Thursday, September 24, 2009

Sun-Times Media Group CEO Explains It All to You

Posted by Michael Miner on 09.24.09 at 05:02 PM

September 24, 2009


To: All Sun-Times Media Group employees

From: Jeremy L. Halbreich

Subject: Questions and answers related to recent events

(entire memo follows)

As you know, we announced earlier this month that a group of Chicago investors have made a bid to purchase our Company’s newspapers, Web sites and other assets. Though the proposed sale is a very positive development, there is a lot of uncertainty right now with major change looming before us all. I want you to know that I am confident, as I have told many of you in our employee town hall meetings, that we can get this deal done and create an exciting future for our employees and our award-winning newspapers and Web sites.

I know this has been a challenging time for all. Many of you have questions. I want to be as straightforward as we can about where we are, and what could happen, rather than let erroneous rumors flourish.

Here is a Q&A of some of the frequently asked questions we’ve received from employees across the Company. This is one in what will be a series of communications we will be sharing with you. In future communications we will discuss other important matters, such as pension benefit questions. I hope you will find these answers and this information helpful.

For your convenience, the Q&A below is divided into four categories:

• What happens if the sale that was announced last week goes through?
• What happens if the sale does not go forward and the Company is forced to liquidate?
• What is the role of the Sun-Times Media Group’s bargaining units in the potential sale of the Company’s assets?
• Other questions.

We understand that this Q&A contains quite a bit of information and some of it becomes complicated. Please read this information carefully, and should you need clarifications or have any further questions, feel free to send them to STNGquestions@suntimes.com and we will do our best to answer them.


WHAT HAPPENS IF A SALE GOES THROUGH?

Q. Can I expect to have a job if the Company’s assets are sold to the prospective Buyer?
A. While the Buyer is not legally or contractually obligated to do so, we expect and the Buyer has repeatedly indicated its intent to hire virtually all current employees.

Q. What happens to my vacation if the sale goes through?
A. If the Company’s assets are sold, the Buyer has said that it will create a vacation bank to allow all transferred employees to have generally the same vacation benefit that they have currently.

Q. Will my benefits change if the Company’s assets are sold?
A. Any changes in benefit programs will be decided and announced by the Buyer. However, the Buyer has said that it intends to assume sponsorship of existing health, welfare and Section 125 plans at closing. Based on this, we anticipate that you would continue to receive those existing benefits going forward. In the future, it will ultimately be the Buyer’s decision regarding what benefits it offers.

Q. Will the Buyer assume our current 401(k) plans? If not, can we roll our current accounts into the Buyer’s 401(k) plan?
A. As an initial matter, you should be aware that the Buyer has informed us that it intends to offer a 401(k) defined contribution plan to all of its employees in the future. There are a couple of different possible outcomes for the existing 401(k) plans that depend on the Buyer’s decisions about how to handle this benefit. If the Buyer assumes sponsorship of the existing 401(k) plans, the transition will appear seamless to you. If, however, the Buyer does not assume the existing 401(k) plan and decides to establish its own new plans, then it is likely that the Buyer would allow you to roll over your 401(k) account into a new Buyer-established 401(k) plan, or you could roll over your account into an IRA, or take a distribution of the amount in your account. Note that if you take a distribution, the amount of the distribution would be taxable to you and may also be subject to a penalty surtax, depending upon your age at the time of the withdrawal.

Q. I have an outstanding 401(k) loan balance. If the Company’s assets are sold, what will happen to this loan? Will I have to repay the balance? Will I be penalized if I can’t repay the balance?
A. If the Company’s assets are sold, and if the Buyer assumes sponsorship of the 401(k) plans, the loans would continue to be paid off through payroll deductions with no interruption. If the Buyer does not assume sponsorship of the 401(k) plans, it is possible there would be no change in loans, though the Buyer will have to determine whether it will allow you to roll over the loan to the 401(k) established by the Buyer. If the Buyer does not allow loan rollovers, your unpaid loan balance would become taxable to you if you do not repay the loan. The plan has a 90-day grace period, meaning the participant has 90 days from the date of the last payroll payment before the loan is considered to be in default. Once in default, the unpaid balance becomes taxable. If the borrower is under the age of 59 ½, there will be an additional 10 percent penalty.


WHAT HAPPENS IF THE COMPANY IS FORCED TO LIQUIDATE?

Q. If we close our doors, would I get my last paycheck and when would I get it?
A. If it is necessary to liquidate our business, all employees will be paid through their last day worked. This date would be determined by the Board of Directors in consultation with management. Employees would be paid on the next scheduled payroll date after the employee’s termination date.

Q. Am I eligible for unemployment compensation if the Company liquidates?
A. Employees are eligible to apply for unemployment benefits. Benefit payments will be subject to the specific state’s unemployment guidelines. Some kinds of compensation, such as pension benefits, may offset your unemployment payment. Since each situation is unique, employees should contact their local unemployment office directly.

Q. How quickly would the Company shut down?
A. It is not possible right now to speculate on the timing of a liquidation, but the liquidation process could begin in a matter of weeks. The Bankruptcy Court along with the IRS, U.S. Trustee and the Unsecured Creditors Committee will all have significant input into the final timing and schedule.

Q. Can a buyer come in and buy individual newspaper titles in a Chapter 7 liquidation and keep the papers going?
A. It is very unlikely that a buyer who would operate the business going forward would emerge once the liquidation process has started. It is only reasonable to assume that any party who is interested in buying a going concern would have participated in the extensive sale process that the Company has engaged in over the past several months. In a liquidation, assets are sold off individually and this immediately follows the shut-down of all Company operations. None of our publications can operate on a stand-alone basis without the substantial centralized functions that are provided by the Sun-Times News Group and these functions would be shut down immediately along with the Ashland production facility. Any buyer who wanted to acquire a single title would also need to buy or create a substantial amount of the centralized infrastructure (such as ad sales, production, front-end systems for news and advertising, insurance, benefits plans, distribution, IT, HR and Interactive Media). This would probably make such a purchase uneconomical and highly impractical. In addition, even in liquidation it would be expensive to purchase any newspaper assets since it is likely the Bankruptcy Court will require that such offers exceed the pure liquidation values of the assets themselves.

Q. How would unused vacation be paid out if the Company is liquidated?
A. If we liquidate, each individual employee would have to file with the Bankruptcy Court a claim for the vacation pay due to them. Approved claims would be satisfied on a pro rata basis based on the funds available within the bankrupt estate. There are three (3) types, or levels, of claims that are paid in this order: Administrative, Priority and General Unsecured claims. Each level of claim must be satisfied in full before the next level can be paid anything. Administrative claims for vacation include any amounts that are earned by employees from the time of our bankruptcy filing (March 31, 2009) until the date of the Company shutdown. These Administrative claims receive the highest priority claim. Priority claims for vacation include amounts earned up to 180 days prior to the bankruptcy filing date. General Unsecured claims include vacation earned prior to this 180 day period. All Administrative claims would receive pro rata disbursements from the estate. It is less clear whether Priority claims would be paid in full and it is unlikely that General Unsecured claims will be paid at all.

Q. What would happen to my health insurance if we shut down?
A. Health insurance coverage would continue for as long as the Company maintains the insurance plans. As a result, any medical, dental and vision insurance will discontinue at the end of the last period for which the Company pays the premiums. You should expect that premiums would be discontinued when the Company ceases to do business. The coverage would not terminate at on the date we close our doors, but would continue until the end of the period for which the latest premium was paid. In any event, this is likely to be only a matter of weeks. Illinois law requires that your current health insurance carrier offer you an individual policy without regard to pre-existing conditions, but the cost of that is not regulated and could be high.

Q. What happens to COBRA?
A. Upon termination of the Company’s health and welfare plans, COBRA continuation under those plans would no longer be possible. If you are a member of a union and not under the Company’s health and welfare plans, check with your bargaining unit’s health insurance representative.

Q. How would the Section 125 plan (flexible spending account for parking reimbursement, dependent care and health care) work in the event of a liquidation scenario?
A. This plan would also be terminated in connection with the shutdown. Benefits would no longer be available once the plan is terminated.

Q. What happens to the 401(k) plans?
A. You will be permitted to take a distribution from the 401(k) plans. You may roll your account balance into an IRA or take a taxable distribution. If you have an outstanding plan loan, your account will become taxable to you if you do not repay the loan. The loan plan has a 90-day grace period before the loan is considered to be in default.

Q. Will there be any severance if we liquidate?
A. Non-union employees will not be paid severance. Unionized employees may be paid some limited severance depending upon the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and the amount of cash available to pay these benefits in the bankruptcy estate. Unionized employees will need to file a claim for severance with the Bankruptcy Court. Claims for severance for union employees for amounts that were earned after our bankruptcy filing date (March 31, 2009) are Administrative claims. Claims for severance for union employees for amounts earned up to 180 days prior to the bankruptcy filing date are Priority claims. Claims for severance for union employees for amounts earned prior to this 180 day period are General Unsecured claims. To provide an example, if a union employee’s collective bargaining agreement says that the employee earns one week of severance pay for each completed six months of service and a liquidation of the Company were to occur on September 30, then the employee would have an Administrative claim equal to one week’s pay, a Priority claim equal to one week’s pay and a General Unsecured claim for all severance amounts earned prior to the 180 day period. All Administrative claims would receive pro rata disbursements from the estate. It is less clear whether Priority claims would be paid in full and it is unlikely that General Unsecured claims will be paid at all.


WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE COMPANY’S BARGAINING UNITS IN THE POTENTIAL SALE?

Q. What is the role of the Sun-Times Media Group’s bargaining units in the asset purchase bid made by the local investor group?
A. The Buyer has made a number of demands of the Company to reduce costs. The Company has responded with a number of initiatives, all of which have been accomplished or are in process, except for the amendments to the union contracts, which require the approval of the union members. The amendments, which are economic and work-rule related in nature, will allow the Buyer maximum flexibility in creating a viable business during these challenging times in our industry and across the general economy. If we do not implement the union cost-reduction and work-rule related initiatives, the Buyer does not believe it can justify investing the millions of dollars it is committing to the future viability of our business and it will withdraw its bid to purchase the assets of the Company. This condition imposed by the Buyer is included in the formal Purchase Agreement filed with the Bankruptcy Court earlier this month and it is the required, necessary step prior to the Buyer committing millions of dollars behind the future of our Company.

Q. If the unions don’t vote for the amendments by September 29, what is likely to happen?
A. Getting all of the required union concessions is one of several conditions that must be met before the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement that we filed with the Bankruptcy Court in Delaware. September 29th is an important deadline that has been set by the Buyer of our assets. If we don’t have all of the required union amendments by that time, the Buyer has said that it will not close on the transaction since this important condition to the sale will not have been met. This would likely lead to the other interested parties in the bankruptcy (IRS, U.S. Trustee, UCC) quickly moving to convert our bankruptcy case to a Chapter 7 Liquidation on or before October 8, the date on which the final sale hearing is currently scheduled. Any such conversion would preclude the possibility of a sale.

Q. If some of the unions vote “yes” will the properties that voted “no” be cut loose and will the Buyer only buy the “yes” properties?
A. No. The Buyer has signed an agreement to buy all of the newspapers, Web sites and other assets owned by Sun-Times News Group if certain conditions are met. If all 18 of the Company’s bargaining units do not approve the Buyer’s required amendments to the collective bargaining agreements, the Buyer does not have to buy the assets and has said it will withdraw its bid.

Q. Can the unions re-vote by September 29?
A. Yes, they have the opportunity if they choose to do so, but all 18 of our bargaining units must vote in favor of the required contract amendments no later than the September 29 date established by the Buyer.

Q. If all unions vote “no” will we close on that day?
A. No. If the sale falls through, we will shortly run out of cash and we will be forced to shut down all of our publications and Web sites and liquidate the business. This will result in the loss of all jobs across the Company. That won’t happen all at once, but it will likely occur over the course of a few weeks.

Q. Why is it up to the unions to decide if we stay in business?
A. The Buyer established that several cost reduction and work-rule flexibility conditions be met before agreeing to buy the Company. Since these conditions represent changes to the existing union contracts, the conditions must be voted on and approved by the respective union memberships. All of these conditions have been met except the cost reduction amendments to the collective bargaining agreements. The union groups have until September 29 to approve these amendments. These amendments are vital to allowing the Buyer to successfully transform our business in a changing news and information environment. The status quo is no longer acceptable or financially viable.


OTHER QUESTIONS:

Q. Should we be working hard on selling existing or new products, given the uncertain environment that we are in?
A. Yes. The Buyer’s bid to purchase our assets represents a new beginning for the Company’s newspapers, Web sites and other products. The sale will create a new Company that is entirely debt-free, rid of the longstanding liability to the IRS and financially capable to make needed capital investments in plant and technology. It is an exciting development and we should continue to give our best efforts to our customers and our products, which we pride ourselves in. We should all operate on the assumption that the deal is going to happen.

Q. What happened to the ESOP idea at the Post-Tribune?
A. Our Board of Directors believes the sale of our assets as a whole to a single buyer is in the best interests of the Company’s creditors, employees and other stakeholders. Therefore, the Board did not elect to pursue offers for pieces of the business in light of the Buyer’s offer to acquire all of the Sun-Times newspapers, Web sites and other businesses. In addition, the Gary Guild decided to wait until a new owner emerged for the Company and then it plans to approach the new owner regarding the possibility of a sale.

Tags: ,

Comments (22)

Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

Guess what Jeremy. It isn't going to happen.

report   
Posted by Jack Mack on 09/24/2009 at 6:27 PM

None of what Mr. Halbreich is saying is true. I've heard he is one of the silent partners with Tyree and his cohorts. The judge just gave union employees until December, 2009, to concede, and MISTER Tyree cannot stamp his foot, turn red or take his ball bat and go home when he doesn't get his way.

There are other buyers interested in the Sun-Times, willing to pay a lot more than the measly insult of $5 with the other $22 million debt taken from the employees' blood, sweat and tears.

The best thing MISTER Halbreich could do for the Sun-Times is leave. But that ain't going to happen. Not while there's a cash cow to be milked.

report   
Posted by Jack Again on 09/24/2009 at 6:32 PM

Q: What's this we hear about a $500,000 "breakup" fee + an additional expensive reimbursement fee, which could amount to another $500,000, that needs to be paid to the high bidder if the company fails to amend collective bargaining agreements with its employee unions to satisfy certain terms of the sale?

A: You don't want to know.

report   
Posted by DeBartolo on 09/24/2009 at 10:17 PM

Associated Press
Judge says no rush on Sun-Times union concessions
By RANDALL CHASE , 09.24.09, 05:18 PM EDT

WILMINGTON, Del. -- A Delaware bankruptcy judge says a bidder for the Sun-Times Media Group can't demand quick concessions from labor unions in order to close the sale.

Chicago banker Jim Tyree has offered to buy the company for $5 million in cash and to assume about $22 million in liabilities. But he has threatened to walk away if unions don't approve several concessions by Sept. 29.

The judge noted Thursday that the sale doesn't have to close until early December. He said if Tyree walks away two or three months before closing, he would be liable for not acting fairly and in good faith.

Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

report   
Posted by salernos on 09/24/2009 at 10:35 PM

Sun-Times to hold auction with Tyree as lead bidder; union intact
Daily Herald News Services
Published: 9/24/2009 4:17 PM | Updated: 9/24/2009 4:25 PM
Sun-Times Media Group Inc., the bankrupt publisher of the Chicago Sun-Times, won court approval to hold an asset auction where a group led by James C. Tyree will be the lead bidder with an offer valued at $26.5 million.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi approved the Oct. 7 auction today in Wilmington, Delaware. Sontchi will consider approving the sale at an Oct. 8 hearing.

The publisher filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March, listing $479 million in assets and $801 million in debt. Sun-Times' bankruptcy followed that of Tribune Co., owner of the Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times, as plunging advertising sales hindered its ability to make debt payments.

Tyree's group has offered $5 million in cash and would assume about $21.5 million of Sun-Times debt, Sun-Times lawyer David Agay said today. Tyree, chief executive officer of Mesirow Financial Inc, told Bloomberg Television Sept. 11 that his group's offer might save 1,200 or more "nicely paying jobs."

The judge also said bidders can't demand quick concessions from labor unions in order to close the sale.

Tyree has threatened to walk away if the unions don't approve several labor concessions by Sept. 29.

The judge noted Thursday that the sale doesn't have to close until early December. He said if Tyree walks away two or three months before closing, he would be liable for not acting fairly and in good faith.

The judge also rejected the idea that competing bids involving liquidating the company could not be accepted.

The case is In re Sun-Times Media Group Inc., 09-11092, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington).

report   
Posted by salernos on 09/24/2009 at 10:37 PM

Well, well, well, check this out:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-sun-times-0925-artsep25,0,4553232.story

Leave it to the competition to spell it out in black and white: Sun-Times management lied to not only the Guild, but also to the hundreds of non-union employees it's been trying to recruit in its blame-the-loss-of-your-jobs-on-the-union campaign.

report   
Posted by Fed up on 09/24/2009 at 10:48 PM

Salernos,

It is always completely inexcusable for anyone to disrespect and violate the copyright laws. If you are an STMG employee, it is truly unconscionable. Jesus! Don't you guys even want to save your industry? If I were Halbreich (I am not, by the way) and I knew who you were I would have you fired immedietely.

report   
Posted by The original IAC on 09/25/2009 at 1:41 AM

At yesterdays hearing in Delaware there were 8 Lawyers representing Mr. Tyree's new company STMG Holding LLC , two lawyers from the DOJ.

Hmmm...

report   
Posted by IAMNOTCOOKED on 09/25/2009 at 4:41 AM

IAC: What laws were violated? One story reprinted here is from AP, the other from Daily Herald. Both are credited.
IAMNOTCOOKED: Hmmmm....is right. Eight lawyers and none of them could tell Mr. Tyree that what was going on was illegal? Maybe he should get some of those Guild members who are going to be out of jobs and put them on his legal team.

report   
Posted by Fed up on 09/25/2009 at 7:15 AM

This is what happens when you take a guy (Halbreich) from the South to deal with Unions in the North. If Halbreich is still of the notion that if one Union group votes NO, then it over, well the fat lady has song, because the Guild is not the only Union that has rejected the amended agreement.

report   
Posted by Papers on 09/25/2009 at 7:27 AM

Time to recycle some lawyer jokes.

How can you tell when a STMG exec is lying?

His lips are moving.

report   
Posted by Six of one, half a dozen of the other on 09/25/2009 at 8:52 AM

Looks like one of the trade unions might join the Guild in turning down the initial concessions package. The ITU, whose members were guaranteed jobs for their lifetimes in exchange for other concessions in a contract that dates back 30 yeas ago, is asked to give back the job guarantees, among other things. The remaining members read that as essentially, "The condition of sale is that you go away."

report   
Posted by Six of one, half a dozen of the other on 09/25/2009 at 9:28 AM

Fed Up,

Are you serious? You cannot copy and paste an entire article to reprint it somewhere else. I should not have to explain this to you. Even if you find some way to argue that what Salernos did was not illegal (and yes, I know people can find ways of making that case), it most definetely is completely selfish. The news organizations used their resources to report those stories. For someone to, without permission, simply reprint it for consumption on another website deprives them from being compensated through advertising. He should have done exactly what you did in the next post, post a link. This is not something I should have to tell you guys. You seem to be guild members, for Christ's sakes. Don't you even have a basic understanding of the importance of allowing yourselves at least some sort of revenue? My God! If journalists at a newspaper don't even understand the importance of copyright then I don't know what to say.

report   
Posted by The original IAC on 09/25/2009 at 3:48 PM

Now that JH killed the sale by his miscalculation of the Unions responses, we can talk about copyright laws

report   
Posted by Papers on 09/25/2009 at 3:58 PM

THIS MEMO IS FROM THE SUN-TIMES UNION

The REAL Sun-Times Media Group STORY!!

29th and counting??

Sept. 29 was the date that James Tyree had publicly set as the deadline to walk away from his bid for the Sun-Times and its 58 suburban publications if all 18 unions didn’t cave-in and accept cuts in pay and severance, freeze pensions and, in the case of the Chicago Newspaper Guild’s four editorial units, give up virtually all rights governing seniority, jurisdiction and grievances. But what Tyree — through his spokesman CEO Jeremy Halbreich — hasn’t told you is the rest of the story.

The judge noted Thursday that the sale doesn¹t have to close until early
December. He said if Tyree walks away two or three months before closing, he would be liable for not acting fairly and in good faith.

Sept. 29 was the date that Tyree and Halbreich now admit to the competing Chicago Tribune was picked to “coincide with the date of non-union pay cuts and … keep the heat on given the company’s financial condition.”

Even as Judge Christopher Sontchi was calling Tyree’s position “posturing,” Halbreich was distributing a memo to employees reiterating the Sept. 29 deadline and explaining “why is it up to the unions to decide if we stay in business,” an attempt to further foment non-union versus union conflict.


The real deal:

Jim Tyree’s take-it-or-leave-it proposal would decimate virtually every sentence in the Guild’s 54-page contract with the Sun-Times, and those of the Pioneer Press, the Waukegan News-Sun and the Joliet Herald News. Although he is offering to “accept” the current contracts for three-years, he is insisting that we sign an ancillary document that gives him the right to nullify any provision that “might prevent, impede or increase the cost” of his business plan.

The Guild is willing, ready and able to negotiate on every issue related to a new owner’s ability to make this company profitable for all of us. Our problem is that the ultimatum effectively eliminates not only our contract but also our ability to negotiate a replacement.

Described in media accounts as merely “some work rules,” here are just some of things Tyree is asking us to give up:


Fair System of Force Reduction. Several pages of the contract spell out the process of layoffs, calling for advance notice to the Guild, the taking of voluntary resignations as an alternative to discharges, making the reduction in inverse seniority order, the ability of those laid off to be rehired if conditions improve. All of that would be gone and the company could get rid of anyone at anytime.

Just Cause Discharges. The current contract requires the company to have “just and sufficient cause” to fire an employee. Under the proposal the company could simply dismiss an employee through a layoff.
Protection Against Involuntary Transfers. Employees could not only be forced to move to another city under the proposal, they could be scheduled to work in a different location each day of the week.

Vacation Scheduling. The contract spells out not only the amounts of vacation employees are entitled to, but the system of selecting vacation dates. None of that would mean anything under the proposal because the new owner would be able to set it aside.

Work Schedules. The contract defines the length of the workday and work week, specifies the number of hours between shifts and the notice that must be given before changing schedules. If, in the new owner’s “managerial discretion” any of those things increased the company’s costs or impeded its business plan, they could be ignored.

Protection Against Replacement by Temporary Employees. Currently, the contract says the company won’t displace full-time employees by hiring temporary workers. The new owner could give Guild work to anyone at anytime and discharge Guild members.

Restrictions on Use of Stringers and Freelancers. The contract spells out limitations on the use of work from these independent contracts. For example, they can’t come into the office and file stories on VDTs. There would be no restrictions under the proposal.
Parenting Leave. Employees can now take up to 12 months leave in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. If, in the new owner’s discretion, such leave would impede the business plan, it could be denied. The same thing is true for sick leave and funeral leave – “managerial discretion” trumps old contract language.


Obviously, the list could go on and on, through every nook and cranny of the contract. The Guild is not saying that contract language is sacred and can’t be changed. We are ready and willing to negotiate changes. What is unacceptable, however, is to simply replace our contract with “managerial discretion” and have to wait three years to work out something both sides can live with.

What now?
The Chicago Newspaper Guild will continue to talk with management and press to negotiate. As far as we’re concerned, there’s no relevance to the Sept. 29 date or to Oct. 8, the date when Sontchi is scheduled to decide whether to approve Tyree’s deal that Tyree and Halbreich are now beginning to float as a new deadline.

The Sun-Times Media Group’s union employees also continue to work with the 15 percent pay and benefits cuts they voluntarily imposed upon themselves in March. Our reduced salaries contributed to a reported positive cash flow for the company in August.
















report   
Posted by NO MORE BS on 09/25/2009 at 5:07 PM

MR. HALBREICH: WE'RE STILL WAITING FOR THE FOLLOW UP MEMO AFTER THE 12 PAGE DIATRIBE YOU SENT YESTERDAY. YOU KNOW, THE EMAIL LETTING US ALL KNOW THAT THE FAT LADY WASN'T PLANNING ON SINGING JULY 29.

AND HERE I THOUGHT YOU WERE SO INTO COMMUNICATION AND JUST ONE OF THE GUYS.

report   
Posted by WINSTON OBOOGIE on 09/25/2009 at 5:17 PM

At least the guild is finally seeing through all this BS as to the false deadlines. Now, it's Oct. 8th....as the Guild astutely states, it has no relevance. The only relevant date is Dec. as mandated by the Del. judge. No rush now....it's who blinks first. And whether the company doesn't run out of cash. No matter how this plays out, one thing is clear: Tyree's "civic" reputation has been forever tarnished (hubris), and Halbreich (who somehow got on board the ST from the perennially screwed up Dallas paper, and that should have been a red flag right there) has proven himself to be a liar. Not that big of a surprise given the revolving door of conmen passing through at 10th floor, Orleans....anybody remember Redmond, then there's Friedheim, Stoklosa, the ad guy with the radio background (can't remember his name) and countless others. I guess Surkamer is still around but, for obvious reasons, he's not allowed to talk. That's because once he starts, he can't stop. As to Tyree's comment elsewhere here that there were representatives of the ST's competitor in the courtroom, doesn't that ring a little hollow? Don't those guys have enough problems of their own?

report   
Posted by Naperville on 09/25/2009 at 6:44 PM

Unless someone knows of any Union and there are not 18 of them as quoted, that has voted for the amended agreement, stop laying this on the Guild.

report   
Posted by Papers on 09/25/2009 at 8:30 PM

Management is attempting to pit non-union against union, but it isn't working. Those of us in the union have had long talks with non-union people who understand that a victory for the union is a victory for everyone.

Now two other bidders are coming forward at the October auction. One for certain wants to buy the chain in hope of ridding the company of the corruption that still persists and FINALLY restoring the Sun-Times to its former glory. They now want everyone to agree to their heinous terms by Oct. 8 to prevent anyone else for getting a great deal.

TRUST ME! TYREE HAS NO PLANS TO BACK OUT NO MATTER WHAT.

report   
Posted by LIBERTY on 09/26/2009 at 7:41 AM

Liberty, you can't just say there are two other bidders and not give any sources. Where did you get this information?

report   
Posted by Journalist on 09/26/2009 at 10:49 AM

To all unions members: as a mother of two small children I ask you to think about others families not just your own. I would like the chance to continue raising my children in the house they were born in. If my husband does not have a chance of keeping his job our dream for our family and other families in down the drain. A question if there are other buyers out there where are they? whether you are union or not do you not want a chance to keep your job. or do you want to tell your children they will not have any presents for christmas because mommy of daddy lost their job.

report   
Posted by mother of two on 09/26/2009 at 1:47 PM

Mother of two: We all have families, too, and mortgages, and bills, and ailing parents, and special needs children, and so on. Your question — "do you not want a chance to keep your job" — speaks volumes, particularly the "chance" part. It is a gamble either way. Even if the Guild miraculously turned the vote around, you, mother of two, might still be out of a job. So then who are you going to blame it on?

report   
Posted by GuildEmp on 09/26/2009 at 2:28 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-22 of 22

Add a comment

Related User Lists

Agenda Teaser

Galleries & Museums
On Making Things Matter Southside Hub of Production
May 26

Tabbed Event Search

The Bleader Archive

Recent Comments