Thursday, December 22, 2011
Film Coming soon: "Hitchcock for the Holidays"
Posted by Ben Sachs on 12.22.11 at 03:00 PM
The films have been organized into five thematically-joined double features, making it easier for aspiring scholars to chart the development of key ideas across different periods of Hitchcock’s career. The most inspired pairing may be Rope with Strangers on a Train (on December 27 & 28), which contain the strongest gay subtext of any Hitchcock films (Farley Granger, the bisexual star of both films, has interesting things to say about them in his autobiography Include Me Out); though the back-to-back screenings of Rear Window and Rebecca (on December 25 & 26) should bring out the romanticism of the former and the voyeurism of the latter.
Less imaginative, but no less rewarding, is the final program of The Birds and Marnie (on January 2 & 3). Hitchcock’s two collaborations with Tippi Hedren, a not-quite-actress who made her way through both films as though walking on eggshells, lay bare the themes of passivity and control that disturb even his brightest efforts. These themes would find their richest articulation in Vertigo, which is, in Dave Kehr’s assessment “perhaps the most personal movie to emerge from the Hollywood cinema.” Vertigo screens here (on December 29 & 30) with To Catch a Thief, a decidedly less personal film that nonetheless shares a structure based on the idea of the return. Cary Grant’s retired thief re-enters the world of crime in order to clear his name while James Stewart’s traumatized detective resurrects his dead lover in Vertigo out of compulsive need, but both films characterize the past as vindictive and inescapable.
This theme is really just a variation of Hitchcock’s single most consistent subject—and the one he depicted better than any other filmmaker—the mechanics of guilt. Feel free to make your own joke about the series being essential holiday viewing.
Comments (5)
Showing 1-5 of 5
like
dislike
It can be. But, in college, I remember getting tired of meeting people who could *only* talk about Hitchcock through the lens of Lacan--as though the movies had never even been intended to be popular entertainment.
To "a not quite writer", I feel your comments are condescending and boorish. Your comment that Tippi Hedren is "a not quite actress" is a sarcastic and conceited opinion stated as fact that she doesn't deserve. It's nasty, hurtful and disrespectful. Why don't you just say you don't like her acting?
Dear Bill,
Sorry if that comment came off as condescending. I meant to refer to Hedren's own discomfort with acting: it's been reported that she had difficulty portraying the complex character arc of "Marnie"--and that Hitchcock told her to approach the movie scene by scene. I think that Hedren's discomfort actually adds to both "Birds" and "Marnie," though I recognize that Hedren is not giving a "conventionally" great performance in either film.
