<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The radicals
    
      by Mick Dumke</title>
      <link>http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Rss.xml?oid=944643&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The radicals
    
      by Mick Dumke</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:15:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#971438]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#971438]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mike]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[You  dont  possibly suppose  that  some  of  the  8 million  that this  church  has  received  in the  last 7  years  might  have  possibly  come  from George Bush's  "faith  base  initative program?"
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by mike]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:46:43 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#958482]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#958482]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[careaboutfacts]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[@Pete
    
    "As for the substantial accuracy of "God Da*n America" ...? You can debate that nine ways 'til Sunday, if you'd like. Point being that he violated on of the 10 Commandments, again, on the pulpit. 
    
    He's a man of God. He should know the old man upstairs doesn't take kindly to having his name used in vein, right?"
    
    He didn't violate any commandments.  As far as I undertand it, the Christian God is and always has been in the 'damning' business.  He not only dislikes sin he also 'damns' sinners to hell.
    
    When evangelical preachers first starting getting radio time back around the 1920's they were the only ones allowed to use the words 'damn' and 'hell' on air.  Because that's part of what the Christian religion is - factually -about.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by careaboutfacts]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:59:35 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#969343]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#969343]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mike]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[where did this grant information come from?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Mike]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:31:55 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#956121]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#956121]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[R U Gene Pincham]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'll pay yall to bury me...give ya a dollar and free legal service...bury me on the 12th of April I ain't got court then.
    Bring  me some ice water and sunscreen for my soul, I'm gonna need it for where I'se goin...
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by R U Gene Pincham]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:46:31 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#947871]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#947871]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fuck Chris Matthews & Co]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[They are the ROYAL KISSASSES of the Obama mania.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Fuck Chris Matthews & Co]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:29:44 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#960135]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#960135]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Not Like You.....]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Anal retentives of the Hyper-Obama MEEEEEDIAAAAA cabal.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Not Like You.....]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:51:21 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953198]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953198]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[re wankless]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["The Pro-Obama Media Wanks.....
    March 24th - 5:57 p.m.
    
    .....Go to Lynn Sweet-Robert Novak-Chris Matthews-Keith Olbermann MASTURBATION School."
    
    
    You sound tense, uptight, disturbed and generally miserable.
    
    Poor baby.
    
    Guess you flunked out of that masturbation school, didn't you?
    
    What happened, did you fail to perform?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by re wankless]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:51:51 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#967946]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#967946]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Ed Who]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[what about crazy lackey McElroy $50,000.00 no bid lifetime contract with water district
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Ed Who]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:17:41 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953255]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953255]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[The Pro-Obama Media Wanks.....]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[.....Go to Lynn Sweet-Robert Novak-Chris Matthews-Keith Olbermann MASTURBATION School.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by The Pro-Obama Media Wanks.....]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:57:59 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#972280]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#972280]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Pete]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks for the clarification, Mick.
    
    Still, when it's our $$, you shouldn't have to work that hard to find out where it went.
    
    As for "Do you trust the media"'s comment, who cares the context?
    
    Wright made rather unpleasant motions on the pulpit.  In front of children.  Context is immaterial.
    
    As for the substantial accuracy of "God Da*n America" ...?  You can debate that nine ways 'til Sunday, if you'd like.  Point being that he violated on of the 10 Commandments, again, on the pulpit.
    
    He's a man of God.  He should know the old man upstairs doesn't take kindly to having his name used in vein, right?
    
    He's using the church to propagate his own world view while ignoring the text he so proudly insists that he preaches.
    
    What's that word?
    
    Oh, yeah ... hypocrite.  
    
    You've got good points regarding the media, but using that argument to mask what an abject jerk Wright is ..., that's just silly.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Pete]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:36:22 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#970191]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#970191]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Well a little corruption.....]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Goes a long way... CBS 2 NEWS 10:00 p.m. Enjoy the really big shoe....
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Well a little corruption.....]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:18:58 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#948421]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#948421]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Hugh]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[" ... I couldn't readily access the contracts ... "
    
    that's a problem
    
    all City contracts are supposed to all be avaiable online
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Hugh]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:52:01 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953034]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#953034]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mick D.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Point of clarification: "Not clear" simply means that I couldn't readily access the contracts to get the details, though they do appear to be all for social services.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Mick D.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:36:17 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#967563]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#967563]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[jolt]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Daley buys peace with Black preachers. This is to say these monies are not put to good use.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by jolt]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:51:08 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#947691]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#947691]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Do You Trust the Media?]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The fact that the media chose to air only a small portion of the sermon seems to have been ignored by most all who've expressed an opinion on that small portion.
    
    Interesting, isn't it, that those who regularly doubt what the media feeds the public on numerous other issues are quick to swallow whole the misrepresentation that this fragment of a sermon presents to the unquestioning observer.
    
    What preceded this short segment?
    
    What followed this small segment?
    
    What meaning did this small segment have, within the context of the whole?
    
    Are we all so many well-conditioned lemmings as to respond, like trained lab rats, to every piece of bullshit the media sees fit to spoon feed us?
    
    Are we all so bereft of thought to automatically react to whatever the media dangles in front of our salivating eyes and ears, hungry for any reason, however unreasonable or irrational, to stimulate our twisted desire to hate and condemn someone?
    
    And, finally, what, exactly, was said, even in this short and calculated snip, that wasn't substantially accurate?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Do You Trust the Media?]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:13:05 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#960023]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#960023]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[James Duff]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Did you read what Congressman Jackson said about me. That Con Job better never run for mayor. When he needed a job when he was going to school, who do you think gave him a job? My partner Union Boss, Ed Hanley . It was a no show job that the poor membership paid for..
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by James Duff]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:32:59 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#962445]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#962445]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Reverand Lucius Hall]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Can't a brother get a piece of the pie! Why do you think we back lemon head Daley!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Reverand Lucius Hall]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:29:01 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#955516]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#955516]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rev. Goodie]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Amen, my fellow Christians. We're here to give you a "Head Start' on Race-baiting 101.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Rev. Goodie]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:36:50 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The radicals]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#961828]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2008/03/21/radicals/#961828]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Pete]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[... and over $1.2M of that money was spent on "not clear?"
    
    Any expenditure paid for by taxes best be 100% crystal.
    
    Regardless, none of that excuses the vitriol Wright spewed forth, nor the a** gyrations when talking about Monica Lewinski (I'm not defending her, nor am I religious, but a man of religion gyrating on the pulpit is just tasteless).
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Pete]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:18:47 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




