<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: What&apos;s the worst that could happen?
    
      by Harold Henderson</title>
      <link>http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Rss.xml?oid=942886&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: What&apos;s the worst that could happen?
    
      by Harold Henderson</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: What's the worst that could happen?]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#969938]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#969938]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Harold]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Sure. And one of the basic job requirements of those who claim to follow his teachings might be to pay equally serious attention to what he says about the Iraq war and the death penalty.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Harold]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:44:28 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: What's the worst that could happen?]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#971140]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#971140]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[John Powers]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[From Rosenbaum 
    
    "The withdrawal of life science-related projects from a $350 million plan to use sold loans from the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority for capital improvement projects at public colleges."
    
    I think Pope Benedict's resume speaks pretty well to being a proponent for freedom, and for a consistent stance in favor of life. 
    
    Don't you think one of the basic job requirements of a moral and spiritual leader is to harbor some doubts about scientific experiments on humans?
    
    JBP
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by John Powers]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:18:51 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: What's the worst that could happen?]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#965215]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#965215]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[whet]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Worth noting the same thing is going on in CA, only the sticking point is environmental regs.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by whet]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:41:32 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: What's the worst that could happen?]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#967804]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#967804]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Harold]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Radical indeed, and morally quite counterintuitive: check out http://unbecominglevity.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2007/5/11/2942952.html
    for the case of the firefighter entering the fertility clinic, who can either save a six-year-old girl or a test tube containing a frozen embryo. Should he hesitate?
    
    And by the way, Rosenbaum's article  mentions nothing about subsidies, but it does have something to say about freedom, a value which most Americans (and, based on the referendum results, most Missourians) hold in higher esteem than Pope Benedict does.
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by Harold]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:56:15 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: What's the worst that could happen?]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#948473]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/TheBlog/archives/2007/08/07/whats-worst-could-happen/#948473]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[John Powers]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Harold, you just classified Pope Benedict, the Vatican, and the pontifical teachigns of the Catholic Church as a "radical fundamentalist ideology".  
    
    Reading Rosenbaums article, it can also be interpreted that Missouri is unwilling to put out subsidy and pork for a morally questionable and economically unlikely project, prompting Stowers to demand government loot elsewhere.
    
    JBP
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by John Powers]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:29:07 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




