Chicago Reader

Friday, March 21, 2008

The radicals

Posted by Mick Dumke on Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:38 PM

Want to know how hateful and destructive the Trinity United Church of Christ has been under Reverend Jeremiah "God damn America" Wright? So much so that over the last two decades it's received millions of dollars in grants from both Democratic and Republican administrations at the federal, state, and city levels. Most of the money has gone to provide community child care, HIV and AIDS programs, food services, and Head Start. Here's a sampling from the city of Chicago (which includes federal and state grants the city administers):

 

 

YEAR

PURPOSE

 AMOUNT

1993-1994

child care

 $          137,592.12

1994-1995

child care food program

 $            30,772.10

1994-1995

child care

 $          109,581.68

1994-1995

Head Start

 $            11,492.70

1995-1996

child and adult care food program

 $            31,314.24

1995-1996

child care

 $          119,638.44

1995-1996

Head Start

 $          103,845.42

1996

Head Start

 $            45,691.43

1996-1997

conferences

 $              6,500.00

1996-1997

HIV/AIDS programs

 $            25,000.00

1996-1997

child care food program

 $            55,404.81

1996-1997

day care

 $          122,891.00

1996-1997

Head Start

 $          122,876.00

1996-1997

Head Start

 $          292,883.30

1997

not clear

 $          108,975.18

1997-1998

HIV/AIDS programs

 $            23,775.00

1997-1998

child care food program

 $            27,692.78

1997-1998

child care

 $          101,694.40

1997-1998

Head Start

 $          300,319.62

1998-1999

child and adult care food program

 $            58,352.58

1998-1999

child care

 $          336,863.32

1998-1999

Health and Human Services

 $          416,143.20

1998-1999

Health and Human Services

 $            93,268.05

1999-2000

Illinois Department of Human Services

 $          355,467.12

1999-2000

Head Start

 $          103,923.21

1999-2000

not clear

 $          114,251.43

1999-2000

Head Start

 $          326,709.16

2000-2001

child care

 $          363,118.00

2000-2001

not clear

 $          123,969.60

2000-2001

not clear

 $          128,833.29

2000-2002

not clear

 $          288,193.47

2001-2003

child care

 $          697,864.10

2001-2003

not clear

 $          106,542.19

2001-2003

not clear

 $          368,437.22

2003-2004

Head Start

 $            68,224.87

2003-2007

Head Start

 $       1,945,430.20

2006-2008

Head Start

 $       1,203,142.50

TOTAL

 

 $       8,876,673.73

 

 

Tags: , ,

Comments (19) RSS

Showing 1-19 of 19

Add a comment

Generic user icon

... and over $1.2M of that money was spent on "not clear?" Any expenditure paid for by taxes best be 100% crystal. Regardless, none of that excuses the vitriol Wright spewed forth, nor the a** gyrations when talking about Monica Lewinski (I'm not defending her, nor am I religious, but a man of religion gyrating on the pulpit is just tasteless).

Posted by Pete on March 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Amen, my fellow Christians. We're here to give you a "Head Start' on Race-baiting 101.

Posted by Rev. Goodie on March 21, 2008 at 8:36 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Can't a brother get a piece of the pie! Why do you think we back lemon head Daley!

Posted by Reverand Lucius Hall on March 21, 2008 at 9:29 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Did you read what Congressman Jackson said about me. That Con Job better never run for mayor. When he needed a job when he was going to school, who do you think gave him a job? My partner Union Boss, Ed Hanley . It was a no show job that the poor membership paid for..

Posted by James Duff on March 21, 2008 at 9:32 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

The fact that the media chose to air only a small portion of the sermon seems to have been ignored by most all who've expressed an opinion on that small portion. Interesting, isn't it, that those who regularly doubt what the media feeds the public on numerous other issues are quick to swallow whole the misrepresentation that this fragment of a sermon presents to the unquestioning observer. What preceded this short segment? What followed this small segment? What meaning did this small segment have, within the context of the whole? Are we all so many well-conditioned lemmings as to respond, like trained lab rats, to every piece of bullshit the media sees fit to spoon feed us? Are we all so bereft of thought to automatically react to whatever the media dangles in front of our salivating eyes and ears, hungry for any reason, however unreasonable or irrational, to stimulate our twisted desire to hate and condemn someone? And, finally, what, exactly, was said, even in this short and calculated snip, that wasn't substantially accurate?

Posted by Do You Trust the Media? on March 21, 2008 at 11:13 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Daley buys peace with Black preachers. This is to say these monies are not put to good use.

Posted by jolt on March 22, 2008 at 7:51 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Point of clarification: "Not clear" simply means that I couldn't readily access the contracts to get the details, though they do appear to be all for social services.

Posted by Mick D. on March 22, 2008 at 9:36 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

" ... I couldn't readily access the contracts ... " that's a problem all City contracts are supposed to all be avaiable online

Posted by Hugh on March 22, 2008 at 12:52 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Goes a long way... CBS 2 NEWS 10:00 p.m. Enjoy the really big shoe....

Posted by Well a little corruption..... on March 23, 2008 at 5:18 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Thanks for the clarification, Mick. Still, when it's our $$, you shouldn't have to work that hard to find out where it went. As for "Do you trust the media"'s comment, who cares the context? Wright made rather unpleasant motions on the pulpit. In front of children. Context is immaterial. As for the substantial accuracy of "God Da*n America" ...? You can debate that nine ways 'til Sunday, if you'd like. Point being that he violated on of the 10 Commandments, again, on the pulpit. He's a man of God. He should know the old man upstairs doesn't take kindly to having his name used in vein, right? He's using the church to propagate his own world view while ignoring the text he so proudly insists that he preaches. What's that word? Oh, yeah ... hypocrite. You've got good points regarding the media, but using that argument to mask what an abject jerk Wright is ..., that's just silly.

Posted by Pete on March 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

.....Go to Lynn Sweet-Robert Novak-Chris Matthews-Keith Olbermann MASTURBATION School.

Posted by The Pro-Obama Media Wanks..... on March 24, 2008 at 5:57 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

what about crazy lackey McElroy $50,000.00 no bid lifetime contract with water district

Posted by Ed Who on March 24, 2008 at 7:17 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

"The Pro-Obama Media Wanks..... March 24th - 5:57 p.m. .....Go to Lynn Sweet-Robert Novak-Chris Matthews-Keith Olbermann MASTURBATION School." You sound tense, uptight, disturbed and generally miserable. Poor baby. Guess you flunked out of that masturbation school, didn't you? What happened, did you fail to perform?

Posted by re wankless on March 24, 2008 at 9:51 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

Anal retentives of the Hyper-Obama MEEEEEDIAAAAA cabal.

Posted by Not Like You..... on March 25, 2008 at 12:51 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

They are the ROYAL KISSASSES of the Obama mania.

Posted by Fuck Chris Matthews & Co on March 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

I'll pay yall to bury me...give ya a dollar and free legal service...bury me on the 12th of April I ain't got court then. Bring me some ice water and sunscreen for my soul, I'm gonna need it for where I'se goin...

Posted by R U Gene Pincham on April 4, 2008 at 10:46 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

where did this grant information come from?

Posted by Mike on April 12, 2008 at 9:31 PM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

@Pete "As for the substantial accuracy of "God Da*n America" ...? You can debate that nine ways 'til Sunday, if you'd like. Point being that he violated on of the 10 Commandments, again, on the pulpit. He's a man of God. He should know the old man upstairs doesn't take kindly to having his name used in vein, right?" He didn't violate any commandments. As far as I undertand it, the Christian God is and always has been in the 'damning' business. He not only dislikes sin he also 'damns' sinners to hell. When evangelical preachers first starting getting radio time back around the 1920's they were the only ones allowed to use the words 'damn' and 'hell' on air. Because that's part of what the Christian religion is - factually -about.

Posted by careaboutfacts on April 28, 2008 at 9:59 AM | Report this comment
Generic user icon

You dont possibly suppose that some of the 8 million that this church has received in the last 7 years might have possibly come from George Bush's "faith base initative program?"

Posted by mike on June 2, 2008 at 6:46 PM | Report this comment

Add a comment

Latest in The Blog

Author Archives

Recent Comments

©2009 Creative Loafing Media
All Rights Reserved.