in New York
City, answering phones and opening
the mail. Eventually she moved on to
write movie reviews and other features
(an admitted Lord of the Rings
geek, she got to meet director Peter
Jackson and go to New Zealand a
few times), and was ensconced there
until a couple years ago, when EW
decided to increase its presence in
Los Angeles. Flynn moved west,
having had enough of New York.
She’d started writing Sharp
Objects in 2001. “I’d dabbled in fiction
but I’d certainly never published
fiction before, or anything
like that,” she says. “I just kinda
started writing to see if I could.” The
character of Camille, she says, was
based a bit on her experience at
Medill, where, she says, “I discovered
I was a much better writer
than a hard-core reporter. That’s
what I figured I would do with my
life, and I very quickly discovered
that I was horrible at it. I hated
trying to walk up to people in large
crowds, so she was kind of based on
that. . . . She has to have a couple
drinks before she talks to people.”
Though she ran some medical passages
past doctors and dentists she
knew, she didn’t do a lot of research.
“I didn’t want it to read like a police
procedural,” she says. “I wanted to
keep that sort of gothic-fairy-tale-gone-wrong tone.” When she was
done she sent the manuscript, “whole
hog,” to Stephanie Roston at the
Levine Greenberg Literary Agency.
“I had a conversation with her, and
had lunch with her one time,” says
Flynn, “and we just clicked. And,
uh, then she sold it!”
Sharp Objects was published by
Shaye Areheart Books, Crown’s literary
imprint, in September. Her
industry contacts were invaluable
in getting jacket blurbs from
Harlan Cohen and Stephen King,
who calls the novel “an admirably
nasty piece of work.”
By then Flynn was a Chicagoan
again: she moved here in March.
“To me it is the definition of a big
city, since I was a kid,” she says.
“New York was like a fairy tale, and
LA didn’t seem real. Chicago is a
place I’ve actually visited and loved.
I always thought it was the kind of
place I’d want to live when I was
grown-up.” She currently lives in
Wicker Park, where, in a move
that seems to say she’s here to stay,
she replaced her old box TV with a
40-inch Samsung flat screen about
a month ago. 
Send a letter to the editor.
|
Flag as inappropriate
Christina at 11:52 AM on 8/12/2007
her book is really good. i just read four chapters and got it a week or so ago (the reason that i havent read that much yet, is because my boyfriend is here now, which he lives 3 hours away so cant exactly read as much as i'd like to). but yeah, great book!
Flag as inappropriate
Damon Devereux at 12:00 AM on 9/9/2007
I read this book in a scant week, and was completely enraptured from start to finish. I am still meditating on it a week or two hence. In the tradition of Chuck Palaniuk, the story is raw, provocative, and both utterly real and disturbingly unreal. It makes the reader feel both alive and envigorated, and dead, deflated and hopeless simultaneously. It passionately expresses the essence of the existential, orgasmic state and balance or our pathetic and ecstatic sojourn through this ugly and radiant world. Beautiful work, Ms. Flynn - I cannot wait to read your next book.
Add a comment