<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>




































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan
    
      by Dave Kehr</title>
      <link>http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/MovieTimes?oid=1055110</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Rss.xml?oid=1055110&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan
    
      by Dave Kehr</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009 Chicago Reader. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Chicago Reader readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Chicago Reader.</copyright>
      <webMaster>wil@desert.net (Chicago Reader Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0600</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:15:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan]]></title>
    
    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/MovieTimes?oid=1055110&show=comments#1213356]]></link>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/MovieTimes?oid=1055110&show=comments#1213356]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[BobSmith]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I'm not really sure why you're now posting a review of a 27 year old star trek movie, and I can't quite understand how you could have watched this film and the rest of the movies in the series (as you, quite idiotically, judge the film by the series, and not its own merits) and come to these conclusions, and I have no idea why you talk about it having "one-set claustrophobia" when it has a fairly ordinary amount of sets (three different planets, three starship bridges, and a space station) but the font you chose to express yourself with is just fine. It's clear and easily read.<br>
<br>
Honestly, every opinion uttered about this film seems not based in anything approaching reality, and I can only imagine it a kneejerk response to something the author had already decided he hated before he ever watched the movie. Maybe it's star trek, maybe it's scifi in general, I don't really know, but this is one of the worst reviews I've ever read for any movie.
        
          <br /><br />
          
            Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan<br />
          
          Rating: 4 Stars
        
        <br />
        
          Posted by <a href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/Profile?oid=1213355">BobSmith</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:48:51 -0500</pubDate> 
    <source url="http://www.chicagoreader.com">Chicago Reader</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>




