Alice in Genderland
As a woman, Alice Sheldon was a frustrated debutante. As James Tiptree Jr., she revolutionized science fiction.
By Susannah J. Felts
November 3, 2006
BY THE TIME she was ten years
old, Alice Bradley had seen
up close two dead bodies
lashed to posts on a trail in the
Belgian Congo. She’d lain awake in
a tent listening to the screams of a
man being killed and slept with the
formaldehyde-soaked remains of a
young gorilla beneath her cot. She’d
accompanied her parents on three
excursions to Africa and been
described in the New York Times as
the “First White Child Ever Seen by
the Pigmy Tribes.” She’d watched
her parents prepare for a lion hunt
and longed for a gun of her own.
Alice grew up accustomed to public
scrutiny. She was the only child of
Herbert and Mary Hastings Bradley,
wealthy, prominent Chicagoans
whose celebrated expeditions to
Africa in the 20s and 30s produced
some of the first big-game specimens
seen in this country. Herbert
was a respected lawyer and real
estate investor, Mary a prolific
author. Her fiction appeared in Good
Housekeeping, Ladies’ Home Journal,
and the Saturday Evening Post, and
her account of the first African
expedition, later published as On
the Gorilla Trail, ran as a ten-week
serial in the Chicago Tribune. She
wrote two children’s books inspired
by the family’s adventures, Alice in
Jungleland and Alice in
Elephantland, which her daughter
illustrated. Mary was frequently
asked to lecture on her travels and
was inducted into the Society of
Women Geographers, whose membership
grew to include heavyweights
like Amelia Earhart, Margaret Mead,
and Eleanor Roosevelt.
Young Alice found her mother’s
long shadow impossible to outrun.
“I couldn’t count the times I was
patted on the head by some
Eminence and told, ‘Little girl, if
you’re ever half as talented, half as
charming, half as good-capable-warmhearted-
plucky-beautiful-witty-(name ten)-as your mother,
you’ll be lucky,’” she wrote. When
Alice took up painting in her 20s,
she did so partly because it was just
the sort of refined, creative pursuit
at which her parents wished to see
her excel. She stabbed away at
writing for years, trying her hand at
journalism, a novel, a treatise on
aesthetics, and occasional short stories,
one of which was published in
the New Yorker in 1946. (Unhappy
with the editing process, she never
submitted there again.)
But Alice never seemed at peace
with the life she’d been born into.
As she matured she spun in multiple
new directions—chicken
farmer, research psychologist, CIA
agent—constantly in search of an
identity more true to herself. It
wasn’t until 1967, at the age of 51,
that she found her medium. On a
whim she began writing short science
fiction stories—under a male
pseudonym, James Tiptree Jr.—and
went on to become one of the
genre’s groundbreaking figures.
Tiptree became Alice’s mouthpiece,
a workable if flawed strategy
for expressing ideas and passions
that didn’t fit the scripts available
to women of her time. Her writing
under the alias received multiple
Hugo and Nebula awards, and four
years after her death in 1987, two
science fiction writers, Karen
Fowler and Pat Murphy, launched
the Tiptree Award in her memory,
recognizing works that “explore
and expand gender.” Mainstream
literary writers such as Aimee
Bender, Jonathan Lethem, and
Salman Rushdie have been honored
alongside sci-fi heavyweights
Ursula K. Le Guin, Samuel Delany,
and Nalo Hopkinson.
James Tiptree, Jr.:
The Double
Life of Alice
B. Sheldon
Julie Phillips
St. Martin’s Press
When Fri 11/10,
7:30 PM
Where Women &
Children First,
5233 N. Clark
Info 773-769-9299
Julie Phillips, a Netherlands-based
journalist, wrote about the
Tiptree Award in an article about
feminist science fiction for Ms. in
1994. “I did so much reading for
that story that I thought, I have to
see if I can get another out of this,”
she says. After completing a piece
about Tiptree for the Village Voice
in 1996, Phillips decided Alice’s life
merited book treatment. “It had
never occurred to me to write a
biography, but this just came along,
and it was fascinating,” she says.
Phillips’s dense, thoughtful book,
James Tiptree, Jr.: The Double Life
of Alice B. Sheldon (Alice took the
name Sheldon after her second
marriage), has been praised in the
New York Times Book Review and
Salon since its August release and
stands to bring new readers to what
little of Tiptree’s work is currently in
print. Tachyon Publications, which
printed 2,500 copies of the Tiptree
story collection Her Smoke Rose Up
Forever in 2004, has launched a
second printing in response to the
demand spurred by the biography.
“Early on we tried to help Julie promote
her book as best we could
because we didn’t want it to disappear,”
says Jacob Weisman,
Tachyon’s publisher. “We were naive
enough to believe that her book
needed our support.”
In the process of analyzing the
full scope of Alice’s life, Phillips also
exhumes Mary Bradley, who died in
1976 in the Hyde Park apartment
where she’d lived for more than 60
years. The biographer believes it
was Alice’s relationship with her
mother that gives the story a sense
of continuity: with each new career,
each move away from Chicago,
Alice was driving yet another
wedge between herself and Mary,
whom she nevertheless admired a
great deal and never stopped measuring
herself against. Her desire to
prove herself, the book argues, may
have prevented Alice from ever
being able to fully integrate the
parts of her identity—sexuality
chief among them—that didn’t fit
the Bradley mold.
Much like her daughter, Mary
was a woman divided; unlike
her, she seems to have been comfortable
with the balancing act. A
working writer with a solid reputation
at a time when women were
expected not to have aspirations
beyond the domestic, she was also a
mother, a socialite, and a consummate
hostess. “She wanted to be a
mother and an adventure heroine
both, to shoot lions and raise a
daughter at the same time,” Phillips
writes. “There was pressure on her
not to do this.” When the Bradleys
announced plans to go to Africa
with Carl Akeley, a family friend
and a hunter and naturalist who
worked for the American Museum
of Natural History, Phillips notes,
“editorials cast doubt on Mary’s fitness
as a mother or suggested that
Akeley was taking the women along
as decoys to attract male gorillas.”
Alice, who’d previously attended
the University of Chicago Lab School,
was sent off to a prestigious Swiss
academy at the age of 14. There and
at Sarah Lawrence—then a two-year
women’s college—her fellow students
viewed her as a glamorous, sleepdeprived
oddball. She was erratic in
her studies, distracted by romances
and moody impulses, and though she
bridled against her family’s elite
standing she wasn’t immune to the
lure of expensive fashion, banquets,
and gossip columns.
This image of the author as a
young woman was a surprise and
even a disappointment to Phillips,
who says she’d expected Alice to
“rebel and take control of her life
from beginning to end.
“I wanted her to be a geek like everybody else who writes science
fiction,” she says. “It wasn’t like that.
I think she was a geek, but a geek in
the body of a beautiful debutante.
She was so beautiful and socially
fortunate that there were a lot of
temptations to go down that road.
She couldn’t make the geek go away,
but in the end she could kind of
muffle the beautiful debutante.”
Phillips suggests that Alice’s
beauty was an early burden. If she
hadn’t been beautiful, “she might
have rejected the roles for girls and
tried to make something new.”
Instead she “practiced femininity
and flirtation, and got addicted to
the rewards for being a pretty girl.”
But Alice’s journals suggest that
even as a young adult she’d begun to
ponder the problem of being an
intelligent, unconventional woman
in a man’s world. More confusing,
during her years at Sarah Lawrence
she developed the first of several
unrequited crushes on girls and
began suffering mood swings.
Depression was a tiger in the cage
with Alice the rest of her life, fueling
a dependency on pills, especially
speed, and an attraction to suicide.
On December 20, 1934, when she
was 19, Alice made her debut at a
tea attended by more than 400
guests. At a celebratory formal
dance on Christmas Eve, she met a
stepson of Cyrus McCormick Jr. and
eloped with him several days later,
an act that scandalized her parents
and made the Tribune’s front page.
The couple moved to California,
then Greenwich Village. Their ultimately
disastrous partnership lasted
six years, during which time Alice
had an abortion and several affairs.
In the late 1930s she painted, wrote
art criticism for the Chicago Sun,
and—with money from her first and
only sale of artwork, a nude self-portrait—
bought the gun she’d
always coveted, a Fox CE double-barrel
12-gauge shotgun. As it
turned out, she was a crack shot.
In 1942 Alice signed up for the
Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps,
which she’d romanticized as a place
where women were in control. But
the secretarial work was stifling, the
efforts at female solidarity not so
utopian. Despite her disillusionment,
she reenlisted when the corps was reformed
with full military status as
the Women’s Army Corps. Assigned
to the Pentagon, she worked her
way into the new field of intelligence
as an interpreter of highaltitude
photographs. In the spring
of 1945 she was reassigned to Paris,
where she met a colonel 12 years her
senior, Huntington “Ting” Sheldon.
They were married less than a
month later—again an impulsive
partnering, but this time for keeps.
After a few rough spots, Ting and
Alice developed a devoted if (Phillips
posits) largely platonic relationship.
TING AND ALLI—as Alice began
calling herself around this time—returned to the States in 1946. For
four years they ran a chicken
hatchery in New Jersey, a gig they’d
been led to believe would allow them
plenty of leisure time. When the novelty
wore off they sold the farm and
moved to Washington, where they
both took positions in the CIA. Ting
stayed for the duration of his career,
but while Alice liked the work and
atmosphere well enough at first,
before long she got itchy: the hours
were too long for the limited
advancement available to women,
and she longed to pour energy into
creative and intellectual projects of
her own. She went back to school in
1957 and ultimately earned a PhD in
experimental psychology from
George Washington University.
The rigor and challenge of academic
pursuit suited Alice, but
during the final stages of her dissertation
something else began to take
root in her mind. She started
directing more and more energy into
writing fiction, and in 1967 sent several
short stories out to magazines
like Fantastic and Galaxy under the
moniker James Tiptree Jr. The name
Tiptree came from a jar of jam Alice
had spied at a grocery store; she
picked the first name, Ting suggested
the junior. (In 1972 Alice
invented a female persona,
Raccoona Sheldon, under which she
wrote stories she thought were more
feminine, with characters who were
defined by their empathic urges.
Raccoona’s work was never as well
received as Tiptree’s, though a
horror novella called “The Screwfly
Solution” did win a Nebula.)
Phillips suggests that, having
accomplished the serious writing
her degree required, Alice felt free
to indulge her impulse to write science
fiction. The alias gave her “not
just the authority to speak, but the
courage to play games, to be bad at
something, to stop trying to be polished
and perfect but to be amateurish
and silly and have fun.” She
sent off slight pieces peppered with
dirty jokes and stories that creaked
under moralistic weight, and from
the start her writing was lauded for
its quick narrative pacing and taut
prose. Her first real breakthrough
came with “The Last Flight of Dr.
Ain,” published in 1969, in which a
biologist spreads a deadly strain of
influenza with the goal of killing off
the human race and saving earth.
The story came close to winning a
Nebula Award and “established
Tiptree as a writer to watch, with
depth, worldliness, and narrative
style,” Phillips writes.
Some of the earliest Tiptree stories
drew on Alice’s experiences in the
CIA, some bore traces of the subversion
of gender roles that defined the
best of her later work, and many
evinced the fascination with space
exploration that characterized
American culture in the late 60s. But
Alice was also clearly hacking
through some weedy personal terrain. In the Hugo Award winner
“The Girl Who Was Plugged In,” an
ugly teenager agrees to be locked in a
cabinet; in return she’s able to control
the body of an artificially constructed
proxy, a blond movie star.
“Among other things,” Phillips
observes, “the story seems to echo the
uneasy relationship between Alli and
Tiptree: the inadequate private self
operates the attractive persona by
remote, and division is the precondition
of a complete self.”
If the Tiptree persona was another
attempt at independence from the
Bradley story, it also allowed Alice to
circle back to her
mixed emotions
about the displacement
and
joy that characterized
her childhood.
A critic
described
Tiptree’s stories
as populated by
“people searching
for Home with
the obsessive and
monomaniacal
intensity of Ahab
in pursuit of the
White Whale.
Interestingly, the
Homes in these
stories are
seldom idyllic—in fact they are
often hurtful and
ugly. But for
most Tiptree characters, the issue is
never in doubt: in spite of logic, personal
welfare, or comfort, the only
important thing is to regain the
Home that has been lost.”
Alice had opted into a long literary
tradition of women who’d sought
greater authority or approval by
hiding or downplaying their gender.
But her deception was founded in
truth: in the voluminous letters she
wrote as Tiptree, Alice didn’t hide or
fudge any salient details of her life.
Rather, her life became his. Tiptree,
Phillips writes, enabled Alice to “feel
taken seriously when she wrote abut
what she knew: guns, hunting, politics,
war. It let her write the way she
wanted to write, with an urgency that
was hers. It gave her enough distance
and control to speak honestly about
herself.” As Tiptree Alice cultivated
flirtatious, epistolary friendships with
such dedication that for a while her
fiction writing dropped off in favor of
correspondence. Chief among her pen
pals were Ursula Le Guin—whom she
nicknamed “Starbear”—and Joanna
Russ, with whom she tangled intellectually
about feminism. Russ, interestingly,
seemed on to Tiptree—“Do you
know,” she wrote to him at one point,
“there’s a good deal about you that
seems to me more like women I know
than like men I know in the way you
handle your feelings?”—but she never
explicitly questioned his gender.
Tiptree’s literary reputation skyrocketed.
In a gushing 1969 acceptance
letter Harlan Ellison, then
editing an anthology called Again,
Dangerous Visions, wrote, “You are
the single most important new writer
in science fiction today. Nobody
touches you! . . . I am so fucking
destructed by what you’ve allowed
me to read, I don’t know how to say
thank you.” The author’s mystique
only stoked the buzz traveling
through the tight-knit science fiction
community. At a convention in 1974,
a false rumor that Tiptree was lurking
spread like a virus. A few readers
speculated that he might actually be
a woman; others concluded that his
prose was distinctly masculine. Early
on a fan dropped by the Sheldon
home in McLean, Virginia; Alice told
him he was mistaken, that no man
named Tiptree lived there. After that
she opened a post office box.
AT THE SAME TIME as her career
as Tiptree was taking off, Alice
was also coping with her mother’s
declining health. She’d travel to
Chicago to see Mary and arrange for
her care, but often her concern was
expressed long-distance, through letters
and phone calls. To Mary this
might well have felt like abandonment;
for Alice it might have been
yet another act of self-preservation.
Mary’s feeble state, Phillips argues,
could only have enhanced Alice’s preoccupation
with death, a common
theme in Tiptree’s narratives.
It was Mary’s death in late October
1976 that inadvertently revealed
Tiptree’s true identity. Alice, writing
under her pseudonym, had made it
known that “his” mother lived in
Chicago and had been an explorer;
when Mary’s obituary appeared in the
Tribune, listing Alice as her only survivor,
rumors began circulating based
on the similarities between her bio
and Tiptree’s. Alice first came clean to
one of her editors, then gradually to
her friends in letters she wrote
through the end of the year. In one she
wrote, “I never felt deceptive. One
knows when one is being devious and
nasty and untrue, you know. I was
always just being me.” In another she
offered a glimpse of her lifelong
struggle with identity when she wrote,
after the unveiling, that Alice Sheldon
was “not a science fiction writer or
any other kind of writer. I am
nothing. Must learn to be happy so.”
Sexuality was another struggle
Alice had failed to resolve. As
Tiptree she’d written about her
teenage crushes but still held them
at arm’s length. To Joanna Russ,
who’d expressed to Alice the liberation
she felt upon coming out, she
wrote, “It occurred to me to wonder
if I ever told you in so many words
that I too am a Lesbian . . . Oh, had
65 years been different! I like some
men a lot, but from the start, before
I knew anything, it was always girls
and women who lit me up.” Though
she cultivated the closest female
friendships of her life in Tiptree’s
letters, Alice never acted on her
desires for women. It was just one
more piece that didn’t quite fit.
Alice kept up her literary friendships,
and about four years later
began to write as Tiptree again. But
the alter ego had lost its magic, and
Alice, free of her mother, still wasn’t
free from herself. Ting was going
blind and her own health was deteriorating;
her bouts of depression,
frequent and fierce, often paralyzed
her. She rejected the idea of writing
an autobiography: “I will NOT
return to being a Bradley
appendage.” She’d talked about suicide
for years, and Ting had reluctantly
agreed that they would take
their own lives when they became
too old or ill to enjoy them. In 1987,
at age 71, she shot her ailing husband
in his sleep, then pulled the
trigger on herself.
ALICE’S PAPERS ARE housed in the
basement of the Baltimore
home of her literary trustee, Jeffrey
D. Smith, who became friends with
the author in the mid-70s after
interviewing Tiptree by mail for his
zine, Phantasmicon. In his care are
journals, letters, news clippings,
unfinished autobiographical essays,
and the three interviews Alice ever
gave (two as herself, one as Tiptree).
A few friends had suggested Smith
attempt a biography himself but “I
always said no,” he says. “I’d looked
at the material enough to know that
there were some periods of her life
that I had a lot of information on
and other parts I had virtually no
information on.”
“I think he was still so busy
respecting Tiptree’s privacy that he
hadn’t gone through everything he
had,” says Phillips. Smith acknowledges
there was “a lot of material
that no-one had ever seen” until
Phillips started her research. When
she came along, he was happy to
help, filling the backseat of her car
with boxes and granting her permission
to photocopy at will. She spent
hours at Kinko’s with Alice’s papers.
“Later on,” she says, “when I started
going to real archives where you
have to handle the photos with
white gloves, that was kind of a
shock.” One such archive was the
Mary Hastings Bradley Papers at
the UIC library: 171 boxes of published work, journals, manuscripts,
letters, photographs and negatives,
crumbling scrapbooks, magazine
and newspaper clippings, even
clothes, all bequeathed by Alice.
Although she’d found frequent
praise of Mary’s stories in Alice’s
writing, Phillips was underwhelmed.
They weren’t the “undiscovered
gems” she’d hoped for;
rather, they were a brand of light,
popular fiction that now seems
dated. Mary herself remains a bit of
an enigma: though always confident
and composed in the folds of elite
Chicago, she did, according to
Alice’s journals and letters, harbor
her own grim preoccupation with
death. In particular, she worried
about Herbert’s when Alice was
young, and she grieved terribly for a
second daughter who was born four
years after Alice and lived only one
day. “She certainly liked to create
the appearance that she was sailing
through life,” Phillips says, “and that
was something Alice said about her:
all the suffering went on behind
closed doors, with Herbert and
Alice as her only confidants. I think
that was really hard on Alice.” Alice
once wrote of her mother, “She had
emotion enough for 10, but I got it
all, and was always—perhaps
wrongly—aware that had the others
existed she wouldn’t have cared
much for me. Or perhaps we could
really have been friends, if I hadn’t
been also her sole possession and
projection into the future.”
Phillips found Mary’s journals to
be little more than carefully kept
activity logs. “She didn’t seem to have
much of an inner life, so that didn’t
make her very interesting to me as a
biographical subject.” But Mary does
seem compelling to former librarian
Sandra Naiman, who’s been
researching her at UIC for a year.
Naiman says she first heard about
Mary Bradley 25 years ago when she
was working at the Elmhurst Public
Library. “A woman who was a regular
patron came up to me one day and
said, ‘You know, I was going to write
a book on what I’m going to tell you
about, but I’ve decided to make a
present of it to you,’” she says. The
woman, who apparently had been
involved with the accession of the
Mary Bradley Papers, told Naiman
she was “fascinated by the material—which had been given to the library
by the woman’s daughter—because
of the way it showed how much her
daughter hated her. And of course I
was intrigued.” Naiman had lived in
Hyde Park years before; she suspects
that she might have known
people who knew Mary Bradley or
even crossed paths with her from
time to time. “I love Chicago, and
I’m interested particularly in Mary
in the context of Chicago in her lifetime,”
she says. “How extraordinary
was she, exactly?”
Naiman agrees that the journals
are light on introspection, and she
too describes the fiction as “dated.”
But she’s still fascinated by Mary’s
“incredible combination of opposites:
she was enormously attractive
to men, but she could do these
heroic things like climb up muddy
mountains in Africa.” Whatever animosity
tempered the love between
her and her daughter, she says, is
“not my main interest.” But because
“Alice didn’t want to go see her
mother when [Mary] had lavished
so much care and attention and
money on her,” she does feel
unkindly toward her. She says Alice
strikes her as a person “hell-bent on
blabbing her feelings on a variety of
subjects. Alice just seems to me to
have been an incredibly spoiled
person.” In her view, Mary and
Alice’s relationship is one characterized
by “an inability to move on
emotionally from late-adolescent
mother-daughter feelings.”
As similar as mother and
daughter were in some respects,
they stood worlds apart when it
came to their responses to questions
of gender and culture. Mary was
simply not one to gnaw at the
problem of being a woman in a
man’s world; Alice couldn’t stop. Nor
could Alice reach a satisfying conclusion.
While her science fiction
offered challenging takes on gender
in an era when feminist voices were
deepening the genre’s complexity,
her personal response to the movement
was marked by ambivalence.
“One of the ironies of Alli’s career as
Tiptree is that she insisted most on
the biological, essential nature of
gender at the moment she seemed to
be proving that it was all an act, that
gender was what you said it was
after all,” Phillips writes.
Naturally, Phillips says her sympathies
are with Alice. “Mary’s influence
loomed so large over Alice’s life
that I felt like I had to defend Alice
against her in a funny way,” she says.
“It seemed like nobody had ever
been on Alice’s side, and it was my
job to say that Alice was more
important than Mary. All her life it
had been the other way around.”  Send a letter to the editor.
|
No comments yet
Add a comment