Chicago Reader

Monday, January 12, 2009

That money's been spent

Posted by Mick Dumke on Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:09 PM

So much for that $10 million.

As expected, Daley administration officials told aldermen this morning that the city can’t recover any of the taxpayer-funded subsidies it gave Republic Windows and Doors to keep hundreds of jobs in Chicago—even though the company’s owners abruptly closed its Goose Island plant last month, laid off its entire workforce, and bought a nonunionized facility in Iowa.

The city’s original, 1996 agreement with Republic [PDF; starts on page 27849] was to last through 2019 and require the company to “use commercially reasonable best efforts” to keep hundreds of jobs at the north side plant in return for tax increment financing assistance. But Mara Georges, the city’s top lawyer, said the pact only gave the city enforcement power through June 2006. After that the city had no way to penalize Republic it if it didn’t adhere to the agreement.

“We have not found any sort of remedy under this redevelopment agreement,” Georges said.

The issue came up before the council’s Committee on Finance at the behest of aldermen Manny Flores and Scott Waguespack, who had argued that the city might be able to recover some of the money it paid to Republic. Even after Georges rejected their argument, the two maintained that Republic offered an example of why TIF agreements need closer scrutiny.

“We need to look at some type of TIF reform,” said Waguespack, alderman of the 32nd Ward. “What is a ‘commercially reasonable best effort’? If a company’s going to be able to walk away from the table with $10 million in public funding, maybe we need to look at changing the definition.”

Alderman Berny Stone of the 50th Ward wasn’t convinced. “If I understand what alderman Waguespack is saying, here we are more than 12 years after the TIF agreement was executed, and we should have made a better TIF agreement," he said. “Nobody has that kind of hindsight.”

Flores said the city needs to come up with a way to measure whether it’s getting a sufficient return on its TIF investments. He asked Georges whether city officials had checked along the way to see if Republic was employing as many people as it had agreed to. She said it had. Flores then wondered if the enforcement period should have been longer. “The reason we have these TIF projects are to help our city and grow our economy,” he said, “not to give money away.”

Georges said it would be hard to negotiate stricter terms because businesses want and need flexibility. “As their attorney balks against putting some of that into the agreement, it’s a question of getting the deal done.”

Twelfth Ward alderman George Cardenas, an administration loyalist who owns money transfer and consulting businesses, was just as skeptical of his colleagues’ demands, saying the city had benefited for years from Republic’s presence. “I’m sitting here trying to understand what’s going on,” he said.

The committee didn’t take any action on the issue, instead moving on to a freewheeling discussion about greedy Wall Street executives and “geniuses in Washington” who were really to blame for the country’s economic troubles.

But Flores later said that he and Waguespack are planning to draft legislation requiring the administration to analyze how it awards TIF subsidies, potentially so it can create standards for monitoring them.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments (8) RSS

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Generic user icon

The standards are already in place. They are set pursuant to a minimum TIF grant to kickback ratio. Get a hand mirror and look up your own ass, bernie, if it's hindsight you're looking for. As for kickback specialist jorge, you know hat's going on, as you're one of the minor players. Both you and bernard can now report to the 5th floor, with those lips ready to pucker for the pimp.

Posted by same old same old on January 12, 2009 at 9:09 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

TIFs just haven't worked.

Posted by Neil on January 13, 2009 at 8:42 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Let me see if I understand this, Georges claims we can't put some teeth into TIF contracts as "it’s a question of getting the deal done.” Giving away taxpayer cashola may be a deal of the century for the businesses receiving it, but it's not a good deal for the taxpayers!

Posted by Carter on January 13, 2009 at 1:01 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

thankfully we have separation of powers in Chicago, our aldermen must approve expenditures, you know, in case the executive gets too cozy

Posted by Hugh on January 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

If the founding fathers landed in chicago today they would sh** a brick over these TIFs.

Posted by JJ on January 13, 2009 at 5:58 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

great read

Posted by vicn on January 13, 2009 at 6:19 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Waguspack should shut it and do something for the neighborhood instead. no one cares about Tifs. We've been asking for a stop sign on Addison for months now to slow down the trucks on the road and he can't get that done so we had to ask our state rep who will do it for him. He can't get the potholes fixed.

Posted by smitty on January 16, 2009 at 6:40 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Anyone who tries to stop Daley from raising taxes , even hidden taxes like TIFS gets a high five.

Posted by Too many taxes on February 8, 2009 at 10:47 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

Latest in The Blog

Author Archives

  • The guardians of our wastewater

    Believe it or not, some of the more interesting and important offices up for grabs tomorrow are the seats on the board of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District.
    • Feb 1, 2010
  • Spreading the privatization gospel

    Other cities continue to consider following Chicago's lead in privatizing their parking systems—with the help of some of the same firms that engineered the deal here.
    • Feb 9, 2010
  • The Audacity of Archived Video Clips

    City Clerk Miguel del Valle announces that archived video of City Council meetings is now available online. It's a small step for mankind but a big one for good government in Chicago.
    • Mar 15, 2010
  • More »

Recent Comments

©2010 Creative Loafing Media
All Rights Reserved.