Saints president B.J. Nelson informed members of the volunteer usher organization by email yesterday that its board has reversed a controversial decision to ban longtime member (and board member) Deborah Granite. Granite's membership had been revoked (as reported in a recent Reader column) as punishment for her having used members' email addresses listed in the Saints newsletter to communicate her suggestions for making the group more transparent and democratic.
As noted on this blog, even the League of Chicago Theatres got into the fray.
But the tenor and tone of Nelson's note give no indication that he and his cadre on the board recognize the underlying issues that threaten the group—issues brought to the surface by Granite's ouster. This valued organization, which has about 1,900 members and serves almost all of Chicago's nonprofit theaters, is in sore need of a change at the top. The next general meeting is Tuesday, September 29.
Here's what Nelson wrote:
"In view of the expenditure of time and energy that is being exacted from the all volunteer Saints' Board, in view of the unnecessary, unpleasant atmosphere that is being forced on the membership and in view of the distraction that is being forced upon the entire organization depriving everyone of devoting time and energy to the activities we enjoy most and/or the objectives we need to accomplish to further the welfare of the organization, the Board vacates the decision to revoke Deborah Granite's membership so she gets another opportunity. The ban has been lifted."
And here's what dissident board member Jim Venskus has to say about it (in an email received by the Reader this morning):
"Past and current leaders of the Saints as well as many, many members are talking, increasing their involvement and invested in change.
"One might wonder what was the motivation for Monday night's board action vacating the expulsion of Deb Granite from the Saints. Was it the upcoming general membership meeting scheduled for September 29 evening at the North Shore Center for the Performing Arts in Skokie? The statement read to attendees by Sharon McLean indicated clearly that the action would not address the issues involved, but rather was taken to stop the activism surrounding Ms. Granite rather than a correction of improper governance, which barred a director from 1/3 of this years board meetings.
"However, Ms. Granite was only an example of governance issues and those important issues have not changed. Even having tape recordings, serious motions were omitted from the August Minutes, required reports have not been filed, corporate records properly requested haven't been produced, information is restricted, decisions are made outside of official meetings, to name a few.
"Now that Ms. Granite is being offered reinstatement and an assumed return to her elected director position, the attention can rightly be focused on the numerous governance issues raised but not yet addressed. The membership meeting is the first since the discussion started and the first opportunity to address their board directly during a Minutes-taken session.
"Every organization needs their members to stay involved and to channel the positive energy to see changes through from proposals to governance. As always, we encourage a large turn out of the membership on the 29th."
Granite's side of the story can be found on her blog.
Showing 1-3 of 3
A friend sent me a pointer to this Blog entry and I must say, I have to agree with Mr. Venskus.
I had a phone conversation with a Board member last night (discussing a completely unrelated matter) and when we had finished I added, in a "while I have you on the phone" manner, that I thought the letter from the President - which you quote above - seemed to place the responsibility for "the expenditure of time and energy" and "the distraction that is being forced upon the entire organization" entirely at the feet of Ms. Granite.
I told the Board member that I thought the letter completely ignored the Board's own actions for creating - and perpetuating - the furor. After some back-and-forth conversation I added, "You and I seem to be looking at this all from completely different viewpoints, so I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, but I doubt that reinstating Deb is going to make the other issues and concerns go away."
Many of us are wondering if Mr. Nelson is even the author of the various messages that have come bearing his signature - or if another Board member is ghost-writing them for him.
We're proud to be Saints - the group does wonderful work raising money for the Chicagoland theatre world - but as Harold Hill might say, "There's trouble in River City."
respectively submitted - Marvin Levin, Saints member and coordinator
I also have to agree with Mr. Venskus and Mr Levin. There has been and continue to be a continuing series of actions by the Saints Board that really put the best interests of the general Saints membership and the theater community at risk. For example, it appears that recent Board actions to enhance their control and stifle independent actions and suggestions have led to the resignation of the respected chair of the Saints Grants committee. The incidents regarding Deb Granite were simply the 'last' and most visible straw that put the spotlight on the entire haystack.
I would hope that the reinstatement of Deb's Saints status is not an attempt to re-hide that haystack. Some members of the Board are now realizing that their function is to LEAD, and not to CONTROL, the organization. Let's see if more Board members can follow. Or if not, maybe our members can find governing Board members who can!
I am still hopeful.
If the Saints board and membership don't resolve this controversy soon, we might be witness to . . . The Fall of the House of Ushers.