http://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/archives/2012/07/18/on-meter-deal-legal-action-speaks-louder-than-words Comments On: On meter deal, legal action speaks louder than words by Mick Dumke en-us Copyright 2013 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader. wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster) Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0500 Sat, 18 May 2013 12:15:00 -0500 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by jkarova]]> Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:18:15 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by JohnK]]> Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:29:41 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by PeopleFirst]]> Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:56:53 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by The original IAC]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:57:22 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Aviva Patt]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:15:07 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Fox News is the Mainstream Media]]> Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:23:07 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by curious]]> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:23:18 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Morgan S.]]> Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:32:51 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by The original IAC]]> Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:02:52 -0500 Chicago Reader
I wouldn't exactly phrase it like that. If the city were to take the position that the deal should be struck down because "the city illegally auctioned off its power to set public policy that manages traffic and parking" it would be advocating for something that would have tremendous implications in the future.
Posted by The original IAC]]> Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:26:23 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Rick Aztlan]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:58:50 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Yellow Dog Democrat]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:50:00 -0500 Chicago Reader
So let's get creative.
Posted by dave1976]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:48:57 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Calls'em like I sees'em]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:32:59 -0500 Chicago Reader
Because the big newspapers have done nothing but kiss Rahm's ass since he took office? That's what your bat-shit ignorant statement implies.
Posted by Ben hates Twitter]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:18:52 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by Anup Gurnani]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:09:25 -0500 Chicago Reader Posted by jwryan]]> Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:45:20 -0500 Chicago Reader