The sizzle may be in Chicago, but the steak is being cooked in Springfield. Our transit, roads, schools, health care, and planning in general are in the hands not of the City Council, but of a state government mired in deficit spending. For that reason, much as I hate the nonconcept "most underrated," I have to say I think the bipartisan Center on Tax and Budget Accountability is the most underrated Chicago policy shop going.
Among those who haven't drunk the anti-tax Kool-Aid, many think 2007 is the year something will finally get done in Springfield -- but not everyone agrees on what that should be. Key points from CTBA's annual fiscal symposium last week:
CTBA director Ralph Martire had the last word: "If Illinois were a separate country, its economy would be the 27th largest in the world, bigger than Ireland, Saudi Arabia, or Greece. And we can't talk about raising taxes?"
Showing 1-1 of 1
Hi Harold, Just read the Gold Collar report (I am very busy). While I generally agree that subsidies are a waste, there are couple of glaring holes in the research. 1) TIFF districts were excluded. Of all the good reporting in The Reader, Ben Joravsky had really pegged TIFFs as a massive, generally misguided subsidy. 2) The Gold Collar report shows that approximately 80% of the "subsidy" takes the form of Tax Free Bonds. To the best of my knowledge, these bonds have the advantage of being tax free, but still must be repaid. Perhaps, at a 28% tax rate, one should take (1-.28) x the 80% = 57% of the "subsidy", is of no advantage at all. So if you subtract $680 Million (57%), from the total $1.2B, I am convinced that the disparity will not seem so large. Add in the nutty TIFF Districts, and I sounds like the point of the paper is not very well founded. JBP
Comments (1) RSS