Chicago Reader [ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Pitchfork Music Festival - Union Park - July 17 - 19 ] [ Food & Drink - Openings and closings, deals and special events, and more - Sign up now ]

 

Reader Info
Advertising, subscriptions, staff, privacy policy, contact info, freelancers' guidelines, etc.

[ Chicago Reader FREE STUFF: ALEFEST Soldier Field July 11 ]

[ Chicago Reader FREE TIX: Kathy Griffin - The Chicago Theatre - October 8 & 9 ]


submit to the windy citizen | Digg! Digg this | del.icio.us | E-mail E-mail this | facebook Facebook

Lit

Pulp Porn

The long-awaited sequel to a sexy sci-fi comic.

Tranceptor: Book Two: Iron Gauge, Part One Patrick Conlon and Michael Manning (Amerotica)

When we think of genre fiction, we tend to think of sci-fi, detective, horror, western, romance, and the like. Porn doesn’t make the list—it’s set off in a box by itself for special censure or, less often, praise. But why? Like other genre forms, porn is broadly popular, has its own predictable tropes, and appeals primarily (though not exclusively) to one gender. Porn isn’t an absolute evil ruining our children, nor is it a liberating force releasing repressed sexuality—it’s just another marketing niche.

This isn’t meant as a sneer. On the contrary, once you stop thinking about porn as a moral outrage or anthropological curiosity and start thinking of it as just another pulp genre, it’s easier to see its virtues and put its vices in context. Like other great genre narratives—Agatha Christie’s novels, say, or John Carpenter’s movies—good porn fulfills obvious expectations in surprising ways while veering vertiginously between extreme technical competence and grungy amateurism. But most important, porn, like pulp, doesn’t care about good taste, so the best examples have an energy and imagination that are hard to find in more sedate forms.

There’s nothing sedate about Patrick Conlon and Michael Manning’s Tranceptor comic book series, the second, long-delayed volume of which was finally released last month, a full nine years after the first. Despite the hiatus, Tranceptor: Book Two: Iron Gauge, Part One picks up right where the original left off, following the adventures of the titular (in various ways) Tranceptors, a kind of priesthood of dominatrices who ride through a postapocalyptic landscape in chariots pulled by buxom leather-clad horse-girls and/or well-hung leather-clad horse-boys. Our heroine, called simply the Tranceptor, has inventively intimate encounters with her horse-girls (involving chains, water, lather, and various attachments), with another Tranceptor named Ravanna, and with Hyu, a cute subgroom at a way station who looks decidedly underage. Most spectacularly, the Tranceptor is raped by Ravanna’s pal, a disgusting mutant lizard called Sslthsss. (She sustains no apparent physical or psychological damage—the Tranceptors are a tough bunch.)

This is all good, trashy, stylish fun: Conlon is a tattoo artist, and he and Manning have that testosterone swagger down cold. The first volume, Tranceptor: The Way Station, opens with a tour de force of faux noir: stark white light and sensual black shadows wash over piles of fetish gear and a voluptuously writhing sleeping female form complete with obligatory ass shots and nipple eruptions. The cynically exploitive surface flash is certainly part of the charm—but it isn’t the only thing going on either.

Manning and Conlon’s series is in many ways heir to the tradition in which porn (like all pulp) cross-pollinates with other genres. The sci-fi fertilization has been particularly intense. The magazine Heavy Metal is an obvious touchstone, but much of the avant-garde SF movement from the 70s on has involved explicit erotica. Writers like Samuel R. Delany and John Varley lovingly fetishize gender transformation and interspecies intercourse. One paradigmatic example, Piers Anthony’s “In the Barn,” features an alternate universe where some human beings are deliberately brain-damaged and kept in barns to be bred and milked like cattle. Our dimension-hopping hero gets to offer stud services as the story boldly explores the realm where “controversial and brave” slides right into “surreptitious stroke material.”

Tranceptor is much more comfortable with its pulp qualities than its highbrow predecessors. Delany uses his forays into porn in a contradictory but hardly unique effort to cement his bona fides as an artiste. Anthony is a bit more confused—but it’s clear that he’s conflicted about being a pornographer. That’s not all to the bad: the intense anxiety inherent in “In the Barn” contributes to its squicky charge. There’s also something to be said for being on top of your shit, though: Conlon and Manning’s perversion isn’t so much fraught as enthusiastically delectable. Probably the best image in the book is a panel of Sslthsss, lying on a beam, head resting on his hands, watching his mistress below suck off one of her horse-boys. The lizard looks like a happy cat, thoroughly entertained. To complete the picture, he’s got one of the station men, Raika, tied up and dangling from his tail, and his outsize scaly member is dripping cum on the poor guy’s head.

In highbrow SF—or for that matter in Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie’s historical/porn/literary hybrid Lost Girls—such perversity often serves as a labored allegory of freedom, mutability, or desire. It’s the pulpy goodness about which the highbrow wax literary; Moore, for example, laboriously leads his characters into a roomful of costumes to drive home the joys of role-playing. But in Tranceptor the perversion is amplified not by exegesis but by pulp tropes. The Tranceptors, for example, are treated like a typical mysterious sci-fi matriarchy reminiscent of the Bene Gesserit in Dune. So when Ravanna casually reaches into Raika’s pants and pulls out his penis, it comes across as both funny and weirdly transgressive—especially since Sslthsss is holding his arms so he can’t escape. Depicting the following hand job over two pages, Conlon and Manning use a range of hysterically intricate motion lines to show Ravanna’s finger motions while she natters on, the typical scheming villainess. The sequence’s last panel, looking down at Ravanna from Raika’s viewpoint as she looks up at him, is a blend of dominant and submissive fantasies bound up with genre cliches into one supremely sexy package.

In Manning’s Spider Garden series, moments like this are woven together seamlessly to create a world in which gender, sexuality, and identity flow and break down in a humid orgy of paranoia and soap opera romance. Tranceptor hasn’t yet reached those heights, though there are hints it might. Most promising is the series’ obsessive doubling. The second volume is split between scenes with the Tranceptor, all bright whites and light grays, and scenes with Ravanna, very dark, with halftones against solid black backgrounds and the shadowy Sslthsss lurking nearby. The dark/light mirroring is extended by other parallels: there are two identical horse-girls, two identical horse-boys, two young men taken from the station (Raika by Ravanna, Hyu by the Tranceptor). Where all this is leading isn’t clear. But good versus evil and dueling doppelgangers are tried-and-true genre devices—and a genre device is really just another name for a particular cathexis of possibility and desire. In this sense porn isn’t just pulp; it’s Platonic pulp. Or at least it can seem that way when you’re reading Tranceptor.   R

Send a letter to the editor.

Comments

Flag as inappropriate

ooookay at 3:45 PM on 1/10/2008

Well, Noah we all now know what material you've used for beating off in the last decade.

Too bad the idea of porn as a bridge between high and low art is not exactly as fresh as you think, especially when it's used as an excuse to describe your favorite stroke scenes in detail.

I suspect you typed this whole thing with one hand.

Flag as inappropriate

K at 4:33 PM on 1/10/2008

Noah, what the heck makes you think that there's anything remotely transgressive about "Tranceptor"? It portrays women in a way that confirms the mainstream (i.e. patriarchal) culture's favorite images of eks eks eks slutttts. There's nothing in the least transgressive about that.

Flag as inappropriate

Noah Berlatsky at 6:45 AM on 1/11/2008

K -- I said Tranceptor violates some sci-fi expectations and tropes around authority. That makes it transgressive in a limited way. I certainly don't think, and didn't argue that, it's overthrowing the patriarchy, certainly. On the other hand, I really don't think it's misogynist either; the women have distinct personalities, and are represented as intelligent, resourceful, and having political power. I know some feminists believe that any portrayal of fetish material, or even porn, is sexist; I just don't agree (though I have a lot of respect for Andrea Dworkin, for example.)

ooookay, I pointed out in the essay that porn was often used as a bridge between high and low art in certain ways (note the discussion about Delaney). I think Tranceptor negotiates that territory in an interesting and memorable way. In a positive review, you of course talk about aspects of the book that you enjoy. I'm not really sure why that's less appropriate in a review of pornography than in a review of a work of literature. If you don't like porn as a genre, that's fine, but if you're interested in it, it seems worthwhile to think about the themes and cultural position of a particular work, just as you would for any other piece of art.

And the Reader assigns these things on deadline. Typing with one hand isn't really an option.

Flag as inappropriate

Noah Berlatsky at 8:58 AM on 1/11/2008

Incidentally, for those folks who are interested, Manning's website is here:
http://www.thespidergarden.net/
Also, I'm putting together a symposium on The Gay Utopia which touches on many of the issues in this review. Besides Michael Manning (who contributed a fascinating article on Aubrey Beardsley), other participants will include Ursula K. Le Guin, cartoonists Dame Darcy, Johnny Ryan, Ariel Schrag, Reader critic Bert Stabler feminist writer Jennifer Baumgardner, trans-activist Julia Serano, artists Scott Treleaven and Paul Nudd, and a whole host of other people. I'm hoping to put the symposium online in a couple of weeks; I'll have more information about it at that time on my blog:
http://hoodedutilitarian.blogspot.com/

Add a comment

Required, but will never be displayed

This math problem is an anti-spam measure

(please read our policy)



From the Reader blogs

On Film Ed M. Koziarski: "Mustachioed perverts in a spaceship fire upon a deformed, nude woman daily" in Lale Westvind's "Flesh Gun," screening in Chi(a)nimation All-Stars Sunday at Nightingale.
Friday at 11:37 am

 



We welcome your comments and suggestions. Click here to send us a message.

©1996-2009 Creative Loafing Media All Rights Reserved.