<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: New Craigslist Costs
    
      by Michael Miner</title>
      <link>http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/10/02/new-craigslist-costs</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Rss.xml?oid=945777&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: New Craigslist Costs
    
      by Michael Miner</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:15:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: New Craigslist Costs]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/10/02/new-craigslist-costs/#952267]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/10/02/new-craigslist-costs/#952267]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Tom Sherman]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[That may be spin, but it's still cheap.  I have no problem with it.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Tom Sherman]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:54:15 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: New Craigslist Costs]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/10/02/new-craigslist-costs/#953119]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/10/02/new-craigslist-costs/#953119]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Delia]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[re: "As is usually the case when fees are introduced or raised, Craigslist is presenting this change as progress."
    
    Hi, Michael!
    
    I would have looked into that claim: what happens with that money? -- it appears to go straight into Craig&Co's pockets instead of being used to provide customer service and inprovements...
    
    Delia
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Delia]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:30 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




