<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The &quot;blighted&quot; fight back
    
      by Ben Joravsky</title>
      <link>http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Rss.xml?oid=943082&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The &quot;blighted&quot; fight back
    
      by Ben Joravsky</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#973995]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#973995]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Eat that!]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Seems that it is not a done deal after all.   The properties are off the involuntary list except for the burnt out building which the City now owns and Pikarsky's Walgreens building.  Yes you and I have paid for a burnt out building that sits and crumbles.  The big news is Schulter was defeated in his land grab.  Power of the people! Bravo! Bravissimo!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Eat that!]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:05:37 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954674]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954674]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[update]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I just saw Schulter on the news, back-pedaling so fast you'd think he'd had a lot of experience doing so.
    
    His statement appeared to be that the city would not 'ever' be using the power of eminent domain to force the sale of any of 'these properties'.
    
    Yet, is appears that the only properties his amended ordinance characterizes as being removed from his 'hit list' are still going to remain subject to the 'reserved right' of involuntary acquisition. 
    
    How many tongues do these guys have?
    
    As many as they need, it seems.
    
    Why does it take citizens having to protest injustice to even get a probably short lived reprieve from injustice?
    
    Why is it that those we elect to represent our interests so dependably prove to be only representing the interests of everyone other than those who elected them?
    
    A few of our fellow citizens may appear to have dodged a bullet here, for how long is anyone's guess, but what about the rest of us?
    
    Do we all just have to resign ourselves to being vulnerable to every greedy fuck with money deciding they want to 'acquire' our personal, real property, whether we want to sell it or not, our individual desires be damned?
    
    If these self-styled 'leaders', aka rulers, aka big shots, aka bosses, don't succeed in taxing us out of our homes and businesses, why, they'll just eminent domain us out.
    
    When will the citizens of this city and county decide they've had enough of this bullshit?
    
    Or will they ever?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by update]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:30:20 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#960626]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#960626]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Focus, people, please Focus.]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The only sentence in Schulter's statement that needs to be remembered and understood:
    
    "However, the City will reserve the right to acquire this property involuntarily if necessary."
    
    "...RESERVE THE RIGHT..."?
    
    Yep, that's it right there.
    
    And our Federal Supreme Court has ruled in support of this 'right' to impose eminent domain for the specific purposes and reasons being used here.
    
    If anyone still has doubts about the nature of the liars holding elected office, here's a sentence from Schulter that precedes the above quote:
    
    "The City will not seek to acquire any such properties by condemnation."
    
    So, first Schulter states that the city will NOT force the sale of real property, then states that the city reserves the RIGHT to force the sale of real property.
    
    What is the definition of a liar?
    
    Saying you'll do one thing and, then, doing the opposite? 
    
    How often do our 'elected' officials say one thing and then do the opposite?
    
    Maybe a better question would be, how often don't they?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Focus, people, please Focus.]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:36:26 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954162]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954162]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[47th Ward Resident]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[From: Christina Walsh [mailto:cwalsh@ij.org] 
    Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:04 PM
    To: IJ Distribution
    Subject: Rally at City Council to Save Lincoln Square
    
    
    *NOTE:  The ordinance will NOT be voted on tomorrow, but we encourage you to attend the rally to show your support for the Lincoln Square business owners.*
    
    
    MEDIA ADVISORY
     
    
    EVENT:                      Rally at City Council to Save Lincoln Square
     
    
    TIME/DATE:               9am/Wednesday, December 12, 2007
    
     
    
    PLACE:                       Outside of City Council Chambers
    
                                        2nd Floor Elevator Lobby
    
                                        City Hall
    
                                        121 N. La Salle Street
    
                                        Chicago, IL  60602
    
     
    
    PARTICIPANTS:         Imre Hidvegi, Chicago Soccer
    
                                        Tim Le, Decorium Furniture
    
                                        
    
    CONTACT:                  Imre Hidvegi: 773-271-2255 or ihidvegi@chicagosoccer.net
    
     
    
    SUMMARY:
    
     
    
    On Wednesday, December 12, at 9am, business owners from Save Lincoln Square will hold a rally before the full City Council meeting to protest the abuse of eminent domain in Lincoln Square, Chicago.    
    
     
    
    On Monday, December 10, Alderman Schulter told Chicago Soccer, Decorium Furniture, and The Dental Corner that he is introducing a new ordinance that will not allow the acquisition of their properties through eminent domain.  Five parcels, including a Walgreens and many small offices, will still be subject to condemnation if they don&acirc;&#128;&#153;t sell. 
    
     
    
    The city was expected to authorize the acquisition of the 16 properties on the 4800 block of North Western Avenue at its full meeting on Wednesday, December 12.  Alderman Schulter has claimed that he is trying to &acirc;&#128;&#156;control development&acirc;&#128;&#157; in the area&acirc;&#128;&#148;specifically, by condemning and marketing the land to private developers for new retail and condominiums. 
    
     
    
    Schulter pulled the ordinance and introduced the substitute less than one week after 250 community members joined together at Chicago Soccer to learn how to stop eminent domain abuse in Chicago.  After the meeting, over 100 residents marched to Schulter&acirc;&#128;&#153;s ward office, shouting &acirc;&#128;&#156;Save Lincoln Square &acirc;&#128;&#147; Stop Eminent Domain.&acirc;&#128;&#157;  The ordinance has been sent back to the Committee on Housing and Real Estate, and will not be put to a vote on Wednesday. 
    
     
    
    &acirc;&#128;&#156;Alderman Schulter is saying he won&acirc;&#128;&#153;t condemn our businesses now,&acirc;&#128;&#157; said Imre Hidvegi of Chicago Soccer, &acirc;&#128;&#156;yet we&acirc;&#128;&#153;re still on an acquisition list.  We will not allow him to come back and try to do this again later.  If city officials think that resistance from the community will die down, they better think again &acirc;&#128;&#147; it&acirc;&#128;&#153;s only growing.&acirc;&#128;&#157; 
    
     
    
    &acirc;&#128;&#156;My business may be safe for now, but if my neighbor&acirc;&#128;&#153;s business is being taken, who&acirc;&#128;&#153;s to say the city won&acirc;&#128;&#153;t come back for mine?&acirc;&#128;&#157; said Tim Le, owner of Decorium Furniture.  Tim and his wife, Kim, fled Vietnam by boat in the 1980s in pursuit of the American Dream.
    
     
    
    Hidvegi and Le will speak at the rally about their meeting with Alderman Schulter and what still needs to be done to stop eminent domain abuse in Lincoln Square.  If you have questions, contact Imre Hidvegi and visit www.SaveLincolnSquare.com.  
    
    #  #  #
    
    
    Christina Walsh 
    Castle Coalition Coordinator 
    Institute for Justice 
    901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900 
    Arlington, VA 22203 
    (703) 682-9320 
    (703) 682-9321 (fax) 
    www.ij.org 
    www.castlecoalition.org
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by 47th Ward Resident]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:31:48 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958400]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958400]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[47th Ward Resident]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[To bring this discussion back to the subject at hand, there's good news to report.  Schulter wisely withdrew his plan from consideration by the City Council.  He issued this statement on Monday, December 10:
    
    &acirc;&#128;&#156;Today, I met with representatives from a number of businesses on the
    4800 block on N. Western Avenue to further address concerns regarding
    implementing acquisition authority. As I have stated from the beginning, this is going to be a collaborative process. Language is now being changed in the ordinance to assure many of the property owners and other stakeholders that we are in this process together. Under the new language, the City of Chicago states any acquisition north of 4807 N. Western Avenue will occur only on a volunteer basis, where the terms of purchase are mutually acceptable. The City will not seek to acquire any such properties by condemnation.
    
    "The City will also make every effort to achieve a mutual agreement with the owners of the Walgreens building. However, the City will reserve the right to acquire this property involuntarily if necessary.
    
    "Previously, I asked the City Council to defer voting on this issue at the City Council meeting on November 13, 2007 to give us more time to review the language. In consideration of the new changes, the matter will once again not go before the full City Council on Wednesday, December 12, 2007, but will return to committee for review.
    
    "I would like to also take this opportunity to thank the many residents of the 47th Ward who have called, written, and emailed their thoughts and views on this issue to my office expressing both support and concerns. I hope that we continue to work together as a community to move forward in achieving our shared goals for Lincoln Square.&acirc;&#128;&#157;
    
    Schulter finally figured out that the voters finally figured out what he was up to and, when they did, decided they didn't like it one damn bit.
    
    People are increasingly fed up with HAVING TO PAY FOR corrupt and self-serving politicians.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by 47th Ward Resident]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:13:59 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#967973]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#967973]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Well....]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[At least you are a 'person' of few words.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Well....]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:08:41 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#969504]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#969504]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[That TURNSPEAK Seditionist LOVES........]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Phallic lollipops.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by That TURNSPEAK Seditionist LOVES........]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:49:11 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#962258]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#962258]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[re the authentic 'turnspeaker']]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[So, questioning the veracity, integrity, honesty and sincerity of elected officials is the same, in your world, as feeling contempt for same?
    
    So, your belief is that few, if any, public officials ever lie? 
    
    Or commit theft by various frauds? 
    
    Or merit any criticism? 
    
    Or mismanage the taxpayers dollars? 
    
    Or misuse and/or misappropriate taxpayers dollars? 
    
    Or misrepresent themselves to the voters prior to an election? 
    
    Or ever conceal their relationships with private individuals who, somehow, end up receiving lucrative city, county and/or state contracts, lucrative city, county and/or state legal determinations, lucrative city, county and/or state employment, etc., etc., etc.....?
    
    Or accept financial assistance from these private individuals?
    
    Or their business enterprises?
    
    Or their 'not-for-profit' enterprises?
    
    If anything, using the word 'simple-minded', to refer to your comments, is being much too generous, though your choice of words to post is, indeed, simple-minded.
    
    The fact that many, if not most, if not all, public officials lie on a regular basis is why I refer the them as liars.
    
    The fact that many, if not most, if not all, public officials participate, by acts of commission and/or omission, in various thieveries, is why I refer to them as thieves.
    
    Since your response to my post was, in no way, surprising, I extend the same invitation to you once again, to wit:
    
    "Are you sure you want to digress from your, to date, pure form of blanket, simple-minded, accusatory criticisms of anyone who dares to question the veracity of those who have dominated the electorate for generations?
    
    Are you sure you want to attempt to engage in a conversation containing any elements of intelligence, thoughtfulness, reason, logic, honesty and sincerity?
    
    Are you sure you want to enter the deep waters of being honest, honest with others and honest with yourself?
    
    Are you sure you really want to explore the many details of human nature, both currently experienced and historically observed?
    
    Are you sure you want to face the realities of life?"
    
    Let's see if you have the capacity to be surprising.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by re the authentic 'turnspeaker']]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:24:31 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958684]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958684]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[RE:CALM DOWN]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[MORE CLASSIC "T___U___R___N___S___P___E___A---K FROM "NOT HUGH",  SO, ANYBODY THAT CHALLENGES YOUR CONTEMPT FOR OUR GOVERNMENTS AND ALL OFFICIALS IS "SIMPLE -MINDED"?ANYONE WHO CALLS A LIAR, A L-I-A-R, IS ACCUSATORY, BUT CALLING ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS LIARS AND THIEVES IS WHAT, HIGH MINDED?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by RE:CALM DOWN]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:49:23 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#965347]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#965347]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Calm down, little buddy]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["DO YOU KNOW UNIVERSITIES GIVE DEGREES IN POLITICAL SCIENCE,PUBLIC AFFAIRS,GOVERNMENT ..."
    
    Are you sure you want to digress from your, to date, pure form of blanket, simple-minded, accusatory  criticisms of anyone who dares to question the veracity of those who have dominated the electorate for generations?
    
    Are you sure you want to attempt to engage in a conversation containing any elements of intelligence, thoughtfulness, reason, logic, honesty and sincerity?
    
    Are you sure you want to enter the deep waters of being honest, honest with others and honest with yourself?
    
    Are you sure you really want to explore the many details of human nature, both currently experienced and historically observed?
    
    Are you sure you want to face the realities of life?
    
    Because that's what you are inviting, should you choose to actually discuss the subjects you occasionally seem to accidentally raise.
    
    I have yet to see you post a comment that gives me any confidence that you have the capacity to think, or the patience to attempt to do so.
    
    But, hey, surprise me and give it a shot.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Calm down, little buddy]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:27:48 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#952625]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#952625]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[ACTUALLY,"ACTUALLY"]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I GIVE YOU THIS,"NOT HUGH", YOU HAVE "TURNSPEAK " DOWN TO AN ART! WHAT A CROCK OF SEDTIOUS BULLSH**!DO YOU KNOW UNIVERSITIES GIVE DEGREES IN POLITICAL SCIENCE,PUBLIC AFFAIRS,GOVERNMENT ,ETC! YOU REALLY ARE AN ANARCHIST WHO WANTS NO GOVERNMENT AND A SEDITIONIST WHO HATES OUR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC FORM OF GOVERNMENT! YOU MUST BE EITHER AN ANTI-GOVRNMENT LIBERTARIAN(BINGO) WHACK JOB,AND /OR A SUPPORTER OF THE TEXAS LIBERTARIANWHO IS  APPEALING TO THOSE LIKE YOU-MAYBE YOUR EVEN ACTIVE IN HIS CAMPAIGN!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by ACTUALLY,"ACTUALLY"]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:50:05 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954860]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954860]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Actually]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Since you either read, but do not comprehend OR you comprehend but choose to deceive, it's expected that you'd have chosen to post yet another falsehood.
    
    I'm encouraging the many citizens who either are not registered to vote or, being registered, don't bother to vote, to get registered and vote or vote, if already registered.
    
    I am further recommending that practically all incumbents should not be reelected, given that practically all incumbents are either professional Democrats or professional Republicans.
    
    Professional as in 'in it for the power and the money', not primarily to serve the public who elected them.
    
    You may disagree with my assessment of Democrats and Republicans, as is your right.
    
    Others may agree with my assessment and, hopefully, cast their votes accordingly.
    
    Since either the Republican party or the Democratic party have ruled our city, county, state and federal governments for nigh on a century now, and, since these two parties have, for several generations, been composed of individuals who have proven themselves to be sorely lacking in even the basic qualities of honesty, integrity, morality, intelligence, and a sincere understanding and appreciation for the principles upon which our country was founded, it is clear that both parties have failed Democracy, have failed the citizens and have long ago abandoned Authentic Democracy, our Constitution and Bill of Rights, upon which our Democracy depends.
    
    For you to support this failed two party 'system' reveals your lack of support for Authentic Democracy, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights.
    
    This makes you a truly 'amazing fellow', as in 'it's amazing that you have the gall to consider yourself a true American, when it is so obvious that you are not.
    
    You may continue to coat all incumbent Democrats and/or Republicans with your sugar coating, as seems to be your desire.
    
    I will continue to encourage all citizens to not be fooled by this thin, veneer of sweetness which covers a bitter and poisonous inner core of lies.
    
    HAVE NO DOUBT, VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Actually]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:47:47 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958233]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#958233]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[WELL AT LEAST]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[WELL AT LEAST ,"NOT HUGH" LEAVES A LITTLE ROOM IN HIS TAR ALL INCUMBENTS, NOW HE "ONLY" TARS "MOST" INCUMBENTS! OH, "NOT HUGH", YOU ARE AN AMAZING FELLOW!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by WELL AT LEAST]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:13:57 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972790]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972790]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[re Mary]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Hold on tight to that thought.
    
    And think it about every last incumbent who has proven themselves unworthy of reelection.
    
    That would be most all incumbents.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by re Mary]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:38:32 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954796]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#954796]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mary]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It's TIME TO ELECT A NEW ALDERMAN......... SCHULTER IS GOING
    GOING GOING GONE....MARK MY WORDS... GRASSROOTS HAVE BEGUN
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Mary]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:14:36 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#949271]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#949271]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[THE LAST WORD]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["IS HUGH ANTI-DEMOCRACY?
    November 28th - 3:58 p.m.
    IT SEEMS THAT NO INCUMBENT OFFICIAL OR LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT CAN PLEASE HUGH. HUGH MANAGES TO TAKE PUBLIC RECORDS AND INFER NEFARIOUS THINGS TO THEM,ALL IN AN ATTEMPT TO BESMIRCH ELECTED OFFICIALS ,ELECTED BY THE VOTERS. AT A TIME OF SUCH SERIOUS NATIONAL AND LOCAL PROBLEMS, HUGH IS EITHER SERVING THE CAUSE OF ANARCHY ,OR EVEN THE ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES, BECAUSE HIS ACTIVITIES ARE INTENDED TO UNDERMINE PUBLIC FAITH AND SUPPORT IN OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. ALL A CHALLENGER TO AN ELECTED OFFICIAL NEEDS TO DO TO RECEIVE HUGH'S SMEARS AND INNUENDOES ,IS TO WIN AN ELECTION AND THEREBY BECOME AN INCUMBENT, AND HUGH WILL THAN TWIST THINGS AGAINST THAT NEW OFFICEHOLDER.THERE IS A WORD THAT DESCRIBES HUGH'S ANTI-DEMOCRACY RANTS AND ONE MUST REMIND HUGH THAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH DOES NOT INCLUDE AIDING AND ABETTING THOSE THAT SEEK TO UNDERMINE OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM.ONE WOULD EVEN HAZARD A GUESS THAT HUGH IS SUPPORTING AN EXTREMIST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT."
    
    
    "HUGH BY ANY OTHER NAME
    November 28th - 6:56 p.m.
    IS STILL HUGH! Hugh knows his excessive Anti-Government posts are so redundent,that he uses different titles to disguise that it's him.The STRONG reaction to the truthful exposure of SEDITION, shows that the TRUTH was told. Hugh hates ALL incumbents,meaning he hates our democratically ELECTED government, and his on-line tactics are designed to create complete PUBLIC ALIENATION to their Government(s); Hugh would have readers here and on other blogs and sites believe he is their "WHITE KNIGHT" ,but what he is is a devious Government- Hating ANARCHIST and SEDITIONIST, and no spin by Hugh can change that."
    
    
    "re"All Caps....."
    November 28th - 7:12 p.m.
    Now thereis a COMMERCIAL by Hugh, for Hugh! Hugh, do you really think your SEDITIOUS Conspiracy Theories and blanket accusations against all Public Officials, employing your use of inference,innuendo,and misinterpretation and distortions of Public Records makes you ST.HUGH?Au Contraire!oh, one more item,Hugh-Identifying WHAT YOU ARE ,is not a refuge for anybody or anything, it's an observation of FACT!"
    
    
    "re:re:RPGIRL
    November 29th - 12:26 a.m.
    Nice try Hugh,the man of a many names.Hugh is an expert at TURNSPEAK and that's what RP GIRL and re:RP GIRL are about;an attempt by Hugh to turn his anti-government/anti-all Elected officials smearfests into something other than what they ARE:- which is his attempt to make people hateful and distrustfull of their ELECTED government(s). One poster made an excellent point-that once a challenger defeats an officeholder, he/she will then enter Hugh's "target list" ,because they than will become an incumbent.Frankly,RPGIRL, the question must be asked,-Why does Hugh pursue an OBSESSED Agenda against those willing to SERVE the public, however Hugh NEVER RUNS for any office himself? The only answer that seems logical is that the poster who stated Hugh is either an anarchist,seditionist,or both may actually have a rather CHILLING point!"
    
    
    "re:RPGIRL
    November 29th - 10:17 a.m.
    now RP GIRL gives an excellent example of TURNSPEAK.Posters commented on Hugh's obsession against Gov't. and Public Officials, an obsession obvious on multipleblogs and web sites,and RPgirl TURNSPEAK's it that they are "obsessed".One would have to conclude that Hugh has an AGENDA ,and that AGENDA is to create as much anti-Democracy feelings as possible by use of smears based on lies,distortions,and inferences."
    
    
    "RE:re: ALL CAPS S____
    November 30th - 12:48 p.m.
    Now there is the PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUE known as "TURNSPEAK"-an Anarchist/Sedition Artist accusing a poster who points out THEIR ANTI-DEMOCRACY with a twist and the counter charge of the same, trying to cloud the issue. There is no clouding of the Issue, to constantly harp on how DEMOCRACY functions, is SEDITION,as we are at WAR,GLOBALLY, against Forces that want to destroy our way of life and Democratic System. One can only conclude that these AGENDA Posters are trying to aid both, America's enemies ,by DESTROYING CONFIDENCE in all levels of our Governments,but to also aid Extremist Political Candidates!"
    
    
    "re:PUZZLING
    November 30th - 4:37 p.m.
    MORE "TURNSPEAK"-IT'S DOUBTFUL THAT THE POSTERS WHO MAKE THE CLAIM OF ANTI-AMERICANISM ARE REFERRING TO CITIZENS VOTING IN EVERY ELECTION OR JUDGING INCUMBENTS ON THEIR RECORDS-WHAT IT SEEMS ,IMO, IS THEY ARE REFERRING TO THE POSTERS THAT MALIGN ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS WITH THE SAME BRUSH,MAKING USE OF LIES,INNUENDOES,AND DISTORTIONS OF PUBLIC RECORDS, ALL WITH THE INTENT TO CREATE PUBLIC MISTRUST AND DISTRUST WITH ALL LEVELS OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT,AND ALL WHO HOLD OFFICE. THE "VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS" OUT POSTER IS A GLARING EXAMPLE OF THIS SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR-A-L-L?THAT POSTER IS TRYING TO PERSUADE VOTING CITIZENS THAT ANY AND ALL DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED OFFICIALS ,WITHOUT EXCEPTION, SHOULD BE VOTED OUT IN FAVOR OF "CHAOS CREATING" NEWBIES,WHO THE MINUTE THEY ARE ELECTED WILL BE INCUMBENTS. ONE POSTER KNOWN TO BE THAT UNREASONABLE IS THE ONE NAMED "HUGH""
    
    
    "re:Patterns
    December 1st - 10:13 a.m.
    This has to be an example of what a poster refers to as "Seditous posting"! Apparently those who "Hate" public servants,and insisist on painting them with one "tarred"brush,now have it "worked out" in their DELUSIONAL brains that anybody posting against their anti-democratic hallucinations,is somehow connected to local government and somehow "abusing" something!If anything, readers should realize the old saying that the best defense is offense, and the HATEFUL "vote everyone out" crowd,by their assault, are covering their REAL AGENDA,WHICH is SEDITION---WEAKENING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC"S FAITH IN THEIR GOVERNMENT,ITS OFFICIALS AND DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM ITSELF!"
    
    
    "re:So What Your'e Saying
    December 1st - 4:56 p.m.
    More "Turnspeak" by the Sedition Crowd LEADER-WHAT IS BEING SAID IS "TO VOTE EVERY INCUMBENT OUT" IS NOT DEMOCRACY, BUT SEDITIOUS ANARCHY! DON'T YOU DARE "TURNSPEAK" THIS THAT ANYONE IS AGAINST LEGITIMATE AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO ARE REGISTERED VOTERS VOTING ,AND FOR WHOEVER THEY CHOOSE!IT'S ABOUT THE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC( NOT THE PARTY) RANTINGS AGAINST ALL GOVERNMENT(S),AT ALL LEVELS, AND AGAINST A-L-L PUBLIC OFFICIALS-THAT'S NOT DEMOCRACY-THAT'S S-E-D-I-T-I-O-N!"
    
    
    "AGAIN-WHEN DOES ST. HUGH RUN
    December 1st - 5:05 p.m.
    WHEN DOES HUGH GET OUT FROM BEHIND HIS COMPUTER, AND ACTUALLY RUN FOR AN OFFICE HIMSELF? HE CERTAINLY WOULD SET NEW STANDARDS IN NEGATIVE CAMPAIGNING--THINK OF HIS CAMPAIGN THEME BEING "ALL COMPLAINING,ALL THE TIME", OR"VOTE FOR HUGH-HOLIER THAN THOU", OR HIS VERY CREATIVE-"VOTE ALL INCUMBENTS OUT",WHICH OF COURSE IS HIS SIGNATURE!"
    
    
    "Hugh's class in Turnspeak
    December 1st - 9:39 p.m.
    Hugh is conducting a post by post class in "turnspeak"-instead of answering simple questions such as "Who do you support for President" ,or acknowleding his anti-Gov't anarchic diatribes for the un-democratic seditious posts they are, Hugh has the gall to call his exposers anti-democratic/anti-American,when in fact,that's what Hugh himself is."
    
    
    "AND MORE TURNSPEAK
    December 2nd - 1:04 a.m.
    WHY DO YOU ASSUME THAT TO OPPOSE YOUR CONSTANT WHINING MEANS ONE HAS A "CLOUTED JOB? THAT'S COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,HUGH!"
    
    
    Happy now?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by THE LAST WORD]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:15:39 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#967859]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#967859]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[re 47th Man]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[That's good.
    
    But, as you have seen, it's not good enough.
    
    Until a larger number of citizens choose to also Register to Vote and Vote in Every Election, Authentic Democracy will remain a thing of the distant past.
    
    For those elected to public office to honestly be able to claim the support and approval of the majority of citizens, the majority of citizens must participate in the electoral process.
    
    Until then, all any elected official can honestly claim is to have been elected by the meager minority of citizens who have participated.
    
    Hardly a resounding show of support to claim.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by re 47th Man]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:50:24 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972154]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972154]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[47th man]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I do vote in every election and I am proud to say, I have never voted for Schulter or Mayor Rumplestiltskin.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by 47th man]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:53:27 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972712]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#972712]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[So]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[So, un-elect them.
    
    With approximately 50% of citizens who are qualified to vote NOT registered to vote, and, with approximately 50% of those citizens who ARE registered to vote NOT voting in any given election, we can conclude that, in most elections, a meager 25% of all citizens who COULD be voting actually ARE voting.
    
    Since the most votes any given candidate would have to receive to win is 51% of all votes cast, simple math tells us that it's been approximately 13% of all potential voters who've been deciding who gets elected.
    
    That's less than 1 out of every 5 citizens deciding who all of our elected representatives will be.
    
    That's less than 1 out of every 5 citizens deciding who our judges will be.
    
    That's less than 1 out of every 5 citizens deciding who will determine which individuals will hold the powers to tax, to make laws, to interpret and adjudicate those laws, to create policies and manage same, to, in effect, impose  upon the remaining 87% of us what the minority 13% desire.
    
    We citizens of this city and county allow that meager 13% to rule over us, just by doing nothing.
    
    Apparently, doing nothing seems, to many, better than doing something.
    
    How much something can it be, to:
    
    REGISTER TO VOTE
    
    VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION
    
    HAVE NO DOUBT, VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT
    
    
    But, who will I vote FOR, you say?
    
    At this point in time, here, in this city and county, I suggest that it doesn't matter who you vote for, only that you cast your votes with the initial goal of denying reelection to most, if not all, of the present incumbents.
    
    Sounds counter intuitive, doesn't it?
    
    But, to ever actually HAVE candidates who are 'worth' voting for, we have to break the stranglehold that both the Democrats and Republicans have had on all of us, here in the City That Works (for crooks) and the County of Crooks, let alone statewide.
    
    The only way to break this stranglehold is for every citizen to focus on doing so.
    
    The only means by which we have to break this stranglehold is our Right to Vote.
    
    The only way we can exercise our Right to Vote is by REGISTERING TO VOTE and by VOTING IN EVERY ELECTION.
    
    We have no valid excuse not to.
    
    All the reasons we use, to justify our collective failures to vote, are mere excuses, which those 13% of us who ARE registered and who DO vote in every election, are more than happy to encourage us use.
    
    Those 13% KNOW what they're doing, when they promote a myriad of reasons and realities which discourage citizen/voters from bothering to participate in the electoral process.
    
    They KNOW just how easily a small minority of citizens can dominate a large majority of citizens.
    
    And they practice what they don't preach.
    
    And all of us who buy into the apathy, the discouragements, the laziness, the carelessness, the resignation, of not bothering to vote or even to register to vote, are allowing those who KNOW what they're doing to remain in control.
    
    In control of what laws we must obey.
    
    In control of what those laws are interpreted to mean and exactly how they are enforced and imposed upon us.
    
    In control of how much we are compelled to pay, in taxes, for the privilege of having these laws imposed upon us.
    
    In control of who receives our tax dollars and for what purposes our tax dollars are used.
    
    And in control of making the very rules that control how we elect those who control us.
    
    While it may seem to be a very tight web that's been spun around all of us, it ain't necessarily so.
    
    We can break through this web by doing what those in control have yet to persuade us we have no right to do, namely, vote them out of office.
    
    Whether we are presented with much better candidates to vote into office, or not, just the event of most incumbents being voted out of office will encourage and inspire many truly honest citizens to run for elected office, once they see that the people care enough about honesty to take the time to:
    
    REGISTER TO VOTE
    
    VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION
    
    HAVE NO DOUBT, VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by So]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:05:54 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#956191]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#956191]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[47th man]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I have lived in the 47th ward for many years. 15 years ago, the 47th was a safe, affordable area that had a diverse population that seemed to get along well. That is something you would not expect to find in a segregated city like Chicago. The ward is now home to a lot of Yuppies who all seem to be waiting for an episode of "Friends" to break out. The last thing this neighborhood needs is another ugly, overpriced condo development. There are already hundreds of brand new condos that are selling very slowly, or not at all, in this ward. I liva a block away from Western and Lawrence, and this area is not blighted at all. As far as pigeons shitting in the area well, pigeons will shit from a 500,000 dollar condo just as easily as it will from a long time successful business, which there are many at the Lawrence and Western intersection. Schulter is an asshole bent on forcing longtime residents out of the 47th ward. We get what we deserve for electing these crooks.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by 47th man]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:48:52 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#948023]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#948023]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Thanks]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Patience, little knucklehead, patience.
    
    Soon, very soon, all your fears will become reality.
    
    Don't refinance that condo just yet.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Thanks]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 02:38:36 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#965498]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#965498]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Once more_When is Hugh running]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Since Hugh has all the answers and allegations, when does this great Paragon of "The way it ought to be" offer himself for some Public Office ,and show us ,by example what he has been bleating about and against all these years?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Once more_When is Hugh running]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:12:32 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#973107]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#973107]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[AND MORE TURNSPEAK]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[WHY DO YOU ASSUME THAT TO OPPOSE YOUR CONSTANT WHINING MEANS ONE HAS A "CLOUTED JOB? THAT'S COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,HUGH!
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by AND MORE TURNSPEAK]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:04:17 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#949011]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#949011]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[and...]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[And, it's not criticizing government as government, it's observing the failures, mismanagements and abuses engaged in by the individuals the people have either elected or allowed to be elected to positions of governmental authority.
    
    It's the persons in power that are  worthy of criticisms, along with the many citizen/voters who've allowed themselves to be played for chumps for so many years.
    
    We're Americans and that's supposed to mean something, other than being the easily fooled patsies our lack of participation in our own governance has shown us to be.
    
    We shame our founding fathers every time an election passes without our individual, thoughtful participation.
    
    HAVE NO DOUBT, VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by and...]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:46:14 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The "blighted" fight back]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#960465]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/11/27/blighted-fight-back/#960465]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[(hint, hint)]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Not likely, as I don't clean up so good these days.
    
    And, anyway, it's the thoughts that count.
    
    Right?
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by (hint, hint)]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 23:38:51 -0600</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




