Showing:
- Letters
- News & Commentary, Letters, Nov 19, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, November 19, 2009
"Prediction: Public Radio is gone in Chicago. Maybe not tomorrow, maybe not next week, but GONE GONE GONE nevertheless."
- News & Commentary, Letters, Nov 12, 2009
-
Letters & Comments: November 12, 2009
"You are the specialized bureaucracy in this helter-skelter pluralist society of opinion."
- News & Commentary, Letters, Nov 5, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, November 5, 2009
In addition to being a great talent, Ryan was a courageous man of admirable integrity, a "fighting liberal" unbowed by HUAC or any threats to his career.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Oct 29, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, October 29, 2009
To me, this is just more rabble rousing. I get it: you don't like TIFs.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Oct 22, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, October 22, 2009
Let's get this on the record and together let's examine our aldermen's fav excuse for their lack of spine, I'm sick of it.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Oct 8, 2009
-
-
Letters & Comments, October 8, 2009
I realize that's it's more arcane IOC politics than anything else that doomed this bid, but at least it doomed it. I just hope this will have some blowback on Daley, both to tarnish his legacy and so we can boot his ass.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Oct 1, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, October 1, 2009
"Hey Ben Joravsky, the powers that be are beginning to recognize that Chicago's transit facilities are inadequate to transport all the attendees to Olympic events"
- News & Commentary, Letters, Sep 24, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, September 24, 2009
"Of course, right after the Olympics you are going to see a drop in tourism—everybody came there DURING the Olympics!! It's the LONG TERM effect that is important."
- News & Commentary, Letters, Sep 17, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, September 17, 2009
- News & Commentary, Letters, Sep 10, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, September 10, 2009
Maybe next time you'll wait until AFTER you talk to someone with actual knowledge of the situation before you throw a rumor with no real information but a sensationalized headline out on the Internet and cause a panic among hundreds of workers.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Sep 3, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, September 3, 2009
If Hoffman makes it to Washington, what muscle stays behind to effectively police local corruption in Illinois and Chicago?
- News & Commentary, Letters, Aug 27, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, August 27, 2009
When it comes to learning about what our aldermen and other elected officials are up to, I think we should adopt a six-word motto: the more, the sooner, the better.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Aug 20, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, August 20, 2009
Why you think you're entitled to, or would even want to, sit in broken glass spilling PBR on your ironic t-shirts is beyond me.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Aug 13, 2009
-
Letters & Comments, August 13, 2009
- News & Commentary, Letters, Aug 6, 2009
-
Letters & Comments | August 6, 2009
The Register slashed and slashed under Gannett, and profits soared in the first few years. In fact, Gannett has made a bundle over the years with the same formula in market after market.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Jul 30, 2009
-
Letters & Comments | July 30, 2009
Is there really no way to look at a movie venue's showings for the whole week? Yes indeed there is!
- News & Commentary, Letters, Jul 30, 2009
-
Letters & Comments | July 30, 2009
Is there really no way to look at a movie venue's showings for the whole week? Yes indeed there is!
- News & Commentary, Letters, Jul 23, 2009
-
Letters & Comments | July 23, 2009
- News & Commentary, Letters, Jul 16, 2009
-
Letters & Comments July 16, 2009
One aspect of racism is often refusing to admit an issue has a racial context—even when it involves an all-white group turning violent destroying a music which is associated with blacks.
- News & Commentary, Letters, Jun 11, 2009
-
Letters & Comments
So now our alder-creatures are expressing reservations about the parking meter lease. One of them actually told the television news media that the City Council didn't have adequate time to review the proposal. I have one question. If you didn't have time to read it carefully, why the hell did you vote for it?
