http://www.chicagoreader.com Comments On: Chicago Reader en-us Copyright 2013 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader. wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster) Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500 Sun, 19 May 2013 02:45:00 -0500 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Oops, I'll remain quiet, like I was ordered to.
Posted by Beth]]> Sun, 19 May 2013 00:05:47 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Souther and Happy]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 21:42:42 -0500 Chicago Reader
You should never state how easy it is to find the facts and then proceed to misrepresent those "facts."

"First, they are not contributing to social security so that 6.2% deduction everyone else has ain't there."

Yep. AND we will not be able to collect Social Security for the wages we earned as teachers.
Posted by Shorty Lee Lowe]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 19:29:33 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Collingwood]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 19:15:32 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by a fan]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 18:44:01 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by MOOR]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 18:41:10 -0500 Chicago Reader
Awful? I guess that depends on what neighborhood or part of the city you lived in during his reign.
Posted by Least favorite son]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 18:17:13 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Enginist]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 17:51:37 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Enginist]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 17:36:08 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Kym Miller]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 17:03:00 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Kym Miller]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:59:54 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Bria]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:42:20 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Ed Seoighe]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:30:09 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by OMG]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:26:59 -0500 Chicago Reader
only on occasion.

ps - in much better mood, but must admit ‘runt’ really hurt :(
Posted by DeBartolo]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:20:45 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Ed Seoighe]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 16:16:51 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Lonnie Burks]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 15:21:11 -0500 Chicago Reader
You have proof? I mean, even if you don't like a person, it's pretty classless--no, disgusting--to accuse a person of being at least mildly corrupt but offering no back-up.
Posted by really sad]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 14:22:17 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Valerie F. Leonard]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 13:11:27 -0500 Chicago Reader
Ben's assertion.
Posted by Dante]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 13:10:27 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Charles Webster]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 13:03:55 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Peter Byrne]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 12:10:44 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Alonzo Powe]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 11:22:34 -0500 Chicago Reader
Ever read Miner before, you dog-fucking, shit-smearing little runt?
Posted by really sad]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 11:15:38 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Tower B12]]> Sat, 18 May 2013 11:14:09 -0500 Chicago Reader